Factors associated with suitability of empiric antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with bloodstream infections

High levels of discordant antimicrobial therapy in hospital-acquired bloodstream infections is associated with increased mortality in an intensive care, low antimicrobial resistance setting

BACKGROUND

Bloodstream infections (BSI) occur frequently and are associated with severe outcomes. In this study we aimed to investigate proportions of patients that received discordant empirical antimicrobial therapy and its association to mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study model was undertaken to outline BSI in an intensive care, single centre, and low antimicrobial resistance prevalence setting. We used descriptive statistics to delineate proportions of patients that received discordant empirical antimicrobial therapy, and a correlation model and a logistic regression model to calculate the association with mortality and predictors of receiving discordant therapy, respectively.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2018 we included 270 BSI episodes, of which one third were hospital-acquired. Gram negative, Gram positive, and anaerobic pathogens were detected in 49.0%, 45.3% and 5.7% respectively. The proportion of isolates that conferred extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) properties were 5.9% among enterobactereales, and no methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates were detected. Empirical antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired (CA) and hospital-acquired (HA) BSI were discordant at day 0 in 6.5% and 24.4%, respectively (p<.001). Discordant therapy was significantly associated with mortality at day 28 (p=.041). HA-onset BSI, enterococcal BSI and BSI of intraabdominal origin were statistically significant predictors of receiving discordant therapy.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of HA-BSI did not receive effective antimicrobial therapy and this was significantly associated with mortality. The results underscore the need for more accurate diagnostic tools, improved communication between the microbiological laboratory and the clinicians, and antimicrobial stewardship measures.

Appropriateness of Empirical Fluoroquinolones Therapy in Patients Infected with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa: The Importance of the CLSI Breakpoints Revision

Purpose

Empirical antibiotic therapy should follow the local bacterial susceptibility, and the breakpoints revisions of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing can reflect the changes in the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria. This study aimed to analyze whether the changes in the antimicrobial susceptibility to antibiotics caused by the breakpoint revision will affect the empirical antibiotic therapy and its appropriateness.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted among 831 hospitalized patients infected by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from April 10, 2018, to April 11, 2020. We evaluated the appropriateness of empirical therapy based on the antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. The rate of empirical use and appropriateness of fluoroquinolones was calculated, and logistic regression was used to analyze influencing factors of empirical use of fluoroquinolones.

Results

The susceptibility rate of the three bacteria to levofloxacin (50.78% vs 32.06%) and ciprofloxacin (48.45% vs 21.90%) was decreased (P<0.001), while the resistance rate to levofloxacin (45.74% vs 58.73%) and ciprofloxacin (46.90% vs 66.67%) was increased (P<0.001) after the breakpoints revision. The empirical usage rate of fluoroquinolones in patients infected with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 20.94%, which was influenced by the breakpoint revision (P=0.022), age (P=0.007), and the department (P=0.006); the appropriateness rate was 28.74%, affected by the pathogenic bacteria (P=0.001) and multidrug-resistant microorganism (P=0.001), department (P=0.024), and the length of stay before the empirical therapy (P=0.016).

Conclusion

The susceptibility of bacteria to antibiotics has changed significantly after the breakpoint revision while the clinicians’ empirical therapy failure to change accordingly, which results in the decrease of the appropriateness of empirical use. It is enlightened that we should conduct more research to evaluate the rational use of antibiotics from the laboratory perspective and carry out interventions such as education and supervision to strengthen the collaboration between the microbiology laboratories and clinicians to improve the empirical antibiotic therapy and slow down the antimicrobial resistance.

Antibiotic modification versus withhold in febrile patients without evidence of bacterial infection, unresponsive to initial empiric regimen: a multicentre retrospective study conducted in Israel

Prescribing antibiotics for febrile patients without proof of bacterial infection contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Lack of clinical response in these patients often leads to antibiotic escalation, although data supporting this strategy are scarce. This study compared outcomes of modifying, withholding, or continuing the same antibiotic regimen for such patients. Febrile or hypothermic stable patients with suspected infection, unresponsive to empiric antibiotic treatment, admitted to one of 15 internal medicine departments in three hospitals during a 5-year study period, were included. Patients with a definitive clinical or microbiological bacterial infection, malignancy, immunodeficiency, altered mental status, or need for mechanical ventilation were excluded. Participants were divided into groups based on treatment strategy determined 72 h after antibiotic initiation: antibiotic modified, withheld or continued. Outcomes measured included in-hospital and 30-day post-discharge-mortality rates, length of hospital stay (LOS) and days of antimicrobial therapy (DOT). A total of 486 patients met the inclusion criteria: 124 in the Antibiotic modified group, 67 in the Antibiotic withheld group and 295 in the Initial antibiotic continued group. Patient characteristics were similar among groups with no differences in mortality rates in-hospital (23% vs. 25% vs. 20%, p = 0.58) and within 30 days after discharge (5% vs. 3% vs. 4%, p = 0.83). Changing antibiotics led to longer LOS (9.0 ± 6.8 vs. 6.2 ± 5.6 days, p = 0.003) and more DOT (8.6 ± 6.0 vs. 3.2 ± 1.0 days, p < 0.001) compared to withholding treatment. Withholding as compared to modifying antibiotics, in febrile patients with no clear evidence of bacterial infection, is a safe strategy associated with decreased LOS and DOT.