1
|
Lu Y, Pei Y, Pang W. A comparison of the differences in the way parents and grandparents interact with children and their effects on children's creative performance. Front Psychol 2022; 13:1066524. [PMID: 36619060 PMCID: PMC9812495 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1066524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
As grandparents' involvement in parenting becomes more common, it is valuable to understand the differences between grandparenting and parenting and how these differences affect children. To elucidate the differences between grandparenting and parenting and their effects on children's creativity performance, children's performance on creativity tasks after grandparent-child interactions and parent-child interactions were compared, and the behavioral differences between grandparents and parents when interacting with children were discussed. In this study, grandparents and parents were asked to interact with children separately, and creativity performance was measured before and after adult-child interactions. The results showed that children's creative performance improved significantly after parent-child interactions, while there was little change after grandparent-child interactions. In addition, according to parental investment theory, parents provided children with more cognitive and interpersonal resources during the interaction compared to grandparents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Lu
- Youth Research Data Center, Shanghai Youth College of Management, Shanghai, China
| | - Yilai Pei
- Institute of Developmental and Educational Psychology, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiguo Pang
- Institute of Developmental and Educational Psychology, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bianchi I, Branchini E, Burro R, Capitani E, Savardi U. Overtly prompting people to “think in opposites” supports insight problem solving. THINKING & REASONING 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2018.1553738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Bianchi
- Department of Humanities, Section of Philosophy and Human Sciences, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy
| | - Erika Branchini
- Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Burro
- Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Capitani
- Department of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy
| | - Ugo Savardi
- Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kizilirmak JM, Serger V, Kehl J, Öllinger M, Folta-Schoofs K, Richardson-Klavehn A. Feelings-of-Warmth Increase More Abruptly for Verbal Riddles Solved With in Contrast to Without Aha! Experience. Front Psychol 2018; 9:1404. [PMID: 30150953 PMCID: PMC6099077 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
When we are confronted with a new problem, we typically try to apply strategies that have worked in the past and which usually lead closer to the solution incrementally. However, sometimes, either during a problem-solving attempt that does not seem to lead closer to the solution, or when we have given up on problem-solving for the moment, the solution seems to appear out of nowhere. This is often called a moment of insight. Whereas the cognitive processes of getting closer to the solution are still unknown for insight problem-solving, there are two diverging theories on the subjective feeling of getting closer to the solution: (1) One that states that an intuitive feeling of closeness to the solution increases slowly, but incrementally, before it surpasses the threshold to consciousness and becomes verbalizable (=insight) (continuous approach), and (2) another that proposes that the feeling of closeness to the solution does not increase before it exceeds the threshold to consciousness (discontinuous approach). Here, we investigated the subjective feeling of closeness to the solution, assessed as feeling-of-warmth (FoW), its relationship to solving the problem versus being presented with it and whether a feeling of Aha! was experienced. Additionally, we tested whether Aha! experiences are more likely when the problem is solved actively by the participant or presented to the participant after an unsuccessful problem-solving attempt, and whether the frequency of Aha! experiences correlates with problem difficulty. To our knowledge, this is the first study combining the CRAT with FoW assessments for the named conditions (solved/unsolved, three difficulty levels, Aha!/no Aha!). We used a verbal problem-solving task, the Compound Remote Associates Task (CRAT). Our data revealed that Aha! experiences were more often reported for solutions generated by the participant compared to solutions presented after unsuccessful problem-solving. Moreover, FoW curves showed a steeper increase for the last two FoW ratings when problems were solved with Aha! in contrast to without Aha!. Based on this observation, we provide a preliminary explanation for the underlying cognitive process of solving CRA problems via insight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin M Kizilirmak
- Neurodidactics and Neuro Lab, Institute for Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Violetta Serger
- Neurodidactics and Neuro Lab, Institute for Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Judith Kehl
- Memory and Consciousness Research Group, Clinic for Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Kristian Folta-Schoofs
- Neurodidactics and Neuro Lab, Institute for Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Alan Richardson-Klavehn
- Memory and Consciousness Research Group, Clinic for Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Öllinger M, Fedor A, Brodt S, Szathmáry E. Insight into the ten-penny problem: guiding search by constraints and maximization. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2017; 81:925-938. [PMID: 27592343 PMCID: PMC5533865 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0800-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
For a long time, insight problem solving has been either understood as nothing special or as a particular class of problem solving. The first view implicates the necessity to find efficient heuristics that restrict the search space, the second, the necessity to overcome self-imposed constraints. Recently, promising hybrid cognitive models attempt to merge both approaches. In this vein, we were interested in the interplay of constraints and heuristic search, when problem solvers were asked to solve a difficult multi-step problem, the ten-penny problem. In three experimental groups and one control group (N = 4 × 30) we aimed at revealing, what constraints drive problem difficulty in this problem, and how relaxing constraints, and providing an efficient search criterion facilitates the solution. We also investigated how the search behavior of successful problem solvers and non-solvers differ. We found that relaxing constraints was necessary but not sufficient to solve the problem. Without efficient heuristics that facilitate the restriction of the search space, and testing the progress of the problem solving process, the relaxation of constraints was not effective. Relaxing constraints and applying the search criterion are both necessary to effectively increase solution rates. We also found that successful solvers showed promising moves earlier and had a higher maximization and variation rate across solution attempts. We propose that this finding sheds light on how different strategies contribute to solving difficult problems. Finally, we speculate about the implications of our findings for insight problem solving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Öllinger
- Parmenides Center for the Study of Thinking, Kirchplatz 1, 82049, Pullach, Germany.
