The effect of cefoperazone sulbactam and piperacillin tazobactam on mortality in Gram-negative nosocomial infections

Multicenter study on clinical outcomes and poor prognostic factors in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam treatment

BACKGROUND

Infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae are common and result in high mortality rates. In vitro studies demonstrated the potency of cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SUL) against Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, the clinical efficacy of CPZ/SUL for the treatment of K. pneumoniae bacteremia has not been studied.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to associate the clinical outcomes of patients with bacteremia with the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CPZ/SUL against the causative K. pneumoniae isolates.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in Taiwan between July 2017 and April 2021. Patients with K. pneumoniae bacteremia treated with CPZ/SUL were enrolled in this study. CPZ/SUL MICs were determined using the agar dilution method. Data on the patients' clinical outcomes and characteristics were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 201 patients were enrolled. Among the causative K. pneumoniae isolates, 180 (89.5%) were susceptible to CPZ/SUL. Most patients (n = 156, 77.6%) had favorable outcomes. The 30-day mortality rate was 11.9% (n = 24). Multivariate risk analyses showed that higher APACHE II score (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.14; Confidence Interval [CI], 1.07-1.21; p < 0.001), metastatic tumors (OR, 5.76; CI, 2.31-14.40; p < 0.001), and causative K. pneumoniae CPZ/SUL MICs > 16 µg/ml (OR, 4.30; CI, 1.50-12.27; p = 0.006) were independently associated with unfavorable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients with K. pneumoniae bacteremia treated with CPZ/SUL at a ratio 1:1 had favorable outcomes when the CPZ/SUL MICs were ≤ 16 µg/ml. Patients with higher APACHE II scores and metastatic tumors had unfavorable outcomes.

Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin and Combinations of Cephalosporins with β-Lactamase Inhibitors as an Advancement in Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance among pathogens, the treatment options for infectious diseases are diminishing. One of the clinical groups especially vulnerable to this threat are patients who are hospitalized in intensive care units due to ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In order to prevent the exhaustion of therapeutic options for this life-threatening condition, there is an urgent need for new pharmaceuticals. Novel β-lactam antibiotics, including combinations of cephalosporins with β-lactamase inhibitors, are proposed as a solution to this escalating problem. The unique mechanism of action, distinctive to this new group of siderophore cephalosporins, can overcome multidrug resistance, which is raising high expectations. In this review, we present the summarized results of clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case studies on the therapeutic efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefiderocol in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We demonstrate that treatment strategies based on siderophore cephalosporins and combinations of β-lactams with β-lactamases inhibitors show comparable or higher clinical efficacy than those used with classic pharmaceuticals, like carbapenems, colistin, or tigecycline, and are often associated with a lower risk of adverse events.

Intra-abdominal infection after tumor surgery: tigecycline combined with β-lactam antibiotics versus tigecycline alone

BACKGROUNDS

Tigecycline has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and has been approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. However, it is debatable whether tigecycline should be used alone or in combination. This study aimed to investigate whether tigecycline plus β-lactam antibiotics (combination therapy [CT] group) are superior to tigecycline alone (monotherapy [MT] group) in non-critically ill intra-abdominal infection patients after tumor surgery.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was mortality during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were clinical success rate, microbial eradication rate, relapse rate within one week, course of treatment, and adverse effects. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the degree of infection before medication between the MT and CT groups. Univariate comparisons were performed using the chi-squared test for qualitative variables and Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between antimicrobial treatments and mortality during hospitalization. The paired samples Wilcoxon test was used to compare the parameters before and after medication.

RESULTS

In total, 291 patients were included in the final analysis: 128 in MT group and 163 in CT group. Mortality rate was 6.25% in the MT group and 6.13% in the CT group (P = 0.97). Multivariate logistic regression model showed that carbapenem-resistant organisms (OR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.36 ~ 61.70) and age > 65 (OR: 1.32, 95% CI:1.19 ~ 3.01) were independent risk factors for death. CT group had a shorter defervescence time (P < 0.05), with less likelihood of relapse (P < 0.05) but had a more significant effect on activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin time.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline plus β-lactam wasn't superior to tigecycline monotherapy for the treatment of non-critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection. But for advanced age patients with cancer, tigecycline combination therapy maybe a better choice in terms of mortality.

