A randomized phase I clinical trial comparing the pharmacokinetic, safety, and immunogenicity of potential biosimilar recombinant human HER2 monoclonal antibody for injection and trastuzumab in healthy Chinese adults

A Randomized, Single-dose, Phase I Clinical Comparison of a Trastuzumab Biosimilar With a Reference Trastuzumab Formulation in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers

The test drug, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, is a biosimilar candidate for the reference drug. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of these two drugs. The study was divided into two parts, a pre-study and a formal trial. The pre-study included two subjects who were each given a single intravenous infusion of 6 mg/kg test drug. The formal trial was designed to be a randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled trial in which 70 subjects were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either test or reference drug as a single 6 mg/kg intravenous infusion. In the pre-study, the immunogenicity was negative in both subjects and the safety of the test drug was considered to be good. The two groups in the formal trial had similar demographic characteristics. The 90% confidence interval of geometric mean ratios of area under the serum concentration-time curve from the time 0 to the time of last quantifiable concentration, area under the serum concentration-curve from time 0 to infinity, and maximum observed serum concentration between the test group and the reference group fell between 80% and 125% and the bioequivalence was recognized. There was no significant difference in the positive rate of antidrug antibodies. The treatment-emergent adverse events in the test group were similar to those in the reference group. This study showed that the test drug has similar pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety to the reference drug in healthy male subjects.

Systematic Review on the Use of Biosimilars of Trastuzumab in HER2+ Breast Cancer

Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of breast cancer in cases where the tumor overexpresses the HER2 receptor, a cell membrane receptor activated by the epidermal growth factor. Intravenous and subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab have comparable clinical and pharmacological characteristics, but trastuzumab biosimilars are currently only available in intravenous form. Trastuzumab biosimilars are ultimately preferred by a proportion of patients, especially in cases where co-administration of other chemotherapeutic agents, such as trastuzumab and tucatinib, a small molecule of tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is required in patients with HER-positive metastatic breast cancer. Oncologists should be well-aware of the advantages of intravenously administered trastuzumab biosimilars over subcutaneous administration, certainly also taking into account the patient’s preferences. Further cost-effectiveness analyses will be very important, along with expectations regarding successful concomitant subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab with other anticancer drugs, such as pertuzumab. This systematic review describes and analyzes the so-far published studies concerning the use of the available trastuzumab biosimilars in HER-positive early and metastatic breast cancer in terms of efficacy, safety, and cost–benefit ratio. An attempt was also made to draw some conclusions and to comment on future needs and perspectives.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel phase I clinical trial to compare the bioequivalence, immunogenicity and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar and bevacizumab in healthy Chinese subjects

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF, can be used as a target therapy for colorectal cancer. A phase I clinical trial was conducted to compare the bioequivalence, immunogenicity and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar (Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.) and Bevacizumab (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) in healthy Chinese males.

RESEARCH DESIGN & METHOD

Healthy Chinese subjects (N = 98) were randomly divided into two groups. A single-dose bevacizumab biosimilar or Bevacizumab was given for per cycle. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MC/MS) assay. We detected the levels of anti-drug antibody (ADA) to evaluate drug immunogenicity and the safety of drugs throughout the study.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of AUC_0-t, C_max and AUC_0-∞ for bevacizumab biosimilar and Bevacizumab were 96.27%, 93.69% and 97.01%, respectively. The 90% CIs were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. The levels of ADA were similar. In addition, the two drugs both demonstrated excellent safety in the trial.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that bevacizumab biosimilar and Bevacizumab had similar pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters and safety in healthy Chinese subjects.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Number: NCT05476341, date registered: 25, Jul 2022) and Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Disclosure Platform (Number: CTR20171308, date registered: 16, Nov 2017).

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, single-center, parallel phase I clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerance of pertuzumab injection and Perjeta® in healthy Chinese male subjects

BACKGROUND

Perjeta® is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody that has been marketed and approved for the targeted therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) positive breast cancer in the United States. This study compared the bioequivalence, immunogenicity, and safety of pertuzumab injection (a biosimilar of Perjeta® produced by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd) and Perjeta® (produced by Roche Pharma AG) in healthy Chinese males.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Healthy Chinese male subjects (N = 87) were randomly given intravenous injection of 5 mg/kg pertuzumab or Perjeta® at a 1:1 ratio. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and primary pharmacokinetic parameters were statistically analyzed. We detected the levels of anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (nAb) to evaluate drug immunogenicity and safety of the drugs throughout the study.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios of AUC_0-t, C_max, and AUC_0-∞ for pertuzumab and Perjeta® were 100.42%, 96.71%, and 101.47%, respectively. The 90% CIs were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. The levels of ADA and nAb were similar. In addition, both had good safety in the study.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that pertuzumab injection and Perjeta® had similar bioequivalence, immunogenicity, and safety.

Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, safety, and immunogenicity of GB222, a bevacizumab biosimilar candidate, and bevacizumab in Chinese healthy males: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to compare the similarity of the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and immunogenicity of GB222, a potential bevacizumab biosimilar, to that of reference bevacizumab in Chinese healthy males.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-group clinical trial performed in 84 Chinese healthy males, who were randomly assigned to receive a single infusion dose of 1 mg/kg GB222 or bevacizumab with an 84-days follow-up. The primary endpoint was the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero to the last quantifiable concentration at time t (AUC_0-t). The second endpoints were the safety and immunogenicity evaluation. The PK bioequivalence was verified by the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometrical mean (GM) ratio for AUC_0-t falling within the bioequivalence margin, 80-125%.

RESULTS

The PK profiles of GB222 and bevacizumab were comparable. The 90% CIs of GM ratio of GB222 to bevacizumab for AUC_0-t was within the pre-specified bioequivalence margin. The most common treatment-related adverse event was sinus bradycardia. Seventeen subjects (20.2%) tested positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs).

CONCLUSION

GB222 was found to be comparable to bevacizumab in terms of PKs, safety, and immunogenicity for Chinese healthy males.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-IIR-17,011,143.

Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity and Safety Study for SHR-1309 Injection and Perjeta® in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers

Objectives: Pertuzumab is a monoclonal antibody for the treatment of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety of the test preparation SHR-1309 injecta and the reference preparation Perjeta® in healthy Chinese male subjects.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, single dose, two-way, parallel bioequivalence trial, a total of 80 qualified Chinese male subjects were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Each subject was intravenously injected with SHR-1309 or Perjeta®. Blood samples were collected at 21 different time points for pharmacokinetic analysis. In addition, immunogenicity was assessed at five different time points. The safety of the medication was monitored throughout the whole trial.

Results: C_max and AUC_0-t were the primary pharmacokinetic parameters. Under a 90% confidence interval, their geometric mean ratios were 98.30 and 88.41% for SHR-1309 injection and Perjeta®, respectively. The geometric mean ratio of secondary pharmacokinetic parameters AUC_0-∞ was 88.58%. These evaluation indexes are in the standard range of 80–125%, so SHR-1309 can be considered bioequivalent to Perjeta®. After 1,680 h (day 70) of administration, the two groups had 12 and 13 subjects who produced antidrug antibody (ADA), respectively. The occurrence time and proportion of ADA in SHR-1309 and Perjeta® were similar between subjects, and they had similar immunogenicity. During the entire trial period, there were 71 drug-related adverse reactions in 29 subjects who received SHR-1309 and 61 drug-related adverse reactions in 32 subjects who received Perjeta®. The incidence of adverse reactions between the two drugs was similar.

Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic parameters, immunogenicity and safety of the biosimilar SHR-1309 injection produced by Shanghai Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. were similar to the original drug Perjeta® produced by Roche Pharma AG. The two drugs met the bioequivalence evaluation criteria. Therefore, SHR-1309 is bioequivalent to Perjeta®. Clinical trial registration: CTR20200,738.

Trastuzumab immunogenicity development in patients' sera and in laboratory animals

Background

Immunogenicity is a major challenge in drug development and patient care. Clinicians and regulators are familiar with immunogenicity concerns of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics, growth factors and enzyme replacements. Although most small therapeutic molecules are unlikely to trigger undesirable immunogenic responses against themselves upon their administration, the biological therapeutic agents are likely to induce such kind of immunogenicity. This imparts a problem that has to be considered upon judging their risk–benefit ratio. In this article, we tested the immunogenicity developed in patients’ sera due to the use of trastuzumab and that developed in laboratory animals injected with this recombinant humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody.

Methods

We studied trastuzumab immunogenicity by: I in vitro detection of anti-trastuzumab antibody (Ab) levels in patient’s serum samples withdrawn at different points during trastuzumab treatment course; I.1 using an Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) assay, the assay is both sensitive and highly tolerant to free drug; I.2 using MTT cytotoxicity method against MCF-7 cell line as confirmatory method used in sample showed high level of anti-trastuzumab Ab and to determine neutralizing activity of the anti-trastuzumab Ab. II in vivo immunogenicity testing of trastuzumab in lab animals.

Results

In vitro analysis of patients’ sera for antibodies developed against trastuzumab revealed that this monoclonal antibody has low immunogenicity since most samples showed low levels of anti-trastuzumab antibodies that decreased progressively along the treatment course. Only 1% of samples showed high levels of anti-trastuzumab antibodies which might affect treatment course. In vivo immunogenicity testing in mice showed also low immunogenicity of trastuzumab that could support the in vitro clinical assessment applied in our study.

Conclusions

The study gives an evidence for the low trastuzumab immunogenicity when assessed in Egyptian patients under treatment with this biological therapeutic agent. This supports its prescription and continuous use across the approved indications as biological therapeutic agent.