Non-glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored recombinant prion protein with dominant-negative mutation inhibits PrPSc replication in vitro

Volatile Anesthetic Sevoflurane Precursor 1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-Propanol (HFIP) Exerts an Anti-Prion Activity in Prion-Infected Culture Cells

Prion disease is a neurodegenerative disorder with progressive neurologic symptoms and accelerated cognitive decline. The causative protein of prion disease is the prion protein (PrP), and structural transition of PrP from the normal helix rich form (PrP^C) to the abnormal β-sheet rich form (PrP^Sc) occurs in prion disease. While so far numerous therapeutic agents for prion diseases have been developed, none of them are still useful. A fluorinated alcohol, hexafluoro isopropanol (HFIP), is a precursor to the inhalational anesthetic sevoflurane and its metabolites. HFIP is also known as a robust α-helix inducer and is widely used as a solvent for highly aggregated peptides. Here we show that the α-helix-inducing activity of HFIP caused the conformational transformation of the fibrous structure of PrP into amorphous aggregates in vitro. HFIP added to the ScN2a cell medium, which continuously expresses PrP^Sc, reduced PrP^Sc protease resistance after 24-h incubation. It was also clarified that ScN2a cells are more susceptible to HFIP than any of the cells being compared. Based on these findings, HFIP is expected to develop as a therapeutic agent for prion disease.

Strain variation in treatment and prevention of human prion diseases

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies or prion diseases describe a number of different human disorders that differ in their clinical phenotypes, which are nonetheless united by their transmissible nature and common pathology. Clinical variation in the absence of a conventional infectious agent is believed to be encoded by different conformations of the misfolded prion protein. This misfolded protein is the target of methods designed to prevent disease transmission in a surgical setting and reduction of the misfolded seed or preventing its continued propagation have been the focus of therapeutic strategies. It is therefore possible that strain variation may influence the efficacy of prevention and treatment approaches. Historically, an understanding of prion disease transmission and pathogenesis has been focused on research tools developed using agriculturally relevant strains of prion disease. However, an increased understanding of the molecular biology of human prion disorders has highlighted differences not only between different forms of the disease affecting humans and animals but also within diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), which is represented by several sporadic CJD specific conformations and an additional conformation associated with variant CJD. In this chapter we will discuss whether prion strain variation can affect the efficacy of methods used to decontaminate prions and whether strain variation in pre-clinical models of prion disease can be used to identify therapeutic strategies that have the best possible chance of success in the clinic.

A dominant-negative mutant inhibits multiple prion variants through a common mechanism

Prions adopt alternative, self-replicating protein conformations and thereby determine novel phenotypes that are often irreversible. Nevertheless, dominant-negative prion mutants can revert phenotypes associated with some conformations. These observations suggest that, while intervention is possible, distinct inhibitors must be developed to overcome the conformational plasticity of prions. To understand the basis of this specificity, we determined the impact of the G58D mutant of the Sup35 prion on three of its conformational variants, which form amyloids in S. cerevisiae. G58D had been previously proposed to have unique effects on these variants, but our studies suggest a common mechanism. All variants, including those reported to be resistant, are inhibited by G58D but at distinct doses. G58D lowers the kinetic stability of the associated amyloid, enhancing its fragmentation by molecular chaperones, promoting Sup35 resolubilization, and leading to amyloid clearance particularly in daughter cells. Reducing the availability or activity of the chaperone Hsp104, even transiently, reverses curing. Thus, the specificity of inhibition is determined by the sensitivity of variants to the mutant dosage rather than mode of action, challenging the view that a unique inhibitor must be developed to combat each variant.

