Efficacy of combined bland embolization and chemoembolization for huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma

Impact of anticancer drugs on the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of hepatic arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Aim

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using various anticancer drugs is often performed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of TACE with anticancer drugs versus transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) without anticancer drugs for HCC.

Methods

Patients with HCC were randomized to either the TACE or TAE group. Up to five target nodules were treated in each patient. Lipiodol (Lp; 10 mL), contrast media (CM; 10 mL), epirubicin (40 mg), mitomycin C (10 mg), miliplatin (70 mg), and 1-2-mm 2-day soluble gelatin sponge particles (2D-SGS) were injected into the TACE group, whereas Lp (10 mL), CM (10 mL), and 2D-SGS were injected into the TAE group. Treatment effect (TE) of the target nodules was graded (TE1-TE4) and patient responses were assessed. Three months after treatment, blood tests were performed to compare tumor markers and adverse events.

Results

Fifty-four patients and 161 target nodules were included; 75 nodules in 28 patients were treated by TACE, and 86 nodules in 26 patients were treated by TAE. The number of nodules graded TE1, TE2, TE3, and TE4 was 1, 28, 7, and 39, respectively, in the TACE group and 2, 25, 7, and 52, respectively, in the TAE group. The response rates were 89% (25/28) and 73% (19/26) in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in TE, response rates, or blood test results between the two groups.

Conclusion

In hepatic arterial embolization for HCC, anticancer drugs did not have any impact on the therapeutic efficacy or side effects at 3 months after embolization.

Impact of particle size of multivesicular liposomes on the embolic and therapeutic effects in rabbit VX2 liver tumor

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is usually considered more efficacious in the local treatment of parenchyma-sparing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). At present, embolic agents commonly used in TACE, include DC pellets, Hepasphere, Lipiodol, etc. Except that iodine oil is a viscous fluid embolic agent, other solid microsphere particles used clinically range from 70 to 700 µm, among which 100 to 300 µm is the most commonly used. With the technology development of micro-invasive interventional therapy, the specific distal embolization through TACE to occlude tumor arterial blood supply in patients with HCC is also required more accurately. Effective terminal embolization is considered to be a preferred option for TACE therapy due to significantly improving the survival rate of patients and preserving liver function. In this article, we prepared the multifunctional multivesicular liposomes (IVO-DOX-MVLs) (<100 µm) that can simultaneously encapsulate ioversol and doxorubicin based on the high-phase transition temperature (T_m) lipid ingredients, and evaluated its local artery embolization and therapeutic effect in rabbit VX-2 tumor model. The influence of particle size on occlusion and therapeutic effect of MVLs on rabbit VX-2 liver tumor models were well evaluated, including the tumor volume change, tumor growth rate, and necrosis rate, which were evaluated by magnetic resonance (MR). MVL samples with average particle size distribution of 50-60 µm exhibited fewer off-target embolization. Through TACE, IVO-DOX-MVLs were directly transported to the tumor tissues, playing roles of embolization performance, CT imaging effect, and local tumor killing effect. The feasibility of MVLs as a multifunctional embolic agent in its clinical application can be further improved by optimization of lipid composition and preparation process.

Spontaneously Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Computed Tomography-Based Assessment

Spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (SRHCC) is an uncommon and life-threatening complication in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is usually associated with chronic liver disease and has a poor prognosis with a high mortality rate during the acute phase. SRHCC can cause a severe and urgent condition of acute abdomen disease and requires a correct diagnosis to achieve adequate treatment. Clinical presentation is related to the presence of hemoperitoneum, and abdominal pain is the most common symptom (66–100% of cases). Although the treatment approach is not unique, trans-arterial (chemo)embolization (TAE/TACE) followed by staged hepatectomy has shown better results in long-term survival. A multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scan is a pivotal technique in the diagnosis of SRHCC due to its diagnostic accuracy and optimal temporal resolution. The correct interpretation of the main CT findings in SRHCC, such as active contrast extravasation and the sentinel clot sign, is fundamental for a prompt and correct diagnosis. Furthermore, CT also plays a role as a post-operative control procedure, especially in patients treated with TAE/TACE. Therefore, a multi-phase CECT scan should be the diagnostic tool of choice in SRHCC since it suggests an immediate need for treatment with a consequent improvement in prognosis.

