Xiao L, Ou X, Liu W, Lin X, Peng L, Qiu S, Zhang Q. Combined modified Valsalva maneuver with adenosine supraventricular tachycardia: A comparative study.
Am J Emerg Med 2024;
78:157-162. [PMID:
38281376 DOI:
10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.035]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE
Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is an arrhythmia commonly seen in the emergency department. Both modified Valsalva maneuver (MVM) and intravenous adenosine are the first line treatment, of which the former has e lower success rate while the latter has a higher success rate but some risks and adverse effects. Given both of these reverse rhythms quickly, combining them may achieve a better effect.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to evaluate the success rate and potential risk of combining the use of intravenous adenosine while patients were doing MVM as a treatment for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia(pSVT).
DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS
We recruited patients with pSVT from 2017 to 2022, and randomly assigned them into 3 groups, MVM group, intravenous adenosine group, and combination therapy group, in which MVM was allowed to be performed twice, while intravenous adenosine was given in a titration manner to repeat three times, recorded the success rate and side effects in each group.
MAIN RESULTS
The success rate of the MVM group, adenosine group, and combination group are 42.11%, 75.00 and 86.11%, respectively. The success rate of the adenosine group and combination group is significantly higher than the n MVSM group (p < 0.01, p < 0.001), while the success rate of the combination group is higher than the adenosine group, it has no significant difference (p = 0.340). In terms of safety, the longest RR durations (asystole period) are 1.61 s, 1.60s, and 2.27 s, there is a statistical difference among the three groups (p < 0.01) and between the adenosine and combination group (0.018).
CONCLUSION
Therefore, we can conclude that combination therapy has a relatively high success rate and good safety profile, but the current study failed to show its superiority to adenosine.
Collapse