1
|
Peters EJ, Frydland MS, Hassager C, Bos LD, van Vught LA, Cremer OL, Møller JE, van den Born BJH, Vlaar AP, Henriques JP. Biomarker patterns in patients with cardiogenic shock versus septic shock. IJC HEART & VASCULATURE 2024; 52:101424. [PMID: 38784047 PMCID: PMC11112335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Background In cardiogenic shock (CS), contractile failure is often accompanied by a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In contrast, many patients with septic shock (SS) develop cardiac dysfunction. A similar hemodynamic support strategy is often deployed in both syndromes but it is unclear whether this is justified based on profiles of biomarkers expressing neurohormonal activation and cardiovascular stress. Methods In this prospective, multicenter cohort, 111 patients with acute myocardial infarction related CS were identified, and matched to patients with SS. Clinical parameters were collected and blood samples were obtained on day 1-3 of Intensive Care admission. Results In this shock cohort comprising 222 patients, with a mean age of 61 (±13.5) years and of whom 161 (37 %) were male, we found that despite obvious clinical disparities on admission, mortality at 30-days did not differ (CS: 40.5 % vs. SS 43.1 %, p = 0.56). Overall, plasma concentrations of all biomarkers were higher in SS patients, with the largest difference on the first day. However, only in CS patients the biomarker concentrations were associated with mortality. Conclusion In this prospective, multicenter cohort SS and CS patients showed similarities in baseline conditions and had similar mortality. However, several biomarkers only showed prognostic value in CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elma J. Peters
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin S. Frydland
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Hassager
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lieuwe D.J. Bos
- Intensive Care, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lonneke A. van Vught
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olaf L. Cremer
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacob E. Møller
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bert-Jan H. van den Born
- Department of Internal/vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander P.J. Vlaar
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jose P.S. Henriques
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - on behalf of the MARS consortium
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Intensive Care, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Internal/vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sun D, Wei C, Li Z. Blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio is associated with in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022; 22:258. [PMID: 35676647 PMCID: PMC9178813 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02692-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds Although Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine concentration (Cr) has been widely measured in daily clinical practice, BUN-to-Cr ratio (BCR) for prognosis among patients admitted with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unknown. The present study was conducted to assess the prognostic effectiveness of BCR on CS. Methods and results Records of data for patients with CS were extracted from public database of the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III). The primarily endpoint was in-hospital mortality. We incorporated multivariate Cox regression model and Kaplan–Meier curve to evaluate the relationship between BCR and in-hospital mortality, adjusting for potential confounders. Data of 1137 patients with CS were employed for the final cohort, with 556 in the low BCR (< 20) and 581 in the high BCR (≥ 20) group. In the multivariate Cox model and Kaplan–Meier curve, compared to low BCR, we found high BCR was independently associated with significantly improved in-hospital survival for CS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51–0.84; P < 0.01). The benefit of high BCR on in-hospital survival for CS was remaining among subgroups of acute kidney injury (AKI) and non-AKI. Conclusions Our analysis indicated that high BCR, as compared to low BCR, was correlated with improved in-hospital survival for participants with CS, with or without AKI. The results need to be proved in large prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Sun
- Department of Cardiology, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, 31 Jinan Road, Dong ying, Shandong, China
| | - Changmin Wei
- Department of Cardiology, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, 31 Jinan Road, Dong ying, Shandong, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Cardiology, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, 31 Jinan Road, Dong ying, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|