Comparison of vNOTES technique with conventional laparoscopy in gynecological emergency cases

Is single-port laparoscopy or vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery the better option for salpingo-oophorectomy?

AIM

To compare postoperative pain and recovery in patients undergoing oophorectomy with single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) versus vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).

METHOD

Patients who underwent salpingo-oophorectomy with SPLS or vNOTES between 2016 and 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Oophorectomy was performed based on the presence of an adnexal mass or breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent oophorectomy with SPLS and 35 underwent vNOTES. Although the mean mass size was slightly larger in the SPLS group than in the vNOTES group (8.0 ± 4.1 vs. 6.8 ± 3.3 cm), the difference was not significant. There was no difference in operating times between SPLS and vNOTES. The mean visual analog scale and faces pain scale scores 2 and 6 h postoperatively were lower in the vNOTES group. The mean quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) score was higher in the vNOTES group (156 ± 14 vs. 148 ± 11; p = 0.009). This analysis identified vNOTES as an independent predictor of a high QoR-40 score.

CONCLUSION

The vNOTES group experienced less pain during the early postoperative period than the SPLS group. Although the operating and removal times were similar, the port setup time was longer for the vNOTES group.

Early surgical outcomes of 550 consecutive patients treated for benign gynecological conditions by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Evidence about intra- and postoperative complication rates related to transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign gynecological conditions is still limited. We report and analyze data from a large cohort of patients operated in a single institution during 3.5 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of vNOTES for benign gynecological indications, we performed a single-center observational study reporting and analyzing perioperative outcomes of 550 consecutive patients operated between 2020 and 2024.

RESULTS

Of the 550 included patients, 365 (66.4%) underwent a vNOTES hysterectomy, 167 (30.4%) a procedure limited to the adnexa, and 18 (3.3%) other interventions, including myomectomy, pelvic adhesiolysis, post-hysterectomy pelvic hematoma drainage, pelvic organ prolapse repair, and appendectomy. The mean age was 49.4 ± 12.2 years, and the mean BMI was 26.2 ± 5.8 kg/m2. The total complication rate was 6.5% (36 cases), of which 2.7% (15 cases) were intraoperative complications and 4.0% (22 cases) were postoperative complications. Patients presented postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade I in 4 cases (0.7%), grade II in 10 cases (1.8%), and grade III in 8 cases (1.5%). We observed no CD grade IV and V complications. Three patients (0.5%) were rehospitalized for postoperative complications management. The conversion rate was 1.6%, with nine cases of conversion to conventional laparoscopy and none to laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of vNOTES appears safe and feasible for most benign gynecological surgeries. Our study focused on surgical complications and demonstrated a profile similar to those reported in previous studies.

vNOTES scarless and painless endometrial cancer staging surgery

AIMS

Sentinel lymph node dissection is performed in endometrial cancer surgery instead of staging surgery, particularly when the disease is advanced and confined to the uterus. The aim of this study is to share our sentinel lymph node detection rates via the vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery method with the literature and to demonstrate a safer and more comfortable surgical treatment process.

METHODS

The analysis includes the patients who underwent surgery sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer utilizing indociyanin green in our center between January 2022 and June 2024.

RESULTS

In all, of 24 endometrial cancer patients underwent surgery sentinel lymph node dissection, nonendometrioid (serous) pathology was observed in only 1 (4%) patient, our other patients (96%) had endometrioid adenocarcinoma pathology. The rates of our sentinel lymph node dissection bilateral and symmetric are 96% (23/24), 94% (22/24), and 79% (19/24), respectively. We would like to emphasize that we successfully used vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery approach on four of our patients who were unsuitable for laparoscopic and robotic surgery due to pain scores of 2 at the 12th hour after surgery and low lung capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and sentinel lymph node dissection will be considered as surgical options in other gynecological cancers due to the comfort it brings to the patient in endometrial cancer.

A Case Control Study of vNOTES versus Conventional Laparoscopic Salpingectomy for Ectopic Pregnancy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

While the laparoscopic approach is the surgical treatment of choice for ectopic pregnancy, vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) is emerging as an alternative route with its good optical visibility and avoidance of abdominal incisions. The authors compare demographics and outcome data of vNOTES vs conventional laparoscopic (CL) salpingectomy for the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

A London University hospital.

