Kidney biopsy in AA amyloidosis: impact of histopathology on prognosis

bDMARD can prevent the progression of AA amyloidosis to end-stage renal disease

INTRODUCTION

AA amyloidosis (AA) can be the consequence of any chronic inflammatory disease. AA is associated with chronic inflammatory diseases (cid+AA), autoinflammatory syndromes (auto+AA) or AA of unknown origin or idiopathic AA (idio+AA). The major organ manifestation is renal AA that can progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and multiple organ failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a monocentric retrospective analysis of the renal outcome and survival of patients with cid+AA (n=34), auto+AA (n=24) and idio+AA (n=25) who were treated with cytokine-inhibiting biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

RESULTS

83 patients with renal AA were identified and followed for a mean observational period of 4.82 years. C reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid alpha and proteinuria were significantly reduced with bDMARD therapy. Progression to ESRD was prevented in 60% (cid+AA), 88% (auto+AA) and 81% (idio+AA) of patients. Tocilizumab was given to 34 patients with cid+AA and idio+AA and was more effective in reducing CRP and progression to ESRD and death compared with other bDMARDs.

CONCLUSIONS

bDMARDs reduce systemic inflammation in various diseases, leading to a reduction of proteinuria and prevention of ESRD. Importantly, tocilizumab was more effective than other bDMARDs in controlling systemic inflammation in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and idiopathic AA, leading to better renal and overall survival.

Deactivation of the Unfolded Protein Response Aggravated Renal AA Amyloidosis in HSF1 Deficiency Mice

Systemic amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis, which is considered the second most common form of systemic amyloidosis usually takes place several years prior to the occurrence of chronic inflammation, generally involving the kidney. Activated HSF1, which alleviated unfolded protein response (UPR) or enhanced HSR, is the potential therapeutic target of many diseases. However, the effect of HSF1 on AA amyloidosis remains unclear. This study focused on evaluating effect of HSF1 on AA amyloidosis based on HSF1 knockout mice. As a result, aggravated amyloid deposits and renal dysfunction have been found in HSF1 knockout mice. In progressive AA amyloidosis, HSF1 deficiency enhances serum amyloid A production might to lead to severe AA amyloid deposition in mice, which may be related to deactivated unfolded protein response as well as enhanced inflammation. Thus, HSF1 plays a significant role on UPR related pathway impacting AA amyloid deposition, which can mitigate amyloidogenic proteins from aggregation pathologically and is the possible way for intervening with the pathology of systemic amyloid disorder. In conclusion, HSF1 could not only serve as a new target for AA amyloidosis treatment in the future, but HSF1 knockout mice also can be considered as a valuable novel animal model for renal AA amyloidosis.

Amyloidosis and the Kidney: An Update

Various types of systemic amyloidosis can wreak havoc on the architecture and functioning of the kidneys. Amyloidosis should be suspected in patients with worsening kidney function, proteinuria, and multisystem involvement, but isolated kidney involvement also is possible. Confirming the amyloidosis type and specific organ dysfunction is of paramount importance to select the appropriately tailored treatment and aim for better survival while avoiding treatment-associated toxicities. Amyloid renal staging in light chain amyloidosis amyloidosis helps inform prognosis and risk for end-stage kidney disease. Biomarker-based staging systems and response assessment guide the therapeutic strategy and allow the timely identification of refractory or relapsing disease so that patients can be switched to salvage therapy. Kidney transplantation is a viable option for selected patients with amyloidosis. Because of the complex nature of the pathophysiology and treatment of amyloidosis, a multidisciplinary team-based approach should be used in the care of these patients.

