Penetration of ciprofloxacin into human peritoneal tissue following a single oral dose of 750 milligrams

Systematic review: fluoroquinolones for the treatment of intra-abdominal surgical infections

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal infections result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Fluoroquinolones are among the various regimens that are used for the treatment of these infections.

AIM

To evaluate the available data from laboratory and clinical studies regarding the use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections.

METHODS

We searched for relevant laboratory and clinical studies in the PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases.

RESULTS

Good pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of fluoroquinolones in inflamed abdominal tissue are reported in several laboratory studies. In six prospective non-randomized clinical studies of patients with intra-abdominal infections, the clinical success achieved with the use of fluoroquinolones ranged from 77% to 94%. In 10 randomized-controlled trials fluoroquinolone-based regimens were compared with other commonly used (mainly beta-lactam-based) regimens. Clinical success, bacterial eradication, withdrawal because of toxicity and mortality were similar between the compared treatment arms except from two randomized-controlled trials, in which clinical success was statistically higher in the fluoroquinolone treatment arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroquinolones seem to be an effective and relatively safe option for the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Results of a randomized trial comparing sequential intravenous/oral treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole to imipenem/cilastatin for intra-abdominal infections. The Intra-Abdominal Infection Study Group

OBJECTIVE

In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, ciprofloxacin/metronidazole was compared with imipenem/cilastatin for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. A secondary objective was to demonstrate the ability to switch responding patients from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) therapy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Intra-abdominal infections result in substantial morbidity, mortality, and cost. Antimicrobial therapy often includes a 7- to 10-day intravenous course. The use of oral antimicrobials is a recent advance due to the availability of agents with good tissue pharmacokinetics and potent aerobic gram-negative activity.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to either ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole intravenously (CIP/MTZ IV) or imipenem intravenously (IMI IV) throughout their treatment course, or ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole intravenously and treatment with oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole when oral feeding was resumed (CIP/MTZ IV/PO).

RESULTS

Among 671 patients who constituted the intent-to-treat population, overall success rates were as follows: 82% for the group treated with CIP/MTZ IV; 84% for the CIP/MTZ IV/PO group; and 82% for the IMI IV group. For 330 valid patients, treatment success occurred in 84% of patients treated with CIP/MTZ IV, 86% of those treated with CIP/MTZ IV/PO, and 81% of the patients treated with IMI IV. Analysis of microbiology in the 30 patients undergoing intervention after treatment failure suggested that persistence of gram-negative organisms was more common in the IMI IV-treated patients who subsequently failed. Of 46 CIP/MTZ IV/PO patients (active oral arm), treatment success occurred in 96%, compared with 89% for those treated with CIP/MTZ IV and 89% for those receiving IMI IV. Patients who received intravenous/oral therapy were treated, overall, for an average of 8.6 +/- 3.6 days, with an average of 4.0 +/- 3.0 days of oral treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate statistical equivalence between CIP/MTZ IV and IMI IV in both the intent-to-treat and valid populations. Conversion to oral therapy with CIP/MTZ appears as effective as continued intravenous therapy in patients able to tolerate oral feedings.