Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle and abdominal training in women with stress urinary incontinence

Pelvic floor training to prevent stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common disorder in women that has a negative impact on quality of life. Pregnancy and childbirth are considered important risk factors that directly affect the pelvic floor during pregnancy and labour, increasing the risk of pelvic floor dysfunction, with prevalence rates of SUI in the postpartum period ranging from 30 to 47% during the first 12 months.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in the prevention of SUI in women during the antenatal and postnatal period by reviewing and evaluating the available scientific literature.

METHODS

This is a systematic review, using only randomised controlled trials. We searched the databases Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane and PEDro. We reviewed 7 prospective studies in English and Portuguese, which included 1,401 pregnant women of legal age who underwent PFMT to prevent SUI.

RESULTS

The results allowed us to establish that PFMT is used for pelvic floor muscles and that this intervention, applied with the appropriate methodology, can prevent or cure SUI.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of PFMT in an early stage of pregnancy has positive effects on the continence capacity after delivery.

The effect of using mobile phone applications for intelligent pelvic floor rehabilitation on elderly female patients with stress urinary incontinence

BACKGROUND

Stress urinary incontinence is prevalent among women and the incidence increases with age.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of intelligent pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation on elderly female patients with incontinence.

METHODS

A total of 209 patients with urinary incontinence who were treated with pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation at Peking University International Hospital from September 2020 to January 2022 were selected by convenient sampling. All subjects were divided into the 50-60 year old patient group (n= 51) and over 60 years old patient group according to age (n= 158). The subjects of different age group were divided into an experimental group and a control group. The patients in the control group received routine nursing and health education, and the patients in the observation group received a combination of mobile application use and smart dumbbells. Based on this, we constructed an intervention model for intelligent, continuous pelvic floor rehabilitation. After 7 and 12 weeks, pelvic floor muscle function knowledge and exercise compliance in the two groups were evaluated. The improvement of urinary incontinence symptoms, pelvic floor muscle strength grades and quality-of-life scales were evaluated.

RESULTS

The results showed that pelvic floor knowledge and exercise compliance in the experimental group were better than in the control group at 7 and 12 weeks after intervention (P< 0.05). There was no significant difference in pelvic floor muscle strength and quality of life between the two groups at 7 weeks after intervention (P> 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in pelvic floor muscle strength and quality of life between the two groups at 12 weeks after intervention (P< 0.05). There was no significant difference between different age groups.

CONCLUSION

The intelligent pelvic floor rehabilitation model that combines a mobile application with smart dumbbells can maintain and strengthen the clinical treatment effect for elderly patients with urinary incontinence.

Is Diastasis Recti Abdominis Rehabilitation after Childbirth Able to Prevent the Onset of Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Case-Control Study

Background and Objectives: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) represent the first-line approach to pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFDs). Recently, studies have shown a synergy between the pelvic floor and abdominal muscles, hypothesizing that the anatomical and functional integrity of the abdominal wall plays a role in the prevention of pelvic floor disorders. Some studies have shown a significant correlation between diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Nevertheless, the evidence reported in the literature is controversial and based on low-quality data. The aim of the study is to clarify whether DRA-specific abdominal rehabilitation is needed in women with SUI after childbirth. Materials and Methods: All consecutive women who had at least one delivery and complained of symptoms of pure SUI that were urodynamically proven were considered for the study. The group of symptomatic patients was compared with a series of consecutive women, identified during the same study period, without any symptoms of SUI. In both groups, we measured the inter-rectal distance (IRD) with an ultrasound scanner above and below the navel. Results: A total of 102 women eligible for the study group and 100 women who did not report any symptoms of SUI were enrolled. The inter-rectal distance above the umbilicus showed no significant difference between the two groups (2.12 ± 0.98 vs. 2.1 ± 0.77; p = 0.94). In contrast, the data from the sub-umbilical measurements showed a significant difference. Surprisingly, the asymptomatic group showed significantly greater (0.98 ± 0.9 vs. 1.33 ± 0.87 p-value: 0.009) IRD compared to the symptomatic group. Conclusions: The study shows that DRA is not a risk factor for SUI in women after childbirth. Therefore, specific abdominal wall rehabilitation after childbirth does not seem to be indicated.

The relative activation of pelvic floor muscles during selected yoga poses

BACKGROUND

Individuals with pelvic floor muscle (PFM) dysfunction can benefit from core stabilization exercises. Yoga is a popular activity that can generate moderate to high trunk activity and has been shown to benefit this patient population. No data exist regarding PFM activity during yoga. Determining PFM activity will provide important information for developing an evidence-based exercise program.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative activation of the PFM during select yoga poses.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional design.

METHODS

Perianal surface EMG sensors were used to capture levator ani (LA) activation. Peak activity of a maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) represented 100% activity. For testing, subjects held the following poses for 30 s: locust; modified side plank; side angle; and hands-clasped front plank. The average EMG activity, expressed as a 100% percent of the MVIC (%MVIC), from 5 to 25 s of each pose was analyzed.

RESULTS

Subjects generated the most activity (63.5 %MVIC) during the locust. Side angle (35.3 %MVIC) required greater activity than the side (29.1 %MVIC) and front planks (26.3 %MVIC). Locust activity was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than all poses; side angle activity was significantly greater (P < 0.01) than the front and side planks.

CONCLUSION

LA activation during locust was very high and sufficient for strength gains. LA activation during side angle, front plank, and side plank would be best for improving endurance and/or neuromuscular control of the PFM. Findings from this study showed differing levels of PFM activation across yoga poses that may benefit patients with pathology associated with PFM dysfunction.

