Health intervention experiences and associated mental health outcomes in a sample of LGBTQ people with intersex variations in Australia

Support for affirmative actions to increase inclusivity of intersex* persons at an Austrian medical university

BACKGROUND

Since the ruling handed down by the Austrian Constitutional Court in 2018 intersex variation has been recognized under Austrian law as a "third sex". In order to ensure that people with intersex variation are not discriminated against based on their group membership affirmative actions (i.e., proactive practices to avert discrimination) can be implemented. The current study explored whether students and employees at an Austrian medical university know about intersex variation. Furthermore, the study investigated what affirmative actions are practiced at the medical university to be inclusive for intersex persons and students' and employees' support for such affirmative actions.

METHODS

All students and employees of a medical university in Austria were invited by e-mail to participate at the current study that included a self-constructed knowledge test on intersex variation with ten true-false questions. On five-point Likert scales participants reported for each of twelve listed affirmative actions whether they had seen a certain affirmative action at their university and how important they thought the implementation of an affirmative action was. Finally, participants' gender, age, sexual orientation, highest level of education, and nationality was assessed. A cluster analysis was performed to determine groups of people with different degrees of support for affirmative actions for intersex persons.

RESULTS

220 students (62% cisgender women, 38% cisgender men) and 200 employees (72% cisgender women, 28% cisgender men) participated. Participants responded correctly to three out of ten knowledge test questions. The cluster analysis revealed that participants could be clustered as heterosexual cisgender women (Cluster 1; 55%), heterosexual cisgender men (Cluster 2; 30%), or sexual minority cisgender women and men (Cluster 3; 15%). Sexual minority persons knew more about intersex variation than did heterosexual participants. On average, affirmative actions for the inclusivity of intersex people have not been encountered (M = 1.5, SD = 0.4) at the studied university. Participants, especially those in Cluster 3, believed that the listed actions are moderately important.

CONCLUSIONS

At the medical university many actions should be taken to increase inclusivity for intersex people. Increasing the knowledge of university staff and students concerning intersex might help increase their support for such actions.

A needs assessment for self-management services for adults awaiting community-based mental health services

BACKGROUND

High demand for services has resulted in lengthy waiting times being experienced across mental health services, both across Australia and internationally. Timely access to services is necessary to optimise the effectiveness of treatment, and prevent further mental health decline, risk of suicidality and hospitalisation for clients waiting for services to commence. The present study aims to better understand the experiences of individuals who are waiting for ongoing mental health services to commence and their preferences for additional support whilst on the waitlist, as a means to recommend alternative supports.

METHODS

A link to the cross-sectional, anonymous survey was sent via text message to 2,147 clients of a mental health service, with a reminder text message sent approximately one week subsequent to those who did not opt out of the communication. Eligibility criteria included having been a client of the service in the previous 12 months, having spent time on the waiting list, being aged 16 or over and having sufficient English proficiency.

RESULTS

A total of 334 participants responded to the needs assessment survey, 277 (82.9%) of which resided in the metropolitan region and 57 (17.1%) residing in the country region. Of the respondents, the majority presented with generalised anxiety/panic attacks (n = 205, 61.4%), followed by life stressors (e.g., financial concerns, relationships, n = 196, 58.7%) and lack of motivation/loss of interest (n = 196, 58.7%). Most respondents (52.7%) waited 4-12 months for ongoing services to commence and almost half (47%) reported that their mental health deteriorated during this time. Of the additional support options, most participants expressed interest in additional mental health supports (78.4%, n = 262), such as telephone support and access to online materials. There was significant interest in other supports such as exercise support (57.4%, n = 192), sleep education (56.6%, n = 190) and healthy eating support (41%, n = 137).

CONCLUSION

Mental health services are experiencing significant waiting times, increasing the risk of mental health deterioration for persons waiting for services to commence. However, the findings demonstrate that there is interest for alternative support options, such as lifestyle interventions, in the interim. Desire for lifestyle support services, particularly in-person exercise programs and self-directed sleep, was especially high amongst the population of respondents within this study. Future work to rigorously develop and evaluate such lifestyle support services for mental health clients is warranted.