- Psychological Department, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Pullach, Germany.
| | - Anna Fedor
- Parmenides Center for the Study of Thinking, Kirchplatz 1, 82049, Pullach, Germany
- MTA-ELTE Theoretical Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Biological Institute, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Svenja Brodt
- Institute for Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eörs Szathmáry
- MTA-ELTE Theoretical Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Biological Institute, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary
- Parmenides Center for the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Pullach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Öllinger M, von Müller A. Search and Coherence-Building in Intuition and Insight Problem Solving. Front Psychol 2017; 8:827. [PMID: 28611702 PMCID: PMC5447020 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Coherence-building is a key concept for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of intuition and insight problem solving. There are several accounts that address certain aspects of coherence-building. However, there is still no proper framework defining the general principles of coherence-building. We propose a four-stage model of coherence-building. The first stage starts with spreading activation restricted by constraints. This dynamic is a well-defined rule based process. The second stage is characterized by detecting a coherent state. We adopted a fluency account assuming that the ease of information processing indicates the realization of a coherent state. The third stage is designated to evaluate the result of the coherence-building process and assess whether the given problem is solved or not. If the coherent state does not fit the requirements of the task, the process re-enters at stage 1. These three stages characterize intuition. For insight problem solving a fourth stage is necessary, which restructures the given representation after repeated failure, so that a new search space results. The new search space enables new coherent states. We provide a review of the most important findings, outline our model, present a large number of examples, deduce potential new paradigms and measures that might help to decipher the underlying cognitive processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Öllinger
- Parmenides Center for the Study of ThinkingPullach, Germany.,Psychological Department, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMunich, Germany
| | - Albrecht von Müller
- Parmenides Center for the Study of ThinkingPullach, Germany.,Philosophical Department, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMunich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fedor A, Zachar I, Szilágyi A, Öllinger M, de Vladar HP, Szathmáry E. Cognitive Architecture with Evolutionary Dynamics Solves Insight Problem. Front Psychol 2017; 8:427. [PMID: 28405191 PMCID: PMC5370243 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we show that a neurally implemented a cognitive architecture with evolutionary dynamics can solve the four-tree problem. Our model, called Darwinian Neurodynamics, assumes that the unconscious mechanism of problem solving during insight tasks is a Darwinian process. It is based on the evolution of patterns that represent candidate solutions to a problem, and are stored and reproduced by a population of attractor networks. In our first experiment, we used human data as a benchmark and showed that the model behaves comparably to humans: it shows an improvement in performance if it is pretrained and primed appropriately, just like human participants in Kershaw et al. (2013)'s experiment. In the second experiment, we further investigated the effects of pretraining and priming in a two-by-two design and found a beginner's luck type of effect: solution rate was highest in the condition that was primed, but not pretrained with patterns relevant for the task. In the third experiment, we showed that deficits in computational capacity and learning abilities decreased the performance of the model, as expected. We conclude that Darwinian Neurodynamics is a promising model of human problem solving that deserves further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Fedor
- Parmenides Center for the Study of Thinking, Parmenides FoundationPullach am Isartal, Germany; MTA-ELTE Theoretical Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Research GroupBudapest, Hungary; Institute of Advanced Studies Kőszeg (iASK)Kőszeg, Hungary
| | - István Zachar
- Institute of Advanced Studies Kőszeg (iASK)Kőszeg, Hungary; Department of Plant Systematics, Ecology and Theoretical Biology, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE)Budapest, Hungary
| | - András Szilágyi
- MTA-ELTE Theoretical Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Research GroupBudapest, Hungary; Institute of Advanced Studies Kőszeg (iASK)Kőszeg, Hungary
| | - Michael Öllinger
- Parmenides Center for the Study of Thinking, Parmenides Foundation Pullach am Isartal, Germany
| | - Harold P de Vladar
- Institute of Advanced Studies Kőszeg (iASK)Kőszeg, Hungary; Center for the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Parmenides FoundationPullach am Isartal, Germany
| | - Eörs Szathmáry