PATIENTS

Women with ectopic pregnancy unsuitable for medical management who underwent surgical management.

INTERVENTION

Twenty-five cases of vNOTES vs 25 CL salpingectomy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The mean patient age (29.7 ± 53 vs 31.4 ± 6.7 days), parity (1.2 ± 1.1 vs 1.6 ± 2.1), body mass index (26.7 ± 5.3 vs 27.2 ± 5.4 kg/m3), gestation age (8.44 ± 2.1 vs 7.3 ± 1.7 weeks) and β human chorionic gonadotrophin (βhCG) levels (3725.4 ± 3674.8 vs 4376.5 ± 6493.4 IU/liter) were comparable (p >.05, t test) between patients having vNOTES vs CL salpingectomy. While estimated blood loss was similar (218.2 ± 491.7 vs 173.5 ± 138.7 mL) (p >.001), vNOTES patients had a statistically shorter duration of surgery (35.8 ± 14.4 vs 75.8 ± 19.7 mins) (p <.001, t test) and length of stay (median: 11.5 vs 19.7 hours) (U = 72, p <.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Less patients in the vNOTES group required postoperative opioids (9% vs 25%), and the median visual analog score (/10) for pain at 24 hours was significantly lower (2.0 vs 4.0) (U = 75, p <.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Patients from the vNOTES group were able to return to normal daily activity 11.3 days quicker (5.8 ± 4.3 vs 17.1 ± 8.2 days) (p <.05, t test). vNOTES cases cost approximately USD150 more due to the price of the commercial kits but this is offset by reduced intraoperative time, length of stay and need for postprocedure analgesia.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing vNOTES have shorter intraoperative times and length of stays, less postoperative pain, and more rapid recovery, which help mitigate higher costs incurred by commercial kits. While the vNOTES approach for ectopic pregnancy appears safe and efficacious, more robust data from larger randomized studies are needed.

Learning curve analysis of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in treating ovarian cysts: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopy (vNOTES) is regarded as a challenging surgical technique to learn but is promising in reducing perioperative pain and significantly improves the cosmetic outcomes. Previous studies on the learning curve analysis of vNOTES mainly focuses on the hysterectomy approach, while the vNOTES ovarian cystectomy's learning curve was merely reported though more frequently performed than vNOTES hysterectomy. Therefore, this study seeks to analyze the learning curve of three surgeons with varying levels of experience in performing endoscopic surgery and vaginal surgeries for the treatment of ovarian cysts using vNOTES.

METHODS

A total of 127 patients with ovarian cysts of a variety of pathological types were treated by ovarian vNOTES performed by three surgeons of different levels of endoscopic and transvaginal surgical experience. Each surgeon's learning curve was plotted using the Cumulative Sum method and divided into three or four phases of technique learning at the turning point of the learning curve. The sociodemographic and clinical features of patients in each phase were then compared and factors potentially associated with operation time were also screened.

RESULTS

The learning curve was presented in four phases. The operation time (OT) was significantly shorter in phases II (53.66 ± 16.55 min) and IV (54.39 ± 23.45 min) as compared with phases I (68.74 ± 15.85) and III (75.93 ± 30.55) (p < 0.001). More cases of serve pelvic adhesion and endometrioma were assigned in the later phases. The OT of endometriotic cysts had much longer than that of non-endometriotic cysts(62.57 ± 18.64 min vs. 49.88 ± 14.26 min, p = 0.15) The presence of pelvic adhesion [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 7.149 (0.506, 13.792), p = 0.035] and bilateral cyst [adjusted OR 16.996 (2.155, 31.837), p = 0.025], max diameter of cyst[adjusted OR 2.799 (0.174, 5.425), p = 0.037], and individual surgeon [adjusted OR -6.118 (-11.814, -0.423), p = 0.035] were significantly associated with OT.

CONCLUSION

There learning curve of ovarian vNOTES has four phases. ovarian vNOTES could be mastered after performing seven, nine, and 16 cases by surgeons #1, 2 and 3 respectively, in gynecologic endoscopic surgeries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2200059282 (Registered on April 28th, 2022).

Perioperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in hysterectomy: A comparative study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases using transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) or transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS).

METHODS

A total of 314 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign uterine disease at West China Second University Hospital between October 2018 and December 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. vNOTES (n = 157) and TU-LESS (n = 157) recipients were matched 1:1 in terms of uterine volume. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, uterus weight, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score at 12 h, postoperative indwelling catheter time, and other clinical indicators were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All 314 patients successfully completed the surgery, and the two groups had similar baseline characteristics, with no statistical difference. Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the operation time was shorter in the vNOTES group than in the TU-LESS group (80 vs 100 min, P = 0.04), and there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion rate, postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, or uterine weight. Concerning postoperative outcomes, vNOTES hysterectomy was significantly superior to TU-LESS hysterectomy in terms of the length of hospital stay (3 vs 4 days, P < 0.001), visual analog scale score for pain at 12 h after surgery (P = 0.04), postoperative indwelling catheter time (39.5 vs 64.0 h, P < 0.001), and postoperative exhaust time (24.0 vs 42.0 h, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

vNOTES and TU-LESS seem safe and feasible for hysterectomy, but vNOTES hysterectomy was more conducive to the postoperative rehabilitation of patients, with less trauma, less pain, and better cosmetic effects than TU-LESS hysterectomy. As an emerging surgical approach, more studies, including large-sample, multicenter, randomized controlled trials, are needed to validate our findings.

Discharge within 24 h, transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery- more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecology procedures: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an achievement in the field of minimally invasive surgery. However, the vantage point of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologicalprocedures remains unclear. The main purpose of this study was to compare vNOTES with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery, and to determine which procedure is more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecologic procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital. The 207 enrolled patients had accepted vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology procedures from February 2021 to March 2022. Surgically relevant information regarding patients who underwent ambulatory surgery was collected, and 64 females underwent vNOTES.

RESULTS

Multiple outcomes were analyzed in 207 patients. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery groups in terms of postoperative pain score (0 vs. 1 scores, p = 0.026), duration of anesthesia (90 vs. 101 min, p = 0.025), surgery time (65 vs. 80 min, p = 0.015), estimated blood loss (20 vs. 40 mL, p < 0.001), and intestinal exhaustion time (12.20 vs. 17.14 h, p < 0.001). Treatment with vNOTES resulted in convenience, both with respect to time savings and hemorrhage volume in surgery and with respect to the quality of the prognosis.

CONCLUSION

These comprehensive data reveal the capacity of vNOTES to increase surgical efficiency. vNOTES in gynecological procedures may demonstrate sufficient feasibility and provide a new medical strategy compared with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for ambulatory surgery in gynecological procedures.

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecological emergencies

Objective

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is an emerging minimally invasive approach increasingly applied to perform many gynecological procedures. Despite a still limited level of evidence, compared to conventional laparoscopy, vNOTES seems to be associated with reduced blood loss, shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization time, better cosmetic results and decreased postoperative morbidity. Although growing evidence supports the effectiveness of vNOTES for elective adnexal surgeries, there is still limited knowledge regarding its feasibility and safety in emergency settings. In the present study, we report our experience performing vNOTES in gynecological emergency cases.

Study design

We prospectively collected and analyzed data from patients who underwent vNOTES for gynecological emergencies between November 2021 and June 2023. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were collected and analyzed.

