The impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on health-related quality of life assessed using the SF-36: a systematic review and meta-analysis

SVM-Based Model Combining Patients' Reported Outcomes and Lymphocyte Phenotypes of Depression in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

BACKGROUND

The incidence of depression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is high and leads to a lower quality of life than that in undepressed SLE patients and healthy individuals. The causes of SLE depression are still unclear.

METHODS

A total of 94 SLE patients were involved in this study. A series of questionnaires (Hospital Depression Scale, Social Support Rate Scale and so on) were applied. Flow cytometry was used to test the different stages and types of T cells and B cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the key contributors to depression in SLE. Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning was applied to form the prediction model.

RESULTS

Depressed SLE patients showed lower objective support, severer fatigue, worse sleep quality and higher percentages of ASC%PBMC, ASC%CD19+, MAIT, TEM%Th, TEMRA%Th, CD45RA+CD27-Th, TEMRA%CD8 than non-depressed patients. A learning-based SVM model combining objective and patient-reported variables showed that fatigue, objective support, ASC%CD19+, TEM%Th and TEMRA%CD8 were the main contributing factors to depression in SLE. With the SVM model, the weight of TEM%Th was 0.17, which is the highest among objective variables, and the weight of fatigue was 0.137, which was the highest among variables of patients' reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Both patient-reported factors and immunological factors could be involved in the occurrence and development of depression in SLE. Scientists can explore the mechanism of depression in SLE or other psychological diseases from the above perspective.

Health-related quality of life among acute pancreatitis patients correlates with metabolic variables and associated factors

Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP) and associated metabolic abnormalities constitute prevalent medical disorders that have disastrous implications and expensive cost of care. However, the connection with metabolic abnormalities and their influence on wellbeing i.e., health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains unclear. As a result, we investigated the influence of MetS components on HRQoL in AP patients.

Methods

In a tertiary care hospital in North India, comprehensive observational research was undertaken with enrollment of subjects having AP along metabolic syndrome (MetS) or without was included. MetS was diagnosed for subjects using the National Cholesterol Education Program–Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) guidelines. Various socio-demographic variables were also taken into consideration for the calculation of statistical significance (P ≤ 0.05) in AP patients. Student's t-test and Short Form-36 (SF-36) along with the association between AP and MetS, as well as their impact on HRQoL, was investigated finally with, Pearson Correlation Analysis Factor.

Results

The study comprised 100 subjects or patients diseased of AP associated with MetS and 100 patients with AP associated without MetS. Gender, Age, Educational Status, Tobacco uses along with the metabolic variables were found to be statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) and comparatively increased in patients with AP with MetSthan AP without MetS except HDL levels. Finally, a negative association between all metabolic variables with the exception of HDL, and AP was found to be producing deterioration in Health compartment scores.

Conclusion

AP with MetS patients had a worse aggregate HRQOL than AP without MetS patients.

•

Acute pancreatitis (AP) and associated metabolic abnormalities constitute prevalent medical disorders.

•

We investigated the influence of MetS components on HRQoL in AP patients.

•

The focus of this study is to figure out the relationship between MetS with quality of life among AP patients.

•

AP with MetS patients had a worse aggregate HRQOL than AP without MetS patients.

State of the art and future directions in assessing the quality of life in rare and complex connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases

Background

As chronic conditions, rare and complex connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases (rCTDs) significantly affect the quality of life generating an impact on the physical, psychological, social, and economic dimensions of the patients’ lives, having implications on the family, changing the lifestyle and interpersonal relationships. Traditionally, generic and disease-specific measures for Quality of Life (QoL) provide valuable information to clinicians since QoL affects healthcare services utilization, predicts morbidities and mortalities, workability, etc. Moreover, the assessment of unmet clinical needs, satisfaction, the experience with the treatment and the care, the psychological dimensions, and the effects of the diseases, such as fatigue, could represent valuable dimensions to be considered in the QoL impact assessment. It is also necessary to measure the impact of rCTDs by considering the perspectives of family members/informal caregivers, for instance considering values, beliefs, experiences, life circumstances, psychological aspects, family relationships, economic issues, changes in social activities, etc.

Objective

The aim of this scoping review is to better understand the status of QoL metrics used in clinical and economic research for the assessment of the individual’s perspective on living with rCTDs.

Research question

What are the main challenges in QoL measures (and/or) measurement/assessment in rCTDs?