The effect of novel antihypertensive drug valsartan on lysozyme aggregation: A combined in situ and in silico study

Protein misfolding can result in amyloid fiber aggregation, which is associated with various types of diseases. Therefore, preventing or treating abnormally folded proteins may provide therapeutic intervention for these diseases. Valsartan (VAL) is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) that is used to treat hypertension. In this study, we examine the anti-aggregating effect of VAL against hen egg-white lysozyme (HEWL) amyloid fibrils through spectroscopy, docking, and microscopic analysis. In vitro formation of HEWL amyloid fibrils was indicated by increased turbidity, RLS (Rayleigh light scattering), and ThT fluorescence intensity. 10 μM VAL, amyloid/aggregation was inhibited up to 83% and 72% as measured by ThT and RLS respectively. In contrast, 100 μM VAL significantly increases the fibril aggregation of HEWL. CD spectroscopy results show a stabilization of HEWL α-helical structures in the presence of 10 μM VAL while the increase in β-sheet was detected at 100 μM concentration of VAL. The hydrophobicity of HEWL was increased at 100 μM VAL, suggesting the promotion of aggregation via its self-association. Steady-state quenching revealed that VAL and HEWL interact spontaneously via hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images illustrate that the needle-like fibers of HEWL amyloid were reduced at 10 μM VAL, while at 100 μM the fibrils of amyloid were increased. Additionally, our computational studies showed that VAL could bind to two binding sites within HEWL. In the BS-1 domain of HEWL, VAL binds to ASN⁵⁹, ILE⁹⁸, ILE⁵⁸, TRP¹⁰⁸, VAL¹⁰⁹, SER⁵⁰, ASP⁵², ASN⁵⁹, ALA¹⁰⁷, and TRP¹⁰⁸ residues with a binding energy of -9.72 kcal mol^-1. Also, it binds to GLU⁷, ALA¹⁰, ALA¹¹, CYS⁶, ARG¹²⁸, and ARG¹⁴ in the BS-2 domain with a binding energy of -5.89 kcal mol^-1. VAL, therefore, appears to have dual effect against HEWL aggregation. We suggest that VAL stabilizes HEWL's aggregation-prone region (APR) at 10 μM, preventing aggregation. Also, we assume that at 100 μM, VAL occupies BS-2 beside BS-1 and destabilizes the folding structure of HEWL, resulting in aggregation. Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanism of action and determine its potential side effects.

Prognostic value of histopathological scoring and grading in patients with renal AA amyloidosis

OBJECTIVE

The amount and distribution pattern of amyloid deposits may contribute to renal function and outcome, given the great diversity of renal involvement in amyloidosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of histological characteristics of patients with biopsy-proven renal AA amyloidosis (AAA) on renal outcome.

METHODS

Renal biopsies of 37 patients with AAA were re-evaluated. The distribution pattern of glomerular amyloid (GA) deposits was classified, the extent of amyloid deposits in glomeruli, vessel, and interstitium and other histopathologic lesions were scored, and renal amyloid prognostic score (RAPS) was determined by summing all scores. Their potential prognostic relevance on renal outcome was investigated.

RESULTS

GA and vascular amyloid (VA) deposits were noted in all cases, interstitial amyloid (IA) was detected in 70.2%. GA deposits were predominantly seen in diffuse mesengiocapillary fashions (class IV) (51.4%). GA class, the extent of GA, VA, IA deposit, and RAPS, as well as interstitial fibrosis (IF) and interstitial inflammation were correlated to renal function at diagnosis. During the median follow-up of 52 months, 13 patients developed doubling of serum creatinine or end stage renal disease and they had a higher degree of GA and VA load (p = 0.03 and p = 0.042, respectively) as compared to the remaining patients. VA load, but not GA and RAPS grade, was associated with poor renal outcome (HR 3.016, 95% CI 1.45-6.25, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline renal function is closely linked to the extent of AA amyloid deposit in renal parenchyma but only VA load was a predictor of renal outcome in AAA patients.

A multicenter study of the clinical, laboratory characteristics, and potential prognostic factors in patients with amyloid A amyloidosis on hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

While light chain (AL) amyloidosis is more common in western countries, the most common type of amyloidosis is amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis in Eastern Mediterranean Region, including Turkey. Although worse prognosis has been attributed to the AL amyloidosis, AA amyloidosis can be related to higher mortality under renal replacement therapies. However, there are no sufficient data regarding etiology, clinical presentation, and prognostic factors of AA amyloidosis. The objective of our study is to evaluate the clinical, laboratory characteristics, and possible predictive factors related to mortality in patients with AA amyloidosis undergoing hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