The Investigation on Nosocomial Infection of Acinetobacter baumannii and the Clinical Analysis of Sequential Therapy of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam Sodium for Intracranial Infection

Background. Intracranial infection is a serious complication after neurosurgery. According to a survey, the incidence of intracranial infection is about 2.2%-2.6%, and patients with severe symptoms may even pose a threat to their life safety. Objective. To explore the risk factors for intracranial infection caused by Acinetobacter baumannii after surgery and the clinical effect of sequential therapy of cefoperazone/sulbactam sodium. Methods. In this study, a retrospective study was used. In this case-control study, 48 cases of intracranial Acinetobacter baumannii infection after neurosurgery in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2021 were selected as the infection group, and 96 patients without intracranial infection after surgery during the same period were selected as the control group to study all kinds of related factors and analyze the risk factors for intracranial Acinetobacter baumannii infection; in addition, in accordance with the therapeutic regimen for anti-infection, the infection group was divided into the tigecycline group (patients with tigecycline therapy in this group) and the combined group (patients with tigecycline combined with cefoperazone/sulbactam sequential therapy), with 24 cases in each group in order to compare the therapeutic effects of the two groups. Results. Logistic regression factor model results show that increasing age of patients, surgical treatment for intracranial tumor or craniocerebral trauma, postoperative drainage time (≥3 days), and postoperative hospital stay (≥10 days) were the risk factors for postoperative intracranial infection of Acinetobacter baumannii in neurosurgical patients ( $P<0.05$ ), and postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment can reduce the incidence of intracranial infection ( $P<0.05$ ). The cerebrospinal fluid nucleated cell count, serum CRP, and serum PCT in the combined group 72 h after treatment were lower than those in the tigecycline group, and the difference was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ). Compared with the clinical efficacy after 72-hour treatment, the cure rate and effective rate in the combined treatment group were 83.33% and 16.67%, respectively, and those in the tigecycline group were 54.17% and 33.33%, respectively. The invalid interest rate was 12.50%, and the combined treatment group was superior to the tigecycline group ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. For patients with craniocerebral surgery, targeted preventive interventions should be carried out for the risk factors that may lead to intracranial Acinetobacter baumannii infection. The clinical effect of tigecycline combined with cefoperazone and sulbactam sodium sequentially in the treatment of intracranial Acinetobacter baumannii infection is better.

Correlation Between Cefoperazone/Sulbactam MIC Values and Clinical Outcomes of Escherichia coli Bacteremia

INTRODUCTION

The clinical efficiency of cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SUL) against Escherichia coli bacteremia was unknown. This study aimed to explore the relationship between CPZ/SUL MIC values and clinical outcomes in Escherichia coli bacteremia.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in Taiwan between January 2015 and December 2020. Patients treated with CPZ/SUL for E. coli bacteremia were enrolled in the analysis. The CPZ/SUL MICs were determined by using the agar dilution method. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 247 isolates, 160 (64.8%) isolates were susceptible, 8 (3.2%) were intermediate, and 79 (32.0%) were resistant to cefoperazone. The activity of cefoperazone against cefoperazone-non-susceptible E. coli (n = 87) was restored upon combination with sulbactam, with susceptibility ranging from 0% to 97.7%. The 30-day mortality was 4.5% (11/247) and overall clinical success rate was 91.9% (227/247). Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that heart failure [adjusted relative risk (ARR), 5.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-23.02; p = 0.020], malignancy (ARR 7.50; 95% CI 2.02-27.80; p = 0.003), SOFA score (ARR 1.29; 95% CI 1.09-1.52; p = 0.003), and CPZ/SUL MIC ≥ 64 mg/L (ARR 11.31; 95% CI 1.34-95.52; p = 0.026) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. No statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality were found between groups with or without cefoperazone susceptibility (3.4% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.751, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with E. coli bacteremia who were treated with CPZ/SUL had a favorable outcome when the MICs of the isolates were ≤ 16 mg/L and a high risk of mortality with MICs ≥ 64 mg/L.

