1
|
Kochkin A, Kalfountzos C, Gallyamov E, Biktimirov R, Sanzharov A, Sergeev V, Popov S, Dal Moro F, Tokas T, Gözen AS. Laparoscopic intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement: multi-institutional data from 102 patients. MINIM INVASIV THER 2024; 33:140-146. [PMID: 38265869 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2302889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present long-term results of our laparoscopic intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement (LIUR) cohort, including more complex cases of laparoscopic ileocalycostomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected records of patients undergoing LIUR. Follow-up included a chemical profile and urine cultures. Imaging consisted of renal ultrasonography, excretory urography, cystography, and computer tomographic or magnetic resonance urography. RESULTS One hundred and two patients were included. Stricture location was left (46.1%), right (39.2%), or bilateral (14.7%). No open conversion was performed. Seventy-four patients (72.5%) underwent a total ureteral unit removal. The mean operative time was 289.4 (120 - 680) minutes. The estimated blood loss was 185.2 (10-400) mL. Three patients had intraoperative complications, and fifteen had early postoperative complications. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 12.2 (7-35) days. The mean follow-up duration period was 37.7 (12-162) months. Most patients' follow-up was uneventful (88%), and seven patients presented with Grade 2 late complications. CONCLUSIONS Intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement in cases of extensive ureteral lesions offers optimal long-term outcomes and a low complication rate. Ileocalycostomy constitutes a viable option in the small group of patients with long proximal ureteral strictures and intrarenal pelvis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Kochkin
- Department of Urology, Urological Center of Russian Railways Hospital, Privolzhskiy Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Christos Kalfountzos
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Viopolis, Larissa, Greece
| | - Eduard Gallyamov
- Department of Common Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Rafael Biktimirov
- Department of Urology, Federal Clinical Center of High Medical Technology of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Sanzharov
- Department of Urology, Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Methods of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir Sergeev
- Department of Urology, Russian State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Popov
- Department of Urology, I.I. Mechkikov North - Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Greece
- Department of Urology, Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu G, Li H, Luo F, Zheng H, Yuegao Y, Xie L, Luo H, Chen Z, Ye D, Lai C. Total intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal ureter replacement in a single position for ureteral stricture based on membrane anatomy. BMC Surg 2024; 24:88. [PMID: 38481186 PMCID: PMC10935906 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02363-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to present our initial experience and prove the feasibility of total intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal ureter replacement (TILIUR) in a single position for ureteral stricture based on membrane anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2021 and April 2023, six patients underwent TILIUR in a single position for ureteral strictures based on membrane anatomy. All patients with a past medical history underwent radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection as well as extensive ureteral stricture due to radiotherapy. The procedure is performed completely laparoscopically. Dissection of the digestive system as well as ureteral stricture or renal pelvis is based on membrane anatomy. The surgery is performed in a single position. RESULTS TILIUR in a single position for ureteral stricture based on membrane anatomy was successfully performed without open conversion in all patients. Among the 6 patients, 3 patients underwent combined ileal ureter replacement (IUR) and abdominal wall ostomy, 2 underwent unilateral IUR, and 1 underwent bilateral IUR. The mean length of the ileal substitution was 22.83 cm (range: 15-28). The average operative time was 458 ± 72.77 min (range 385-575 min), and the average intraoperative blood loss was 158 mL (range 50-400 mL). The median postoperative hospital stay was 15.1 d (range: 8-32). The median duration of postoperative follow-up was 15 months (range: 3-29 months). The success rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS TILIUR in a single position may be a promising option for ureteral stricture based on membrane anatomy in selected patients. Moreover, it has a positive effect on patients with renal insufficiency and urinary incontinence. Although IUR is difficult and risky, proficient surgeons can perform the procedure safely and effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohao Wu
- Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 88, Changdong Road, Dongguan, 523560, China
| | - Haomin Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Feng Luo
- Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 88, Changdong Road, Dongguan, 523560, China
| | - Handa Zheng
- Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 88, Changdong Road, Dongguan, 523560, China
| | - Yuanzhi Yuegao
- Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 88, Changdong Road, Dongguan, 523560, China
| | - Lishan Xie
- Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 88, Changdong Road, Dongguan, 523560, China
| | - Huilan Luo
- Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 88, Changdong Road, Dongguan, 523560, China
| | - Zhihui Chen
- Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 88, Changdong Road, Dongguan, 523560, China
| | - Dongming Ye
- Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 88, Changdong Road, Dongguan, 523560, China.
| | - Caiyong Lai
- Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 88, Changdong Road, Dongguan, 523560, China.
