Drugs in phase I and phase II clinical trials for systemic sclerosis

Is cyclophosphamide still the gold standard in early severe rapidly progressive systemic sclerosis?

Cyclophosphamide (CYC) has been a gold standard of treatment for severe progressive Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), especially in patients with concomitant interstitial lung disease (ILD). This approach was based on results of several interventional studies, including randomized control trials, which mainly addressed SSc-ILD as a primary end point and skin involvement as a second one. The use of CYC is time-limited due to significant adverse events. More recently, other immunosuppressive and biological agents showed efficacy but better safety profile in patients with SSc and SSc-ILD. With regards to other end-points, post-hoc analyses, systematic reviews and metalysis showed that CYC had limited influence on patients' quality of life, event-free survival and mortality. Comprehensive patient's stratification according to a molecular, cellular and phenotypic pattern may help in choosing of personalized medicine with more ambitious treatment effect and should be the future direction. According to the above available data and even if scientific evidence may be missing, experts' opinion has changed the attitude to CYC as an anchor drug in the management of severe SSc. Indeed, CYC has been pushed to the second and even third treatment option after mycophenolate mofetil, tocilizumab or rituximab. This position became obvious during debate on this topic at CORA meeting 2023.

Serum C-X-C Chemokine Ligand 1 Levels in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: Relationship of Clinical and Laboratory Observations to Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Administration

Objectives: To determine whether C-X-C chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), which is a potent neutrophil chemoattractant and activator that plays important role in inflammation, is elevated in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and whether it is associated with the clinical features and disease activity of patients with SSc. In addition, to determine whether the changes in serum CXCL1 levels before and after treatment correlate with changes in disease activity in SSc patients who received an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody drug. Patients and method: We examined patient serum collected in the DesiReS trial, which was a double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase II clinical trial. In the trial, patients were randomly allocated to the drug or placebo group and received 375 mg/m2 of an anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, or placebo once a week for four weeks. We obtained serum samples from 47 patients administered at our hospital, including 3 males and 44 females, the median age of 48 years, range 27−71 years, with 42 diffuse cutaneous SSc and 5 with limited cutaneous SSc. Serum CXCL1 levels were measured using multiplex immunoassay in patient serum before and 24 weeks after administration and also in serum from 33 healthy controls. Results: Serum CXCL1 levels were significantly higher in SSc patients (mean 25.70 ng/mL; 95% confidence interval (CI) 18.35−33.05 ng/mL) than in the healthy controls (15.61 ng/mL; 95% CI 9.73−21.51 ng/mL). In addition, SSc patients with elevated CXCL1 levels had a significantly higher percentage of area occupied with interstitial shadows (p < 0.05), increased serum levels of surfactant protein (SP)-A (p < 0.05), SP-D (p < 0.05), Krebs von den Lungen-6 (p < 0.01), and C-reactive protein (p < 0.05) compared to those with normal levels. Furthermore, defining Δ as the value after rituximab administration minus the value before rituximab administration, baseline serum CXCL1 levels correlated with Δ percent predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (p < 0.01). In addition, ΔCXCL1 correlated with ΔSP-A (p < 0.05). Similarly, serum CXCL1 levels after rituximab administration correlated with percent predicted forced vital capacity (p < 0.05) and serum SP-D levels (p < 0.05) after rituximab. Conclusions: Our results suggest that serum CXCL1 is associated with the disease activity of SSc-ILD, and high serum CXCL1 levels are one of the predictors of improvement in SSc-ILD with rituximab.

New promising drugs for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: pathogenic considerations, enhanced classifications, and personalized medicine

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc), also known as scleroderma, is a complex orphan disease characterized by early inflammatory features, vascular hyper-reactivity, and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. Although substantial progress has been made in the understanding of the pathogenesis of SSc, there is still no disease-modifying drug that could significantly impact the natural history of the disease.Areas covered: This review discusses the rationale, preclinical evidence, first clinical eevidence,and pending issues concerning new promising therapeutic options that are under investigation in SSc. The search strategy was based on PubMed database and clinical trial.gov, highlighting recent key pathogenic aspects and phase I or II trials of investigational drugs in SSc.Expert opinion: The identification of new molecular entities that potentially impact inflammation and fibrosis may constitute promising options for a disease modifying-agent in SSc. The early combinations of antifibrotic drugs (such as pirfenidone) with immunomodulatory agents (such as mycophenolate mofetil) may also participate to achieve such a goal. A more refined stratification of patients, based on clinical features, molecular signatures, and identification of subpopulations with distinct clinical trajectories, may also improve management strategies in the future.

