Bone marrow plasma cell infiltration in light chain amyloidosis: impact on organ involvement and outcome

A Simple Frailty Score Predicts Survival and Early Mortality in Systemic AL Amyloidosis

Systemic AL amyloidosis is a challenging disease for which many patients are considered frail in daily clinical practice. However, no study has so far addressed frailty and its impact on the outcome of these patients. We built a simple score to predict mortality based on three frailty-associated variables: age, ECOG performance status (<2 vs. ≥2) and NT-proBNP (<8500 vs. ≥8500 ng/L). Four-hundred and sixteen consecutive newly diagnosed patients diagnosed at ten sites from the Spanish Myeloma Group were eligible for the study. The score was developed in a derivation cohort from a referral center, and it was externally validated in a multicenter cohort. Multivariate analysis showed that the three variables were independent predictors of survival. The score was able to discriminate four groups of patients in terms of overall survival and early mortality in both cohorts. Comorbidity was also analyzed with the Charlson comorbidity index, but it did not reach statistical significance in the model. A nomogram was created to easily estimate the mortality risk of each patient at each time point. This score is a simple, robust, and efficient approach to dynamically assess frailty-dependent mortality both at diagnosis and throughout follow-up. The optimal treatment for frail AL amyloidosis patients remains to be determined but we suggest that the estimation of frailty-associated risk could complement current staging systems, adding value in clinical decision-making in this complex scenario.

Primary gastric amyloidosis associated with linitis plastica and delayed progression to systemic amyloidosis and multiple myeloma

We report the case of a woman in her 50s who underwent, 5 years prior, a total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for diffuse-type gastric cancer diagnosed during a workup for isolated gastric primary light chain (AL) amyloidosis. At the time of diagnosis, immunoglobulins light chain measurements and bone marrow biopsy were performed to rule out multiple myeloma and came back normal. Three years later, the patient developed systemic amyloidosis involving the heart and the lungs, after which she developed multiple myeloma. Isolated amyloid deposits in the stomach are a rare finding. While AL amyloidosis is frequently found in concomitance with multiple myeloma, late progression of primary AL amyloidosis to systemic amyloidosis and multiple myeloma is uncommon.

Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: Diagnosis and Risk Assessment

Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a clonal plasma cell disorder with multiple clinical presentations. The diagnosis of AL amyloidosis requires a high index of suspicion, making a delay in diagnosis common, which contributes to the high early mortality seen in this disease. Establishing the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis requires the demonstration of tissue deposition of amyloid fibrils. A bone marrow biopsy and fat pad aspirate performed concurrently have a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis and negate the need for organ biopsies in most patients. An accurate diagnosis requires amyloid typing via additional testing, including tissue mass spectrometry. Prognostication for AL amyloidosis is largely driven by the organs impacted. Cardiac involvement represents the single most important prognostic marker, and the existing staging systems are driven by cardiac biomarkers. Apart from organ involvement, plasma cell percentage on the bone marrow biopsy, specific fluorescence in situ hybridization findings, age at diagnosis, and performance status are important prognostic markers. This review elaborates on the diagnostic testing and prognostication for patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic value of renal immune complex deposition in patients with light chain amyloidosis

Although patients with light chain amyloidosis (AL) may present with co-deposition of amyloid and immune complexes (ICs) in renal biopsies, data on clinical characteristics and prognostic value of renal IC deposition are limited. A total of 73 patients with AL amyloidosis who were newly diagnosed by renal biopsy in Xijing Hospital (Xi'an, China) were divided into two groups (IC and non-IC groups). As a result, renal IC deposition was found in 26% of patients. Patients with IC deposition were associated with more urinary protein excretion and lower serum albumin. Notably, patients in the non-IC group achieved higher hematological overall response rate (81.5% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.007) and ≥VGPR rate (75.9% vs. 39.8%, p = 0.004) compared with those in IC group. Renal response rate was also higher in the non-IC group (63% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.031). With the median follow-up time of 19 months, a significantly worse overall survival was observed in patients with the IC group as compared with those without renal IC deposition in the Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.036). Further multivariate analysis demonstrated that renal immune complex deposition was associated with worse overall survival in patients with AL amyloidosis (HR 5.927, 95% CI 2.148-16.356, p = 0.001).

