1
|
Jomy J, Jani P, Sheikh F, Charide R, Mah J, Couban RJ, Kligler B, Darzi AJ, White BK, Hoppe T, Busse JW, Zeraatkar D. Health measurement instruments and their applicability to military veterans: a systematic review. BMJ Mil Health 2023:military-2022-002219. [PMID: 37028907 DOI: 10.1136/military-2022-002219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Accurate measurement of health status is essential to assess veterans' needs and the effects of interventions directed at improving veterans' well-being. We conducted a systematic review to identify instruments that measure subjective health status, considering four components (ie, physical, mental, social or spiritual well-being). METHODS Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, JSTOR, ERIC, Social Sciences Abstracts and ProQuest in June 2021 for studies reporting on the development or evaluation of instruments measuring subjective health among outpatient populations. We assessed risk of bias with the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments tool and engaged three veteran partners to independently assess the clarity and applicability of identified instruments. RESULTS Of 5863 abstracts screened, we identified 45 eligible articles that reported health-related instruments in the following categories: general health (n=19), mental health (n=7), physical health (n=8), social health (n=3) and spiritual health (n=8). We found evidence for adequate internal consistency for 39 instruments (87%) and good test-retest reliability for 24 (53%) instruments. Of these, our veteran partners identified five instruments for the measurement of subjective health (Military to Civilian Questionnaire (M2C-Q), Veterans RAND 36-Item Health Survey (VR-36), Short Form 36, Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) and Sleep Health Scale) as clear and very applicable to veterans. Of the two instruments developed and validated among veterans, the 16-item M2C-Q considered most components of health (mental, social and spiritual). Of the three instruments not validated among veterans, only the 26-item WHOQOL-BREF considered all four components of health. CONCLUSION We identified 45 health measurement instruments of which, among those reporting adequate psychometric properties and endorsed by our veteran partners, 2 instruments showed the most promise for measurement of subjective health. The M2C-Q, which requires augmentation to capture physical health (eg, the physical component score of the VR-36), and the WHOQOL-BREF, which requires validation among veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Jomy
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto Temerty, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - P Jani
- School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - F Sheikh
- Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Charide
- Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Mah
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - R J Couban
- Michael G DeGroote National Pain Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - B Kligler
- Office of Patient Centered Care and Cultural Transformation, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - A J Darzi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - B K White
- The Canadian Veterans Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - T Hoppe
- The Canadian Veterans Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - J W Busse
- Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Zeraatkar
- Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gegenfurtner A. Bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling: A meta-analytic review of model fit. Front Psychol 2022; 13:1037111. [PMID: 36389589 PMCID: PMC9643583 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Multivariate behavioral research often focuses on latent constructs-such as motivation, self-concept, or wellbeing-that cannot be directly observed. Typically, these latent constructs are measured with items in standardized instruments. To test the factorial structure and multidimensionality of latent constructs in educational and psychological research, Morin et al. (2016a) proposed bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling (B-ESEM). This meta-analytic review (158 studies, k = 308, N = 778,624) aimed to estimate the extent to which B-ESEM model fit differs from other model representations, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), hierarchical CFA, hierarchical ESEM, and bifactor-CFA. The study domains included learning and instruction, motivation and emotion, self and identity, depression and wellbeing, and interpersonal relations. The meta-analyzed fit indices were the χ2 /df ratio, the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and the standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR). The findings of this meta-analytic review indicate that the B-ESEM model fit is superior to the fit of reference models. Furthermore, the results suggest that model fit is sensitive to sample size, item number, and the number of specific and general factors in a model.
