Investigational immunomodulatory drugs for enhancement of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) immunotherapy: early phase development

Integrating machine learning algorithms and multiple immunohistochemistry validation to unveil novel diagnostic markers based on costimulatory molecules for predicting immune microenvironment status in triple-negative breast cancer

Introduction

Costimulatory molecules are putative novel targets or potential additions to current available immunotherapy, but their expression patterns and clinical value in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are to be clarified.

Methods

The gene expression profiles datasets of TNBC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Gene Expression Omnibus databases. Diagnostic biomarkers for stratifying individualized tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) were identified using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithms. Additionally, we explored their associations with response to immunotherapy via the multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC).

Results

A total of 60 costimulatory molecule genes (CMGs) were obtained, and we determined two different TIME subclasses ("hot" and "cold") through the K-means clustering method. The "hot" tumors presented a higher infiltration of activated immune cells, i.e., CD4 memory-activated T cells, resting NK cells, M1 macrophages, and CD8 T cells, thereby enriched in the B cell and T cell receptor signaling pathways. LASSO and SVM-RFE algorithms identified three CMGs (CD86, TNFRSF17 and TNFRSF1B) as diagnostic biomarkers. Following, a novel diagnostic nomogram was constructed for predicting individualized TIME status and was validated with good predictive accuracy in TCGA, GSE76250 and GSE58812 databases. Further mIHC conformed that TNBC patients with high CD86, TNFRSF17 and TNFRSF1B levels tended to respond to immunotherapy.

Conclusion

This study supplemented evidence about the value of CMGs in TNBC. In addition, CD86, TNFRSF17 and TNFRSF1B were found as potential biomarkers, significantly promoting TNBC patient selection for immunotherapeutic guidance.

Recent advances in targeted strategies for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer, negatively expresses estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Although chemotherapy is the main form of treatment for patients with TNBC, the effectiveness of chemotherapy for TNBC is still limited. The search for more effective therapies is urgent. Multiple targeted therapeutic strategies have emerged according to the specific molecules and signaling pathways expressed in TNBC. These include PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, Notch inhibitors, poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors, for example, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab, are widely explored in the clinic. We summarize recent advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy in TNBC, with the aim of serving as a reference for the development of individualized treatment of patients with TNBC in the future.

Targeting HMGA1 contributes to immunotherapy in aggressive breast cancer while suppressing EMT

Metastasis is an obstacle to the clinical treatment of aggressive breast cancer (BC). Studies have shown that high mobility group A1 (HMGA1) is abnormally expressed in various cancers and mediates tumor proliferation and metastasis. Here, we provided more evidence that HMGA1 mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in aggressive BC. More importantly, HMGA1 knockdown enhanced antitumor immunity and improved the response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy by upregulating programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Simultaneously, we revealed a novel mechanism by which HMGA1 and PD-L1 were regulated by the PD-L1/HMGA1/Wnt/β-catenin negative feedback loop in aggressive BC. Taken together, we believe that HMGA1 can serve as a target for the dual role of anti-metastasis and enhancing immunotherapeutic responses.

Immunotherapy for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Current Paradigm and Future Approaches

OPINION STATEMENT

In approximately 15-20% of the patients diagnosed with breast cancer, it comprises the triple negative (TN) subtype, which until recently lacked targets for specific treatments and is known for its aggressive clinical behavior in patients with metastatic disease. TNBC is considered the most immunogenic breast cancer subtype due to higher levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression, providing a rationale for immunotherapy. The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment resulted in significantly improved PFS and OS for PD-L1 positive mTNBC, leading to FDA approval. However, response rate of ICB in unselected patients is low. Ongoing (pre)clinical trials aim to further optimize ICB efficacy and widen its application beyond PD-L1 positive breast tumors. Novel immunomodulatory approaches to induce a more inflamed tumor microenvironment include dual checkpoint blockade, bispecific antibodies, immunocytokines, adoptive cell therapies, oncolytic viruses, and cancer vaccines. Preclinical data for these novel strategies seems promising, but solid clinical data to further support its application for mTNBC is awaited. Biomarkers capturing the degree of immunogenicity such as but not limited to TILs, CD8 T cell levels, and IFNg signatures could support deciding which therapeutic strategy is most appropriate for which patient. Given 1) the accumulating therapy options for patients with metastatic disease and 2) the heterogeneity of mTNBC from inflamed to immune-desert tumors, the challenge is to work towards immunomodulatory strategies for specific subgroups of patients with TNBC to enable personalized (immuno)therapy for patients with metastatic disease.