Mouse prion protein (PrP) segment 100 to 104 regulates conversion of PrP(C) to PrP(Sc) in prion-infected neuroblastoma cells

Prion diseases are characterized by the replicative propagation of disease-associated forms of prion protein (PrP(Sc); PrP refers to prion protein). The propagation is believed to proceed via two steps; the initial binding of the normal form of PrP (PrP(C)) to PrP(Sc) and the subsequent conversion of PrP(C) to PrP(Sc). We have explored the two-step model in prion-infected mouse neuroblastoma (ScN2a) cells by focusing on the mouse PrP (MoPrP) segment 92-GGTHNQWNKPSKPKTN-107, which is within a region previously suggested to be part of the binding interface or shown to differ in its accessibility to anti-PrP antibodies between PrP(C) and PrP(Sc). Exchanging the MoPrP segment with the corresponding chicken PrP segment (106-GGSYHNQKPWKPPKTN-121) revealed the necessity of MoPrP residues 99 to 104 for the chimeras to achieve the PrP(Sc) state, while segment 95 to 98 was replaceable with the chicken sequence. An alanine substitution at position 100, 102, 103, or 104 of MoPrP gave rise to nonconvertible mutants that associated with MoPrP(Sc) and interfered with the conversion of endogenous MoPrP(C). The interference was not evoked by a chimera (designated MCM2) in which MoPrP segment 95 to 104 was changed to the chicken sequence, though MCM2 associated with MoPrP(Sc). Incubation of the cells with a synthetic peptide composed of MoPrP residues 93 to 107 or alanine-substituted cognates did not inhibit the conversion, whereas an anti-P8 antibody recognizing the above sequence in PrP(C) reduced the accumulation of PrP(Sc) after 10 days of incubation of the cells. These results suggest the segment 100 to 104 of MoPrP(C) plays a key role in conversion after binding to MoPrP(Sc).

Trans-dominant inhibition of prion propagation in vitro is not mediated by an accessory cofactor

Previous studies identified prion protein (PrP) mutants which act as dominant negative inhibitors of prion formation through a mechanism hypothesized to require an unidentified species-specific cofactor termed protein X. To study the mechanism of dominant negative inhibition in vitro, we used recombinant PrP^C molecules expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells as substrates in serial protein misfolding cyclic amplification (sPMCA) reactions. Bioassays confirmed that the products of these reactions are infectious. Using this system, we find that: (1) trans-dominant inhibition can be dissociated from conversion activity, (2) dominant-negative inhibition of prion formation can be reconstituted in vitro using only purified substrates, even when wild type (WT) PrP^C is pre-incubated with poly(A) RNA and PrP^Sc template, and (3) Q172R is the only hamster PrP mutant tested that fails to convert into PrP^Sc and that can dominantly inhibit conversion of WT PrP at sub-stoichiometric levels. These results refute the hypothesis that protein X is required to mediate dominant inhibition of prion propagation, and suggest that PrP molecules compete for binding to a nascent seeding site on newly formed PrP^Sc molecules, most likely through an epitope containing residue 172.

Over the past two decades, various investigators have observed that heterozygous animals possessing two different forms of the gene encoding the prion protein (PrP) are more difficult to infect with some strains of infectious prions than homozygous animals possessing only the most commonly occurring form of the gene encoding PrP for that species. In 1995, it was hypothesized that the inhibition of prion infection in heterozygous animals might be caused by competition between the two different types of PrP molecules for binding to a common cofactor required for prion propagation, provisionally named “protein X,” through a specific portion of the PrP molecule. Here, we report that mixing different purified PrP molecules together in test tube reactions lacking accessory proteins can also interfere with prion propagation. We also found that some mutations of the putative protein X binding site do not inhibit the formation of hamster prions in chemical reactions. Our work suggests that different PrP molecules most likely compete for binding to newly formed prions rather than an accessory protein cofactor, and argues against the existence of protein X.