The effect of an abdominopelvic exercise program alone VS in addition to postural instructions on pelvic floor muscle function in climacteric women with stress urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Scarce literature exists regarding the influence of posture-based interventions for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups was to investigate whether the addition of postural instructions to a 12-week abdominopelvic exercise program is superior to an abdominopelvic exercise program alone, in terms of PFMs function and symptoms in climacteric women with SUI.

METHODS

Climacteric women aged between 40-75 years old who presented with SUI were included in this parallel study (NCT03727945). Two randomized groups performing one 40-minutes session per week for 12-weeks were compared: one performing an abdominopelvic exercise program (AEP) and a second one performing the same intervention with the addition of postural instructions (AEPPI). PFMs electromyographical (EMG) activity and strength (Oxford Grading Scale) were quantified during a maximal voluntary contraction. SUI symptoms were assessed using a 3-day bladder diary. These outcomes were collected at baseline, immediately after intervention, and 3-months after the intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 47 women were included in the study (AEP [n = 23], AEPPI [n = 24]). Between-group analysis showed significant differences for post-intervention EMG and strength values, showing higher values for the AEPPI compared to the AEP group. At 3-months follow-up, statistically significant differences were only obtained in strength, with higher values in the AEPPI group. No significant differences were obtained in terms of UI symptoms.

CONCLUSION

A 12-session abdominopelvic exercise program supplemented with postural instructions is superior to an abdominopelvic exercise program alone in terms of PFMs function in women with SUI.

Does a Kegel Exercise Program Prior to Resistance Training Reduce the Risk of Stress Urinary Incontinence?

This comparative pre-post intervention study investigated the feasibility and benefits of Kegel exercises amongst incontinent women, prior to commencing resistance training (RT), to reduce the risk of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared to a group of women without prior Kegel exercises (KE). Incontinence severity index (ISI) score, pelvic floor muscle strength (PFMS), and body composition (such as body mass index (BMI), fat, and muscle mass), were obtained pre and post intervention. Results demonstrated that RT reduced SUI to a significantly greater extent only if preceded by KE as was observed in the Kegel exercise plus RT group (KE + RT) over time. The improvements in total ISI in both the KE + RT and RT groups were large (d = 1.50 and d = 1.17 respectively). A two-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant improvement in average PFMS within the KE + RT group over time and between the two groups. A positive correlation was found between the average strength of pelvic floor muscles and SUI. Participants in KE + RT group demonstrated a significant increase in muscle mass (p ≤ 0.001) and concomitant reduction in fat mass (p = 0.018). This study determined a dedicated program of KE preceding a RT program improved average pelvic floor muscle strength and was effective in reducing SUI among incontinent women.

Impact of Urinary Incontinence on Physical Function and Respiratory Muscle Strength in Incontinent Women: A Comparative Study between Urinary Incontinent and Apparently Healthy Women

Patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may be afraid to increase intra-abdominal pressure to avoid incontinence. This could lead to weak expiratory muscles. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between respiratory muscle strength, physical function, and SUI in patients with SUI. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Physical Medicine and Functional Rehabilitation Department. Thirty-one incontinent women (IG) and twenty-nine women in a control group (CG) were enrolled in this study. Anthropometric data, respiratory muscle strength (maximal inspiratory pressure; maximal expiratory pressure), SUI (Urogenital Distress Inventory-6; Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7; Pad test), and physical function (waist circumference; timed-up-and-go test; abdominal muscle strength) were assessed. Body fat, body mass index, body weight, and waist circumference were higher in IG than CG (p < 0.01), while postural gait and abdominal muscles were lower (p < 0.001). Respiratory muscle strength displayed moderate correlations with SUI severity, especially for maximal expiratory pressure (p < 0.01). Maximal expiratory pressure was moderately associated with physical function. Deterioration in respiratory muscle strength is a characteristic of women with SUI. In this population, pelvic floor muscle training may be prescribed to improve continence. By feeling more confident about increasing intra-abdominal pressure, women with SUI would strengthen their expiratory muscles and eventually improve their physical function.

Stress urinary incontinence in females. Diagnosis and treatment modalities – past, present and the future

Introduction:

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can be defined as involuntary and unintentional loss of urine through the urethra when vesical pressure exceeds the urethral sphincter pressure during instances of coughing, sneezing or physical exercise. Stress urinary incontinence is the most common form of incontinence in females with an estimated prevalence of 4.5–53% in adult women with urinary incontinence. Yet despite its distressing nature and a negative impact on quality of life, very few women present with their symptoms to a urologist.

Materials and methods:

A literature search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, NLH, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar databases was done up to November 2020, using terms related to SUI, medical therapy, surgical therapy and treatment options. The search terms included female stress urinary incontinence, mid-urethral sling, tension-free vaginal tape and trans obturator tape. The search included original articles, reviews and meta-analyses.

Conclusion:

Current guidelines for the management of stress urinary incontinence propose a step-ladder pattern, based on treatment invasiveness starting from conservative therapies, then drugs followed by minimally invasive procedures and culminating in invasive surgeries. The surgical approach is to be considered only after conservative therapies fail. The recent advances in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence have brought to light newer modalities and newer technologies that can be utilized which include laser therapy, stem cell therapy, intravesical balloon and others that show a lot of promise. This paper provides an in-depth analysis and reviews the literature on the current modalities and the future prospects of female stress urinary incontinence.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable for this review article.