Engineering Advanced In Vitro Models of Systemic Sclerosis for Drug Discovery and Development

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex multisystem disease with the highest case-specific mortality among all autoimmune rheumatic diseases, yet without any available curative therapy. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic antifibrotic strategies that effectively decrease skin and organ fibrosis is needed. Existing animal models are cost-intensive, laborious and do not recapitulate the full spectrum of the disease and thus commonly fail to predict human efficacy. Advanced in vitro models, which closely mimic critical aspects of the pathology, have emerged as valuable platforms to investigate novel pharmaceutical therapies for the treatment of SSc. This review focuses on recent advancements in the development of SSc in vitro models, sheds light onto biological (e.g., growth factors, cytokines, coculture systems), biochemical (e.g., hypoxia, reactive oxygen species) and biophysical (e.g., stiffness, topography, dimensionality) cues that have been utilized for the in vitro recapitulation of the SSc microenvironment, and highlights future perspectives for effective drug discovery and validation.

Safety and efficacy of abatacept in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (ASSET): open-label extension of a phase 2, double-blind randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Abatacept was well tolerated by patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis in a phase 2, double-blind randomised trial, with potential efficacy at 12 months. We report here the results of an open-label extension for 6 months.

METHODS

Patients (aged ≥18 years) with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis of less than 3 years' duration from their first non-Raynaud's symptom were enrolled into the ASSET trial (A Study of Subcutaneous Abatacept to Treat DiffuseCutaneous Systemic Sclerosis), which is a double-blind trial at 22 sites in Canada, the UK, and the USA. Aftercompletion of 12 months of treatment with either abatacept or placebo, patients received a further 6 months ofabatacept (125 mg subcutaneous every week) in an open-label extension. The primary endpoint of the double-blind trial was modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at 12 months, which was reassessed at 18 months in the open-label extension. The primary analysis included all participants who completed the double-blind trial and received at least one dose of open-label treatment (modified intention to treat). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02161406.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 22, 2014, and March 15, 2017, 88 participants were randomly allocated in the double-blind trial either abatacept (n=44) or placebo (44); 32 patients from each treatment group completed the 6-month open-labelextension. Among patients assigned abatacept, a mean improvement from baseline in mRSS was noted at 12 months (-6·6 [SD 6·4]), with further improvement seen during the open-label extension period (-9·8 [8·1] at month 18). Participants assigned placebo had a mean improvement from baseline in mRSS at 12 months (-3·7 [SD 7·6]), with a further improvement at month 18 (-6·3 [9·3]). Infections during the open-label extension phase occurred in nine patients in the placebo-abatacept group (12 adverse events, one serious adverse event) and in 11 patients in theabatacept-abatacept group (14 adverse events, one serious adverse event). Two deaths occurred during the 12-month double-blind period in the abatacept group, which were related to scleroderma renal crisis; no deaths were recorded during the open-label extension.

INTERPRETATION

During the 6-month open-label extension, no new safety signals for abatacept were identified in the treatment of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Clinically meaningful improvements in mRSS and other outcome measures were observed in both the abatacept and placebo groups when patients transitioned to open-label treatment. These data support further studies of abatacept in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb and National Institutes of Health.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of scleroderma: a review of recent phase 2 and 3 trials

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) has the highest case-specific mortality of all connective tissue diseases. Its underlying disease mechanism affects several organs and remains incompletely understood. Ongoing work clarifying its etiopathogenesis is helping to develop targeted therapy.

AREAS COVERED

Several clinical trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of agents targeting different mechanisms of this disease. This review article reviews those mechanisms and surveys four key recent phase II or III clinical trials that are contributing to the landscape of SSc therapy. The reported trials primarily focus on patients with systemic sclerosis in the early phase of disease.

EXPERT OPINION

Traditional therapies for SSc center on immunosuppressive and cytotoxic agents. A new cadre of therapies is borne from improved understandings of SSc pathobiology and target the inflammatory-fibrotic pathways. Scleroderma trials have entered the initial phase of personalized medicine, recognizing molecular subsets that will improve upon cohort enrichment and maximize the measurable benefit of future therapies.