- Institute of Advanced Studies Kőszeg (iASK)Kőszeg, Hungary; Department of Plant Systematics, Ecology and Theoretical Biology, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE)Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Branchini E, Bianchi I, Burro R, Capitani E, Savardi U. Can Contraries Prompt Intuition in Insight Problem Solving? Front Psychol 2016; 7:1962. [PMID: 28082928 PMCID: PMC5183583 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to test whether the use of contraries can facilitate spatial problem solving. Specifically, we examined whether a training session which included explicit guidance on thinking in contraries would improve problem solving abilities. In our study, the participants in the experimental condition were exposed to a brief training session before being presented with seven visuo-spatial problems to solve. During training it was suggested that it would help them to find the solution to the problems if they systematically transformed the spatial features of each problem into their contraries. Their performance was compared to that of a control group (who had no training). Two participation conditions were considered: small groups and individuals. Higher success rates were found in the groups exposed to training as compared to the individuals (in both the training and no training conditions), even though the time required to find a solution was longer. In general, participants made more attempts (i.e., drawings) when participating in groups than individually. The number of drawings done while the participants were trying to solve the problems did not increase after training. In order to explore if the quality (if not the number) of drawings was modified, we sampled one problem out of the seven we had used in the experiment (the “pigs in a pen” problem) and examined the drawings in detail. Differences between the training and no training conditions emerged in terms of properties focused on and transformed in the drawings. Based on these results, in the final discussion possible explanations are suggested as to why training had positive effects specifically in the group condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Branchini
- Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona Verona, Italy
| | - Ivana Bianchi
- Department of Humanities (Section Philosophy and Human Sciences), University of Macerata Macerata, Italy
| | - Roberto Burro
- Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Capitani
- Department of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata Macerata, Italy
| | - Ugo Savardi
- Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fedor A, Szathmáry E, Öllinger M. Problem solving stages in the five square problem. Front Psychol 2015; 6:1050. [PMID: 26300794 PMCID: PMC4523725 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 07/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
According to the restructuring hypothesis, insight problem solving typically progresses through consecutive stages of search, impasse, insight, and search again for someone, who solves the task. The order of these stages was determined through self-reports of problem solvers and has never been verified behaviorally. We asked whether individual analysis of problem solving attempts of participants revealed the same order of problem solving stages as defined by the theory and whether their subjective feelings corresponded to the problem solving stages they were in. Our participants tried to solve the Five-Square problem in an online task, while we recorded the time and trajectory of their stick movements. After the task they were asked about their feelings related to insight and some of them also had the possibility of reporting impasse while working on the task. We found that the majority of participants did not follow the classic four-stage model of insight, but had more complex sequences of problem solving stages, with search and impasse recurring several times. This means that the classic four-stage model is not sufficient to describe variability on the individual level. We revised the classic model and we provide a new model that can generate all sequences found. Solvers reported insight more often than non-solvers and non-solvers reported impasse more often than solvers, as expected; but participants did not report impasse more often during behaviorally defined impasse stages than during other stages. This shows that impasse reports might be unreliable indicators of impasse. Our study highlights the importance of individual analysis of problem solving behavior to verify insight theory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Fedor
- Parmenides Center for the Study of Thinking Pullach, Germany
| | - Eörs Szathmáry
- Parmenides Center for the Study of Thinking Pullach, Germany ; Parmenides Center for the Conceptual Foundations of Science Pullach, Germany ; MTA-ELTE Theoretical Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Biological Institute, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest, Hungary
| | - Michael Öllinger
- Parmenides Center for the Study of Thinking Pullach, Germany ; Psychological Department, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Insights are often productive outcomes of human thinking. We provide a cognitive model that explains insight problem solving by the interplay of problem space search and representational change, whereby the problem space is constrained or relaxed based on the problem representation. By introducing different experimental conditions that either constrained the initial search space or helped solvers to initiate a representational change, we investigated the interplay of problem space search and representational change in Katona’s five-square problem. Testing 168 participants, we demonstrated that independent hints relating to the initial search space and to representational change had little effect on solution rates. However, providing both hints caused a significant increase in solution rates. Our results show the interplay between problem space search and representational change in insight problem solving: The initial problem space can be so large that people fail to encounter impasse, but even when representational change is achieved the resulting problem space can still provide a major obstacle to finding the solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Öllinger
- Parmenides Foundation, Munich, Germany
- Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Working Wonders? Investigating insight with magic tricks. Cognition 2014; 130:174-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2011] [Revised: 08/29/2013] [Accepted: 11/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
11
|
The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the nine-dot problem. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2013; 78:266-75. [DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0494-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2012] [Accepted: 05/14/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|