Materials and methods

Scoping review of the literature referring to QoL measures in rCTDs. Database: PUBMED, ISI-Web of Science; last date: 21/09/2021.

Results

Anxiety and depression, body image satisfaction, daily activity, fatigue, illness perception, pain, personality, QoL, resilience, satisfaction with the relationship, self-management, sexual QoL, sleep quality, social support, stress, uncertainty, and work productivity are the observed dimensions covered by the included studies. However, “more shadows than lights” can summarize the review’s outcome in terms of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) domains covered for each of the rCTDs. Also, for those diseases characterized by a relatively high prevalence and incidence, such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Sjögren’s Syndrome, and Systemic Sclerosis, the analysis of patients’ resilience, satisfaction with the quality of the relationship, personality, and stress are still missing dimensions. It has been observed how reducing items, increasing the number of domains, and disease-specific questionnaires characterize the “technological trajectory,” such as the evolution of questionnaires’ characteristics for assessing QoL and QoL-related dimensions and the burden of rCTDs.

Conclusion

The scoping review presents an overview of studies focused on questionnaires used to evaluate the different dimensions of quality of life in terms of general instruments and disease-specific questionnaires. Future research should include the co-design with patients, caregivers, and patient representatives to create questionnaires focused on the unmet needs of people living with rCTDs.

Generation of evidence supporting the content validity of SF-36, FACIT-F, and LupusQoL, and novel patient-reported symptom items for use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and SLE with lupus nephritis (LN)

OBJECTIVE

SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) have significant impacts on the health-related quality of life of patients living with the condition, which are important to capture from the patient's perspective using patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the content validity of PROs commonly used in SLE and LN (36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL), as well as novel PRO symptom severity items measuring skin rash, joint pain, joint stiffness and swelling of the legs and/or feet, in both populations.

METHODS

Qualitative, semi-structured, cognitive interviews were conducted with 48 participants (SLE=28, LN=20). Understanding and relevance of symptom and impact PRO concepts from existing PROs were assessed, alongside novel PRO symptom severity items with different recall periods (24 hours vs 7 days) and response scales (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) vs Verbal Rating Scale). Interviews were conducted in multiple rounds to allow for modifications to the novel PRO items. Analysis of verbatim interview transcripts was performed.

RESULTS

Symptom and impact concepts assessed by the SF-36, FACIT-F, and LupusQoL were well understood by both participants with SLE and LN (≥90.0%), with most considered relevant by over half of the participants asked (≥51.9%). All participants asked (100%) understood the novel PRO symptom severity items, and the majority (≥90.0%) considered the symptoms relevant. Minor modifications to the novel PRO items were made between rounds to improve clarity based on participant feedback. The selected 7-day recall period and NRS in the final iteration of the PRO items were understood and relevant. No differences in interview findings between the SLE and LN samples were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings provide evidence of content validity for concepts assessed by the SF-36, FACIT-F, LupusQoL and the novel PRO symptom severity items, supporting use of these PROs to comprehensively assess disease impact in future SLE and LN clinical trials.

Depression-, Pain-, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objectives. A significant number of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have depression, and many are untreated. We aim to assess the frequency of moderate to severe depression (MSD) in a multiethnic group of SLE patients with different sociodemographic backgrounds, identify modifiable factors associated with depression, and determine the impact of depression, disease activity, damage, cognitive function, and pain severity on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods. Ninety-nine patients with SLE were evaluated in a cross-sectional study. Sociodemographic data, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI II), SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI-2K), SLICC Damage Index (SLICC-DI), pain severity (10 cm visual analogue scale), cognitive function (Automated Neuropsychologic Assessment Metrics (ANAM)), and the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were recorded. Bivariate analysis identified potential associations of relevant variables with BDI II and SF-36. Regression analysis determined independent correlates with MSD, PCS, and MCS. Results. Over 50% of subjects (50.5%) were African-American, 37.1% had a family income of ≤$20,000, and 31.3% had MSD. In the bivariate analysis, family income, SLEDAI-2K, cognitive function, and pain severity were associated with MSD. Using binary logistic regression, SLEDAI-2K and pain severity remained independently correlated with MSD ( $p=0.004$ ). In the multiple linear regression analysis, pain severity was the only independent correlate of PCS ( $p<0.0001$ ), while cognitive function and BDI II were the main factors associated with MCS ( $p=0.020$ and $p<0.0001$ , respectively). Conclusion. Pain severity and disease activity are associated with MSD in our unique population, are potentially modifiable, and deserve further attention in the clinic. Depression and pain significantly affect HRQoL and should be aggressively managed.