This multicenter, cross-sectional study was a retrospective analysis of 2100 patients on HD. It was carried out in 14 selected HD centers throughout Turkey. Thirty-two patients with biopsy-proven AA amyloidosis and thirty-two control patients without AA amyloidosis undergoing HD were included between October 2018 and October 2019. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age and dialysis vintage. Causes of AA amyloidosis, treatment (colchicine and/or anti-interleukin 1 [IL] treatment), and the number of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) attacks in the last year in case of FMF, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, biochemical values such as mean CRP, hemoglobin, serum albumin, phosphorus, calcium, PTH, ferritin, transferrin saturation, total cholesterol levels, EPO dose, erythropoietin-stimulating agents resistance index, interdialytic fluid intake, body mass indexes, heparin dosage, UF volume, and Kt/V data in the last year were collected by retrospective review of medical records.

FINDINGS

Prevalence of AA amyloidosis was found to be 1.87% in HD centers. In amyloidosis and control groups, 56% and 53% were male, mean age was 54 ± 11 and 53 ± 11 years, and mean dialysis vintage was 104 ± 94 and 107 ± 95 months, respectively. FMF was the most common cause of AA amyloidosis (59.5%). All FMF patients received colchicine and the mean colchicine dose was 0.70 ± 0.30 mg/day. 26.3% of FMF patients were unresponsive to colchicine and anti-IL-1 treatment was used in these patients. In AA amyloid and control groups, erythropoietin-stimulating agents resistance index were 7.88 ± 3.78 and 5.41 ± 3.06 IU/kg/week/g/dl, respectively (p = 0.008). Additionally, higher CRP values (18.78 ± 18.74 and 10.61 ± 10.47 mg/L, p = 0.037), lower phosphorus (4.68 ± 0.73 vs. 5.25 ± 1.04 mg/dl, p = 0.014), total cholesterol (135 ± 42 vs. 174 ± 39 mg/dl, p < 0.01), and serum albumin (3.67 ± 0.49 mg/dl, 4.03 ± 0.22, p < 0.01) were observed in patients with AA amyloidosis compared to the control group.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found that long-term prognostic factors including higher inflammation, malnutritional parameters, and higher erythropoietin-stimulating agents resistance index were more frequent in AA amyloidosis patients under HD treatment.

Noninvasive assessment of kidney dysfunction in children by using blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging

Objectives

To explore whether multiparametric approach including blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI (BOLD-MRI) and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) can be applied in the assessment of renal function in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Materials and methods

This prospective study included 74 children (CKD stage 1–3, 51; CKD stage 4–5, 12; healthy volunteers, 11) for renal MRI examinations including coronal T2WI, axial T1WI and T2WI, BOLD-MRI, and DWI sequences. We measured the renal cortex and medulla T2*, ADC, D_t, D_p, and f_p values on BOLD and DWI images. Appropriate statistical methods were applied for comparing MRI-derived parameters among the three groups and calculating the correlation coefficients between MRI-derived parameters and clinical data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic performance of MRI-derived parameters.

Results

There were significant differences in cortex T2*, ADC, D_t, f_p and medulla T2*, ADC, D_t among the three groups. Cortex T2*, ADC, D_t, f_p and medulla T2*, ADC, D_t had a trend: CKD stage 4–5 < CKD stage 1–3 < healthy volunteers. Cortex and medulla T2*, ADC, D_t were significantly correlated with eGFR, serum creatinine (Scr), cystatin C. In addition, cortex T2* and eGFR showed the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.824, p < 0.001). Cortex D_t and medulla T2* were optimal parameters for differentiating healthy volunteers and CKD stage 1–3 or CKD stage 4–5 and CKD stage 1–3, respectively.

Conclusions

BOLD-MRI and IVIM-DWI might be used as a feasible method for noninvasive assessment of renal function in children with CKD.

