Prognostic significance of P27 and cyclin D1 co-expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: possible target for novel therapeutic strategies

DIAPH1 Promotes Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression Through Cell Cycle Regulation

The diaphanous related formin 1 (DIAPH1) protein is involved in the regulation of dynamic cytoskeleton reorganization, which is closely related to mitosis and the cell cycle. Cell cycle disorders are generally regarded as important underlying causes of many cancers. In the current study, we have revealed that DIAPH1 expression is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and that DIAPH1 promotes colony formation, cell proliferation, and G1/S progression in LSCC cells. Additionally, DIAPH1 promotes growth of AMC-HN-8 LSCC-derived tumors in vivo. In this study, RNA-sequencing analysis revealed that DIAPH1 knockdown led to changes in the expression of genes associated with signaling during the cell cycle. Using western blot analyses, we further demonstrated that DIAPH1 knockdown resulted in upregulation of p21^Waf1/Cip1, p19^Ink4d, p27^Kip1, and p16^Ink4a and downregulation of cyclinA2, cyclinD1, CDK2, CDK4, and CDK6. These results suggest that DIAPH1 influences the expression of genes in several signaling pathways and promotes LSCC progression by regulating the cell cycle.

Long non-coding RNA AC026166.2-001 inhibits cell proliferation and migration in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating the miR-24-3p/p27 axis

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) AC026166.2-001 was found to be down-regulated in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) tissues and metastatic neck lymph nodes. Decreased AC026166.2-001 was associated with poorer prognosis and may act as a novel biomarker for LSCC patients. In this study, AC026166.2–001 was overexpressed by a lentivirus vector and down-regulated by a small interfering RNA (siRNA). The results of real-time cell analysis (RTCA) and a plate colony formation assay showed that AC026166.2–001 inhibited LSCC cell proliferation and the clone-forming capacity. Cell cycle distribution and related protein changes were measured by flow cytometry. AC026166.2–001 arrested the cell cycle at the G1 phase and induced apoptosis. In addition, AC026166.2–001 decreased cell migration as measured by wound healing assays and transwell migration assays. Moreover, luciferase reporter assay and Western blotting results suggested that AC026166.2–001 acts as a sponge of miR-24-3p and regulates the expression of p27 and cyclin D1. The in vivo results showed that AC026166.2–001 significantly suppressed the growth of LSCC xenografts and promoted apoptosis. We validated the molecular mechanisms underlying AC026166.2–001 in LSCC. This is the first report of AC026166.2–001 acting as a tumor suppressor in LSCC by regulating the miR-24-3p/p27 axis.

Combined modality treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx is a major public health concern; it causes substantial morbidity and mortality, and arises chiefly as a result of tobacco and alcohol consumption. Early stage disease is best treated with radiation or surgery alone, but for patients with more locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, combined modality treatment has been shown to benefit selected patients, particularly when cisplatin-based chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy are employed, with or without altered fractionated radiation therapy. Substantial laryngectomy-associated quality-of-life decrements can be avoided in selected, potentially resectable patients with organ-sparing approaches, without sacrificing survival. Recently, trials have addressed the role of targeted systemic agents to the epidermal growth factor receptor, and other targets are under investigation. The addition of induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a promising treatment strategy that warrants further evaluation, but has not yet emerged as a standard of care; the toxicity of such regimens must be balanced with the potential benefits on a case-by-case basis, and functional outcomes are often quite variable. Treatment planning, management and follow-up are complex, and thus should ideally be performed in a comprehensive, multidisciplinary fashion, in a center accustomed to a high volume of such cases. Future research directions are described herein.

Correlation between the expressions of gastrin, somatostatin and cyclin and cyclin-depend kinase in colorectal cancer

AIM

To explore the correlation between the expressions of gastrin (GAS), somatostatin (SS) and cyclin, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) in colorectal cancer, and to detect the specific regulatory sites where gastrointestinal hormone regulates cell proliferation.

METHODS

Seventy-nine resected large intestine carcinomatous specimens were randomly selected. Immunohistochemical staining for GAS, SS, cyclin D1, cyclin E, cyclin A, cyclin B1, CDK2 and CDK4 was performed according to the standard streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase (S-P) method. According to the semi-quantitative integral evaluation, SS and GAS were divided into high, middle and low groups. Cyclin D1, cyclin E, cyclin A, cyclin B1, CDK2, CDK4 expressions in the three GAS and SS groups were assessed.

RESULTS

The positive expression rate of cyclin D1 was significantly higher in high (78.6%, 11/14) and middle GAS groups (73.9%, 17/23) than in low GAS group (45.2%, 19/42) (P<0.05, c2(high vs low) = 4.691; P<0.05, c2(middle vs low) = 4.945). The positive expression rate of cyclin A was significantly higher in high (100%, 14/14) and middle GAS groups (82.6%, 19/23) than in low GAS group (54.8%, 23/42) (P<0.01, c2(high vs low) = 9.586; P<0.05, c2(middle vs low) = 5.040). The positive expression rate of CDK2 was significantly higher in high (92.9%, 13/14) and middle GAS groups (87.0%, 20/23) than in low GAS group (50.0%, 21/42) (P<0.01, c2(high vs low) = 8.086; P<0.01, c2(middle vs low) = 8.715). The positive expression rate of CDK4 was significantly higher in high (78.6%, 11/14) and middle GAS groups (78.3%, 18/23) than in low GAS group (42.9%, 18/42) (P<0.05, c2(high vs low) = 5.364; P<0.01, c2(middle vs low) = 7.539). The positive expression rate of cyclin E was prominently higher in low SS group (53.3%, 24/45) than in high (9.1%, 1/11) and middle (21.7%, 5/23) SS groups (P<0.05, c2(high vs low) = 5.325; P<0.05, c2(middle vs low) = 6.212). The positive expression rate of CDK2 was significantly higher in low SS group (77.8%, 35/45) than in high SS group (27.3%, 3/11) (P<0.01, c2(high vs low) = 8.151). There was a significant positive correlation between the integral ratio of GAS to SS and the semi-quantitative integral of cyclin D1, cyclin E, cyclin A, CDK2, CDK4 (P<0.05, (D1)r(s) = 0.252; P<0.01, (E)r(s) = 0.387; P<0.01, (A)r(s) = 0.466; P<0.01, (K2)r(s) = 0.519; P<0.01, (K4)r(s) = 0.434).

CONCLUSION

The regulation and control of gastrin, SS in colorectal cancer cell growth may be directly related to the abnormal expressions of cyclins D1, A, E, and CDK2, CDK4. The regulatory site of GAS in the cell cycle of colorectal carcinoma may be at the G(1), S and G(2) phases. The regulatory site of SS may be at the entrance of S phase.