Collapse
|
3
|
Esposito C, Di Napoli I, Di Martino S, Prilleltensky I, Arcidiacono C. The I COPPE Scale Short Form for measuring multidimensional well-being: Construct validity and reliability from US, Argentinian, and Italian large samples. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 2022; 50:696-711. [PMID: 34223645 PMCID: PMC9292542 DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to present a short form of the I COPPE scale of multidimensional well-being. We conducted two studies, which include four samples collected across three countries, namely United States, Argentina, and Italy. In the pilot study we tested during the data analysis phase whether it was feasible to reduce the full I COPPE scale by omitting the items dealing with past well-being. Prompted by the positive results of the pilot study, we launched a final validation study with a sample of 2682 Italian people who completed the I COPPE scale short form, which is designed without items referring to past well-being. Results from a series of confirmatory factor analyses show that the I COPPE scale short form presents acceptable levels of construct validity and reliability. Moreover, the 7-factor correlated-trait model proved to be the best fit for the data. We discuss advantaged of using the I COPPE scale short form along with limitations and future recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Esposito
- Department of HumanitiesUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
| | | | | | - Isaac Prilleltensky
- Department of Educational and Psychological StudiesUniversity of Miami's School of Education & Human DevelopmentMiamiFloridaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scarpa MP, Di Martino S, Prilleltensky I. Mattering Mediates Between Fairness and Well-being. Front Psychol 2021; 12:744201. [PMID: 34858276 PMCID: PMC8630584 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Research has suggested a fundamental connection between fairness and well-being at the individual, relational, and societal levels. Mattering is a multidimensional construct consisting of feeling valued by, and adding value to, self and others. Prior studies have attempted to connect mattering to both fairness and a variety of well-being outcomes. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that mattering acts as a mediator between fairness and well-being. This hypothesis was tested through Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM) using multidimensional measures of fairness, mattering, and well-being. Results from a Latent Path Analysis conducted on a representative sample of 1,051U.S. adults provide support to our hypothesis by revealing a strong direct predictive effect of mattering onto well-being and a strong indirect effect of fairness onto well-being through mattering. Results also show that mattering is likely to fully mediate the relationship between fairness and multiple domains of well-being, except in one case, namely, economic well-being. These findings illustrate the value of a focus on mattering to understand the relationship between fairness and well-being and to provide future directions for theory, research, and practice. Theoretical implications for the experience of citizenship and participation, along with cross-cultural considerations, are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P. Scarpa
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States
| | | | - Isaac Prilleltensky
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Myers ND, McMahon A, Prilleltensky I, Lee S, Dietz S, Prilleltensky O, Pfeiffer KA, Bateman AG, Brincks AM. Effectiveness of the Fun for Wellness Web-Based Behavioral Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Adults With Obesity (or Overweight): Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res 2020; 4:e15919. [PMID: 32130110 PMCID: PMC7075548 DOI: 10.2196/15919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insufficient physical activity in the adult population is a global pandemic. Fun for Wellness (FFW) is a self-efficacy theory- and Web-based behavioral intervention developed to promote growth in well-being and physical activity by providing capability-enhancing opportunities to participants. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of FFW to increase physical activity in adults with obesity in the United States in a relatively uncontrolled setting. METHODS This was a large-scale, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Participants were recruited through an online panel recruitment company. Adults with overweight were also eligible to participate, consistent with many physical activity-promoting interventions for adults with obesity. Also consistent with much of the relevant literature the intended population as simply adults with obesity. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (ie, FFW) or the usual care (ie, UC) group via software code that was written to accomplish equal allocations to the FFW and UC groups. Data collection was Web based, fully automated, and occurred at three time points: baseline, 30 days after baseline (T2), and 60 days after baseline (T3). Participants (N=461) who were assigned to the FFW group (nFFW=219) were provided with 30 days of 24-hour access to the Web-based intervention. A path model was fit to the data consistent with the FFW conceptual model for the promotion of physical activity. RESULTS There was evidence for a positive direct effect of FFW on transport-related physical activity self-efficacy (beta=.22, P=.02; d=0.23), domestic-related physical activity self-efficacy (beta=.22, P=.03; d=0.22), and self-efficacy to regulate physical activity (beta=.16, P=.01; d=0.25) at T2. Furthermore, there was evidence for a positive indirect effect of FFW on physical activity at T3 through self-efficacy to regulate physical activity at T2 (beta=.42, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.14). Finally, there was evidence for a null direct effect of FFW on physical activity (beta=1.04, P=.47; d=0.07) at T3. CONCLUSIONS This study provides some initial evidence for both the effectiveness (eg, a positive indirect effect of FFW on physical activity through self-efficacy to regulate physical activity) and the ineffectiveness (eg, a null direct effect of FFW on physical activity) of the FFW Web-based behavioral intervention to increase physical activity in adults with obesity in the United States. More broadly, FFW is a scalable Web-based behavioral intervention that may effectively, although indirectly, promote physical activity in adults with obesity and therefore may be useful in responding to the global pandemic of insufficient physical activity in this at-risk population. Self-efficacy to regulate physical activity appears to be a mechanism by which FFW may indirectly promote physical activity in adults with obesity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03194854; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03194854.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam McMahon
