1
|
Bolther M, Henriksen J, Holmberg MJ, Jessen MK, Vallentin MF, Hansen FB, Holst JM, Magnussen A, Hansen NS, Johannsen CM, Enevoldsen J, Jensen TH, Roessler LL, Carøe Lind P, Klitholm MP, Eggertsen MA, Caap P, Boye C, Dabrowski KM, Vormfenne L, Høybye M, Karlsson M, Balleby IR, Rasmussen MS, Pælestik K, Granfeldt A, Andersen LW. Ventilation Strategies During General Anesthesia for Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg 2022; 135:971-985. [PMID: 35703253 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal ventilation strategy during general anesthesia is unclear. This systematic review investigated the relationship between ventilation targets or strategies (eg, positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], tidal volume, and recruitment maneuvers) and postoperative outcomes. METHODS PubMed and Embase were searched on March 8, 2021, for randomized trials investigating the effect of different respiratory targets or strategies on adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. Two investigators reviewed trials for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed for relevant outcomes, and several subgroup analyses were conducted. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS This review included 63 trials with 65 comparisons. Risk of bias was intermediate for all trials. In the meta-analyses, lung-protective ventilation (ie, low tidal volume with PEEP) reduced the risk of combined pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.49; 9 trials; 1106 patients), atelectasis (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.60; 8 trials; 895 patients), and need for postoperative mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13-1.00; 5 trials; 636 patients). Recruitment maneuvers reduced the risk of atelectasis (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.92; 5 trials; 328 patients). We found no clear effect of tidal volume, higher versus lower PEEP, or recruitment maneuvers on postoperative pulmonary complications when evaluated individually. For all comparisons across targets, no effect was found on mortality or hospital length of stay. No effect measure modifiers were found in subgroup analyses. The certainty of evidence was rated as very low, low, or moderate depending on the intervention and outcome. CONCLUSIONS Although lung-protective ventilation results in a decrease in pulmonary complications, randomized clinical trials provide only limited evidence to guide specific ventilation strategies during general anesthesia for adults undergoing noncardiac surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Bolther
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
| | | | - Mathias J Holmberg
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Marie K Jessen
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mikael F Vallentin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas H Jensen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Narvik, Norway
| | - Lara L Roessler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Mark A Eggertsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philip Caap
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
| | - Caroline Boye
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Lasse Vormfenne
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Høybye
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mathias Karlsson
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Ida R Balleby
- National Hospital of the Faroe Islands, Torshavn, Faroe Islands
| | - Marie S Rasmussen
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Kim Pælestik
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Asger Granfeldt
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars W Andersen
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care.,Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pei S, Wei W, Yang K, Yang Y, Pan Y, Wei J, Yao S, Xia H. Recruitment Maneuver to Reduce Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195841. [PMID: 36233708 PMCID: PMC9573602 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Lung-protective ventilation strategies are recommended for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. However, there are currently no guidelines to follow regarding recruitment maneuvers (RMs). We attempted to identify the effects of RMs on patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, the Cochrane Library databases, Embase, Web of Science and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for trials published up to December 2021. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The secondary outcomes consisted of the static lung compliance, driving pressure (DP), intraoperative oxygenation index (OI), OI in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). Seventeen RCTs with a total of 3480 patients were examined. Results: Patients who received RMs showed a considerable reduction in PPCs (risk ratio (RR) = 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62 to 0.79; p < 0.01), lower DP (weighted mean difference (WMD) = −3.96; 95% CI: −5.97 to −1.95; p < 0.01), elevated static lung compliance (WMD = 10.42; 95% CI: 6.13 to 14.71; p < 0.01) and improved OI (intraoperative: WMD = 53.54; 95% CI: 21.77 to 85.31; p < 0.01; PACU: WMD = 59.40; 95% CI: 39.10 to 79.69; p < 0.01) without substantial changes in MAP (WMD = −0.16; 95% CI −1.35 to 1.03; p > 0.05) and HR (WMD = −1.10; 95% CI: −2.29 to 0.10; p > 0.05). Conclusions: Recruitment maneuvers reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and improve respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. More data are needed to elucidate the effect of recruitment maneuver on the circulatory system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuaijie Pei
- Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, The People’s Hospital of Honghu, Honghu 433200, China
| | - Kai Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Yiyi Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Yu Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Jinrui Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Shanglong Yao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Correspondence: (S.Y.); (H.X.)
| | - Haifa Xia
- Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, The People’s Hospital of Honghu, Honghu 433200, China
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The People’s Hospital of Honghu, Honghu 433200, China
- Correspondence: (S.Y.); (H.X.)
| |
Collapse
|