Health-related quality of life in osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Osteoarthritis (OA) patients and controls. A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE from database inception to 7 January 2020. Random effect model was performed to summarize the scores of each domain and the forest plot was used to compare the scores of OA patients with healthy controls. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were executed using Review Manager (version 5.1). In total, six studies were included in this study, including 7094 patients with OA and 12 100 healthy controls, which were all reliable to summarize the scores of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Meta-analyses found that pooled mean HRQoL score for the SF-36 each domain (physical function, physical role function, body pain, general health, vitality, social function, emotional role function, mental health) was lower in patients with OA than in healthy controls, especially the score in the dimension of physical role function. OA have a substantial impact HRQoL. HRQoL is a significant component of measuring overall health, which contributes to formulate successful self-disease management plan, patient-centered care, and develop effective interventions target confidence.

Relationship between disease activity, organ damage and health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a common systemic autoimmune disease that may lead to considerable physical, psychological, and socioeconomical burden. In previous studies, inconsistent results were reported for the association of disease activity and organ damage with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This paper aimed to explore the relationship between disease activity, organ damage, and HRQoL measured by SF-36, EQ-5D, LupusQoL, and LupusPRO and investigate whether the correlation is region-specific.

METHODS

We systematically searched for studies reporting the association between SLE disease activity, organ damage, and HRQoL in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, World of Science, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from inception to December 2019. A meta-analysis and region subgroup analysis were performed with a random-effects model to estimate pooled correlation coefficients and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Forty articles were included representing of 6079 adult SLE patients. The meta-analysis of SF-36 and LupusPRO studies revealed mild to moderate negative correlations between disease activity and domains of these HRQoL measurements (correlation coefficient r ranging from -0.27 to -0.07). Likewise, negative correlations were found between organ damage and domains of SF-36 and LupusPRO (r ranging from -0.25 to -0.08). The pooled correlation coefficient is relatively higher in physical functioning related domains than mental health. In the region subgroup analysis, disease activity had strong negative correlations with SF-36 domains in African and European SLE patients, while organ damage had the strongest negative correlation with SF-36 domains in Asian SLE patients (p < 0.010).

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of the relationship between disease activity, organ damage, and four popular HRQoL instruments, which provides useful insight into the target therapy in SLE management.

Validation of the Severity of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome by Other Measures than History: Activity Bracelet, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing and a Validated Activity Questionnaire: SF-36

Introduction: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a severe and disabling chronic disease. Grading patient’s symptom and disease severity for comparison and therapeutic decision-making is necessary. Clinical grading that depends on patient self-report is subject to inter-individual variability. Having more objective measures to grade and confirm clinical grading would be desirable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate the clinical severity grading that has been proposed by the authors of the ME International Consensus Criteria (ICC) using more standardized measures like questionnaires, and objective measures such as physical activity tracking and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Methods and results: The clinical database of a subspecialty ME/CFS clinic was searched for patients who had completed the SF 36 questionnaire, worn a Sensewear^TM armband for five days, and undergone a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Only patients who completed all three investigations within 3 months from each other—to improve the likelihood of stable disease—were included in the analysis. Two-hundred-eighty-nine patients were analyzed: 121 were graded as mild, 98 as moderate and 70 as having severe disease. The mean (SD) physical activity subscale of the SF-36 was 70 (11) for mild, 43 (8) for moderate and 15 (10) for severe ME/CFS patients. The mean (SD) number of steps per day was 8235 (1004) for mild, 5195 (1231) for moderate and 2031 (824) for severe disease. The mean (SD) percent predicted oxygen consumption at the ventilatory threshold was 47 (11)% for mild, 38 (7)% for moderate and 30 (7)% for severe disease. The percent peak oxygen consumption was 90 (14)% for mild, 64 (8)% for moderate and 48 (9)% for severe disease. All comparisons were p < 0.0001. Conclusion: This study confirms the validity of the ICC severity grading. Grading assigned by clinicians on the basis of patient self-report created groups that differed significantly on measures of activity using the SF-36 physical function subscale and objective measures of steps per day and exercise capacity. There was variability in function within severity grading groups, so grading based on self-report can be strengthened by the use of these supplementary measures.