A Microtitre Plate Dilution Method for Minimum Killing Concentration Is Developed to Evaluate Metabolites-Enabled Killing of Bacteria by β-lactam Antibiotics

Because, as of yet, there are few new antibiotics active against multidrug-resistant bacteria are being explored, compounds including metabolites that might help us tide over this crisis are greatly expected. A recently adopted method to evaluate the potentiation of metabolites is the plate-counting test. However, the method is time-consuming, strenuous, and unfeasible for a large scale of screening. A minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test by using a microtitre plate dilution method is convenient and economic for a large scale of identification, but it cannot be used to detect the potentiation. Here, the microtitre plate dilution method was modified to develop a novel test for evaluating metabolites that enable the killing of bacterial pathogens by antibiotics, designed as minimum killing concentration (MKC). To do this, bacterial number, incubation time, ionic strength of M9 medium, and inosine concentration are optimized using Escherichia coli. Different from the MIC test, which uses 5 × 10⁴ CFU cells and performed in LB medium, the MKC test needed 1 × 10⁷ CFU - 2 × 10⁷ CFU cells and was carried out in M9 medium. Moreover, MKC test was suitable for bactericidal antibiotics such as cephalosporins, penicillins and carbapenems and was proportional to the plate-counting test. The developed MKC test was feasible for different metabolites and clinically multidrug-resistant pathogens, and measurement of minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). Therefore, the MKC test was developed to accelerate the identification of compounds that promote antibiotic-mediated killing efficacy.

Severe coagulopathy caused by cefminox sodium in a liver cirrhosis patient: a case report

Cefminox sodium is an antimicrobial agent with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Cefminox sodium has high security in clinical practice for its few adverse effects such as coagulation dysfunction, which is rare in clinical treatment. Even in patients suffering from chronic liver disease with coagulation dysfunction, it rarely leads to further deterioration of coagulation function. Therefore, patients with chronic liver disease develop severe coagulation dysfunction during the application of cefminox sodium, which is often mistaken for worsening of liver disease other than considered to be the side effect of the drug. Therefore, we report a 55-year-old female patient with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma treated with cefminox sodium intravenously twice for peritonitis. During the treatments, severe coagulopathy occurred, and the coagulation function quickly recovered after drug withdrawal. The diagnosis and treatment of this patient provides us with ideas for dealing with similar problems in clinical practice in the future.

Cefoperazone/sulbactam: New composites against multiresistant gram negative bacteria?

Sulbactam, a class A β-lactamase inhibitor, added to cefoperazone either at a fixed 8 mg/L level of sulbactam or at a level of fixed cefoperazone: sulbactam ratio (2:1) would constitute a combination form of cefoperazone/sulbactam, which has better activities against Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii than cefoperazone alone. Cefoperazone/sulbactam (1:1 or 1:2) has greater in-vitro activity against most multidrug-resistant organisms (ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii except for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa) than a 2:1 ratio. However, increased sulbactam concentration may induce AmpC production. Besides, sulbactam concentration might not be readily achievable in serum if the susceptibility rates were defined by the breakpoints of higher sulbactam composites, such as ≤16/16 (1:1) or 16/32 (1:2) mg/L. Carbapenemases (KPC-, OXA-type enzymes and metallo-β-lactamases) can't be inhibited by sulbactam. Some in-vitro studies showed that increasing sulbactam composites of cefoperazone/sulbactam had no effect on carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, suggesting the presence of carbapenemases or AmpC overproduction that could not be overcome by increasing sulbactam levels to recover cefoperazone activity. Sulbactam alone has good intrinsic activity against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter strains sometimes even in the presence of carbapenemase genes, suggesting unsteady levels of carbapenemases. In conclusion, appropriate composites of cefoperazone and β-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam may expand the clinical use if the pharmacokinetic optimization could be achieved in the human serum.