1
|
De Backer D, Deutschman CS, Hellman J, Myatra SN, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Talmor D, Antonelli M, Pontes Azevedo LC, Bauer SR, Kissoon N, Loeches IM, Nunnally M, Tissieres P, Vieillard-Baron A, Coopersmith CM. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities 2023. Crit Care Med 2024; 52:268-296. [PMID: 38240508 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome, and pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN Shortly after publication of the most recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, the Surviving Sepsis Research Committee, a multiprofessional group of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine, convened virtually and iteratively developed the article and recommendations, which represents an update from the 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities. METHODS Each task force member submitted five research questions on any sepsis-related subject. Committee members then independently ranked their top three priorities from the list generated. The highest rated clinical and basic science questions were developed into the current article. RESULTS A total of 81 questions were submitted. After merging similar questions, there were 34 clinical and ten basic science research questions submitted for voting. The five top clinical priorities were as follows: 1) what is the best strategy for screening and identification of patients with sepsis, and can predictive modeling assist in real-time recognition of sepsis? 2) what causes organ injury and dysfunction in sepsis, how should it be defined, and how can it be detected? 3) how should fluid resuscitation be individualized initially and beyond? 4) what is the best vasopressor approach for treating the different phases of septic shock? and 5) can a personalized/precision medicine approach identify optimal therapies to improve patient outcomes? The five top basic science priorities were as follows: 1) How can we improve animal models so that they more closely resemble sepsis in humans? 2) What outcome variables maximize correlations between human sepsis and animal models and are therefore most appropriate to use in both? 3) How does sepsis affect the brain, and how do sepsis-induced brain alterations contribute to organ dysfunction? How does sepsis affect interactions between neural, endocrine, and immune systems? 4) How does the microbiome affect sepsis pathobiology? 5) How do genetics and epigenetics influence the development of sepsis, the course of sepsis and the response to treatments for sepsis? CONCLUSIONS Knowledge advances in multiple clinical domains have been incorporated in progressive iterations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, allowing for evidence-based recommendations for short- and long-term management of sepsis. However, the strength of existing evidence is modest with significant knowledge gaps and mortality from sepsis remains high. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel De Backer
- Department of Intensive Care, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Clifford S Deutschman
- Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY
- Sepsis Research Lab, the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY
| | - Judith Hellman
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sheila Nainan Myatra
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Marlies Ostermann
- Department of Critical Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hallie C Prescott
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Daniel Talmor
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Massimo Antonelli
- Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Seth R Bauer
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Niranjan Kissoon
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ignacio-Martin Loeches
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St James's Hospital, Leinster, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Pierre Tissieres
- Pediatric Intensive Care, Neonatal Medicine and Pediatric Emergency, AP-HP Paris Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Antoine Vieillard-Baron
- Service de Medecine Intensive Reanimation, Hopital Ambroise Pare, Universite Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cimino J, Braun C. Clinical Research in Prehospital Care: Current and Future Challenges. Clin Pract 2023; 13:1266-1285. [PMID: 37887090 PMCID: PMC10605888 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract13050114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Prehospital care plays a critical role in improving patient outcomes, particularly in cases of time-sensitive emergencies such as trauma, cardiac failure, stroke, bleeding, breathing difficulties, systemic infections, etc. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in clinical research in prehospital care, and several challenges and opportunities have emerged. There is an urgent need to adapt clinical research methodology to a context of prehospital care. At the same time, there are many barriers in prehospital research due to the complex context, posing unique challenges for research, development, and evaluation. Among these, this review allows the highlighting of limited resources and infrastructure, ethical and regulatory considerations, time constraints, privacy, safety concerns, data collection and analysis, selection of a homogeneous study group, etc. The analysis of the literature also highlights solutions such as strong collaboration between emergency medical services (EMS) and hospital care, use of (mobile) health technologies and artificial intelligence, use of standardized protocols and guidelines, etc. Overall, the purpose of this narrative review is to examine the current state of clinical research in prehospital care and identify gaps in knowledge, including the challenges and opportunities for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Cimino
- Clinical Research Unit, Fondation Hôpitaux Robert Schuman, 44 Rue d’Anvers, 1130 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Hôpitaux Robert Schuman, 9 Rue Edward Steichen, 2540 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Claude Braun
- Clinical Research Unit, Fondation Hôpitaux Robert Schuman, 44 Rue d’Anvers, 1130 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Hôpitaux Robert Schuman, 9 Rue Edward Steichen, 2540 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jouffroy R, Gueye P. Do prehospital sepsis alerts decrease time to complete CMS sepsis measures? Am J Emerg Med 2023; 72:201-202. [PMID: 37596201 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Jouffroy
- Intensive Care Unit, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux Paris and Paris Saclay University, Boulogne Billancourt, France; Institut de Recherche bioMédicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport - EA7329, INSEP - Paris University, France; Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations - U1018 INSERM - Paris Saclay University, France.
| | - Papa Gueye
- SAMU 972, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France Martinique, France; EA 7525 University of the Antilles, French West Indies, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jouffroy R, Gueye P. Comment on: Evidence for Use of Validated Sepsis Screening Tools in the Prehospital Population. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2023; 28:494. [PMID: 37494276 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2240901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Jouffroy
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Universitaire Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, and Paris Saclay University
| | - Papa Gueye
- SAMU 972, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France Martinique, France, and EA 7525 University of the Antilles, French West Indies
| |
Collapse
|