1
|
Gauna F, Carof S, Mouret-Fourme E, Coupier I, Mari V, Moretta-Serra J, Mancini J, Noguès C, Bouhnik AD. Links between gender norms and the intergenerational transmission of health information in parents carrying BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:370-381. [PMID: 37282361 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Understanding how gender norms affect parents' communication of genetic and cancer risk information to their children can enable healthcare professionals to better facilitate cascade genetic testing. We conducted a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews to determine social factors associated with parents carrying the BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who communicated cancer prevention practices to their children. Thirty adult carriers (23 women, 7 men) participated in the interviews. All had at least one child aged over 8 years old. Interview topics included their discovery of the variants, their relationship to their body and to the risk of cancer, as well as disclosure to and subsequent communication with their children after testing positive for BRCA1/2. The interviews were analyzed qualitatively, and the major themes identified were identified and compared. We described the roles played by the BRCA1/2 carriers and their partners in communicating cancer prevention practices to their children, from how they managed their own risk of cancer after testing positive, to how they disclosed the risks linked to these pathogenic variants to their children. We also described their involvement in the process of their children going for professional genetic consultation. Gender norms lead women to be more attentive than men to their own health and that of their loved ones. In the context of the transmission of genetic information to children, gender differences in behavior are reinforced by perceptions of the risks of BRCA1/2 variants and women's related health management practices. Cancer prevention is shaped by complex links between gender norms and health management practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Gauna
- Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France
| | - S Carof
- Sorbonne Université, GEMASS (CNRS, Sorbonne Université), Paris, France
| | | | - I Coupier
- Gastroenterology and Genetic Department, Montpellier Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - V Mari
- Unité d'Oncogénétique, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - J Moretta-Serra
- Institut Paoli Calmette, Departement d'Anticipation et de Suivi du Cancer, Pôle Clinique Consultations d'Oncologie Genétique, Marseille, France
| | - J Mancini
- Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France
- AP-HM, BIOSTIC, Hop Timone, Marseille, France
| | - C Noguès
- Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France
- Institut Paoli Calmette, Departement d'Anticipation et de Suivi du Cancer, Pôle Clinique Consultations d'Oncologie Genétique, Marseille, France
| | - A D Bouhnik
- Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Development of a Secure Website to Facilitate Information Sharing in Families at High Risk of Bowel Cancer-The Familyweb Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13102404. [PMID: 34065728 PMCID: PMC8155923 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Families with an inherited high risk of bowel cancer may struggle to share information about their diagnosis. This means that relatives are not always aware of their increased risk of cancer or able to access screening for the early detection of cancer. Through this study, we aimed to help such families by creating a website where patients could share confidential information with their relatives securely online. Following a survey and telephone interviews with affected individuals, the content of the website was developed to suit the needs of families. Website function was tested with patients to check feasibility and acceptability. Most participants wanted more information to support their adaptation to the diagnosis and help inform their relatives. This study demonstrates how health professionals can improve access to genetic testing and cancer screening in families at high risk of cancer, thus reducing morbidity and mortality. Abstract Individuals with pathogenic variants in genes predisposing to bowel cancer are encouraged to share this information within their families. Close relatives at 50% risk can have access to bowel cancer surveillance. However, many relatives remain unaware of their vulnerability or have insufficient information. We investigated the feasibility and acceptability of using a secure website to support information sharing within families at high risk of bowel cancer. Patients (n = 286) answered an anonymous cross-sectional survey, with 14 participating in telephone interviews. They reported that the diagnosis had a profound effect on them and their family relationships, and consequently desired more support from health professionals. Website content was created in response to the preferences of survey and interview participants. Reactions to the website from 12 volunteers were captured through remote usability testing to guide further refinement of the website. Participants welcomed the opportunity to store and share personal information via the website and wanted more information and help informing their relatives about the diagnosis. Important website topics were: healthy lifestyle; genetic testing; and how to talk to children about the diagnosis. A website providing online access to confidential documents was both feasible and acceptable and could translate into increased uptake of cancer surveillance, resulting in lower morbidity and mortality in these families.