Recent advances in prion chemotherapeutics

The transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are rapidly progressive and invariably fatal neurodegenerative diseases for which there are no proven efficacious treatments. Many approaches have been undertaken to find ways to prevent, halt, or reverse these prion diseases, with limited success to date. However, as both our understanding of pathogenesis and our ability to detect early disease increases, so do our potential therapeutic targets and our chances of finding effective drugs. There is increasing pressure to find effective decontaminants for blood supplies, as variant Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease (vCJD) has been shown to be transmissible by blood, and to find non-toxic preventative therapies, with ongoing cases of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) and the spread of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD). Within the realm of chemotherapeutic approaches, much research has focussed on blocking the conversion of the normal form of prion protein (PrP(c)) to its abnormal counterpart (PrP(res)). Structurally, these chemotherapeutic agents are often polyanionic or polycyclic and may directly bind PrP(c) or PrP(res), or act by redistributing, sequestering, or down-regulating PrP(c), thus preventing its conversion. There are also some polycationic compounds which proport to enhance the clearance of PrP(res). Other targets include accessory molecules such as the laminin receptor precursor which influences conversion, or cell signalling molecules which may be required for pathogenesis. Of recent interest are the possible neuroprotective effects of some drugs. Importantly, there is evidence that combining compounds may provide synergistic responses. This review provides an update on current testing methods, therapeutic targets, and promising candidates for chemical-based therapy.

Heterozygous inhibition in prion infection: the stone fence model

The human PrP gene (PRNP) has two major polymorphic codons: 129 for methionine (M) or valine (V) and 219 for glutamate (E) or lysine (K). The PRNP heterozygotes appear to be protected from sporadic CJD compared to the PRNP homozygotes. The molecular mechanism responsible for these protective effects of PRNP heterozygosity has remained elusive. In this review, we describe the inhibition of PrP conversion observed in a series of transmission studies using PRNP heterozygous animal models. In vCJD infection, the conversion incompetent human PrP 129V molecules showed an inhibitory effect on the conversion of human PrP 129M molecules in the 129M/V heterozygous mice. Furthermore, though the human PrP 219E and PrP 219K were both conversion competent in vCJD infection, these conversion competent PrP molecules showed an inhibitory effect in the 219E/K heterozygous animals. To explain this heterozygous inhibition, we propose a possible mechanism designated as the stone fence model.

The dominant-negative effect of the Q218K variant of the prion protein does not require protein X

Previous studies identified several single-point mutants of the prion protein that displayed dominant-negative effects on prion replication. The dominant-negative effect was assumed to be mediated by protein X, an as-yet-unknown cellular cofactor that is believed to be essential for prion replication. To gain insight into the mechanism that underlies the dominant-negative phenomena, we evaluated the effect of the Q218K variant of full-length recombinant prion protein (Q218K rPrP), one of the dominant-negative mutants, on cell-free polymerization of wild-type rPrP into amyloid fibrils. We found that both Q218K and wild-type (WT) rPrPs were incorporated into fibrils when incubated as a mixture; however, the yield of polymerization was substantially decreased in the presence of Q218K rPrP. Furthermore, in contrast to fibrils produced from WT rPrP, the fibrils generated in the mixture of WT and Q218K rPrPs did not acquire the proteinase K-resistant core of 16 kDa that was shown previously to encompass residues 97-230 and was similar to that of PrP(Sc). Our studies demonstrate that the Q218K variant exhibits the dominant-negative effect in cell-free conversion in the absence of protein X, and that this effect is, presumably, mediated by physical interaction between Q218K and WT rPrP during the polymerization process.

Sequence variation of bovine prion protein gene in Japanese cattle (Holstein and Japanese Black)

To assess relationships between nucleotide polymorphisms of the prion protein (PRNP) gene and susceptibility to bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), we investigated polymorphisms in the open reading frame (ORF) and 2 upper regions of the PRNP gene from 2 Japanese cattle breeds: 863 healthy Holstein cattle, 6 BSE-affected Holstein cattle, and 186 healthy Japanese Black (JB) cattle. In the ORF, we found single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at nucleotide positions 234 and 576 and found 5 or 6 copies of the octapeptide repeat, but we did not find any amino acid substitutions. In the upper region, we examined 2 sites of insertion/deletion (indel) polymorphisms: a 23-bp indel in the upper region of exon 1, and a 12-bp indel in the putative promoter region of intron 1. A previous report suggests that the 23-bp indel polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to BSE, but we did not find a difference in allele frequency between healthy and BSE-affected Holstein cattle. There were differences in allele frequency between healthy Holstein and JB cattle at the 23- and 12-bp indels and at the SNPs at nucleotide positions 234 and 576, but there was no difference in allele frequency of the octapeptide repeat. We identified a unique PRNP gene lacking a 288-bp segment (96 amino acids) in DNA samples stocked in our laboratory, but this deletion was not found in any of the 1049 cattle examined in the present study. The present results provide data about variations and distribution of the bovine PRNP gene.

