A quality-of-life mapping function developed from a grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy trial to a tree pollen sublingual immunotherapy trial

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Inferior Turbinate Reduction and Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common condition that is frequently associated with atopic inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH) resulting in nasal obstruction. Current guidelines support the use of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) when patients fail pharmacologic management. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the role of inferior turbinate reduction (ITR), a treatment that we hypothesize is cost-effective compared with other available treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the following treatment combinations over a 5-year time horizon for AR patients presenting with atopic nasal obstruction who fail initial pharmacotherapy: (1) continued pharmacotherapy alone, (2) allergy testing and SCIT, (3) allergy testing and SCIT and then ITR for SCIT nonresponders, and (4) ITR and then allergy testing and SCIT for ITR nonresponders. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

For patients who fail initial pharmacotherapy, prioritizing ITR, either by microdebrider-assisting submucous resection or radiofrequency ablation, before SCIT was the most cost-effective strategy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that prioritizing ITR before SCIT was the most cost-effective option in 95.4% of scenarios. ITR remained cost-effective even with the addition of concurrent septoplasty.

CONCLUSION

For many AR patients who present with nasal obstruction secondary to atopic inferior turbinate hypertrophy that is persistent despite pharmacotherapy, ITR is a cost-effective treatment that should be considered prior to immunotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA - Laryngoscope, 2023 Laryngoscope, 134:1572-1580, 2024.

A Cost-Utility Analysis of SQ® Tree SLIT-Tablet versus Placebo in the Treatment of Birch Pollen Allergic Rhinitis from a Swedish Societal Perspective

Background and Aims

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an immunoglobulin E antibody-mediated inflammatory condition that arises in response to inhaled allergens such as pollen. Pollens from trees in the birch homologous group are the most common allergenic tree pollens in Northern and Central Europe and North America. SQ® Tree SLIT-Tablet (ITULAZAX®) is a sublingual immunotherapy tablet indicated for moderate-to-severe AR and/or conjunctivitis induced by pollen from the birch homologous group. The present analysis evaluated the cost-utility of treating adults with AR with SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet versus placebo, both in combination with symptom-relieving medications, from a Swedish societal perspective.

Methods

A model was developed to evaluate changes in cost and quality of life associated with using SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet relative to placebo in an adult population of individuals with AR. The model captured costs associated with symptom-relieving medications, healthcare professional interactions, SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet, and indirect costs arising from absenteeism and reduced workplace productivity. The analysis was conducted over 10 years with costs captured in 2021 Swedish Krona (SEK) and future costs and effects discounted at 3% per annum. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results

Treatment with SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet resulted in an improvement of 0.041 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 10 years versus placebo. From a Swedish societal perspective, costs increased by SEK 9077 over the same period, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio of SEK 223,445 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the model was most sensitive to assumptions around the disease-modifying effect of SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet.

Conclusion

SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet improved quality of life in moderate-to-severe AR and/or conjunctivitis induced by pollen from the birch homologous group in Sweden, with only a modest increase in societal costs over a medium-term time horizon, representing good value for money at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SEK 700,000 per QALY.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Experience of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the IMPACT-AF Clinical Trial

Background

The IMPACT‐AF (Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) trial is a prospective, randomized, cluster design trial comparing atrial fibrillation management with a computerized clinical decision support system with usual care (control) in the primary care setting of Nova Scotia, Canada. The objective of this analysis was to assess and compare patient‐reported health‐related quality of life and patient‐reported experience with atrial fibrillation care between clinical decision support and control groups.

Methods and Results

Health‐related quality of life was measured using the EuroQol 5‐dimensional 5‐level scale, whereas patient‐reported experience was assessed using a self‐administered satisfaction questionnaire, both assessed at baseline and 12 months. Health utilities were calculated using the Canadian EuroQol 5‐dimensional 5‐level value set. Descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations were used to compare between groups. Among 1145 patients enrolled in the trial, 717 had complete EuroQol 5‐dimensional 5‐level data at baseline. The mean age of patients was 73.53 years, and 61.87% were men. Mean utilities at baseline were 0.809 (SD, 0.157) and 0.814 (SD, 0.157) for clinical decision support and control groups, respectively. At baseline, most patients in both groups reported being “very satisfied” with the care received for their atrial fibrillation. There were no statistically significant differences in utility scores or patient satisfaction between groups at 12 months.

Conclusions

Health‐related quality of life of patients remained stable over 12 months, and there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction or utility scores between clinical decision support and control groups.

Registration information

clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01927367.

Application of a Mapping Function to Estimate Utilities for Ragweed Allergy Immunotherapy Trials

BACKGROUND

Ragweed pollen sensitivity is a common cause of allergic rhinitis (AR) worldwide. AR symptoms include itchy and runny eyes, sneezing, blocked nose, impaired sleep and social and emotional problems, which can have a significant impact on quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this analysis was to estimate utilities for two pooled standardised quality (SQ) ragweed sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet trials by applying a previously developed mapping algorithm. This study validated the algorithm and extended its application to ragweed seasonal allergy trials. The mapping algorithm relates disease-specific quality-of-life scores to preference-based utilities that may be used to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in cost-effectiveness studies.

METHODS

A mapping algorithm based on a grass pollen allergy immunotherapy trial, GT-08 (EudraCT no. 2004-000083-27) was applied to pooled data from two ragweed pollen immunotherapy trials, P05233 (EudraCT 2008-003863-38) and P05234 (EudraCT 2008-003864-20) to generate EuroQoL 5-Dimensions, 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) utilities from Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) data.

RESULTS

The mean utility difference between the SQ ragweed SLIT tablet and placebo was 0.025 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.011-0.038]. The SQ ragweed SLIT tablet showed an incremental quality-adjusted life-days (QALDs) benefit of 1.900 (95% CI 0.835-2.916) over 75 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of a previously developed mapping function allowed for the calculation of QALDs associated with the SQ ragweed SLIT tablet. The results showed a QALD benefit of the SQ ragweed SLIT tablet in P05233 and P05234 trials in the treatment of ragweed pollen-induced AR.