Results

Seventeen patients were included. Interventions were realized for suspicion of ectopic pregnancy in 7 cases (41.2%), for suspicion of adnexal torsion in 7 cases (41.2%), for post-hysterectomy hemoperitoneum in 2 cases (11.8%), and for uncontrollable uterine bleeding in 1 case (5.9%). Emergency procedures included unilateral salpingectomy (35.3%), ovarian cystectomy (23.5%), ovarian cystotomy (17.6%), adnexal detorsion (11.8%), hemoperitoneum drainage (11.8%), hysterectomy (5.9%), and appendectomy (5.9%). The overall median operative time was 38 [18-72] minutes. The median estimated intraoperative blood loss was 30 [5-150] mL, and no intraoperative complications occurred. Conversion to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy was never needed. Patients stayed hospitalized for a median time of 30 [4-144] hours after the intervention. The median visual analog scale value for postoperative pain evaluation was 2 [0-5] at 12, 24, and 48 postoperative hours. No complications associated with the procedure occurred.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing vNOTES procedures for managing gynecological emergencies such as tubal ectopic pregnancy, adnexal torsion, painful ovarian lesions, post-hysterectomy hemoperitoneum, and uncontrollable uterine bleeding. Associated with data reported in the available literature, our results suggest potential benefits in treating gynecological emergencies by vNOTES over conventional laparoscopy. However, stronger evidence from larger studies is needed to confirm it.

Study on the Efficacy of "Information Platform + Self-Care Model" on the Health Status of Discharged Patients Following Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery

Objective

To discuss the impact of the "information platform + self-care model" on the health status of discharged patients following vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).

Methods

Patients underwent vNOTES at a tertiary specialized women's and children's hospital in Chengdu. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups-the intervention group (29 patients) and the control group (29 patients). The control group received standard education after discharge, while the intervention group received guidance based on an "information platform + self-care model" on discharge; a questionnaire survey was conducted for both groups one month after discharge.

Results

The quality of life score in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the scores of the intervention group on dimensions such as vitality, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, social role functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health, except for physical functioning (Z = 0.034, P = 0.973) and bodily pain (Z = 1.470, P = 0.141), were higher than those in the control group one month after discharge, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no patient (0) in the intervention group who had an unscheduled visit/admission, and there was 1 patient (3.6%) in the control group who had unscheduled visit/admission; there were no statistical differences between the two groups in the number of patients who had an unscheduled visit/admission 1 month after discharge (P = 0.491).

Conclusion

The application of the "information platform + self-care model" can, to a certain extent, improve the health status of patients following vNOTES after discharge, and it can also reduce unscheduled visits/admissions, but more research with a larger sample size is required.

Implementing the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) "first" strategy in benign gynecological surgeries

PURPOSE

The use of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) as the first choice of surgical route for patients scheduled to undergo conventional laparoscopy is still being debated. We aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of the "vNOTES first" strategy in benign gynecological cases.

METHODS

All benign gynecological surgeries were initiated using vNOTES during the study period, regardless of the difficulty. Surgical outcomes, short-term patient satisfaction and sexual pain were compared between hysterectomies, adnexal and diagnostic procedures. Visual Analog Score (VAS), Patients Global Impressions of Improvements scale (PGI-I) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were used to assess the postoperative pain, satisfaction and sexual pain, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 105 vNOTES procedures were performed during the study period: 63 (60.58%) adnexal procedures, 36 (34.62%) hysterectomies, 5 (4.81%) diagnostic procedures and one (0.96%) myomectomy. The median 24th hour VAS scores for adnexal, hysterectomy, and diagnostic procedures were 1.29 ± 1.41, 2.06 ± 2.08, and 2.6 ± 2.41, respectively. The satisfaction rate was 96.19% at the 1st postoperative week and 97.14% at the first month. There was either no change or a slight improvement in the patients' total score on the FSFI/pain domain before and after surgery. There were two conversions (1.9%) from vNOTES to laparoscopy and laparotomy, and two (5.56%) bladder injuries in hysterectomy cases.

CONCLUSION

Implementing the vNOTES technique as an initial approach for all benign gynecological surgeries seems feasible, safe and satisfactory, even in those with a non-prolapsed or enlarged uterus and those that have previously undergone abdominal surgery. The pain scores were found to be low and patients stated a high satisfaction with no or better change in their sexual life.

Women's Perception of Transgastric and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) - Impact of Medical Education, Stage of Life and Cross-Cultural Aspects

Introduction

Despite that NOTES produces at least matchable clinical long-term results when compared to laparoscopy, still a restraint within the medical community and among patients is evident. Consequently, it might be meaningful to evaluate factors of patient's NOTES perception to promote its acceptance. NOTES is still quite novel and questionnaires regarding its perception by the public is still lacking even so in the Middle East. Aim of our survey is to investigate the viewpoint of female healthcare staff on NOTES.