- University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States
| | | | - Seungmin Lee
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Myers ND, McMahon A, Prilleltensky I, Lee S, Dietz S, Prilleltensky O, Pfeiffer KA, Bateman AG, Brincks AM. Effectiveness of the Fun for Wellness Web-Based Behavioral Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Adults With Obesity (or Overweight): Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res 2020. [DOI: 10.2196/15919
expr 988639718 + 906864596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundInsufficient physical activity in the adult population is a global pandemic. Fun for Wellness (FFW) is a self-efficacy theory- and Web-based behavioral intervention developed to promote growth in well-being and physical activity by providing capability-enhancing opportunities to participants.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of FFW to increase physical activity in adults with obesity in the United States in a relatively uncontrolled setting.MethodsThis was a large-scale, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Participants were recruited through an online panel recruitment company. Adults with overweight were also eligible to participate, consistent with many physical activity–promoting interventions for adults with obesity. Also consistent with much of the relevant literature the intended population as simply adults with obesity. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (ie, FFW) or the usual care (ie, UC) group via software code that was written to accomplish equal allocations to the FFW and UC groups. Data collection was Web based, fully automated, and occurred at three time points: baseline, 30 days after baseline (T2), and 60 days after baseline (T3). Participants (N=461) who were assigned to the FFW group (nFFW=219) were provided with 30 days of 24-hour access to the Web-based intervention. A path model was fit to the data consistent with the FFW conceptual model for the promotion of physical activity.ResultsThere was evidence for a positive direct effect of FFW on transport-related physical activity self-efficacy (beta=.22, P=.02; d=0.23), domestic-related physical activity self-efficacy (beta=.22, P=.03; d=0.22), and self-efficacy to regulate physical activity (beta=.16, P=.01; d=0.25) at T2. Furthermore, there was evidence for a positive indirect effect of FFW on physical activity at T3 through self-efficacy to regulate physical activity at T2 (beta=.42, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.14). Finally, there was evidence for a null direct effect of FFW on physical activity (beta=1.04, P=.47; d=0.07) at T3.ConclusionsThis study provides some initial evidence for both the effectiveness (eg, a positive indirect effect of FFW on physical activity through self-efficacy to regulate physical activity) and the ineffectiveness (eg, a null direct effect of FFW on physical activity) of the FFW Web-based behavioral intervention to increase physical activity in adults with obesity in the United States. More broadly, FFW is a scalable Web-based behavioral intervention that may effectively, although indirectly, promote physical activity in adults with obesity and therefore may be useful in responding to the global pandemic of insufficient physical activity in this at-risk population. Self-efficacy to regulate physical activity appears to be a mechanism by which FFW may indirectly promote physical activity in adults with obesity.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03194854; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03194854.
Collapse
|
7
|
Myers ND, Prilleltensky I, Lee S, Dietz S, Prilleltensky O, McMahon A, Pfeiffer KA, Ellithorpe ME, Brincks AM. Effectiveness of the fun for wellness online behavioral intervention to promote well-being and physical activity: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:737. [PMID: 31196052 PMCID: PMC6567517 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7089-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fun For Wellness (FFW) is an online behavioral intervention developed to encourage growth in well-being by providing capability-enhancing learning opportunities to participants. Self-efficacy theory guides the conceptual model underlying the FFW intervention. Some initial evidence has been provided for the efficacy of FFW to promote: well-being self-efficacy; interpersonal, community, psychological and economic subjective well-being; and, interpersonal and physical well-being actions. The purpose of this paper is to describe the protocol for a new randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to provide the first investigation of the effectiveness of FFW to increase well-being and physical activity in adults with obesity in the United States of America. METHODS The study design is a large-scale, prospective, parallel group RCT. Approximately 9 hundred participants will be randomly assigned to the FFW or Usual Care (UC) group to achieve a 1:1 group (i.e. , FFW UC) assignment. Participants will be recruited through an online panel recruitment company. Data collection, including determination of eligibility, will be conducted online and enrollment is scheduled to begin