Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration in elderly patients: safety and performance outcomes EBUS-TBNA in elderly

Safety of geriatric patients undergoing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with deep sedation: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can be performed in a wide range, from minimal sedation to general anesthesia. Advanced age increases perioperative risks related to anesthesia and is also associated with many pathological processes that further increase morbidity and mortality. The ideal sedation protocol for EBUS-TBNA has yet to be determined in geriatric patients. Deep sedation (DS) may increase the safety and performance of the procedure. There are limited studies evaluating the effectiveness and safety of EBUS-TBNA under DS in elderly patients.

METHODS

280 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA under DS were included in this retrospective study. 156 patients aged 65 years and over (Group 1) and 124 patients under 45 (Group 2) were compared. Demographic data, comorbidities, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), hemodynamic measurements, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) before the procedure were evaluated. In addition, the duration of the EBUS-TBNA procedure, sedation agents and dosages, recovery time, and complications related to the procedure in the 24 h and applied medications and treatments were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no difference in body mass index, EBUS-TBNA procedure duration, and recovery time between geriatric and young patients(p > 0.05). The proportion of female patients, pre-anesthesia SpO2, and PFTs were found to be significantly lower in geriatric patients(p < 0.05). ASA classification, frequency of comorbidities, and initial mean arterial pressure were found to be significantly higher in the geriatric group(p < 0.05). The propofol-ketamine combination was the most preferred sedative in both groups. The dose of propofol used in the regimen in which propofol was administered alone was found to be lower in the elderly group (p < 0.05). The increase in the HR was significant in Group 2 in the T4 and T5 periods with respect to T1 when the differences were compared (p < 0.05). As a complication, the frequency of high blood pressure during the procedure was higher in the elderly group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The EBUS-TBNA procedure performed under DS was safe in elderly and young patients. Our study showed that the procedure and recovery times were similar in the elderly and young groups. The incidence of temporary high blood pressure during the procedure was higher in the elderly patients. The other complication rates during the procedure were similar in groups. Decreased propofol dose in the regimen using propofol alone has shown us that anesthetists are more sensitive to the administration of sedative agents in geriatric patients, taking into account comorbidities and drug interactions.

Interventional pulmonology in elderly in tuberculosis and respiratory diseases-challenges

With the increasing number of the elderly population, the number of people with respiratory diseases along with other comorbidities is also increasing. With the good number of available evidence, the use of interventional pulmonary procedures is also increasing. However, the studies on the safety and therapeutic benefit of these procedures in the elderly population are limited. Because of the paucity of data, we decided to do a systematic review of the scientific literature that is currently available, to boost confidence to do these procedures by clinicians. This review deals with the procedures that are commonly performed in elderly respiratory patients, their indications, safety and the diagnostic and therapeutic yield, and compares them with the results in the younger population. It also focuses on the safety of anaesthetic techniques used for these procedures in the elderly. The bottom line of this review is that there is no significant difference between the older and younger age groups with regard to the above parameters and that age alone is not a criterion to decide whether the patients may undergo interventional pulmonary procedures.

Safety and efficacy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for patients aged 80 years and older

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in patients aged 70 years and older has been established. However, few studies have evaluated the safety, usefulness, and significance of EBUS-TBNA in patients aged 80 years and older.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated patients aged 80 years and older who underwent EBUS-TBNA under local anesthesia. The study period was 10 years; from November 1, 2010 to October 31, 2020. The primary endpoint was the safety of EBUS-TBNA, which was measured as the incidence of complications associated with the procedure. The secondary endpoints were the overall diagnostic rate, malignant disease diagnosis rate, and malignant disease treatment rate.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients were enrolled in the study, and the median age was 82 years (range: 80-89 years). The incidence of complications (the primary endpoint) was 5% (5/111) and comprised oversedation in one case, chest pain in one case, hypoxemia in two cases, and arrhythmia in one case. Regarding the secondary endpoints, the diagnostic rate for all patients was 75% (83/111), and the diagnostic rate of malignant disease was 89% (75/84). Of the 75 patients with malignant disease diagnosed with EBUS-TBNA, 61 (81%) received tumor-specific therapy in accordance with their diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA can be considered safe and effective even in patients aged 80 years and older.