Effectiveness comparison and incremental cost-per-responder analysis of calcipotriene 0.005%/betamethasone dipropionate 0.064% foam vs. halobetasol 0.01%/tazarotene 0.045% lotion for plaque psoriasis: a matching-adjusted indirect comparative analysis

Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective

BACKGROUND

Edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide are two innovative brain cytoprotective drugs from China that have been approved and widely prescribed for acute ischemic stroke, and the cost of the two drugs are partially paid by the Chinese medical insurance system. This study aimed to investigate and compare the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke from the Chinese healthcare system's perspective.

METHODS

A model combining a short-term decision tree model with 90 days and a long-term Markov model with a life-time horizon (40 years) was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke over a lifetime horizon. Since the absence of a head-to-head clinical comparison of two therapies, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted by adjusting the patient characteristics using individual patient data from pivotal phase III trial of edaravone dexborneol and published aggregated data of dl-3-n-butylphthalide. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Utilities and costs (Chinese Yuan, CNY) were derived from publications and open-access database. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of results.

RESULTS

Compared with patients in dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm, edaravone dexborneol arm was found to be cost-effective in 90 days and highly cost-effective as the study horizons extended. With a similar direct medical cost, patients in edaravone dexborneol arm slightly gained an additional 0.1615 QALYs in life-time. In the long term (40 years), patients in edaravone dexborneol arm and dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm yielded 8.0351 and 7.8736 QALYs with the overall direct medical cost of CNY 29,185.23 and CNY 29,940.28, respectively. The one-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was most sensitive to the price of edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide.

CONCLUSION

Edaravone dexborneol is a cost-effective alternative compared with dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke patients in current medical setting of China.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of efficacy outcomes in trials of calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate foam and cream formulations for the treatment of plaque psoriasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Once-daily, fixed-combination calcipotriol 50 μg/g (Cal) plus betamethasone dipropionate 0.5 mg/g (BD) is available in aerosol foam and cream formulations. As no head-to-head data are available, we use a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) approach to compare Cal/BD foam and cream.

METHODS

Anchored and unanchored MAIC analyses were conducted using individual patient data (IPD) from five Cal/BD foam trials and two trials of Cal/BD cream. Outcomes of interest were the proportion of patients with Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) success and the mean reduction in modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (mPASI).

RESULTS

In the anchored MAIC, patients were more likely to achieve PGA success after 4 weeks of Cal/BD foam than after 8 weeks of Cal/BD cream and had larger mean improvements in mPASI (p < .01 in EU mPASI analysis). In unanchored analyses, 4 weeks of Cal/BD foam treatment was statistically significantly more efficacious in inducing PGA success than 8 weeks of Cal/BD cream (p < .01 in five of six comparisons). Mean reductions in mPASI were consistently statistically significantly greater with Cal/BD foam than with Cal/BD cream.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of Cal/BD foam consistently shows significantly greater improvements in PGA and mPASI outcomes, compared with Cal/BD cream.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Outcomes for Calcipotriol Plus Betamethasone Dipropionate Foam Versus Halobetasol Proprionate Plus Tazarotene Lotion in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis

Introduction

To date, there have been no head-to-head clinical studies comparing calcipotriol 0.005% plus betamethasone dipropionate 0.064% (Cal/BD) aerosol foam and halobetasol propionate 0.01% plus tazarotene 0.045% (HP/Taz) lotion for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. However, the efficacy of 4 weeks of Cal/BD foam and 8 weeks of HP/Taz lotion has been compared using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) approach. Here, we compare the efficacy and safety of Cal/BD foam and HP/Taz lotion for up to 52 weeks.

Methods

An unanchored MAIC was conducted using individual patient data from the PSO-LONG Cal/BD foam trial and a 52-week, open-label phase 3 study of HP/Taz lotion (NCT02462083). Key outcomes of interest were Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) success (PGA 0/1 with ≥ 2-point improvement) after 4 or 8 weeks of open-label therapy; the proportion of patients who had body surface area affected (BSA) ≤ 3 after open-label therapy who maintained BSA ≤ 3 to week 52; and adverse events (AEs).

Results

After matching, patients were statistically significantly more likely to have PGA success after 4 weeks of Cal/BD foam than after 8 weeks of HP/Taz lotion (84.5% versus 54.4%; p < 0.01). At week 52, 92.5% and 92.4% of patients receiving proactive and reactive Cal/BD foam, respectively, maintained BSA ≤ 3, compared with 49.3% of those treated with HP/Taz lotion (both p < 0.01). Treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to withdrawal, and AEs associated with drug application (dermatitis, application site pain, and pruritus) were significantly rarer with Cal/BD foam than with HP/Taz lotion (all p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Cal/BD aerosol foam demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than HP/Taz lotion, and had a more favorable safety profile, compared with HP/Taz lotion, for up to 52 weeks. Proactive Cal/BD foam maintenance therapy and reactive use of Cal/BD foam following relapse both had significant advantages over HP/Taz lotion.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00824-9.

Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate foam demonstrates comparable efficacy to clinical trial data in the real world, improves patient satisfaction and is cost-effective

Real-world evidence studies are becoming increasingly important in providing insight into clinical effectiveness and safety, economic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life of treatments in the clinical setting. These studies also help to complement data reported in clinical studies. Fixed-dose combination calcipotriol 50 µg/g plus betamethasone dipropionate 0.5 mg/g cutaneous foam (Cal/BD foam) is a topical agent used for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. In clinical studies, Cal/BD foam has demonstrated a significantly greater efficacy and rapid onset of action compared with both single and combination formulations such as ointments and gels. To date, three observational studies have examined the real-world efficacy and safety of Cal/BD foam in clinical practice in the United States, Germany and Spain. Data gathered from these studies reinforce the positive findings reported in clinical studies assessing Cal/BD foam for the treatment of psoriasis and demonstrate improved patient satisfaction with Cal/BD foam. Using Cal/BD foam has been shown to be cost-effective based on results from randomised clinical trials and cost-effective analysis. As such, Cal/BD foam has the potential to lower treatment costs by reducing the need for some patients to progress to more expensive treatments, such as phototherapy and biologics. Cal/BD foam is therefore a cost-effective solution for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris that should be considered when prescribing topicals.