on 8 August 2018. Data collection will occur at baseline, 30 days and 60 days after baseline. Instruments to measure demographic information, anthropometric characteristics, self-efficacy, physical activity and well-being will be included in the battery. Data will be modeled under an intent to treat approach and/or a complier average causal effect approach depending on the level of observed engagement with the intervention. DISCUSSION The effectiveness trial described in this paper builds upon the 2015 FFW efficacy trial and has the potential to be important for at least three reasons. The first reason is based upon a general scientific approach that the potential utility of interventions should be evaluated under both ideal (e.g., more controlled) and real-world (e.g., less controlled) conditions. The second reason is based upon the global need for readily scalable online behavioral interventions that effectively promote physical activity in adults. The third reason is based upon the troubling global trend toward obesity along with evidence for obesity as a risk factor for several major non-communicable diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03194854 , registered 21 June 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D. Myers
- Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, 201 IM Sports Circle Building, 308 W. Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | | | - Seungmin Lee
- Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, 201 IM Sports Circle Building, 308 W. Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Samantha Dietz
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Miami, USA
| | - Ora Prilleltensky
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Miami, USA
| | - Adam McMahon
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Miami, USA
| | - Karin A. Pfeiffer
- Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, 201 IM Sports Circle Building, 308 W. Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Morgan E. Ellithorpe
- Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
| | - Ahnalee M. Brincks
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Myers ND, Lee S, Bateman AG, Prilleltensky I, Clevenger KA, Pfeiffer KA, Dietz S, Prilleltensky O, McMahon A, Brincks AM. Accelerometer-based assessment of physical activity within the Fun For Wellness online behavioral intervention: protocol for a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:73. [PMID: 31164990 PMCID: PMC6544927 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0455-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fun For Wellness (FFW) is an online behavioral intervention designed to promote growth in well-being and physical activity by providing capability-enhancing learning opportunities to participants. The conceptual framework for the FFW intervention is guided by self-efficacy theory. Evidence has been provided for the efficacy of FFW to promote self-reported free-living physical well-being actions in adults who comply with the intervention. The objective of this manuscript is to describe the protocol for a feasibility study designed to address uncertainties regarding the inclusion of accelerometer-based assessment of free-living physical activity within the FFW online intervention among adults with obesity in the United States of America (USA). METHOD The study design is a prospective, double-blind, parallel group randomized pilot trial. Thirty participants will be randomly assigned to the FFW or usual care (UC) group to achieve a 1:1 group (i.e., FFW:UC) assignment. Recruitment of participants is scheduled to begin on 29 April 2019 at a local bariatric services center within a major healthcare organization in the Midwest of the USA. There are five eligibility criteria for participation in this study: (1) between 18 and 64 years old, (2) a body mass index ≥ 25.00 kg/m2, (3) ability to access the online intervention, (4) the absence of simultaneous enrollment in another intervention program promoting physical activity, and (5) willingness to comply with instructions for physical activity monitoring. Eligibility verification and data collection will be conducted online. Three waves of data will be collected over a 13-week period. Instruments designed to measure demographic information, anthropometric characteristics, acceptability and feasibility of accelerometer-based assessment of physical activity, self-efficacy, and well-being will be included in the study. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics (e.g., recruitment rates), Pearson's correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analyses, and inferential statistical models under both an intent to treat approach and a complier average causal effect approach. DISCUSSION Results are intended to inform the preparation of a future definitive randomized controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03906942, registered 8 April 2019. TRIAL FUNDING The Erwin and Barbara Mautner Charitable Foundation and the Michigan State University College of Education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D. Myers
- Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, 201 IM Sports Circle Building, 308 W. Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Seungmin Lee
- Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, 201 IM Sports Circle Building, 308 W. Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - André G. Bateman
- Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, 201 IM Sports Circle Building, 308 W. Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Isaac Prilleltensky
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, USA
| | - Kimberly A. Clevenger
- Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, 201 IM Sports Circle Building, 308 W. Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Karin A. Pfeiffer
- Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, 201 IM Sports Circle Building, 308 W. Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Samantha Dietz
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, USA
| | - Ora Prilleltensky
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, USA
