1
|
Bhan V, Clift F, Baharnoori M, Thomas K, Patel BP, Blanchette F, Adlard N, Vudumula U, Gudala K, Dutta N, Grima D, Mouallif S, Farhane F. Cost-consequence analysis of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada. J Comp Eff Res 2023; 12:e220175. [PMID: 37606897 PMCID: PMC10690431 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2022-0175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The costs and consequences of initial and delayed ofatumumab treatment were evaluated in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with active disease in Canada. Materials & methods: A Markov cohort model was used (10-year horizon, annual cycle length, 1.5% discounting). Scenario analyses examined ofatumumab as first-line treatment versus 3 and 5 years following switch from commonly used first-line therapies. Results: Ofatumumab resulted in improvements in clinical outcomes (relapses and disease progression) and productivity (employment and full-time work), and reduction of economic burden (administration, monitoring and non-drug costs) that were comparable to other high-efficacy therapies (ocrelizumab, cladribine and natalizumab). Switching to ofatumumab earlier in the disease course may improve these outcomes. Conclusion: Results highlight the value of a high-efficacy therapy such as ofatumumab as initial treatment (i.e., first-line) in newly diagnosed relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients with active disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virender Bhan
- Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Fraser Clift
- Department of Neurology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Moogeh Baharnoori
- Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kapil Gudala
- Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, 500081, India
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oh M, McBride A, Bhattacharjee S, Slack M, Jeter J, Abraham I. The economic value of knowing BRCA status: BRCA testing for optimizing treatment in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:317-325. [PMID: 36691923 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2169136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to estimate the incremental lifetime effects, costs, and net monetary benefit (NMB) of knowing BRCA information for recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) patients in a given year and the cumulative savings of yearly hypothetical cohort testing over 16 years. We compared two strategies: (1) 'with BRCA information' and (2) 'without BRCA information.' METHODS Incremental NMB (INMB) was calculated as the average net monetized benefit of knowing BRCA status. The net monetized value (cumulative INMB) of knowing BRCA information was estimated by multiplying the INMB with the eligible ROC patients in year 2020 and extended for potential ROC patients over 16 yearly hypothetical cohorts of ROC patients. RESULTS Knowing BRCA information for ROC patients provided an additional monetized value of $3,528 in (payer) and $3,194 (society). Escalated to all ROC patients in the U.S. and future incidence ROC estimates, knowing BRCA information resulted in a lifetime cumulative INMB of $35.6 million (payer) and $32.2 million (society) for the 2020 cohort; and yielded an accumulated value of $97.3 million (payer) and $88.0 million (society) over 16 yearly hypothetical cohorts of ROC patients. CONCLUSIONS The economic value of knowing BRCA status of all U.S. ROC patients provides short-term and long-term evidence for optimizing treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mok Oh
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Ali McBride
- The University of Arizona Cancer Center, North Campus, AZ, USA
| | - Sandipan Bhattacharjee
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Marion Slack
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, United States.,Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Joanne Jeter
- University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, AZ, USA
| | - Ivo Abraham
- Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodríguez-Sánchez B, Daugbjerg S, Peña-Longobardo LM, Oliva-Moreno J, Aranda-Reneo I, Cicchetti A, López-Bastida J. Does the inclusion of societal costs change the economic evaluations recommendations? A systematic review for multiple sclerosis disease. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:247-277. [PMID: 35596098 PMCID: PMC9985586 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01471-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis imposes a heavy burden on the person who suffers from it and on the relatives, due to the caregiving load involved. The objective was to analyse whether the inclusion of social costs in economic evaluations of multiple sclerosis-related interventions changed results and/or conclusions. METHODS A systematic review was launched using Medline and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry of Tufts University (2000-2019). Included studies should: (1) be an original study published in a scientific journal, (2) be an economic evaluation of any multiple sclerosis-related intervention, (3) include productivity losses and/or informal care costs (social costs), (4) be written in English, (5) use quality-adjusted life years as outcome, and (6) separate the results according to the perspective applied. RESULTS Twenty-nine articles were selected, resulting in 67 economic evaluation estimations. Social costs were included in 47% of the studies. Productivity losses were assessed in 90% of the estimations (the human capital approach was the most frequently used method), whereas informal care costs were included in nearly two-thirds of the estimations (applying the opportunity and the replacement-cost methods equally). The inclusion of social costs modified the figures for incremental costs in 15 estimations, leading to a change in the conclusions in 10 estimations, 6 of them changing from not recommended from the healthcare perspective to implemented from the societal perspective. The inclusion of social costs also altered the results from cost-effective to dominant in five additional estimations. CONCLUSIONS The inclusion of social costs affected the results/conclusions in multiple sclerosis-related interventions, helping to identify the most appropriate interventions for reducing its economic burden from a broader perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Rodríguez-Sánchez
- Department of Applied Economics, Public Economics and Political Economy, University Complutense of Madrid, Pl. Menéndez Pelayo 4, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Daugbjerg
- Graduate School of Health Economics and Management (Alta Scuola Di Economia E Management Dei Sistemi Sanitari), Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - L M Peña-Longobardo
- Economic Analysis and Finance Department, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071, Toledo, Spain
| | - J Oliva-Moreno
- Economic Analysis and Finance Department, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071, Toledo, Spain
| | - I Aranda-Reneo
- Economic Analysis and Finance Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Real Fábrica de Seda s/n, 45600, Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain.