Primary Amyloidosis of the Genitourinary Tract

CONTEXT.—

Amyloidosis is caused by the deposition of misfolded proteins as insoluble eosinophilic material in the extracellular tissues of the body, leading to impairment of organ function. It can be systemic or localized. Localized genitourinary tract amyloidosis is rare and can be incidentally seen; however, in some cases, it can be the only presenting disease.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the clinical presentation and pathologic findings related to primary amyloidosis of the urogenital system and highlight some of the associated pathologic findings based on our personal experience.

DATA SOURCES.—

Published peer-reviewed literature and personal experience of the senior author.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Primary localized amyloidosis within the urogenital tract can present as a neoplastic process and may be clinically and radiologically considered as a mass. Awareness of primary amyloidosis by pathologists and clinicians is required for accurate diagnosis and proper patient management.

Renal amyloidosis: validation of a proposed histological scoring system in an independent cohort

Background

In systemic amyloidosis, the kidney is frequently affected and renal involvement has a major impact on survival. Renal involvement is clinically characterized by decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria. The two most common renal amyloidosis types are light chain-related amyloidosis (AL) and serum amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis. Standardized histopathological scoring of amyloid deposits is crucial to assess disease progression. Therefore, we aimed to validate the proposed scoring system from Rubinstein et al. (Novel pathologic scoring tools predict end-stage kidney disease in light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Amyloid 2017; 24: 205–211) in an independent patient cohort.

Methods

We attempt to reproduce the scoring system, consisting of an amyloid score (AS) and a composite scarring injury score (CSIS), in a multicentre AL and AA case series. Additionally, we analysed all renal amyloidosis kidney biopsies performed in the Netherlands between 1993 and 2012.

Results

Similar to the original study, AS and CSIS correlated to eGFR (r = −0.45, P = 0.0061 and r = −0.60, P < 0.0001, respectively) but not to proteinuria at diagnosis. Furthermore, AS, but not CSIS, was associated with renal outcome. The scoring system was not reproducible in AA patients. The median incidence rate for renal amyloidosis in the Netherlands was 2.3 per million population per year, and increased during the study period.

Conclusions

In our AL case series and the original study, AS and CSIS were correlated to eGFR but not to proteinuria, and AS correlated with renal outcome. Overall, we regard this scoring system as competent for standardized histopathological assessment of amyloid deposits burden and thereby disease advancement in renal biopsies.

Profile of renal AA amyloidosis in older and younger individuals: a single-centre experience

OBJECTIVE

In epidemiological studies of amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis from Turkey, the most frequently cause was familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) and it occurs generally in young age population. However, there are no sufficient data regarding aetiology, clinical presentation and prognosis of renal AA amyloidosis in advanced age patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate demographic, clinical presentation, aetiology and outcomes of adults aged 60 years or older patients with biopsy-proven renal AA amyloidosis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study involving 53 patients who were diagnosed with AA amyloidosis by kidney biopsy from 2006 to 2016. In all patients, kidney biopsies were performed due to asymptomatic proteinuria, nephrotic syndrome and/or renal insufficiency. The patients were separated into two groups on the basis of age (group I: ≥60 years and group II: <60 years). Outcomes of patients in terms of the requirement of renal replacement therapy and mortality were recorded.

RESULTS

In patients with group I, the causes of AA amyloidosis were as follows: FMF 16 (50%), bronchiectasis 7 (23%), chronic osteomyelitis 2 (6%), inflammatory bowel disease 2 (6%), rheumatoid arthritis 2 (6%), ankylosing spondylitis 1 (3%) and unknown aetiology 2 (6%). The underlying disorders of AA amyloidosis in group II patients were as follows: FMF 17 (81%), Behcet's disease 1 (5%) and unknown aetiology 3 (14%). No statistically significant differences were detected between two groups with regard to systolic and diastolic blood pressures, albumin, proteinuria and lipids. The combination of chronic kidney disease and nephrotic syndrome was the most common clinical presentation in group I (73%) and group II (43%) (p = .05). Compared to the group II, estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in group I at the time of kidney biopsy (p = .003). At 12-month follow-up, 61% of the group I and 33% of the group II developed end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis, while 11% of the group I died.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that renal AA amyloidosis is a rare disease in advanced age patients. At baseline and follow-up period, advanced age patients had worse kidney disease and outcomes.