Poor in vivo efficacy of caspofungin, micafungin and amphotericin B against wild-type Candida krusei clinical isolates does not correlate with in vitro susceptibility results

Comparative pharmacodynamics and dose optimization of liposomal amphotericin B against Candida species in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

As comparative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) against Candida spp. are lacking, we explored L-AMB pharmacodynamics against different Candida species in an in vitro PK/PD dilution model. Eight Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei isolates (EUCAST/CLSI AMB MIC 0.125-1 mg/L) were studied in the in vitro PK/PD model simulating L-AMB Cmax = 0.25-64 mg/L and t1/2 = 9 h. The model was validated with one susceptible and one resistant Candida albicans isolate. The Cmax/MIC-log10CFU/mL reduction from the initial inoculum was analyzed with the Emax model, and Monte Carlo analysis was performed for the standard (3 mg/kg with Cmax = 21.87 ± 12.47 mg/L) and higher (5 mg/kg with Cmax = 83 ± 35.2 mg/L) L-AMB dose. A ≥1.5 log10CFU/mL reduction was found at L-AMB Cmax = 8 mg/L against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei isolates (MIC 0.25-0.5 mg/L) whereas L-AMB Cmax ≥ 32 mg/L was required for C. glabrata isolates. The in vitro PK/PD relationship followed a sigmoidal pattern (R2 ≥ 0.85) with a mean Cmax/MIC required for stasis of 2.1 for C. albicans (close to the in vivo stasis), 24/17 (EUCAST/CLSI) for C. glabrata, 8 for C. parapsilosis, and 10 for C. krusei. The probability of target attainment was ≥99% for C. albicans wild-type (WT) isolates with 3 mg/kg and for wild-type isolates of the other species with 5 mg/kg. L-AMB was four- to eightfold less active against the included non-C. albicans species than C. albicans. A standard 3-mg/kg dose is pharmacodynamically sufficient for C. albicans whereas our data suggest that 5 mg/kg may be recommendable for the included non-C. albicans species.

In Vitro Susceptibility Tests in the Context of Antifungal Resistance: Beyond Minimum Inhibitory Concentration in Candida spp

Antimicrobial resistance is a matter of rising concern, especially in fungal diseases. Multiple reports all over the world are highlighting a worrisome increase in azole- and echinocandin-resistance among fungal pathogens, especially in Candida species, as reported in the recently published fungal pathogens priority list made by WHO. Despite continuous efforts and advances in infection control, development of new antifungal molecules, and research on molecular mechanisms of antifungal resistance made by the scientific community, trends in invasive fungal diseases and associated antifungal resistance are on the rise, hindering therapeutic options and clinical cures. In this context, in vitro susceptibility testing aimed at evaluating minimum inhibitory concentrations, is still a milestone in the management of fungal diseases. However, such testing is not the only type at a microbiologist's disposal. There are other adjunctive in vitro tests aimed at evaluating fungicidal activity of antifungal molecules and also exploring tolerance to antifungals. This plethora of in vitro tests are still left behind and performed only for research purposes, but their role in the context of invasive fungal diseases associated with antifungal resistance might add resourceful information to the clinical management of patients. The aim of this review was therefore to revise and explore all other in vitro tests that could be potentially implemented in current clinical practice in resistant and difficult-to-treat cases.

In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modelling and Simulation of Amphotericin B against Candida auris

The aims of this study were to characterize the antifungal activity of amphotericin B against Candida auris in a static in vitro system and to evaluate different dosing schedules and MIC scenarios by means of semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling and simulation. A two-compartment model consisting of a drug-susceptible and a drug-resistant subpopulation successfully characterized the time-kill data and a modified E_max sigmoidal model best described the effect of the drug. The model incorporated growth rate constants for both subpopulations, a death rate constant and a transfer constant between both compartments. Additionally, the model included a parameter to account for the delay in growth in the absence or presence of the drug. Amphotericin B displayed a concentration-dependent fungicidal activity. The developed PK/PD model was able to characterize properly the antifungal activity of amphotericin B against C. auris. Finally, simulation analysis revealed that none of the simulated standard dosing scenarios of 0.6, 1 and 1.5 mg/kg/day over a week treatment showed successful activity against C. auris infection. Simulations also pointed out that an MIC of 1 mg/L would be linked to treatment failure for C. auris invasive infections and therefore, the resistance rate to amphotericin B may be higher than previously reported.

Antibacterial application of gentamicin-silk protein coating with smart release function on titanium, polyethylene, and Al2O3 materials

Peri-implant infection after hip and knee arthroplasty is a common and serious complication. Titanium (Ti), polyethylene (PE), and Al₂O₃ materials used as joint prosthesis materials have good biocompatibility and mechanical strength but no antibacterial effect. This study aimed to provide a theoretical basis for the design and manufacture of joint prosthesis materials with antibacterial effect. We applied a coating of gentamicin-silk protein (GS-Silk) on the surface of these materials. We characterized the Ti, PE, and Al₂O₃ materials coated with GS-Silk (experimental group) and performed in vivo and in vitro experiments to test antibacterial activity. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed successful GS-Silk coating, and infrared spectroscopy confirmed successful loading of gentamicin onto the three materials. Nanoscratch test proved that the GS-Silk coating is relatively reliable on the surface of these three materials. The antibacterial effect of the coating in vitro and in vivo was verified by performing bacteriostatic ring test in vitro, bacterial adhesion test, and subendothelial implant infection test. We demonstrated that GS-Silk coating can effectively load gentamicin onto Ti, PE, and Al₂O₃ materials and change the gentamicin release rate with a change in the solution pH to achieve intelligent release. The GS-Silk coating is relatively reliable on the surface of these three materials. Ti, PE, and Al₂O₃ materials coated with GS-Silk have good antibacterial ability, both in vivo and in vitro.