Ultrasound-guided intrauterine device insertion: a step closer to painless insertion: a randomized control trial

Does Ultrasound Guidance Provide Pain Relief During Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate ultrasound guidance effect in pain relief during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion.

METHODS

Four different databases were searched from inception till June 2022. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared transabdominal ultrasound guidance versus traditional non-guided IUD insertion among women undergoing IUD placement for contraception. We used Revman software during performing our meta-analysis. Our primary outcome was the pain score during IUD insertion as evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Our secondary outcomes were the procedure insertion time, satisfaction, and incidences of complications and misplaced IUDs.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were retrieved with a total number of 1267 patients. There was a significant reduction in the VAS pain score during IUD insertion among the ultrasound-guided group (MD = -1.91, 95% CI [-3.08, -0.73], P = .001). The procedure insertion time was significantly shorter within the ultrasound guidance group compared with the control group (MD = -1.35, 95% CI [-1.81, -0.88], P < .001). Moreover, more women were significantly satisfied with the procedure among the ultrasound-guided group (P < .001). In addition, ultrasound-guided IUD insertion was linked to significant decline in incidences of complications and misplaced IUDs.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound guidance can be used as a modified technique during IUD insertion as it decreases pain, procedure time, and rates of complications and misplaced IUDs with better patient satisfaction.

Ultrasound-guided versus uterine sound-sparing approach during copper intrauterine device insertion: a randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAS) guided approach and uterine sound-sparing approach (USSA) during copper intrauterine device (IUD) insertion.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomised open-label clinical trial (Clinical Trials.Gov: NCT03383432) included multiparous women requesting Copper IUD insertion for birth control were invited to participate. The eligible women were randomised into two groups (44 women in each group); group I (TAS-guided IUD insertion) and group II: USSA. The primary outcome was to measure the satisfaction score of IUD insertion in both methods. Secondary outcomes included the easiness score (ES), the difference in pain scores during IUD insertion, the duration of insertion, and the successful device placement after one week and one month evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound (TVS).

RESULTS

Eighty-eight women were analysed in both groups. The VAS for satisfaction was significantly higher in the USSA group than the TAS-guided group (7.80 ± 1.27 vs. 5.45 ± 1.42, p = .0001). There was significantly lower VAS of pain scores during IUD insertion in the USSA group as compared with the TAS-guided IUD (p = .001). A lower ES and a significantly shorter duration of IUD insertion were also determined among the USSA group (p = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

USSA is associated with higher satisfaction and less pain during insertion than the TAS-guided IUD insertion approach. However, both techniques have optimal intra-uterine device positioning.

Predictors for Discontinuation of Intrauterine Devices That Underwent Ultrasound-Guided Placement in a Long-term Follow-up Cohort

OBJECTIVES

To investigate long-term outcomes of ultrasound-guided intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. The rate of and reasons for IUD discontinuation were reviewed, including the prevalence of uterine fibroids.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS)-guided IUD insertion was reviewed. Information collected included age, body mass index, insertion date, indication for IUD use, indication for using TAUS guidance, and presence of uterine fibroids. The date of and reason for discontinuation were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen patients with successful TAUS-guided IUD placement were identified. Of these, 51 patients (43.97%) no longer had an IUD in place. An overall actual-to-expected use ratio was calculated to be 63.49%. The most common reason for IUD discontinuation was spontaneous expulsion (11.21%). The prevalence of fibroid uteri was 27.6% in our cohort. The actual-to-expected use ratio of those with a fibroid uterus was calculated to be 43.28%, which was significantly lower than that for a nonfibroid uterus (73.80%; P = .002). There were 27 of 104 patients with IUD use of less than 1 year, and fibroids were present 44.4% of the time. Comparatively, of the 77 patients that had IUD continuation of greater than 1 year, only 24.7% had fibroids (P = .022). The yearly continuation rates over 5 years were 74.04%, 55.84%, 41.67%, 35.14%, and 32.0% respectively. Of the 18 patients who received TAUS-guided insertion for a previous IUD expulsion, 33.3% had another spontaneous expulsion.

CONCLUSIONS

Uterine fibroids and a previous expulsion appear to be the most likely predictors of IUD discontinuation, particularly within 1 year after insertion.

The value of ultrasound guidance during IUD insertion in women with RVF uterus: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The study objective is to evaluate the benefits of using ultrasound guidance during insertion of Intrauterine device IUD in women with retroverted flexed RVF uteri.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial conducted on 400 women with RVF uteri eligible for IUD insertion. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group 1 underwent IUD insertion under ultrasound guidance while in group 2 no ultrasound guidance was used. The primary outcome measure was the(Visual Analogue Scale) VAS pain score reported by the women during insertion. Other outcome included easiness of insertion, the procedure time and occurrence of complications as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, failure of insertion, uterine perforation and bleeding.

RESULTS

The VAS pain score was significantly lower (2.36 ± 1.77 vs. 4.74 ± 2.35, p < 0.001), the insertion was much easier (score 4.0 ± 0.9 vs. 2.5 ± 1.27, p < 0.001) and the time needed for the procedure was significantly shorter (5.82 ± 2.56 vs. 9.4 ± 4.99 min, p < 0.001) in women within the ultrasound guided group when compared to control group. The total rate of complications was significantly lower (6 vs. 16 %, p 0.001) especially bleeding (2 vs. 9%, p = 0.002), abdominal cramps (10.5 vs. 28 %, p 0.012) and failure of the procedure (0 vs. 3%, p = 005) in ultrasound guided group women when compared to control.

CONCLUSION

Insertion of Intrauterine device IUD under ultrasound guidance in women with Retroverted flexed RVF uterus easier and less painful than the blind standard technique.

Intrauterine contraceptive device embedded in bladder wall with calculus formation removed successfully with open surgery

An Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) is commonly inserted by the primary health care physician. It can migrate into pelvic or abdominal organs. When a pregnancy occurs following an insertion of an IUCD, there should be a high suspicion of uterine perforation or possible migration. A radiograph can be done in the primary health care clinic to search for a missing IUCD. Early referral to the urology service is warranted when a patient presents with recurrent urinary tract infections. Removal of an intravesical IUCD can be managed with cystoscopy, laparoscopy or open surgery. Herein, we report a case of IUCD migration into the bladder. This case will highlight the importance of proper technique, careful insertion and the role of ultrasound.

Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review

A 2013 review found no evidence to support the routine use of pain relief for intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) placement; however, fear of pain with placement continues to be a barrier to use for some women. This narrative review set out to identify (1) new evidence that may support routine use of pain management strategies for IUC placement; (2) procedure‐related approaches that may have a positive impact on the pain experience; and (3) factors that may help healthcare professionals identify women at increased risk of pain with IUC placement. A literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane library databases revealed 550 citations, from which we identified 43 new and pertinent studies for review. Thirteen randomized clinical trials, published since 2012, described reductions in placement‐related pain with administration of oral and local analgesia (oral ketorolac, local analgesia with different lidocaine formulations) and cervical priming when compared with placebo or controls. Four studies suggested that ultrasound guidance, balloon dilation, and a modified placement device may help to minimize the pain experienced with IUC placement. Eight publications suggested that previous cesarean delivery, timing of insertion relative to menstruation, dysmenorrhea, expected pain, baseline anxiety, and size of insertion tube may affect the pain experienced with IUC placement. Oral and local analgesia and cervical priming can be effective in minimizing IUC placement‐related pain when compared with placebo, but routine use remains subject for debate. Predictive factors may help healthcare professionals to identify women at risk of experiencing pain. Targeted use of effective strategies in these women may be a useful approach while research continues in this area.