Pharmacodynamics of Antimicrobial Agents and Rationale for Their Dosing

Daily serum piperacillin monitoring is advisable in critically ill patients

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the benefit of monitoring serum piperacillin concentrations in critically ill patients. This was an 11-month, prospective, observational study in a 30-bed Intensive Care Unit in a teaching hospital, involving 24 critically ill patients with evidence of bacterial sepsis. All patients received a 66 mg/kg intravenous bolus of piperacillin in combination with tazobactam (ratio 1:0.125) followed by continuous infusion of 200mg/kg/24h. The dosage was adjusted when the serum piperacillin concentration either fell below 4x the drug's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the causative agent or exceeded the toxic threshold of 150 mg/L. With the initial regimen, serum piperacillin concentrations were within the therapeutic target range in only 50.0% of patients (n=12). This proportion increased to 75.0% (18 patients) (P=0.006) following dosage adjustment. For patients with low initial serum piperacillin concentrations (n=8), the percentage of time during which the concentration remained above 4x MIC (%T>4x MIC) was 7.1+/-5.9% before dosage adjustment and 27.3+/-8.6% afterwards. In conclusion, in critically ill patients, monitoring and adjustment of serum piperacillin levels is required to prevent overdosing and might also help to correct underdosing, an important cause of antibiotic therapy failure.

Pharmacodynamics of antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-positive hospital infections

Hospital infection due to multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria may often represent a life-threatening challenge; thus, to appropriately combat them, clinicians should be confident and systematically apply several important pharmacodynamic concepts. The concept of 'correct antibiotic treatment' should include, in addition to an appropriate choice in terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, an appropriate dosage and administration schedule consistent with the pharmacodynamic principles. In the next few years, it is expected that some of the anti-Gram-positive antimicrobial agents that are currently under investigation will be added to the therapeutic armamentarium. However, optimization of the usage of old drugs still remains a clinical priority and a scientific challenge, whose dignity may be considered of similar importance to that of the assessment of the possible therapeutic role of the new compounds.

Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol and its major metabolite, florfenicol amine, in rabbits

The pharmacokinetics of florfenicol and its active metabolite florfenicol amine were investigated in rabbits after a single intravenous (i.v.) and oral (p.o.) administration of florfenicol at 20 mg/kg bodyweight. The plasma concentrations of florfenicol and florfenicol amine were determined simultaneously by an LC/MS method. After i.v. injection, the terminal half-life (t(1/2lambdaz)), steady-state volume of distribution, total body clearance and mean residence time of florfenicol were 0.90 +/- 0.20 h, 0.94 +/- 0.19 L/kg, 0.63 +/- 0.06 L/h/kg and 1.50 +/- 0.34 h respectively. The peak concentrations (C(max)) of florfenicol (7.96 +/- 2.75 microg/mL) after p.o. administration were observed at 0.90 +/- 0.38 h. The t(1/2lambdaz) and p.o. bioavailability of florfenicol were 1.42 +/- 0.56 h and 76.23 +/- 12.02% respectively. Florfenicol amine was detected in all rabbits after i.v. and p.o. administration. After i.v. and p.o. administration of florfenicol, the observed Cmax values of florfenicol amine (5.06 +/- 1.79 and 3.38 +/- 0.97 microg/mL) were reached at 0.88 +/- 0.78 and 2.10 +/- 1.08 h respectively. Florfenicol amine was eliminated with an elimination half-life of 1.84 +/- 0.17 and 2.35 +/- 0.94 h after i.v. and p.o. administration respectively.

Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic aspects of antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin in patients undergoing major vascular surgery

A prospective, two-arm, open study assessing plasma exposure to teicoplanin with two different prophylactic regimens (Group A (n = 23), 800 mg pre-operatively versus Group B (n = 24), 400 mg pre-operatively plus two doses of 200 mg 24 h apart) was carried out in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. The intent was to define the feasibility and the possible advantages of the single pre-operative high dose in ensuring therapeutically effective plasma concentrations (>10 mg/L) of teicoplanin even during long-lasting operations. At the end of the intervention, mean teicoplanin concentrations (+/-S.D.) were 14.05 +/- 5.13 mg/L and 5.39 +/- 2.13 mg/L in Groups A and B, respectively. At 24 h, average teicoplanin levels were 5.10 +/- 1.25 mg/L and 2.08 +/- 0.73 mg/L in Groups A and B, respectively; at 48 h they declined to 2.86 +/- 0.70 mg/L in Group A, whereas they rose to 2.67 +/- 0.82 mg/L after administration of 2.63 +/- 0.51 mg/kg at 24 h in Group B. Single pre-operative high-dose teicoplanin may ensure effective plasma levels even in cases of very long-lasting operations (>8 h) with no need for intraoperative re-dosing and may enable more appropriate prophylactic exposure than that achievable with the same total dose given in three administrations 24 h apart.

