Sex Disparities in Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in South Korea

Global Sex Disparities in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review

This scoping review collates evidence for sex biases in the receipt of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients globally. The MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and Embase databases were screened for relevant literature, dated from inception to March 9, 2022. Studies evaluating the association between BCPR and sex/gender in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, except for pediatric populations and cardiac arrest cases with traumatic cause, were included. The review included 80 articles on BCPR in men and women globally; 58 of these studies evaluated sex differences in BCPR outcomes. Fifty-nine percent of the relevant studies (34/58) indicated that women are less likely recipients of BCPR, 36% (21/58) observed no significant sex differences, and 5% (3/58) reported that women are more likely to receive BCPR. In other studies, women were found to be less likely to receive BCPR in public but equally or more likely to receive BCPR in residential settings. The general reluctance to perform BCPR on women in the Western countries was attributed to perceived frailty of women, chest exposure, pregnancy, gender stereotypes, oversexualization of women's bodies, and belief that women are unlikely to experience a cardiac arrest. Most studies worldwide indicated that women were less likely to receive BCPR than men. Further research from non-Western countries is needed to understand the impact of cultural and socioeconomic settings on such biases and design customized interventions accordingly.

Provision of bystander CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Middle East: a retrospective gender-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies conducted in North America, Europe, and East Asia (Liu et al., EClinicalMedicine 44:101293, 2022; Matsui et al., JAMA Netw Open 2:e195111, 2019; Awad et al., J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 4:e12957, 2023; Yoon et al., Prehosp Emerg Care :1-7, 2022) reported gender disparities in the provision of bystander CPR for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, it remains unknown whether similar disparities exist in the Middle Eastern and Gulf regions. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate gender differences in the provision of bystander CPR for patients with OHCA in Qatar.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data obtained from Hamad Medical Corporation OHCA registry in the State of Qatar (2016-2022). We included adults with non-traumatic and EMS-attended OHCA. We used multilevel logistic regression to examine the association between gender and provision of bystander CPR.

RESULTS

In total, 4283 patients were included. Of those, 3414 (79.7%) were males, 1639 (38.3%) arrested in public locations, and 1463 (34.2%) received bystander CPR. Unadjusted comparisons showed that females were significantly older than males (mean age: 62.2 vs. 52.7). Females had a lower proportion of OHCA occurring in public locations (15.1% vs. 44.2%) and a lower proportion of shockable rhythm (11.9 vs. 27.5%). Regarding the outcome variable (provision of bystander CPR), the unadjusted analysis showed that the proportion of females who received bystander CPR was lower than that of males (29.2% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001). However, after adjustment, we found no significant difference in provision of bystander CPR by gender (adjusted OR female vs. male 0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.20, p = 0.97). In the subgroup who arrested in public locations, the analysis revealed females had greater odds of receiving bystander CPR (adjusted OR female vs. male 1.47, 95% CI 1.10-1.82, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, bystander CPR was less common in female gender; after adjustment for other covariates, including arrest location, we found no significant gender differences in provision of bystander CPR. We also observed that females were found to have a lower incidence of cardiac arrest in public locations. Nevertheless, if females were to experience cardiac arrest in a public location, they would be more likely to receive CPR. Further research is required to explain the observed differences in provision of bystander CPR.

Sex disparities in prehospital advanced cardiac life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Japan

OBJECTIVE

Sex disparities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care processes have been reported. This study aimed to investigate the association between sex and prehospital advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) interventions provided by emergency medical services in Japan.

METHODS

We analyzed data from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, from the All-Japan Utstein Registry of patients with OHCA aged ≥18 years who were resuscitated by bystanders. The primary outcomes were prehospital ACLS interventions, including advanced airway management (AAM) and epinephrine administration. Sex-based disparities in receiving prehospital ACLS interventions were assessed via multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 314,460 eligible patients, females with OHCA received fewer prehospital ACLS interventions than males: 83,571/187,834 (44.5%) males vs. 55,086/126,626 (43.5%) females (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.93-0.96) for AAM and 60,097/187,834 (32.0%) males vs. 35,501/126,626 (28.0%) females (AOR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.83-0.85) for epinephrine administration. Similar results were also obtained in the subgroup analysis (groups included patients aged 18-74 years and ≥75 years and those with cardiac origin, ventricular fibrillation (VF), non-VF, non-family member witnessed, and family member witnessed).

CONCLUSION

Compared with males, females were less likely to receive prehospital ACLS. Emergency medical service staff must be made aware of this disparity, and off-the-job training on intravenous cannulation or AAM replacement must be conducted. Investigation of the impact of sex disparity on OHCA care processes can facilitate planning of future public health policies to improve survival outcomes.

Effects of a designated ambulance team response on prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and advanced cardiac life support of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide natural experimental study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the effects of adding advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training to an existing basic life support program and the operation of a designated team response for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) on prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and ACLS management.

METHODS

A natural experimental study was conducted for emergency medical service (EMS)-treated adult patients with OHCA in 2020. In 2019, a quarter of the EMS clinicians were trained in a 3-day ACLS courses, and they were designated to be dispatched first in suspected OHCA. Some were dispatched only to major emergencies, such as OHCA and myocardial infarction (dedicated team), while others were dispatched to all emergencies with priority to major ones (non-dedicated team). The exposure was the ambulance response type: dedicated, no-dedicated, and basic teams (others). The primary outcome was prehospital ROSC. The secondary outcomes were prehospital ACLS (advanced airway management and intravenous access). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of ambulance response type on study outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 23,512 eligible patients with OHCA, 54.8% (12,874) were treated by the basic team, 36.5% (8,580) by the non-dedicated ACLS team, and 8.8% (2,058) were treated by the dedicated ACLS team. Prehospital ROSC was greater for the designated team than for the basic team (dedicated ACLS team 13.8%, non-dedicated ACLS team 11.3%, and basic team 6.7%) (p <0.01). In the final logistic regression analysis, compared with the basic team, the designated ACLS team was associated with a higher probability of prehospital ROSC (AOR (95% CIs), 1.88 (1.68-2.09) compared to the non-dedicated ACLS team, and 2.46 (2.09-2.90) compared to the dedicated ACLS team), prehospital advanced airway management (1.72 (1.57-1.87) and 1.73 (1.48-2.03), respectively), and intravenous access (2.29 (2.16-2.43) and 2.76 (2.50-3.04), respectively).

CONCLUSION

Additional ACLS training and operation of a designated OHCA team response were associated with higher rates of prehospital ROSC and prehospital ACLS provision. However, further research is needed to find the optimal operation for EMS to improve survival outcomes.