What's the latest with investigational drugs for soft tissue sarcoma?

Landscape of clinical drug development of ADCs used for the pharmacotherapy of cancers: an overview of clinical trial registry data from 2002 to 2022

BACKGROUND

To provide reference for clinical development of ADCs in the industry, we analyzed the landscape and characteristics of clinical trials about antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).

METHOD

Clinical trials to study ADCs used for the pharmacotherapy of cancers initiated by the sponsor were searched in the Cite line Pharma Intelligence (Trialtrove database), and the landscape and characteristics of these clinical trials were analyzed from multiple perspectives, such as the number, phases, status, indications, and targets of the clinical trials.

RESULT

As of December 31, 2022, a total of 431 clinical trials have been initiated to study ADCs used for the pharmacotherapy of cancers, and the number of the last 10 years was 5.5 times as large as the first 11 years. These clinical trials involved 47 indications, including breast cancer, lymphoma (lymphoma, non-Hodgkin's and lymphoma, Hodgkin's), unspecified solid tumor, bladder cancer and lung cancer (lung, non-small cell cancer and lung, small cell cancer). As for each of these five indications, 50 + clinical trials have been carried out, accounting for as high as 48.50% (454/936). ADCs involve 38 targets, which are relatively concentrated. Among them, ERBB2 (HER2) and TNFRSF8 (CD30) involve in 100 + registered clinical trials, and TNFRSF17 (BCMA), NECTIN4 and CD19 in 10 + trials. The clinical trials for these five targets account for 79.02% (354/448) of the total number. Up to 93.97% (405/431) of these clinical trials explored the correlation between biomarkers and efficacy. Up to 45.91% (292/636) of Lots (lines of treatment) applied in the clinical trials were the second line. Until December 31, 2022, 54.52% (235/431) of the clinical trials have been completed or terminated.

CONCLUSION

ADCs are a hotspot of research and development in oncology clinical trials, but the indications, targets, phases, and Lot that have been registered are seemingly relatively concentrated at present. This study provides a comprehensive analysis which can assist researchers/developer quickly grasp relevant knowledge to assess a product and also providing new clues and ideas for future research.

Tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer: immune mechanisms and clinical implications

Cancer is a major cause of death globally, and traditional treatments often have limited efficacy and adverse effects. Immunotherapy has shown promise in various malignancies but is less effective in tumors with low immunogenicity or immunosuppressive microenvironment, especially sarcomas. Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) have been associated with a favorable response to immunotherapy and improved survival in cancer patients. However, the immunological mechanisms and clinical significance of TLS in malignant tumors are not fully understood. In this review, we elucidate the composition, neogenesis, and immune characteristics of TLS in tumors, as well as the inflammatory response in cancer development. An in-depth discussion of the unique immune characteristics of TLSs in lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and soft tissue sarcomas will be presented. Additionally, the therapeutic implications of TLS, including its role as a marker of therapeutic response and prognosis, and strategies to promote TLS formation and maturation will be explored. Overall, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of TLS in the tumor immune microenvironment and suggest potential interventions for cancer treatment.

Efficacies of anlotinib monotherapy versus gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the antitumor efficacy of anlotinib with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as subsequent treatment regimens in patients with advanced non-specific soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with advanced STS who were treated with either anlotinib or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy between May 2009 and May 2023 in our center were eligible. All patients experienced disease progression or recurrence after the anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

We included 49 patients receiving anlotinib and 45 patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 76.9 weeks (range 2.9-678.9 weeks). The DCR (65.3% vs. 57.8%; p = 0.610), PFS (24.0 weeks vs. 18.6 weeks; p = 0.669) and OS (79.4 weeks vs. 87.0 weeks; p = 0.471) of anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy indicated similar clinical efficacy. Moreover, exploratory subgroup analyses showed that patients with STS originating from limbs and trunk were inclined to benefit from anlotinib treatment (median PFS: 31.3 weeks vs. 12.4 weeks; p = 0.045). ECOG PS was an independent predictor of the PFS [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.85; p = 0.023] and OS (HR 0.26, 95%CI 0.10-0.70; p = 0.008) in the anlotinib group. While neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent prognostic factor of the PFS (HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.11-0.98; p = 0.045) in the gemcitabine-based chemotherapy group. The incidence of grade 3 or higher related AEs in anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was 20.4% (n = 10) and 20.0% (n = 9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our research suggested that anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy showed similar clinical efficacy and safety in the subsequent treatment of advanced STS after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Chemotherapeutic drugs for soft tissue sarcomas: a review

Despite the low incidence of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), hundreds of thousands of new STS cases are diagnosed annually worldwide, and approximately half of them eventually progress to advanced stages. Currently, chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced STSs. There are difficulties in selecting appropriate drugs for multiline chemotherapy, or for combination treatment of different STS histological subtypes. In this study, we first comprehensively reviewed the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of STSs, and then described the current status of sensitive drugs for different STS subtypes. anthracyclines are the most important systemic treatment for advanced STSs. Ifosfamide, trabectedin, gemcitabine, taxanes, dacarbazine, and eribulin exhibit certain activities in STSs. Vinca alkaloid agents (vindesine, vinblastine, vinorelbine, vincristine) have important therapeutic effects in specific STS subtypes, such as rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma family tumors, whereas their activity in other subtypes is weak. Other chemotherapeutic drugs (methotrexate, cisplatin, etoposide, pemetrexed) have weak efficacy in STSs and are rarely used. It is necessary to select specific second- or above-line chemotherapeutic drugs depending on the histological subtype. This review aims to provide a reference for the selection of chemotherapeutic drugs for multi-line therapy for patients with advanced STSs who have an increasingly long survival.

The biology and treatment of leiomyosarcomas

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a soft tissue sarcoma of smooth muscle origin that can arise in multiple anatomical sites and is broadly classified as extra-uterine LMS or uterine LMS. There is substantial interpatient heterogeneity within this histological subtype, and despite multi-modal therapy, clinical management remains challenging with poor patient prognosis and few new therapies available. Here we discuss the current treatment landscape of LMS in both the localised and advanced disease setting. We further describe the latest advances in our evolving understanding of the genetics and biology of this group of heterogeneous diseases and summarise the key studies delineating the mechanisms of acquired and intrinsic chemotherapy resistance in this histological subtype. We conclude by providing a perspective on how novel targeted agents such as PARP inhibitors may usher in a new paradigm of biomarker-driven therapies that will ultimately impact the outcomes of patients with LMS.