SM-216601, a Novel Parenteral 1β-Methylcarbapenem: Structure-activity Relationships of Antibacterial Activity and Neurotoxicity in Mice

It has been reported that 2-(4-substituted thiazol-2-ylthio)-1beta-methyl-carbapenems exhibit potent activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). In order to develop a novel broad-spectrum carbapenem, the structure-activity relationships of a series of 2-(4-tetrahydropyridinylthiazol-2-ylthio)-1beta-methylcarbapenems and 4-dihydropyrrolyl thiazole analogs were investigated with regard to their activity against Gram-positive and especially Gram-negative bacteria and also their convulsant activity, which is a major side effect concern of carbapenems. The introduction of substituent(s) on the dihydropyrrole moiety did not cause remarkable changes in anti-MRS and VRE activities, but tended to lower the anti-Gram-negative bacterial activity except in some cases of methyl group introduction. These substitutions did however cause a reduction of the convulsant activity, which was affected by the size and also the configuration of the substituent. In the case of SM-216601 (6), introduction of a methyl group brought about significant reduction in neurotoxicity while maintaining favorable anti-Gram-negative bacterial activity.

Clinical relevance of bacteriostatic versus bactericidal mechanisms of action in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections

The distinction between bactericidal and bacteriostatic agents appears to be clear according to the in vitro definition, but this only applies under strict laboratory conditions and is inconsistent for a particular agent against all bacteria. The distinction is more arbitrary when agents are categorized in clinical situations. The supposed superiority of bactericidal agents over bacteriostatic agents is of little relevance when treating the vast majority of infections with gram-positive bacteria, particularly in patients with uncomplicated infections and noncompromised immune systems. Bacteriostatic agents (e.g., chloramphenicol, clindamycin, and linezolid) have been effectively used for treatment of endocarditis, meningitis, and osteomyelitis--indications that are often considered to require bactericidal activity. Although bacteriostatic/bactericidal data may provide valuable information on the potential action of antibacterial agents in vitro, it is necessary to combine this information with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to provide more meaningful prediction of efficacy in vivo. The ultimate guide to treatment of any infection must be clinical outcome.

Macrolides: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Three pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters--(i) the peak concentration to the minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (C(max)/MIC); (ii) the area under the concentration-time curve to MIC ratio (AUC(24h)/MIC); and (iii) the time the concentration exceeds the MIC (T>MIC)--are important predictors of the clinical efficacy of antibiotics. For antibiotics with pronounced concentration-dependent killing, such as the fluoroquinolones or the aminoglycosides, C(max)/MIC and AUC(24)/MIC are the main factors that establish efficacy. Antibiotics with a weak, or no, concentration dependency generally have their efficacy linked to T>MIC, and these include the beta-lactams and the conventional macrolides. Antibiotics with weak concentration-dependent effects, but with prolonged persistent effects, such as tetracyclines and azithromycin, have their activity mostly related to the AUC(24)/MIC. By applying these concepts to current antibiotics, and also to the development of novel agents, it is possible to optimise their dosages and administration schedules. This will maximise therapeutic efficacy, may prevent or delay the emergence of bacterial resistance to antibiotics, and can certainly minimise side-effects.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in intensive care unit patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an intravenous meropenem dosage regimen in adult intensive care patients with acute renal failure treated by continuous renal replacement therapy.

DESIGN

A prospective, clinical study.

SETTING

General intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Ten critically ill adult patients being treated with meropenem and receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (hemofiltration rates, 1-2 L/hr) (n = 5) or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (hemofiltration rates, 1-1.5 L/hr; dialysis rates, 1-1.5 L/hr) (n = 5) via a polyacrylonitrile hollow fiber 0.9-m2 filter.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received a meropenem dose of 1 g iv every 12 hrs as a 5-min bolus.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Meropenem concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in serum taken at timed intervals and in ultrafiltrate/dialysate to determine serum concentration-time profiles, derive pharmacokinetic variable estimates, and determine sieving coefficients and filter clearances. The serum concentrations were examined to see whether they were above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for pathogens that may be encountered in intensive care patients. Serum concentrations exceeded 4 mg/L (MIC90 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa) during 67% of the dosage period in all patients. Sub-MIC90 concentrations were obtained in three patients immediately before treatment and in one patient 12 hrs after treatment. Mean (SD) (n = 10) pharmacokinetic variable estimates were as follows: elimination half-life, 5.16 hrs (1.83 hrs); volume of distribution, 0.35 L/kg (0.10 L/kg); and total clearance, 4.30 L/hr (1.38 L/hr). A sieving coefficient of 0.93 (0.06) (n = 9) indicated free flow across the filter. The fraction cleared by the extracorporeal route was 48% (13%) (n = 9), which is clinically important.

