Does a continuous measure of handedness predict reading processes and reading-related skills across the lifespan?

Handedness in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review

Handedness has traditionally been employed as a proxy of brain lateralization in research. Alzheimer's disease (AD) manifests as a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by impairments across various neuropsychological functions, including visuospatial and language, many of which exhibit lateralization in the human brain. While previous studies have investigated the relationship between AD and handedness, findings have been inconsistent. This article aims to provide an up-to-date overview of studies investigating hand preference in AD and the subtypes, specifically early- and late-onset AD. Through a synthesis of these studies, we conclude that handedness currently lacks utility as a diagnostic biomarker for AD and its subtypes, and this is further supported by the meta-analytic results based on data from over 10,000 AD patients. We emphasize the necessity for future research endeavors, particularly those leveraging advanced neuroimaging techniques to explore the role of brain asymmetry in AD.

Sensory handedness is not reflected in cortical responses after basic nerve stimulation: a MEG study

Motor dominance is well established, but sensory dominance is much less clear. We therefore studied the cortical evoked magnetic fields using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in a group of 20 healthy right handed subjects in order to examine whether standard electrical stimulation of the median and ulnar nerve demonstrated sensory lateralization. The global field power (GFP) curves, as an indication of cortical activation, did not depict sensory lateralization to the dominant left hemisphere. Comparison of the M20, M30, and M70 peak latencies and GFP values exhibited no statistical differences between the hemispheres, indicating no sensory hemispherical dominance at these latencies for each nerve. Field maps at these latencies presented a first and second polarity reversal for both median and ulnar stimulation. Spatial dipole position parameters did not reveal statistical left-right differences at the M20, M30 and M70 peaks for both nerves. Neither did the dipolar strengths at M20, M30 and M70 show a statistical left-right difference for both nerves. Finally, the Laterality Indices of the M20, M30 and M70 strengths did not indicate complete lateralization to one of the hemispheres. After electrical median and ulnar nerve stimulation no evidence was found for sensory hand dominance in brain responses of either hand, as measured by MEG. The results can provide a new assessment of patients with sensory dysfunctions or perceptual distortion when sensory dominance occurs way beyond the estimated norm.