CAR-T cell therapy for triple-negative breast cancer and other solid tumors: preclinical and clinical progress

INTRODUCTION

Most breast cancer-related deaths arise from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Molecular heterogeneity, aggressiveness and the lack of effective therapies are major hurdles to therapeutic progress. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells have emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic strategy in TNBC. This approach combines the antigen specificity of an antibody with the effector function of T cells.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the opportunities provided by CAR-T cell therapies in solid tumors. Emerging targets, ongoing clinical trials, and prospective clinical implications in TNBC are considered later. An emphasis is placed on the key challenges and possible solutions for this therapeutic approach.

EXPERT OPINION

A challenge for CAR-T cell therapy is the selection of the optimal targets to minimize on-target/off-tumor toxicity. Tumor escape via antigen loss and intrinsic heterogeneity is a further hurdle. TROP2, GD2, ROR1, MUC1 and EpCAM are promising targets. Persistence and trafficking to tumor cells may be enhanced by the implementation of CARs with a chemokine receptor and/or constitutively activated interleukin receptors. Fourth-generation CARs (TRUCKs) may redirect T-cells for universal cytokine-mediated killing. Combinatorial approaches and the application of CARs to other immune cells could revert the suppressive immune environment that characterizes solid neoplasms.

Understanding resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to frontline chemotherapy has improved survival for patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) expressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Nonetheless, most patients develop resistance, with outcomes remaining poor for this population. Moreover, unsatisfactory activity has been observed with ICIs in PD-L1-negative TNBC and in other breast cancer (BC) subtypes, warranting a deeper understanding of resistance to ICIs in BC.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss the immune landscape of distinct BC subtypes, review the clinical activity of immunotherapy in BC, and highlight strategies under development to overcome resistance to ICIs.

EXPERT OPINION

Activity and resistance to ICIs in BC are strongly related to the intrinsic immunophenotype of the tumor tissue. Several promising biomarkers reflecting the immunological state of BC are emerging, with only PD-L1 expression currently adopted into clinical practice. However, limitations make of PD-L1 a sub-optimal biomarker for patient selection, which require efforts to integrate this marker with other immunological features. Concomitantly, a wide variety of drug combinations designed to overcome immune-resistance are being evaluated, with some encouraging signals observed in early-phase trials. Combination strategies tailored to patient and tumor immunophenotype may allow to overcome resistance and fully exploit the potential of ICIs.

Novel immune targets for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

To overcome mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to the anti-tumor immune response, novel targets such as ICOS, LAG3, and TIM3 are currently being explored at preclinical and early-phase clinical levels.

AREAS COVERED

This article examines the landscape of the immune therapeutics investigated in early-phase clinical trials for TNBC. Preclinical rationale is provided for each immune target, predominant expression, and function. Clinical implications and preliminary available trial results are discussed and finally, we reflect on aspects of future expectations and challenges in this field.

EXPERT OPINION

Several immune strategies have been investigated in TNBC, including co-inhibitory molecules beyond PD1-PD-L1 axis, co-stimulatory checkpoints, cancer vaccines, adoptive cell transfer, combination therapies, as well as different routes of administration. Most of approaches showed signs of anti-cancer activity and a good safety profile in early-phase clinical trials. Since IO provided benefit only to a small subgroup of TNBC patients so far, identifying predictive biomarkers is a priority to refine patient-selection. Data from ongoing clinical trials, with the gradually improving interpretation of the breast tumor immune environment, will hopefully refine the role of new immune targets for the treatment of TNBC.