Recent guidelines for high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant for systemic AL amyloidosis: a practitioner's perspective

INTRODUCTION

High dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been transformative in treating AL amyloidosis since the early nineties. Recently, the European Haematology Association (EHA) and International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) have developed a combined guideline for the management of patients undergoing an ASCT for AL amyloidosis.

AREAS COVERED

In this practitioner's perspective, we review the guideline, focussing on 6 major areas and offer practical advice for its application. We provide a perspective on the optimal use of ASCT and its potential application in the future.

EXPERT OPINION

The EHA-ISA guideline comprehensively outlines the practicalities of performing an ASCT in AL amyloidosis. The critical aspect is careful patient selection. Vigilant fluid balance assessments are crucial as associated complications are common and dangerous.The role of ASCT is changing with improving haematological responses associated with novel agents. Evidence is limited for the use of ASCT in patients who achieve a complete haematological response (CR). Therefore, ASCT should be considered for those who only achieve a very good partial response (VGPR)/partial response (PR) and fulfil the strict selection criteria. Future research identifying the cohort who would benefit most from ASCT in the era of novel therapies is warranted.

Light Chain Amyloidosis: Epidemiology, Staging, and Prognostication

Amyloidosis is a disorder of protein misfolding and metabolism in which insoluble fibrils are deposited in various tissues, causing organ dysfunction and eventually death. Out of the 60-plus heterogeneous amyloidogenic proteins that have been identified, approximately 30 are associated with human disease. The unifying feature of these proteins is their tendency to form beta-pleated sheets aligned in an antiparallel fashion. These sheets then form rigid, nonbranching fibrils that resist proteolysis, causing mechanical disruption and local oxidative stress in affected organs such as the heart, liver, kidneys, nervous system, and gastrointestinal tract. Here we review the epidemiology of light chain amyloidosis, the staging, and the concomitant prognostication that is critical in determining the appropriate treatment.

Biomarkers in AL Amyloidosis

Systemic AL amyloidosis is a rare complex hematological disorder caused by clonal plasma cells which produce amyloidogenic immunoglobulins. Outcome and prognosis is the combinatory result of the extent and pattern of organ involvement secondary to amyloid fibril deposition and the biology and burden of the underlying plasma cell clone. Prognosis, as assessed by overall survival, and early outcomes is determined by degree of cardiac dysfunction and current staging systems are based on biomarkers that reflect the degree of cardiac damage. The risk of progression to end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis is assessed by renal staging systems. Longer-term survival and response to treatment is affected by markers of the underlying plasma cell clone; the genetic background of the clonal disease as evaluated by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in particular has predictive value and may guide treatment selection. Free light chain assessment forms the basis of hematological response criteria and minimal residual disease as assessed by sensitive methods is gradually being incorporated into clinical practice. However, sensitive biomarkers that could aid in the early diagnosis and that could reflect all aspects of organ damage and disease biology are needed and efforts to identify them are continuous.

The role of induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation in low disease burden AL amyloidosis patients

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy is recommended before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for AL amyloidosis patients with high disease burden [bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) > 10%], but the role of induction therapy before ASCT in patients with low disease burden (BMPCs ≤ 10%) is still unknown.

METHODS

A total of 227 patients with AL amyloidosis were included in this study. Among 227 patients, 124 patients received bortezomib-based induction prior to ASCT and were defined as group A, 35 patients received other chemotherapeutic induction and were defined as group B, and the other 68 patients without induction were defined as group C. We compared the differences of efficacy and prognosis between the three groups.

RESULTS

The haematological overall response rates (ORR) of groups A, B and C were 91%, 67% and 75%, respectively. The complete response rates (CR) of groups A, B and C were 50%, 25% and 20%, respectively. Both the ORR and CR rates of group A were significantly higher than those of groups B and C. The renal response rates of groups A, B and C were 64%, 46% and 47%, respectively. The cardiac response rates of groups A, B and C were 74%, 45% and 40%, respectively. The renal and cardiac responses rates of group A were also significantly higher than those of the other two groups. After a median follow-up of 44 months, the median OS was not reached. The 5-year estimated overall survival (OS) rates of groups A, B and C were 81%, 57% and 67%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 83 months for all patients. The 5-year estimated PFS rates of groups A, B and C were 61%, 38% and 49%, respectively. Both the OS and PFS of group A were higher than those of both group B and group C. On multivariate analysis, baseline dFLC > 50 mg/L was associated with worse survival, but induction with bortezomib was associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that low disease burden AL patients who are eligible for ASCT may benefit from bortezomib-based induction therapy.

