The views of early intervention service staff on the treatment of first episode bipolar disorder

Early intervention in psychosis for first episode psychotic mania: the experience of people diagnosed with bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Early intervention for people diagnosed with bipolar disorder has been identified as a priority, but little is known about how existing early intervention services are experienced by this group or could be tailored to their needs.

AIMS

This study examined the experience of early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services for people diagnosed with bipolar disorder, following first episode psychotic mania.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 adults in EIP services and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

RESULTS

One superordinate theme was formed, Rebuilding within EIP service, consisting of five subthemes: (i) Piecing together episode through talking to staff; (ii) Exploring other perspectives during CBT; (iii) Empowered through shared decision-making; (iv) Reconsidering future and purpose; (v) Service as safety-net. EIP provision was pivotal in helping participants understand their episode, adjust their perspective, build confidence and progress.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspects of the service that were valued, including person-centred relationships with staff, shared decision-making and the development of motivation and opportunities, reflect key principles of mental health care for young people following first episode psychosis. Furthermore, findings point to elements that may be particularly relevant to early intervention following first episode psychotic mania including managing mood escalation and individualised approaches to goals.

Recovering from first episode psychotic mania: The experience of people diagnosed with bipolar disorder

AIM

Early intervention for people diagnosed with bipolar disorder is a priority, but little is known about how recovery from first episode psychotic mania is experienced by this group. This study aimed to explore the experience of recovery from first episode psychotic mania for people diagnosed with bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 young adults during recovery from first episode psychotic mania and were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified: (i) 'Possession of purpose and staying well', (ii) 'Coping with compromise' and (iii) 'Manic relapse: pressure and proving self'. On becoming well, the participants experienced a sense of purpose through engaging with activities and goals that also drove their efforts to engage in strategies to stay well. However, these strategies created feelings of compromise that not all were prepared to accept. Though having purpose and goals created a positive sense of direction, for a minority of the participants they also created additional pressure, contributing to manic relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose created by engaging with aspirations and career-related activities during early intervention was found to be important for a meaningful recovery from first episode bipolar disorder. This instilled positivity and purpose, motivating efforts to maintain wellness. The feelings of compromise that some participants experienced point to the need for individually tailored interventions. Findings suggest a delicate relationship between the positivity of engaging in goals and the risk of manic relapse during recovery from first episode psychotic mania.

A narrative review of intervention in first-episode affective psychoses

While first-episode schizophrenia has received extensive attention in the literature, few studies have focused on the first episode of affective psychoses. Considering the lack of structured data regarding this diagnostic grouping commonly used in clinical settings, our aim was to scope the literature on first-episode affective psychoses to consolidate current knowledge and to identify areas to be targeted in future studies. We also planned to investigate the relevance of the "affective psychosis" concept regarding diagnostic categories and specific needs of intervention. We conducted a search on the Embase, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO and Web Of Science databases until October 2020. We selected studies and synthesized the key findings into a narrative review regarding major topics of early intervention research: diagnostic categorization, premorbid factors, intervention, duration of untreated illness, neurobiology and neurocognition. After screening 961 titles and abstracts and 193 full-text papers, we selected 77 studies for inclusion. Our results showed heterogeneity in diagnosis-related grouping under the concept of affective psychoses, especially variability regarding the inclusion of schizoaffective disorder. Nonetheless, this concept still encompasses patients with different psychopathological and neurocognitive profiles from the non-affective patients requiring specialized intervention. This study thus provided support for the relevance of this concept as well as a need for further investigation.

The impact of manic symptoms in first-episode psychosis: Findings from the UK National EDEN study

OBJECTIVE

The extant literature is inconsistent over whether manic symptoms in first-episode psychosis (FEP) impact on its development and trajectory. This study addressed the following: (1) Does Duration of Untreated Illness (DUI) and Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) differ between FEP patients with and without manic symptoms? (2) Do manic symptoms in FEP have an impact on time to remission over 1 year?

METHODS

We used data from the National EDEN study, a longitudinal cohort of patients with FEP accessing early intervention services (EIS) in England, which measured manic, positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and functioning at service entry and 1 year. Data from 913 patients with FEP (639 without manic symptoms, 237 with manic symptoms) were analysed using both general linear modelling and survival analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to FEP patients without manic symptoms, those with manic symptoms had a significantly longer DUI, though no difference in DUP. At baseline, people with manic symptoms had higher levels of positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and worse functioning. At 12 months, people with manic symptoms had significantly poorer functioning and more positive psychotic symptoms. The presence of manic symptoms delayed time to remission over 1 year. There was a 19% reduced rate of remission for people with manic symptoms compared to those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Manic symptoms in FEP are associated with delays to treatment. This poorer trajectory persists over 1 year. They appear to be a vulnerable and under-recognised group for poor outcome and need more focussed early intervention treatment.