Experimental and investigational drugs for the treatment of anal cancer

POD1UM-303/InterAACT 2: A phase III, global, randomized, double-blind study of retifanlimab or placebo plus carboplatin–paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell anal carcinoma

Background

Squamous carcinoma of the anal canal (SCAC) is a human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven cancer with poor prognosis in locally advanced or recurrent settings. Carboplatin–paclitaxel is the preferred first-line regimen for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic SCAC, with the reported median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 8.1 and 20.0 months, respectively. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) demonstrates improved survival in HPV-driven cervical and head and neck cancers. Retifanlimab (INCMGA00012) is an investigational humanized, hinge-stabilized, immunoglobulin G4κ monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), with characteristics common to the ICB class. In POD1UM-202, retifanlimab showed substantial clinical activity and an expected safety profile in patients with advanced SCAC who progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. Based on these encouraging results, POD1UM-303/InterAACT 2 (NCT04472429), a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multiregional study, investigates the addition of retifanlimab to the standard of care (SOC) carboplatin–paclitaxel in patients with inoperable locally recurrent or metastatic SCAC not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy.

Methods and analysis

Patients ≥18 years with inoperable locally recurrent or metastatic SCAC, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and no prior systemic chemotherapy or PD-(L)1-directed therapy will be enrolled and stratified by PD-L1 expression, region, and extent of disease. Patients with well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus infection are eligible. Planned enrollment is approximately 300 patients worldwide, with a 1:1 randomization to retifanlimab or placebo. Patients will receive up to six induction cycles (24 weeks) of carboplatin (area-under-the-curve 5 on day 1) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15) every 28 days per SOC. Concurrently, retifanlimab 500 mg or placebo will be administered intravenously in a blinded fashion on day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to 13 cycles (1 year) in the absence of unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or premature discontinuation. Crossover to open-label retifanlimab will be allowed for patients assigned to placebo upon verification of progression by blinded independent central radiographic review (BICR). The primary study endpoint is PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. Secondary endpoints are OS, objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, safety, and retifanlimab pharmacokinetics. The study is currently recruiting.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04472429; https://clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2020-000826-24

The Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Anal Cancer and Future Strategies

OPINION STATEMENT

Despite being markedly sensitive to chemoradiotherapy, patients with locally advanced (T3-4 and/or node-positive) squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) still present high rates of disease recurrence, which is characterized by meaningful morbidity and mortality. Abdominoperineal resection as salvage surgery may be considered for patients with local recurrence, but with an important negative impact in the quality of life. Systemic therapy of advanced SCCA is an unmet clinical need. Palliative chemotherapy for the management of unresectable or metastatic disease yields approximately 60% of objective response rate; however, it still portends a grim prognosis. Based on the recently published InterAACT trial, carboplatin plus paclitaxel has become the standard of care of advanced disease; modified DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) may also be considered for fit patients amenable to intensive therapy. There are no FDA-approved therapies for the treatment of chemorefractory patients. Nevertheless, both nivolumab and pembrolizumab may be considered for these patients with promising results, regardless of PD-L1 expression or other predictive biomarkers. It is estimated that approximately 1 out of 5 patients with SCCA will derive large benefit from PD-1 inhibitors, which may produce considerable durations of response. Ongoing clinical trials exploring the combination of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line therapy, combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4, and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches, such as adoptive T cell therapies, are eagerly awaited and may bring practice-changing results in the next few years for the treatment of this challenging disease.

Emerging and Experimental Agents for Anal Cancer: What is New?

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is an HPV-related malignancy with rising incidence in the past few decades in the US, characterized by high rates of complete response to chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. However, in a long-term follow-up, a meaningful subgroup of patients with locally advanced disease presents disease recurrence, which demands treatments with high morbidity and important impact in the quality of life. In metastatic or unresectable disease, palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care, but it is still associated with a dismal prognosis. Novel agents are urgently needed in the systemic therapy of SCCA. From a translational standpoint, there are many hurdles to overcome, since PI3KCA mutation is the most frequent genetic abnormality and actionable mutations are rarely found in SCCA, as well as it is characterized by low tumor mutational burden and low rates of high-frequency microsatellite instability. But the latest studies of immunotherapeutic approaches have produced promising findings and this therapeutic strategy is the major path being followed in the ongoing clinical trials. The latest advances in the systemic therapy of SCCA have provided the framework for the conception of new clinical trials. Therefore, carboplatin plus paclitaxel have become the backbone for novel agents. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), mainly anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, such as retifanlimab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab have been studied in Phase III trials with chemotherapy in first-line therapy. Likewise, ICIs have been evaluated in locally advanced and refractory disease. Novel technologies, such as bispecific antibodies, and immunotherapeutic approaches, such as vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies, have also been tested in ongoing clinical trials. Immunotherapy may bring practice-changing advances in the systemic therapy of SCCA in the next few years and it might play a larger role in the therapeutic management of this challenging disease.

Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Does Not Improve Overall Survival in Anal Cancer Nodal Disease

BACKGROUND

Anal SCC is a rare disease mainly treated with chemoradiation. Abdominoperineal resection (APR), once the mainstay of treatment for anal cancer, now serves a role as salvage therapy for persistent or recurrent disease after chemoradiation. In addition, clinically positive nodes are currently treated by extending the radiation field to the groin. The role of inguinal lymph node dissection in recurrent or persistent anal SCC is unclear. The aim of the study is to determine the role of inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of inguinal lymph node metastasis for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with anal SCC in the National Cancer Database with positive inguinal nodes undergoing salvage APR between 2004 and 2014 was performed. A comparison of overall survival between patients who underwent APR with lymph node dissection versus APR only was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plot.

RESULTS

A total of 3424 patients underwent salvage APR, with 274 (8%) having clinically positive nodes. Within the subgroup that had clinically positive nodes, 195 (71%) underwent APR, whereas 79 (29%) underwent both APR and node dissection. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrates no difference in overall survival in the two groups (P = 0.99). Five-year survival for both groups was similar (36% versus 42%; P = 0.987). No significant difference was found when adjusted for age, gender, and Tumor Node Metastasis staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Inguinal lymph node dissection does not appear to improve overall survival in patients with advanced-stage anal cancer requiring salvage APR. Proper patient selection for node dissection is essential to spare patients from additional morbid procedures.