Treatment of AL Amyloidosis: Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Consensus Statement 2020 Update

Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a clonal plasma cell disorder leading to progressive and life-threatening organ failure. The heart and the kidneys are the most commonly involved organs, but almost any organ can be involved. Because of the nonspecific presentation, diagnosis delay is common, and many patients are diagnosed with advanced organ failure. In the era of effective therapies and improved outcomes for patients with AL amyloidosis, the importance of early recognition is further enhanced as the ability to reverse organ dysfunction is limited in those with a profound organ failure. As AL amyloidosis is an uncommon disorder and given patients' frailty and high early death rate, management of this complex condition is challenging. The treatment of AL amyloidosis is based on various anti-plasma cell therapies. These therapies are borrowed and customized from the treatment of multiple myeloma, a more common disorder. However, a growing number of phase 2/3 studies dedicated to the AL amyloidosis population are being performed, making treatment decisions more evidence-based. Supportive care is an integral part of management of AL amyloidosis because of the inherent organ dysfunction, limiting the delivery of effective therapy. This extensive review brings an updated summary on the management of AL amyloidosis, sectioned into the 3 pillars for survival improvement: early disease recognition, anti-plasma cell therapy, and supportive care.

Effects of Amyloid Light-Chain Amyloidosis on Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Amyloid light-chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) is commonly associated with multiple myeloma. However, the clinical characteristics and prognosis of symptomatic and smoldering multiple myeloma with AL amyloidosis are not particularly clear.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic and smoldering multiple myeloma in the Peking University First Hospital registry from 2010 to 2018 were studied. The clinical and laboratory information was collected from first presentation to death or until the last available clinical follow-up. The patients' survival and outcomes were analyzed, and the relationship between the clinical parameters and survival was also assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with symptomatic multiple myeloma patients without AL amyloidosis, patients with AL amyloidosis had higher incidence of BNP≧700pg/mL (P<0.001), ALP>187.5IU/L (P=0.032) and ALB<25g/L (P<0.001). Similarly, compared with smoldering multiple myeloma patients without AL amyloidosis, patients with AL amyloidosis had higher incidence of BNP≧700pg/mL (P=0.030) and Alb<25g/L (P=0.024). The existence of AL amyloidosis, especially those with the heart involvement, was related to shorter long-term survival of symptomatic and smoldering multiple myeloma according to univariate analyses. Renal involvement and gastrointestinal tract involvement had an impact on the prognosis of smoldering multiple myeloma but not on the symptomatic multiple myeloma. Cox regression model for overall survival detected BNP≧700pg/mL in symptomatic multiple myeloma having independent poorer prognostic significance (HR=2.455, P=0.004). Interestingly, BNP at diagnosis was significantly correlated with cardiac amyloidosis (r=0.496, P<0.001). Cox regression model for overall survival detected the presence of AL amyloidosis in smoldering multiple myeloma having independent poorer prognostic significance (HR=8.741, P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

AL amyloidosis is an independent poor prognostic factor for not only symptomatic multiple myeloma but also smoldering multiple myeloma. It is mainly because of involvement of important organs, especially the heart. AL amyloidosis probably has a greater impact on the prognosis of smoldering multiple myeloma than on the symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Prognosis and Staging of AL Amyloidosis

The treatment options for systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) are currently widening in an unprecedented way, brought about by an expanding arsenal of anti-myeloma therapy as well as by novel approaches to target toxic light chains and, most recently, deposited amyloid directly. In this context, accurate estimates of prognosis in AL, which allow for reliable patient advice and for example comparison of different therapies, are particularly important to clinicians. Some biomarkers and especially the genetic background of the underlying clonal disease as evaluated by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization even have predictive value, enabling an appropriate treatment selection. Derived from the most frequently involved organs in AL, heart and kidney, this review focuses on overall survival and renal survival. A comprehensive overview and summary of reported prognostic factors and biomarkers in AL is given and the most important and validated factors are highlighted. Finally, established staging systems in AL as well as validated and perspective response criteria are presented.