CONCLUSIONS

A meropenem dose of 1g iv every 12 hrs provides adequate serum concentrations in the majority of patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or continuous venovenous hemofiltration with a 0.9-m2 polyacrylonitrile filter at combined ultrafiltrate/dialysate flow rates of up to 3 L/hr. A lower dose would not be sufficient for the empirical treatment of potentially life-threatening infections in all patients.

Comparison of in-vitro pharmacodynamics of once and twice daily ciprofloxacin

The pharmacodynamics of ciprofloxacin were explored in an in-vitro continuous bacterial culture model of infection, by simulating two oral dosing regimens; 0.5 g 12-hourly (bd) and 1 g 24-hourly (od). Three strains of Escherichia coli (ciprofloxacin MICs 0.03, 0.5 and 2 mg/L); two strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MICs 0.09 and 1.5 mg/L), two strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MICs 0.12 and 1 mg/L) and two strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (MICs 0.5 and 2 mg/L) were used. Three pharmacodynamic parameters, T > MIC, C(max)/MIC and AUC/MIC (T = time, C(max) = peak serum concentration, AUC = area under the curve), were compared with area under the bacterial-kill curve (AUBKC) (after transformation of the AUBKC) using a simple E(max) or sigmoidal E(max) model. AUBKC was taken to be the main antibacterial effect measure. The models were compared by inspection of residuals and Akaike information criterion. E(max) models adequately described the relationship between AUC/MIC and AUBKC and between C(max)/MIC and AUBKC, but not between T> MIC and AUBKC. All three pharmacodynamic parameters are related to each other but multiple regression analysis indicated that AUC/MIC was the best individual predictor of AUBKC. Despite this, comparison of od and bd regimens indicates some advantage to od in terms of early antibacterial effect. Serum concentration-time curve shape has some importance in determining antibacterial effect. These data indicate that for ciprofloxacin AUC/MIC ratio is not the sole determinant of antibacterial effect.

Antibiotic-induced release of bacterial cell wall components in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock: a review

This article reviews the new criteria for selecting the proper antimicrobial agent and dosage regimen for standard treatment of severe sepsis, with the intention of preventing septic shock. After introducing new concepts on the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock, the authors analyze the parameters of betalactam antibacterial activity, the antibiotic-induced release of bacterial endotoxin and the interrelationships between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics in the search for an optimum dosage regimen of antimicrobial mono- or polytherapy for severely ill septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy for fever and neutropenia

The treatment of fever and neutropenia following chemotherapy lends itself well to outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Patients prefer to be at home rather than hospitalized again. There is a clear cost advantage of outpatient therapy. With a quality program and careful patient selection, OPAT can be provided effectively and safely. The chances of an infection due to resistant bacteria also appear to be reduced. There are an increasing number of studies that support the use of empiric antibiotic therapy for the first fever in neutropenic patients. The choice of antimicrobial, dose, as well as vascular access and infusion devices must be tailored to the individual patient needs and circumstances.

Determinants of response to antibiotic therapy

The in vivo situation is far more complex than that of the standard in vitro susceptibility test yet in vitro tests have stood the test of time and are often good predictors of clinical outcome. Nevertheless, our understanding of the pharmacodynamics of antibiotic microbe interaction are giving us new insights into how to improve our performance and interpretation of these tests. These factors include consideration of inoculum effect, antibiotic interactions, cidal effects and the area under the inhibitory time curve (AUIC). There are however other variables which it is difficult to incorporate into in vitro tests, especially the immune status of the patient, which can be crucial to outcome. While the immune system can be boosted in certain instances, e.g. by growth factors or immunoglobulin infusions, our ability to modify the immune response to infection has been frustrated. Understanding the interaction of antibiotics with the immune system and the consequences of the differing actions of the various antibiotic classes on the immune response is another door that is opening for the future.

Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic drug monitoring of glycopeptides

The glycopeptide antibacterial drugs, vancomycin and teicoplanin, are widely used in hospitals for therapy of severe or multiresistant infection that has a positive results on Gram's stain test. Although vancomycin resistance is common in some hospital-acquired Enterococcus sp and resistance to teicoplanin occurs among Staphylococci sp glycopeptides remain the cornerstone of therapy for infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus organisms, and infection related to implanted devices. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of these agents remains controversial, but advances in our understanding of their pharmacodynamics and further clinical studies are helping clarify the situation. In the future, a more rational approach to monitoring will probably result in less intensive monitoring of vancomycin but more intensive monitoring of teicoplanin.