Materials and Methods

A total of 350 questionnaires along with written information about Minimally Invasive Surgery and NOTES were distributed among the female staff in a Tertiary-care Hospital in Abu Dhabi, 257 were returned completely anonymously and voluntarily and entered into a database with a response rate of 73%. We surveyed factors like religion, medical background, age as well as history of previous laparoscopy, endoscopy, birth and other aspects that may impact a woman's perception of both transgastric and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy and ovariectomy, respectively.

Results

Univariate analyses revealed the majority of Muslim women to be more receptive to NOTES as a choice of surgical technique for cholecystectomy and for ovariectomy, respectively, when compared to Christians and Hindus. However, when compared to Muslims, Christian and Hindu groups had a larger share of medical professions. Women with a medical background would opt significantly less for NOTES. Among younger women, NOTES cholecystectomy was refused due to anxiety concerning future pregnancies and sexual dysfunction. Multinomial logistic regression analysis determined medical background and with independent predictive value for the overall choice of interventional technique (p<0.001). Marital status played a significant role only in the comparison of laparoscopy vs transgastric NOTES when performing cholecystectomy and ovariectomy (p<0.01).

Conclusion

In this first study emanating from the Middle East, medical education and partly life stage rather than cross-cultural differences seem to influence NOTES perception in women.

Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery: A Single-Center Experience from East China

Objective

To compare hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (VNOTES) versus transumbilical laparoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) as a minimal invasive technique. Materials and Method. The women undergoing hysterectomy for benign diseases by VNOTES and LESS from January 2020 to June 2021 in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

361 women were included in our study, with 228 in the VNOTES groups, 129 in the LESS groups, and 4 conversions from VNOTES to LESS technique. The length of a VNOTES hysterectomy was shorter than that of LESS (80.76 min versus 112.09 min; MD -31.34 min; 95% CI -40.24 to -22.43 min; P < 0.001). VNOTES hysterectomy has a quicker gas passage by the anus (18.80 versus 36.49 hours, MD -17.68 hours, 95% CI -20.23 to -15.14 hours, P < 0.001) and associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (2.31 versus 3.77 days, MD -1.46 days, 95% CI -1.75 to -1.17 days, P < 0.001), while with no increase in blood loss during the operation (median 50 versus 50 ml, P = 0.25). Besides, the VAS pain score in the 24^th hour after the operation was lower (median 0 versus 0.5, P < 0.001) in the VNOTES group. Four unique phases of the learning curve were identified using cumulative analysis: the mean operation time of phase I was 82.81 ± 31.45 min (the initial learning curve of 43 cases), phase II was 72.48 ± 23.66 min (the acquisition of command of 91 cases), phase III was 103.77 ± 45.69 min (the further learning of 26 cases), and phase IV was 73.18 ± 26.89 min (postlearning in 68 cases).

Conclusions

VNOTES is noninferior to LESS as a new minimal invasive procedure for hysterectomy, which also allows patients a faster recovery from surgery and to suffer less pain, and its efficiency and feasibility in large uterine need further exploring.

Safety and Feasibility of Vaginal Delivery in Full-Term Pregnancy After Transvaginal-Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A Case Series

Study Objective

The aim was to investigate the outcome of vaginal delivery of full-term pregnancies in patients after transvaginal-natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) treatment for gynecological disorders.

Design

A case series report.

Setting

A medical university hospital.

Patients

12 cases of successful delivery after transvaginal-natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Interventions

Long-term follow-up of patients with fertility needs after transvaginal-natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Measurements and Main Results

From 2018 to 2021, 163 cases of gynecological diseases were treated by vNOTES. One hundred forty-seven patients were followed up, with a follow-up rate of 90.1%. The average follow-up time was 28 (15–47) months, including 66 cases with fertility requirements. Among these 66 patients, 12 patients successfully got pregnant and completed delivery, including 10 cases of vaginal delivery and 2 cases of cesarean section, with no adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with vNOTES arising.

Conclusion

Vaginal delivery of a full-term pregnancy after transvaginal-natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery appears to be safe and feasible and would not be one of the bases for elective cesarean delivery.