Prognostic Role of Beta-2 Microglobulin in Patients with Light Chain Amyloidosis Treated with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

The prognostic impact of increased beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) in patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown. The Mayo 2012 stage and increased bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) percentage are known predictors for survival. Increased B2M is predictive of survival in patients with multiple myeloma. We evaluated the prognostic role of B2M in patients with newly diagnosed AL undergoing ASCT. We retrospectively reviewed patients with a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis who were treated with ASCT between July 1996 and September 2017. Patients with a creatinine level >1.2 mg/dL were excluded, because that affects B2M levels. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to determine the best cutoff for B2M before ASCT in predicting survival, which was 2.5 µg/mL, which was also the upper limit of normal in our laboratory. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients with B2M >2.5 µg/mL and ≤2.5 µg/mL. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from ASCT to relapse or death, whichever occurred first. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of ASCT to death of any cause. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done for OS. Five hundred and ten patients were identified, 222 of whom (44%) had a B2M >2.5 µg/mL. These patients were more likely to be older (median age, 61 versus 57 years; P = .0002), to have Mayo 2012 stage III/IV disease (33% versus 8%; P < .0001), to have more than 2 organs involved (25% versus 14%; P = .001), and to have ≥10% BMPCs (56% versus 40%; P = .0002) compared with patients with B2M ≤2.5 µg/mL. The median PFS and OS were shorter in patients with B2M >2.5 µg/mL (median PFS, 64 months versus 80 months [P = .03]; median OS, 104.9 months versus 175.5 months [P < .0001]). On univariate analysis, predictors for OS included age >60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; P = .001), Mayo 2012 stage III/IV (HR, 3.36; P < .0001), more than 2 organs involved (HR, 1.36; P = .07), ≥10% BMPCs (HR, 1.5; P = .005), melphalan conditioning with 200 mg/m² (HR, .29; P < .0001), B2M >2.5 µg/mL (HR, 1.82; P < .0001), and transplantation during or after 2010 (HR, .4; P = .0006). On multivariate analysis, only Mayo 2012 stage III/IV (HR, 1.89; P = .005), melphalan conditioning with 200 mg/m² (HR, .39; P < .0001), B2M >2.5 µg/mL (HR, 1.84; P = .003), and transplantation performed during or after 2010 (HR, .58; P = .03) remained independent predictors of OS. Our findings identify B2M >2.5 µg/dL before ASCT as an independent predictor for OS in patients with AL amyloidosis and normal kidney function and should be routinely measured.

Bone marrow plasma cells 20% or greater discriminate presentation, response, and survival in AL amyloidosis

We explored the association between bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) and disease presentation and outcome among 1574 AL patients. Three BMPC groups were formulated: <5% (n = 231, 15% of study population), 5-19% (n = 1045, 66%), and ≥20% (n = 298, 19%). Heart and renal involvement were more and less prevalent, respectively, with increasing BMPCs. Patients with ≥20% BMPCs had higher likelihood for classic myeloma phenotype with less skewed lambda restriction, a higher rate of intact immunoglobulin secretion, a lower hemoglobin and higher rates of hypercalcemia and bone lytic lesions. High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were more common in ≥20% BMPCs. Complete hematological response was less frequent with rising BMPCs. The median survival was inversely associated with the BMPC groups (81, 33, 12 months for <5%, 5-19%, and ≥20% BMPCs, respectively; P < 0.001). Survival discrimination was maintained at 1-year landmark and in those who achieved a complete response. Multivariate analysis accounting for known prognostic markers yielded an independent prognostic role for ≥20% BMPCs, but not for the other BMPC groups. AL patients with 20% or greater BMPCs have poorer outcome independent of their cardiac risk category and stem cell transplant eligibility. Distinct interventions in these patients should be explored to improve outcome.