Curative resection for left-sided pancreatic malignancy

Extended Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer of the Body and Tail of the Pancreas: Analysis of Early and Late Results

Cancer of the body-tail of the pancreas often involves adjacent structures. Thus, surgical treatment may be extended to other organs or vessels in order to achieve radical resection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Between January 2000 and December 2016, 101 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) for pancreatic cancer: 65 patients underwent standard-DP and 36 extended-DP, including the resection of the partial stomach (n = 12), adrenal gland (n = 7), liver (n = 7), colon (n = 8), celiac axis (n = 6), portal vein (n = 5), jejunum (n = 4) and kidney (n = 4). The two groups were compared in terms of their TNM classification, pathological grade, nodal status, state of resection margins, age, sex and levels of preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19.9). The morbidity and mortality were not statistically different in the two groups. The two groups disease-free and overall survival rates were significantly influenced by the tumor's stage, nodal status, pathological features and resection margins. Survival was not influenced by the extent of the surgical resection. However, when patients were stratified according to the type of extended resection, survival was worse in the group of patients undergoing vascular resection. Multivariate analysis showed that the stage and resection margins are independent predictors of disease-free and overall survival. Extended distal pancreatectomy may be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Survival is not significantly different after standard or extended resection. However, the rate of tumor recurrence is high, and long-term survival is a rare event, especially in those patients who undergo distal pancreatectomy associated with vascular resection.

[Choice of surgical approach to insulin-producing pancreatic tumors]

AIM

To determine the optimal surgical approach to insulin-producing pancreatic tumors via an analysis of early postoperative results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 134 patients with insulin-producing pancreatic tumors followed by organic hyperinsulinism who have undergone surgery in the faculty-based surgical clinic of the Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University for the period 1990-2017. Patients were divided into three groups depending on type of surgical intervention. Surgical procedure was determined after comprehensive preoperative and intraoperative examination including intraoperative ultrasound.

RESULTS

Incidence of postoperative complications was 32.8%. Ten (7.5%) patients required redo surgical interventions. Overall postoperative mortality was 4.5%. The best immediate results were observed in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. There was a correlation between incidence of early postoperative complications and tumor location depth in the enucleation group.

CONCLUSION

Enucleation is advisable for insulinoma of pancreatic head or uncinated process, as well as superficial tumors of the left half of the pancreas. Distal pancreatectomy is indicated for deep tumors of the left half of the pancreas. Indications for pancreatoduodenectomy are individual.

Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer-Population-Based Analysis with Propensity Score Matching

This population-based study evaluated the survival impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in left-sided pancreatic cancer. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients with surgically resected left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2010. Propensity score matching was conducted to compare PORT and non-PORT groups. A total of 445 patients were identified, and PORT was performed in 180 (40 %) patients. In the unmatched population, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) (P = 0.197) and cause-specific survival (CSS) (P = 0.379) between the PORT and non-PORT groups. After propensity score matching, the patients treated with PORT had longer median OS (P = 0.012) and CSS (P = 0.039) than the non-PORT group. In propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis, non-receipt of PORT was a poor prognostic factor in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.79), and CSS (HR 1.31, 95 % CI 1.01-1.71). The log odds of positive lymph nodes (LOODS) (≥-0.73) was also associated with worse OS (P = 0.003) and CSS (P = 0.001). In left-sided pancreatic cancer, considering the addition of PORT is a reasonable option as in pancreatic head cancer. The LOODS was suggested as a strong predictive indicator of the patients' prognoses.

Positive expression of L1-CAM is associated with perineural invasion and poor outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently invades and migrates along neural tissue, which results in local tumor recurrences, distant metastases, and poor prognosis. We evaluated whether L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM) and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) expression in PDAC correlated with neural invasion and overall survival on a large cohort of previously untreated patients.

METHODS

L1-CAM and GDNF were examined by immunohistochemistry in pancreatic cancer tissue samples of 94 cases with PDAC on a tissue microarray. The molecular findings were correlated with pain, clinicopathologic characteristics, and overall survival in these patients.

RESULTS

L1-CAM and GDNF were overexpressed in pancreatic cancer tissues compared with the adjacent normal tissues of pancreas. Positive L1-CAM expression was associated with node involvement (P = 0.007), vascular invasion (P = 0.012), perineural invasion (P = 0.001), and higher degree of pain (P = 0.005). In univariate analysis, tissue expression of L1-CAM was associated with poor survival (hazard ratio, 2.508; 95% confidence interval, 1.551-4.053; P < 0.001), and this was also significant in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 2.046; 95% confidence interval, 1.200-3.488; P = 0.009). Positive staining of GDNF, neural invasion, and vascular invasion were all statistically significantly related to unfavorable prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced expression of L1-CAM may contribute to the pain syndrome and perineural invasion and may correlate with poor overall survival in human pancreatic cancer.