Intracerebroventricular delivery of dominant negative prion protein in a mouse model of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease after dura graft transplantation

We have developed a novel procedure in which a small collagen sheet (3 mm x 3 mm) absorbing prion-infected brain homogenates was transplanted onto the brain surface of highly prion-susceptible transgenic mice (Tg(MoPrP)4053/FVB), as an animal model of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (iCJD) caused by prion-contaminated cadaveric dura graft transplantation. Using the iCJD model, we further investigated the in vivo efficacy of dominant negative recombinant prion protein with lysine substitution at mouse codon 218 (rPrP-Q218K), which is known to inhibit prion replication in vitro (H. Kishida, Y. Sakasegawa, K. Watanabe, Y. Yamakawa, M. Nishijima, Y. Kuroiwa, N.S. Hachiya, K. Kaneko, Non-glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored recombinant prion protein with dominant-negative mutation inhibits PrPSc replication in vitro, Amyloid, vol. 11, 2004, pp. 14-20.). Following 7-day intracerebroventricular administration of the rPrP-Q218K via an indwelling catheter connected to the implanted osmotic pump, the median incubation period of Tg(MoPrP)4053/FVB was prolonged considerably from 117 days to 131 days (p=0.016, log-rank test) in the rPrP-Q218K-treated group, even after a lengthy latency period of as long as 30 days by starting the rPrP-Q218K injection. Whether wild-type rPrP, other mutant rPrPs, or the combination of rPrP-Q218K with other anti-prion compounds might extend the survival period in that condition must be further investigated.

A trans-dominant negative 37kDa/67kDa laminin receptor mutant impairs PrP(Sc) propagation in scrapie-infected neuronal cells

The 37kDa/67kDa laminin receptor (LRP/LR) has been identified as a cell surface receptor for cellular and infectious prion proteins. Here, we show that an N-terminally truncated LRP mutant encompassing the extracellular domain of the LRP/LR (LRP102-295::FLAG) reduces the binding of recombinant cellular huPrP to mouse neuroblastoma cells, and infectious moPrP27-30 to BHK cells, and interferes with the PrP(Sc) propagation in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cells (N2aSc(+)). A cell-free binding assay demonstrated the direct binding of the LRP102-295::FLAG mutant to both PrP(c) and PrP(Sc). These results, together with the finding that endogenous LRP levels remain unaffected by the expression of the mutant, indicate that the secreted LRP102-295::FLAG mutant may act in a trans-dominant negative manner as a decoy by trapping PrP molecules. The LRP mutant might represent a potential therapeutic tool for the treatment of TSEs.

Survey of the year 2004 commercial optical biosensor literature

The year 2004 represents a milestone for the biosensor research community: in this year, over 1000 articles were published describing experiments performed using commercially available systems. The 1038 papers we found represent an approximately 10% increase over the past year and demonstrate that the implementation of biosensors continues to expand at a healthy pace. We evaluated the data presented in each paper and compiled a 'top 10' list. These 10 articles, which we recommend every biosensor user reads, describe well-performed kinetic, equilibrium and qualitative/screening studies, provide comparisons between binding parameters obtained from different biosensor users, as well as from biosensor- and solution-based interaction analyses, and summarize the cutting-edge applications of the technology. We also re-iterate some of the experimental pitfalls that lead to sub-optimal data and over-interpreted results. We are hopeful that the biosensor community, by applying the hints we outline, will obtain data on a par with that presented in the 10 spotlighted articles. This will ensure that the scientific community at large can be confident in the data we report from optical biosensors.