Strategies to manage activities in everyday life after a pain rehabilitation program

Patients' experiences of occupational therapy within a multidisciplinary pain management programme: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Occupational problems are common for adults experiencing chronic pain, but occupational therapists are not always accessed as part of the multidisciplinary team. Despite evidence of benefit for work-focused interventions, there is limited evidence for broader benefit from occupational therapy interventions within the context of multidisciplinary pain management. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of programme attendees who received structured intervention from an occupational therapist as part of a multidisciplinary pain management programme, and gain an understanding as to how they felt it influenced changes they made to occupational participation.

METHOD

A qualitative approach was undertaken with 9 individual patients recruited from a group pain management programme for adults with chronic low back pain. Semi-structured interviews were carried out, recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes in the data.

RESULTS

Three key themes were identified: 1) the helpfulness of activity pacing techniques 2) the value of participating in a therapeutic activity-based session and 3) an increased understanding of the importance of leisure and creative activities in the context of their lives.

CONCLUSION

Participants perceived the specific occupational therapy content of the programme to be helpful in a number of different ways. The findings suggest that occupational therapy can be important in facilitating patients to apply theoretical techniques in the real world, thereby increasing the likelihood of long term benefit.

"Pacing does help you get your life back": The acceptability of a newly developed activity pacing framework for chronic pain/fatigue

OBJECTIVES

We have developed and feasibility tested an activity pacing framework for clinicians to standardise their recommendations of activity pacing to patients with chronic pain/fatigue. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and fidelity to this framework in preparation for a future trial of activity pacing.

DESIGN

Acceptability and fidelity were explored using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using framework analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who attended a rehabilitation programme for chronic pain/fatigue underpinned by the framework, and clinicians (physiotherapists and psychological wellbeing practitioners) who led the programmes.

RESULTS

Seventeen interviews were conducted, involving 12 patients with chronic pain/fatigue and five clinicians. The framework analysis revealed four deductive themes: (1) Acceptability of the activity pacing framework, (2) Acceptability of the feasibility study methods, (3) Processes of change and (4) Barriers and facilitators to activity pacing; and one inductive theme: (5) Perspectives of patients and clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The activity pacing framework appeared acceptable to patients and clinicians, and adherence to the framework was demonstrated. Processes of behaviour change included patients' regulation of activities through activity pacing. Barriers to pacing included work/social commitments and facilitators included identifying the benefits of pacing on symptoms. Different perspectives emerged between clinicians and patients regarding interpretations of symptom-contingent and quota-contingent strategies. The framework recognises fluctuations in symptoms of chronic pain/fatigue and encourages a quota-contingent approach with flexibility. Future work will develop a patient friendly guide ahead of a clinical trial to explore the effects of pacing.

Managing daily life among people with advanced cancer living at home: Responding to uncertainties related to shifting abilities, home care, and treatment

Introduction

People with advanced cancer are increasingly expected to live at home and manage the consequences of illness and treatment. The purpose of this study was to explore how people with advanced cancer manage the influence of home care and treatment on occupations and habits.

Method

Constructivist grounded theory guided the collection and analysis of data from 22 people with advanced cancer. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and participant diaries.

Findings

Uncertainty about abilities to engage in occupation and home care and treatment delivery disrupted participants’ daily life. Participants employed various strategies to manage uncertainties and to preserve a sense of agency and control.

Conclusions

This study provides insights into how people with advanced cancer manage and respond to the impact of illness, home care, and treatment in their daily life. The findings may aid occupational therapists to develop and deliver interventions that allow their patients to maintain a sense of agency in their daily life.

Occupational Therapy's Unique Contribution to Chronic Pain Management: A Scoping Review

Occupational therapy (OT) makes a unique contribution to chronic pain (CP) management due to its overarching focus on occupation. The aim of this scoping review was to describe current knowledge about this contribution by documenting OT roles, models, assessments, and intervention methods used with adults living with CP. A systematic search exploring 10 databases and gray literature from 2006 to 2017 was conducted. Fifty-two sources were retained and analysed. Results bring forward the main role of OT being improving activities and participation (76.9 %), the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance (9.6 %), and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (21.2 %). Within the 30 reported interventions, 73.3% related directly to the person, 20% pertained to occupation (activities and participation), and 6.7% addressed environmental factors. The distinction and complementarity between the bottom-up and the top-down approaches to OT intervention were discussed. This review highlights OT specificity in adult CP management.

Identifying, organizing and prioritizing ideas on how to enhance ADL ability

BACKGROUND

There is a need to develop evidence-based occupational therapy programs aiming at enhancing the ability to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADL) among persons living with chronic conditions. Information from different sources is to be integrated in the development process. Thus, it is necessary to engage both occupational therapists and persons living with chronic conditions in suggesting ideas on how to enhance the ADL ability.

OBJECTIVE

To identify, organize and prioritize ideas on how to enhance ability to perform ADL in persons with chronic conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Group Concept Mapping, involving brainstorming, sorting, labeling, rating and validation of ideas, was applied among persons with chronic conditions (n = ≤ 18) and occupational therapists (n = ≤ 23). Multidimensional scaling analysis and cluster analyzes were applied.

RESULTS

149 ideas were identified and organized into seven clusters related to applying new adaptational strategies, personal factors, social surroundings and relevant services and opportunities. Each cluster contained ideas of high priority to persons with chronic conditions and/or occupational therapists.

CONCLUSION

A span of highly relevant themes, illustrated the complexity of enhancing ADL ability. This should be considered in the development of interventions aiming at enhancing ADL ability in persons with chronic conditions.