1
|
König CJ, Richter M, Isak I. Exit interviews as a tool to reduce parting employees’ complaints about their former employer and to ensure residual commitment. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/mrr-02-2021-0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
According to previous research, exit interviews do not fulfil the purpose of generating useful feedback from parting employees. According to signaling theory, they might, however, serve a different purpose: to leave one last good impression on parting employees, and the aim of this study was to test this.
Design/methodology/approach
A survey was administered to a sample of 164 German employees.
Findings
Consistent with arguments based on signaling theory, those who experienced an exit interview reported more residual affective commitment toward their former employer and less willingness to complain about it, and these effects were mediated by interpersonal fairness perceptions. In addition, the probability of having an exit interview was found to depend on the resignation style of employees.
Research limitations/implications
This new perspective on exit interviews can renew the interest in studying how organizations manage the offboarding process.
Practical implications
This study advises employers to conduct “exit conversations” (as two-way interactions rather than one-way interviews) and to carefully plan the exit phase.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that proposes a signaling theory perspective of exit interviews and that links exit interviews with the literature on resignation styles.
Collapse
|
2
|
van Rossenberg YGT, Klein HJ, Asplund K, Bentein K, Breitsohl H, Cohen A, Cross D, de Aguiar Rodrigues AC, Duflot V, Kilroy S, Ali N, Rapti A, Ruhle S, Solinger O, Swart J, Yalabik ZY. The future of workplace commitment: key questions and directions. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/1359432x.2018.1443914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Howard J. Klein
- Management and Human Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kajsa Asplund
- Department of Management and Organization, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kathleen Bentein
- Organization and Human Resources, School of Management, University of Québec at Montréal (ESG-UQAM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Heiko Breitsohl
- Department of Human Resources, Leadership, and Organizations, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Aaron Cohen
- School of Political Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - David Cross
- School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | | | - Veronique Duflot
- IAE CAEN, Normandie University, UNICAEN, UNIHAVRE, UNIROUEN, NIMEC, Caen, France
| | - Steven Kilroy
- Department of HR Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Nima Ali
- School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Andriana Rapti
- Kingston Business School, Kingston University London, London, UK
| | - Sascha Ruhle
- Chair of Business Administration, in particular Organization Studies and Human Resource Management, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Omar Solinger
- Amsterdam Business Research Institute, Department of Management and Organization, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juani Swart
- School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|