| | - A Cicchetti
- Graduate School of Health Economics and Management (Alta Scuola Di Economia E Management Dei Sistemi Sanitari), Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - J López-Bastida
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Castilla-La Mancha, 45600, Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koeditz D, Frensch J, Bierbaum M, Ness NH, Ettle B, Vudumula U, Gudala K, Adlard N, Tiwari S, Ziemssen T. Comparing the long-term clinical and economic impact of ofatumumab versus dimethyl fumarate and glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A cost-consequence analysis from a societal perspective in Germany. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2022; 8:20552173221085741. [PMID: 35371535 PMCID: PMC8969034 DOI: 10.1177/20552173221085741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence suggests that early highly efficacious therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis is superior to escalation strategies. Objective A cost-consequence analysis simulated different treatment scenarios with ofatumumab (OMB), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and glatiramer acetate (GA): immediate OMB initiation as first treatment, early switch to OMB after 1 year on DMF/GA, late switch after 5 years or no switch. Methods An EDSS-based Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was applied. Cycle transitions included EDSS progression, improvement or stabilization, treatment discontinuation, relapse or death. Input data were extracted from OMB trials, a network meta-analysis, published literature, and publicly available sources. Results The late switch compared to the immediate OMB scenario resulted in a lower proportion of patients with EDSS 0-3 (Δ - 7.5% DMF; Δ - 10.3% GA), more relapses (Δ + 0.72 DMF; Δ + 1.23 GA) and lower employment rates (Δ - 4.0% DMF; Δ - 5.6% GA). The same applies to late versus early switches. No switch scenarios resulted in worse outcomes. Higher drug acquisition costs in the immediate OMB and early switch scenarios were almost compensated by lower costs for patient care and productivity loss. Conclusion Immediate OMB treatment and an early switch improves clinical and productivity outcomes while remaining almost cost neutral compared to late or no switches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Zentrum für klinische Neurowissenschaften, Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wiyani A, Badgujar L, Khurana V, Adlard N. How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review. Neurol Ther 2021; 10:557-583. [PMID: 34279847 PMCID: PMC8571458 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-021-00264-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) over the last two decades has prompted the economic assessments of these treatments by reimbursement authorities. The aim of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the modeling approach and data sources used in economic evaluations of DMTs for RMS, identify differences and similarities, and explore how economic evaluation models have evolved over time. METHODS MEDLINE®, Embase®, and EBM Reviews databases were searched using Ovid® Platform from database inception on 25 December 2019 and subsequently updated on 17 February 2021. In addition, health technology assessment agency websites, key conference proceedings, and gray literature from relevant websites were screened. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Drummond and Philips checklists. RESULTS A total 155 publications and 30 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) reports were included. Most of these were cost-utility analysis (73 studies and 25 HTA reports) and funded by medicines manufacturers (n = 65). The top three countries where studies were conducted were the USA (n = 29), the UK (n = 16), and Spain (n = 10). Studies predominantly used Markov cohort models (94 studies; 25 HTAs) structured based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) with 21 health states (20 studies; 12 HTA reports). The London Ontario and British Columbia data sets were commonly used sources for natural history data (n = 33; n = 13). Twelve studies and ten HTAs from the UK assumed a waning of DMT effect over the long term, while this was uncommon in studies from other countries. Nineteen studies adjusted for multiple sclerosis (MS)-specific mortality estimates, while 18 studies used data from the national life table without adjustment. Studies prominently referred to mortality data that were about two decades old. The data on treatment effect was generally obtained from randomized controlled trials (43 studies; 7 HTAs) or from published evidence synthesis (23 studies; 24 HTAs). Utility estimates were derived from either published studies and/or supplemented with data from RCTs. Most of the models used the lifetime horizon (n = 37) with a 1-year cycle length (n = 63). CONCLUSION As expected, similarities as well as differences were observed across the different economic models. Available evidence suggests models should continue using the Markov cohort model with 21 EDSS-based states, however, allowing the transition to a lower EDSS state and assuming a sustained treatment effect. With reference to the data sources, models should consider using a contemporary MS-specific mortality data, recent natural history data, and country-specific utility data if available. In case of data unavailability, a sensitivity analysis using multiple sources of data should be conducted. In addition, future models should incorporate other clinically relevant outcomes, such as the cognition, vision, and psychological aspects of RMS, to be able to present the comprehensive value of DMTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anggie Wiyani
- Novartis Corporation (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
| | | | - Vivek Khurana
- Novartis Corporation (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ngorsuraches S, Poudel N. Incorporating patients' preferences in the value assessment of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: a narrative review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2021; 21:183-195. [PMID: 33472451 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1880321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the increasing role of patients in the US healthcare system, patients have yet been engaged in the value assessment of their treatments, including disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). The objectives of this review were therefore to summarize existing studies on cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and patients' preferences of DMTs for MS, and to discuss how to incorporate patients' preferences into the value assessment of DMTs.Area covered: We reviewed previous systematic reviews and conducted further search until November 2020 for studies on CEA with QALYs and patients' preferences of DMTs for MS. We identified the outcomes that were assessed or valued in the CEA studies and the DMT attributes that were important to patients with MS.Expert opinion: Our literature review showed that the studies using CEA with QALYs failed to capture some important DMT attributes, e.g., route and frequency of administration, identified in the studies on the patients' preferences. Various approaches were available for incorporating the patients' preferences in the value assessment of DMTs for MS. We supported this incorporation, which subsequently would increase patient access to preferred DMTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surachat Ngorsuraches
