1
|
Ruhnke M, Cornely OA, Schmidt-Hieber M, Alakel N, Boell B, Buchheidt D, Christopeit M, Hasenkamp J, Heinz WJ, Hentrich M, Karthaus M, Koldehoff M, Maschmeyer G, Panse J, Penack O, Schleicher J, Teschner D, Ullmann AJ, Vehreschild M, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Weissinger F, Schwartz S. Treatment of invasive fungal diseases in cancer patients-Revised 2019 Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO). Mycoses 2020; 63:653-682. [PMID: 32236989 DOI: 10.1111/myc.13082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive fungal diseases remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing intensive cytotoxic therapy. The choice of the most appropriate antifungal treatment (AFT) depends on the fungal species suspected or identified, the patient's risk factors (eg length and depth of granulocytopenia) and the expected side effects. OBJECTIVES Since the last edition of recommendations for 'Treatment of invasive fungal infections in cancer patients' of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) in 2013, treatment strategies were gradually moving away from solely empirical therapy of presumed or possible invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) towards pre-emptive therapy of probable IFD. METHODS The guideline was prepared by German clinical experts for infections in cancer patients in a stepwise consensus process. MEDLINE was systematically searched for English-language publications from January 1975 up to September 2019 using the key terms such as 'invasive fungal infection' and/or 'invasive fungal disease' and at least one of the following: antifungal agents, cancer, haematological malignancy, antifungal therapy, neutropenia, granulocytopenia, mycoses, aspergillosis, candidosis and mucormycosis. RESULTS AFT of IFDs in cancer patients may include not only antifungal agents but also non-pharmacologic treatment. In addition, the armamentarium of antifungals for treatment of IFDs has been broadened (eg licensing of isavuconazole). Additional antifungals are currently under investigation or in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS Here, updated recommendations for the treatment of proven or probable IFDs are given. All recommendations including the levels of evidence are summarised in tables to give the reader rapid access to key information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Ruhnke
- Division of Haematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Oliver A Cornely
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,ECMM Excellence Centre of Medical Mycology, Cologne, Germany.,Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Clinical Trials Centre Cologne (ZKS Köln), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Nael Alakel
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Boris Boell
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dieter Buchheidt
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mannheim University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian Christopeit
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Oncology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Justin Hasenkamp
- Clinic for Haematology and Medical Oncology with Department for Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Werner J Heinz
- Schwerpunkt Infektiologie, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Innere Medizin III, Rotkreuzklinikum München, München, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Haematology & Oncology, Municipal Hospital Neuperlach, München, Germany
| | - Michael Koldehoff
- Klinik für Knochenmarktransplantation, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum Essen, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany
| | - Georg Maschmeyer
- Department of Hematology, Onclogy and Palliative Care, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Jens Panse
- Klinik für Onkologie, Hämatologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Olaf Penack
- Division of Haematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Charité University Medicine, Campus Rudolf Virchow, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Schleicher
- Klinik für Hämatologie Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Daniel Teschner
- III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrew John Ullmann
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maria Vehreschild
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,ECMM Excellence Centre of Medical Mycology, Cologne, Germany.,Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Infektiologie, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.,Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Bonn-Köln, Deutschland
| | - Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung für Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Florian Weissinger
- Division of Haematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Stefan Schwartz
- Division of Haematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Charité University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maschmeyer G, Carratalà J, Buchheidt D, Hamprecht A, Heussel CP, Kahl C, Lorenz J, Neumann S, Rieger C, Ruhnke M, Salwender H, Schmidt-Hieber M, Azoulay E. Diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy of lung infiltrates in febrile neutropenic patients (allogeneic SCT excluded): updated guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). Ann Oncol 2015; 26:21-33. [PMID: 24833776 PMCID: PMC4269340 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2014] [Revised: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Up to 25% of patients with profound neutropenia lasting for >10 days develop lung infiltrates, which frequently do not respond to broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. While a causative pathogen remains undetected in the majority of cases, Aspergillus spp., Pneumocystis jirovecii, multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, mycobacteria or respiratory viruses may be involved. In at-risk patients who have received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis, filamentous fungal pathogens appear to be predominant, yet commonly not proven at the time of treatment initiation. Pathogens isolated from blood cultures, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or respiratory secretions are not always relevant for the etiology of pulmonary infiltrates and should therefore be interpreted critically. Laboratory tests for detecting Aspergillus galactomannan, β-D-glucan or DNA from blood, BAL or tissue samples may facilitate the diagnosis; however, most polymerase chain reaction assays are not yet standardized and validated. Apart from infectious agents, pulmonary side-effects from cytotoxic drugs, radiotherapy or pulmonary involvement by the underlying malignancy should be included into differential diagnosis and eventually be clarified by invasive diagnostic procedures. Pre-emptive treatment with mold-active systemic antifungal agents improves clinical outcome, while other microorganisms are preferably treated only when microbiologically documented. High-dose TMP/SMX is first choice for treatment of Pneumocystis pneumonia, while cytomegalovirus pneumonia is treated primarily with ganciclovir or foscarnet in most patients. In a considerable number of patients, clinical outcome may be favorable despite respiratory failure, so that intensive care should be unrestrictedly provided in patients whose prognosis is not desperate due to other reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Maschmeyer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany.