| | - Adam McMahon
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, USA
| | - Ahnalee M. Brincks
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Myers ND, Prilleltensky I, Prilleltensky O, McMahon A, Dietz S, Rubenstein CL. Efficacy of the Fun For Wellness Online Intervention to Promote Multidimensional Well-Being: a Randomized Controlled Trial. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2018; 18:984-994. [PMID: 28303422 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-017-0779-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Subjective well-being refers to people's level of satisfaction with life as a whole and with multiple dimensions within it. Interventions that promote subjective well-being are important because there is evidence that physical health, mental health, substance use, and health care costs may be related to subjective well-being. Fun For Wellness (FFW) is a new online universal intervention designed to promote growth in multiple dimensions of subjective well-being. The purpose of this study was to provide an initial evaluation of the efficacy of FFW to increase subjective well-being in multiple dimensions in a universal sample. The study design was a prospective, double-blind, parallel group randomized controlled trial. Data were collected at baseline and 30 and 60 days-post baseline. A total of 479 adult employees at a major university in the southeast of the USA were enrolled. Recruitment, eligibility verification, and data collection were conducted online. Measures of interpersonal, community, occupational, physical, psychological, economic (i.e., I COPPE), and overall subjective well-being were constructed based on responses to the I COPPE Scale. A two-class linear regression model with complier average causal effect estimation was imposed for each dimension of subjective well-being. Participants who complied with the FFW intervention had significantly higher subjective well-being, as compared to potential compliers in the Usual Care group, in the following dimensions: interpersonal at 60 days, community at 30 and 60 days, psychological at 60 days, and economic at 30 and 60 days. Results from this study provide some initial evidence for both the efficacy of, and possible revisions to, the FFW intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D Myers
- Department of Kinesiology, College of Education, Michigan State University, IM Sports Circle, Room 201, 308 W Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
| | - Isaac Prilleltensky
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ora Prilleltensky
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Adam McMahon
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Samantha Dietz
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Carolyn L Rubenstein
- Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Di Martino S, Di Napoli I, Esposito C, Prilleltensky I, Arcidiacono C. Measuring subjective well-being from a multidimensional and temporal perspective: Italian adaptation of the I COPPE scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018; 16:88. [PMID: 29739465 PMCID: PMC5941326 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-0916-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study is to present the psychometric and cultural adaptation of the I COPPE scale to the Italian context. The original 21-item I COPPE was developed by Isaac Prilleltensky and colleagues to integrate a multidimensional and temporal perspective into the quantitative assessment of people's subjective well-being. The scale comprises seven domains (Overall, Interpersonal, Community, Occupation, Psychological, Physical, and Economic well-being), which tap into past, present, and future self-appraisals of well-being. METHODS The Italian adapted version of the I COPPE scale underwent translation and backtranslation procedure. After a pilot study was conducted on a local sample of 683 university students, a national sample of 2432 Italian citizens responded to the final translated version of the I COPPE scale, 772 of whom re-completed the same survey after a period of four months. Respondents from both waves of the national sample were recruited partly through on-line social networks (i.e. Facebook, Twitter, and SurveyMonkey) and partly by university students who had been trained in Computer-Assisted Survey Information Collection. RESULTS Data were first screened for non-valid cases and tested for multivariate normality and missing data. The correlation matrix revealed highly significant correlation values, ranging from medium to high for nearly all congeneric variables of the I COPPE scale. Results from a series of nested and non-nested model comparisons supported the 7-factor correlated-traits model originally hypothesised, with factor loadings and inter-item reliability ranging from medium to high. In addition, they revealed that the I COPPE scale has strong internal reliability, with composite reliability always higher than .7, satisfactory construct validity, with average variance extracted nearly always higher than .5, and and full strict invariance across time. CONCLUSIONS The Italian adaptation of the I COPPE scale presents appropriate psychometric properties in terms of both validity and reliability, and therefore can be applied to the Italian context. Some limitation and recommendations for future studies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Di Martino
- School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Portland Building, Room 519, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
| | - Immacolata Di Napoli
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Via Porta di Massa 5, 80133, Naples, IT, Italy
| | - Ciro Esposito
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Via Porta di Massa 5, 80133, Naples, IT, Italy
| | - Isaac Prilleltensky
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Merrick Building 312, 5205 University Drive, Coral Gables, Florida, 33146, USA
| | - Caterina Arcidiacono
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Via Porta di Massa 5, 80133, Naples, IT, Italy
| |
Collapse
|