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Nabin Poudel
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cost of disease modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: Is front-loading the answer? J Neurol Sci 2019; 404:19-28. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
8
|
Chirikov V, Ma I, Joshi N, Patel D, Smith A, Giambrone C, Cornelio N, Hashemi L. Cost-Effectiveness of Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:168-176. [PMID: 30711061 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and generic glatiramer acetate 20 mg among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in the United States. STUDY DESIGN Markov model with annual periods from payer perspective. METHODS The modeled population represented pooled patients from the CARE-MS I and II trials. Therapies' comparative efficacy at reducing relapses and slowing disability worsening was obtained from network meta-analyses. Safety information was extracted from package inserts. Withdrawal rates, treatment waning, resource use, cost, and utility inputs were derived from published studies and clinical expert opinion. To project the natural history of disease worsening, data from the British Columbia cohort was used. RESULTS Alemtuzumab dominated comparators by accumulating higher total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (8.977) and lower total costs ($421 996) compared with fingolimod (7.955; $1 085 814), natalizumab (8.456; $1 048 599), ocrelizumab (8.478; $908 365), and generic glatiramer acetate (7.845; $895 661) over a 20-year time horizon. Alemtuzumab's dominance was primarily driven by savings in treatment costs because alemtuzumab has long-term duration of response and is initially administered as 2 annual courses, with 36.1% of patients requiring retreatment over 5 years, whereas comparators are used chronically. In model scenarios where alemtuzumab's long-term duration of response was assumed not to hold and therapy had to be administered annually, probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that alemtuzumab remained cost-effective versus ocrelizumab at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY in 74% to 100% of model runs. CONCLUSIONS Alemtuzumab was a cost-effective therapy. Model results should be used to optimize clinical and managed care decisions for effective RMS treatment.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Alemtuzumab/economics
- Alemtuzumab/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/economics
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods
- Female
- Fingolimod Hydrochloride/economics
- Fingolimod Hydrochloride/therapeutic use
- Glatiramer Acetate/economics
- Glatiramer Acetate/therapeutic use
- Humans
- Immunosuppressive Agents/economics
- Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
- Male
- Markov Chains
- Middle Aged
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/economics
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/epidemiology
- Natalizumab/economics
- Natalizumab/therapeutic use
- Treatment Outcome
- United States/epidemiology
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ingrid Ma
- Previously employed by Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hernandez L, O'Donnell M, Postma M. Modeling Approaches in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2018; 36:1223-1252. [PMID: 29971666 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0683-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have been published in the last three decades. Literature reviews of the modeling methods and results from these CEAs have also been published. The last literature review that focused on modeling methods, without country or time horizon in the inclusion criteria, included studies published up to 2012. Since then, new DMTs have become available, and new models and data sources have been used to assess their cost effectiveness. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to provide a detailed and comprehensive description of the relevant aspects of economic models used in CEAs of DMTs for RRMS, to understand how these models have progressed from recommendations provided in past reviews, what new approaches have been developed, what issues remain, and how they could be addressed. METHODS EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the National Health System (NHS) Economic Evaluations Database, the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database, and EconLit were searched for cost-effectiveness studies of DMTs for RRMS that used decision-analytic models, published in English between 1 January 2012 and 24 December 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: being a full economic evaluation, a decision-analytic model was used, the target population concerned adult patients with RRMS, and being available in full-text format. Studies were not excluded based on the methodological quality. The background information of the included studies, as well as specific information on the components of the economic models related to the areas of recommendation from previous reviews were extracted. RESULTS Twenty-three studies from ten countries were included. The model structure of these studies has converged over time, characterizing the course of disease progression in terms of changes in disability and the occurrence of relapses over time. Variations were found in model approach; data sources for the natural course of the disease and comparative efficacy between DMTs; number of lines of treatment modeled; long-term efficacy waning and treatment discontinuation assumptions; type of withdrawal; and criteria for selecting adverse events. Main areas for improvement include using long-term time horizons and societal perspective; reporting relevant health outcomes; conducting scenario analyses using different sources of natural history and utility values; and reporting how the model was validated. CONCLUSION The structure of economic models used in CEAs of DMTs for RRMS has converged over time. However, variation remains in terms of model approach, inputs, and assumptions. Though some recommendations from previous reviews have been incorporated in later models, areas for improvement remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Hernandez
- Evidera, 500 Totten Pond Road, Suite 500, Waltham, MA, USA.
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Maarten Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Unit of Pharmacotherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy (GRIP), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|