| | - J Carratalà
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Buchheidt
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mannheim University Hospital, Mannheim
| | - A Hamprecht
- Institution for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne
| | - C P Heussel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology with Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital, Heidelberg
| | - C Kahl
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg
| | - J Lorenz
- Department of Pneumology, Infectious Diseases, Sleep Medicine and Intensive Care, Klinikum Lüdenscheid, Lüdenscheid
| | - S Neumann
- Medical Oncology, AMO MVZ, Wolfsburg
| | - C Rieger
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Großhadern, München
| | - M Ruhnke
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Charité University Medicine Campus Mitte, Berlin
| | - H Salwender
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg
| | - M Schmidt-Hieber
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - E Azoulay
- AP-HP, Hopital Saint-Louis, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mousset S, Buchheidt D, Heinz W, Ruhnke M, Cornely OA, Egerer G, Krüger W, Link H, Neumann S, Ostermann H, Panse J, Penack O, Rieger C, Schmidt-Hieber M, Silling G, Südhoff T, Ullmann AJ, Wolf HH, Maschmeyer G, Böhme A. Treatment of invasive fungal infections in cancer patients-updated recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO). Ann Hematol 2013; 93:13-32. [PMID: 24026426 PMCID: PMC3889633 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-013-1867-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2013] [Accepted: 07/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO) here presents its updated recommendations for the treatment of documented fungal infections. Invasive fungal infections are a main cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy regimens. In recent years, new antifungal agents have been licensed, and agents already approved have been studied in new indications. The choice of the most appropriate antifungal treatment depends on the fungal species suspected or identified, the patient's risk factors (e.g., length and depth of neutropenia), and the expected side effects. This guideline reviews the clinical studies that served as a basis for the following recommendations. All recommendations including the levels of evidence are summarized in tables to give the reader rapid access to the information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Mousset
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Wilhelm Epstein-Straße 4, 60431, Frankfurt, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rüping MJGT, Vehreschild JJ, Groll A, Lass-Flörl C, Ostermann H, Ruhnke M, Cornely OA. Current issues in the clinical management of invasive aspergillosis--the AGIHO, DMykG, ÖGMM and PEG web-based survey and expert consensus conference 2009. Mycoses 2011; 54:e557-68. [PMID: 21518025 DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01989.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to identify unsolved issues in the management of invasive aspergillosis, identify controversies and achieve consensus. The German Speaking Mycological Society (Deutschsprachige Mykologische Gesellschaft, DMykG) invited other German infectious diseases (ID) and mycological societies to submit unsolved issues concerning the diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Based on these contributions, a digital web-based questionnaire of 12 questions on Aspergillus spp. was designed to be completed by experts of the participating societies. Controversial results were identified by a mathematical model and were discussed at a consensus conference during the 43rd Annual Meeting of the DMykG in Cologne, Germany. Forty-two individuals completed the questionnaire. Analysis showed a strong consensus on effective preventive measures, choice of antifungal agents for pre-emptive, empiric and targeted treatment, as well as the evaluation of early chest CT control scans as a measure of treatment response assessment. Opinions on the indication for a pulmonary biopsy of a halo sign in high-risk neutropenic patients and on the role of Aspergillus spp. PCR as well as galactomannan from serum in the assessment of treatment duration diverged in spite of discussion such that a consensus could not be reached. Using a recently published two-step approach - web-based survey plus classical panel discussion - expert consensus was achieved on 10 of 12 questions concerning the diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J G T Rüping
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maschmeyer G, Calandra T, Singh N, Wiley J, Perfect J. Invasive mould infections: a multi-disciplinary update. Med Mycol 2010; 47:571-83. [PMID: 19444698 DOI: 10.1080/13693780902946559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Systemic fungal infections remain a significant cause of mortality in neutropenic and immunocompromised patients, despite advances in their diagnosis and treatment. The incidence of such infections is rising due to the use of intensive chemotherapy regimens in patients with solid tumours or haematological cancers, the increasing numbers of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplants, and the use of potent immunosuppressive therapy in patients with autoimmune disorders. In addition, the epidemiology of systemic fungal infections is changing, with atypical species such as Aspergillus terreus and zygomycetes becoming more common. Treatment has traditionally focused on empirical therapy, but targeted pre-emptive therapy in high-risk patients and prophylactic antifungal treatment are increasingly being adopted. New treatments, including lipid formulations of amphotericin B, second-generation broad-spectrum azoles, and echinocandins, offer effective antifungal activity with improved tolerability compared with older agents; the potential impact of these treatments is reflected in their inclusion in current treatment and prophylaxis guidelines. New treatment strategies, such as aerosolized lipid formulations of amphotericin B, may also reduce the burden of mortality associated with systemic fungal infections. The challenge is to identify ways of coupling potentially effective treatments with early and reliable identification of patients at highest risk of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Maschmeyer
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Center for Haematology, Oncology and Radiotherapy, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lass-Flörl C. Standard dosing regimen of liposomal amphotericin B is as effective as a high-loading dose for patients with invasive aspergillosis: AmBiLoad trial. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2008; 5:929-32. [PMID: 18039077 DOI: 10.1586/14787210.5.6.929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Invasive mold infections continue to account for significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients; outcomes are dependent on both underlying host factors and appropriate therapy. The antifungal armamentarium has gradually increased during the past, with liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) being an important representative. Still, the question of what dose to use - a maximum tolerated or a minimum effective - has yet to be answered. On this basis, a randomized trial comparing a high-loading dose regimen with a standard dosing of L-AMB (AmBiLoad trial) for primary therapy of mold infections was initiated. No significant differences in response between the treatment groups were detected, although recipients of the 10-mg/kg daily dose experienced higher rates of nephrotoxicity and hypokalemia. Uncontrolled malignancy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation were significantly associated with poor survival. This article analyzes the study, discusses the rationale and the results and concludes that this study supports the routine application of L-AMB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Lass-Flörl
- Innsbruck Medical University, Department of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Section of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Fritz Pregl Str. 3/III, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|