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
- Institute of Kidney Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang K, Wang X, Xu C, Li Z, Han G, Fan S, Chen S, Li X, Zhu H, Zhou L, Li X. Totally Intracorporeal Robot-assisted Unilateral or Bilateral Ileal Ureter Replacement for the Treatment of Ureteral Strictures: Technique and Outcomes from a Single Center. Eur Urol 2023; 84:561-570. [PMID: 37225525 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies on totally intracorporeal robot-assisted ileal ureter replacement (RA-IUR) have been reported. OBJECTIVE To report our technique and the outcomes of totally intracorporeal RA-IUR for unilateral or bilateral ureteral reconstruction, involving performing cystoplasty simultaneously. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Fifteen patients underwent totally intracorporeal RA-IUR from April 2021 to July 2022 at a single center. The perioperative variables were prospectively collected, and the outcomes were assessed. SURGICAL PROCEDURE The surgical procedure included dissection of the proximal end of the ureteral stricture or renal pelvis, harvesting of the ileal ureter, rebuilding of intestinal continuity, upper anastomosis of the ileum to the renal pelvis or the ureteral end, and lower anastomosis of the ileum to the bladder. All operations were performed intracorporeally. MEASUREMENTS Patient demographics and perioperative results were prospectively collected and analyzed for perioperative complications and success rates. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS All patients successfully underwent totally intracorporeal RA-IUR without open conversion. Seven patients received unilateral RA-IUR and eight received bilateral RA-IUR. The mean (range) length of the harvested ileal segment was 28.3 (15-40) cm, the operative duration was 261.8 (183-381) min, the estimated blood loss was 64.7 (30-100) ml, and the duration of postoperative hospitalization was 10.5 (7-17) d. At a median (range) follow-up of 14 (8-22) mo, the subjective and functional success rates were 100% and 86.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that totally intracorporeal unilateral or bilateral RA-IUR (even with ileocystoplasty) can be performed safely and efficiently with acceptable minor complications and a high success rate. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study indicates that totally intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter replacement surgery is safe and feasible for ureteral reconstruction, even with ileocystoplasty. The postoperative complications are acceptable. At a median follow-up of 14 (8-22) mo, the subjective and functional success rates were 100% and 86.7%, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Chunru Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Guanpen Han
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Shubo Fan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Silu Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xinfei Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | | | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu W, Xiong S, Fang D, Hao H, Zhang L, Xiong G, Yang K, Zhang P, Zhu H, Cai L, Li X, Zhou L. Minimally invasive ileal ureter replacement: Comparative analysis of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17:e2230. [PMID: 33533169 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study is an initial comparative analysis of perioperative and intermediate-term functional outcomes between patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic (RALS) or conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 25 patients who underwent ileal ureter replacement (10 RALS and 15 LS) were followed by functional cine magnetic resonance urography (MRU) combined with a modified Whitaker test. Also, the characteristics, perioperative data and functional outcomes of the patients were compared. RESULTS The estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and time to oral intake were significantly lower in the RALS group. At the median 14-month follow-up, all the patients showed improved renal function and were symptom-free, with no signs of leakage or stenosis observed by cine MRU combined with a modified Whitaker test. CONCLUSIONS RALS with an extracorporeal bowel resection is feasible and appears to be safe, with quick postoperative recovery and encouraging outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Shengwei Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Han Hao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Gengyan Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongjian Zhu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Cai
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|