Clinical risk factors for patients with ruptured hepatoblastoma in children: a retrospective study from a single center in China

OBJECTIVE

Hepatoblastoma (HB) tumor rupture is a high-risk criterion in the International Childhood Liver Tumors Strategy Group (SIOPEL) 3/4 protocol. However, the causes and risk factors for HB rupture are still unknown, and whether tumor rupture is an independent risk factor for HB prognosis is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics of children with HB tumor rupture and to search for clinical risk factors to conduct early prediction and intervention.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 27 patients with HB rupture between July 2009 and July 2019. To further identify the risk factors for HB rupture, we included 97 nonruptured HB patients from January 2013 to January 2019. We searched for potentially useful characteristics for HB rupture by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

There were 27 patients with HB rupture, with the median age of 31 (12, 69) months. Nineteen cases (70.37%) were spontaneous tumor rupture, 1 case (3.70%) was posttraumatic rupture, 2 cases (7.41%) were tumor rupture after the biopsy, and 5 cases (18.52%) were tumor rupture after chemotherapy. After the tumor rupture, 4 patients died of hemorrhagic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), 4 patients refused further therapy and were discharged against medical advice, and the remaining 19 patients were stable after emergency treatment. After the treatment, 14 patients survived without disease, 2 patients died, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up was 48 (33, 60) months, the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 54.7%. Compared with the non-tumor rupture group by multivariate logistic regression analysis, it was found that the maximum diameter of the primary tumor > 13.4 cm, and vascular invasion were independent risk factors for tumor rupture.

CONCLUSION

HB rupture is rare, but it seriously threatens the life and health of children. In the acute phase of tumor rupture, surgery, rescue chemotherapy, transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) and other supportive care can be adopted. Large tumors and vascular invasion are risk factors for HB rupture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Benefits of step-by-step debulking microwave ablation for huge unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractoriness

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of step-by-step debulking Microwave Ablation (MWA) with Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) monotherapy for huge (≥10 cm in diameter) unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after TACE refractoriness.

METHODS

This is a multi-center retrospective study carried out on 599 patients with huge unresectable HCC who received TACE as first-line therapy at five hospitals from January 2009 to December 2018. A total of 103 patients with TACE refractoriness were divided into two cohorts: monthly step-by-step debulking MWA (n = 52) or continued TACE (n = 51). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after refractory TACE were evaluated. Residual liver and tumor volume were recorded for the MWA group.

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 24.3 months and median OS and PFS were significantly longer in the MWA group than in the TACE group (OS 21.0 vs. 11.7 months, PFS 6.1 vs. 3.0 months, both p < 0.001). The one-, two-, and three-year OS rates in the MWA and TACE groups were 73.1%, 46.6%, and 37.2% versus 43.1%, 15.5%, and 2.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the 0.5-, 1-, and 2-year PFS rates in the MWA and TACE groups were 51.9%, 36.5%, and 25.0% versus 27.5%, 11.8%, and 0, respectively. Multivariate analyses confirmed that switching to debulking MWA treatment was an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS and OS. In the MWA group, the average additions of residual liver volume/total liver volume were 7.7% ± 6.7%, 7.2% ± 10.2%, and 10.1% ± 8.8% after the first, second, and third MWA procedure.

CONCLUSION

Step-by-step debulking MWA can significantly improve long-term OS and PFS in patients with huge unresectable HCCs compared with repeated TACE after TACE refractoriness. Key PointThe debulking MWA therapy provides significantly longer OS and PFS than continued TACE for patients with huge unresectable HCCs after TACE-refractory, especially with complete tumor ablation.The most common complications were fever (48.1%) and pain (46.2%) in the MWA group. Two major complications (abdominal infection) were recorded in the MWA group, which recovered after symptomatic treatment.During the course of repeated MWAs, liver hyperplasia appeared mainly after the second MWA procedure and the average maximum increased RLV/TLV rate was 16.3%±12.7%.

Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Do Interventional Radiologists Need to Know?

Rupture of HCC (rHCC) is a life-threatening complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and rHCC may lead to a high rate of peritoneal dissemination and affect survival negatively. Treatment for rHCC mainly includes emergency surgery, interventional therapies, and palliative treatment. However, the management of rHCC should be carefully evaluated. For patients with severe bleeding, who are not tolerant to open surgery, quick hemostatic methods such as rupture tissue ablation and TAE/TACE can be performed. We described clinical presentation, prognosis, complication, interventional management, and current evidence of rHCC from the perspective of interventional radiologists. Overall, our review summarized that interventional therapies are necessary for most patients with rHCC to achieve hemostasis, even in some patients with Child–Pugh C. Moreover, TAE/TACE followed by staged hepatectomy is a beneficial treatment for rHCC according to current clinical evidence. TAE/TACE is the first choice for most patients with rHCC, and appropriate interventional treatment may provide staged surgery opportunities for those who are not tolerant to emergency surgery to reach an ideal prognosis.

Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Do Interventional Radiologists Need to Know?

Rupture of HCC (rHCC) is a life-threatening complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and rHCC may lead to a high rate of peritoneal dissemination and affect survival negatively. Treatment for rHCC mainly includes emergency surgery, interventional therapies, and palliative treatment. However, the management of rHCC should be carefully evaluated. For patients with severe bleeding, who are not tolerant to open surgery, quick hemostatic methods such as rupture tissue ablation and TAE/TACE can be performed. We described clinical presentation, prognosis, complication, interventional management, and current evidence of rHCC from the perspective of interventional radiologists. Overall, our review summarized that interventional therapies are necessary for most patients with rHCC to achieve hemostasis, even in some patients with Child–Pugh C. Moreover, TAE/TACE followed by staged hepatectomy is a beneficial treatment for rHCC according to current clinical evidence. TAE/TACE is the first choice for most patients with rHCC, and appropriate interventional treatment may provide staged surgery opportunities for those who are not tolerant to emergency surgery to reach an ideal prognosis.

Prognostic Significance of Tumor Growth Rate (TGR) in Patients with Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

The prognostic value of the tumor growth rate (TGR) in huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HHCC) patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as an initial treatment remains unclear. This two-center retrospective study was conducted in 97 patients suffering from HHCC. Demographic characteristics, oncology characteristics, and some serological markers were collected for analysis. The TGR was significantly linear and associated with the risk of death when applied to restricted cubic splines. The optimal cut-off value of TGR was −8.6%/month, and patients were divided into two groups according to TGR. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the high-TGR group had a poorer prognosis. TGR (hazard ratio (HR), 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23–3.43; p = 0.006), presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.13–3.27; p = 0.016), and subsequent combination therapy (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35–0.99; p = 0.047) were independent predictors of OS in the multivariate analysis. The model with TGR was superior to the model without TGR in the DCA analysis. Patients who underwent subsequent combination therapy showed a longer survival in the high-TGR group. This study demonstrated that higher TGR was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with HHCC. These findings will distinguish patients who demand more personalized combination therapy and rigorous surveillance.

Repeat hepatic resection VS radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of repeat hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrieved and collected all relevant articles from the inception to 8 March 2020. After data extraction, we conducted meta-analysis and carried out the heterogeneity test, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias test to evaluate reliability.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies with 1746 patients (rHR 837, RFA 909) were included. rHR was similar to RFA in a one-year overall survival rate (OS), while rHR was superior to RFA in 3- and 5-year OS and 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates (DFS), but the procedure-related complications of RFA were significantly less than those of rHR. Among the subgroups with Milan criteria, rHR was similar to RFA in 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and 1-year DFS, but superior to RFA in 3- and 5-year DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA is the first choice for recurrent HCC meeting Milan criteria. When it does not meet the Milan criteria, minimally invasive treatment should not be carried out at the cost of survival, and rHR should be the first choice.