Collapse
|
3
|
Marleen van den Heuvel L, Stemkens D, van Zelst-Stams WAG, Willeboordse F, Christiaans I. How to inform at-risk relatives? Attitudes of 1379 Dutch patients, relatives, and members of the general population. J Genet Couns 2019; 29:786-799. [PMID: 31889383 PMCID: PMC7649718 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The uptake of predictive DNA testing in families with a hereditary disease is <50%. Current practice often relies on the proband to inform relatives about the possibility of predictive DNA testing, but not all relatives are informed adequately. To enable informed decision-making concerning predictive DNA testing, the approach used to inform at-risk relatives needs to be optimized. This study investigated the preferences of patients, relatives, and the general population from the Netherlands on how to inform relatives at risk of autosomal dominant diseases. Online surveys were sent to people with autosomal dominant neuro-, onco-, or cardiogenetic diseases and their relatives via patient organizations (n = 379), and to members of the general population via a commercial panel (n = 1,000). Attitudes of the patient and population samples generally corresponded. A majority believed that initially only first-degree relatives should be informed, following the principles of a cascade screening approach. Most participants also thought that probands and healthcare professionals (HCPs) should be involved in informing relatives, and a large proportion believed that HCPs should contact relatives directly in cases where patients are unwilling to inform, both for untreatable and treatable conditions. Participants from the patient sample were of the opinion that HCPs should actively offer support. Our findings show that both patients and HCPs should be involved in informing at-risk relatives of autosomal dominant diseases and suggest that relatives' 'right to know' was considered a dominant issue by the majority of participants. Further research is needed on how to increase proactive support in informing of at-risk relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Marleen van den Heuvel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne Stemkens
- VSOP Dutch Patient Alliance for Rare and Genetic Diseases, Soest, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Imke Christiaans
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen/University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taylor S, Rodrigues M, Poke G, Wake S, McEwen A. Family communication following a diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy: To tell or not to tell? J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1029-1041. [PMID: 31385417 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Family communication about genetic information enables informed medical and reproductive decision-making. The literature suggests that a significant proportion of genetically at-risk family members remain uninformed about genetic risk information as a result of non-disclosure. This study explored the experiences of New Zealand families communicating about a diagnosis of type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1). Eligible individuals were identified and recruited from the New Zealand (NZ) MD Prev study, a nationwide study which aimed to determine the prevalence, impact, and costs of genetic muscle disorders across the lifespan. Twelve qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants. The findings demonstrate diversity among and within families, with several distinct family narratives described. Most participants reported a motivation to tell relatives about their diagnosis to promote autonomy. Women were pivotal throughout communication processes and this was often tied to the concept of maternal responsibility and a desire to promote relatives' reproductive autonomy. The diagnosis of DM1 and the subsequent family communication decisions altered relationships for many, with both positive and negative impacts described. The findings demonstrate that individuals require time to explore the impact of a diagnosis of DM1 on self, family and intimate partner relationships to anticipate unique communication challenges. Genetic counselors can use these findings to inform their approach to counseling families with DM1. Longitudinal genetic counseling may be beneficial as a way to provide individuals with life stage specific support as they communicate with their relatives about a diagnosis of DM1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelby Taylor
- The Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre and Genomic Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Miriam Rodrigues
- Neurology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.,Muscular Dystrophy Association of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gemma Poke
- Genetic Health Services, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Samantha Wake
- The Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heuvel L, Smets E, Tintelen J, Christiaans I. How to inform relatives at risk of hereditary diseases? A mixed‐methods systematic review on patient attitudes. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1042-1058. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L.M. Heuvel
- Department of Clinical Genetics Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - E.M.A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - J.P. Tintelen
- Department of Genetics University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - I. Christiaans
- Department of Clinical Genetics Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kam S, Bylstra Y, Forrest L, Macciocca I, Foo R. Experience of Asian males communicating cardiac genetic risk within the family. J Community Genet 2018; 9:293-303. [PMID: 29308542 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0352-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Revised: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The genetic nature of an inherited cardiac condition (ICC) places first- and second-degree relatives at risk of cardiac complications and sudden death, even in the absence of symptoms. Communication of cardiac genetic risk information allows at-risk relatives to clarify, manage, and potentially prevent ICC-associated risks through cardiac screening. Literature regarding family communication of genetic risk information are predominantly based on Western populations, with limited insight into the Asian experience. This qualitative exploratory study provides a male perspective into the communication of ICC risks within families in Singapore. Eight male participants with clinically diagnosed cardiomyopathy, who had all received genetic counseling, were recruited. A phenomenological perspective was used to identify emergent themes from semi-structured interviews. In this study, most participants recalled their healthcare professional's emphasis on family communication. Notably, participants revealed that at-risk relatives were not accessing screening, and many described family members as currently asymptomatic and "healthy." These findings coincide with documented Asian beliefs regarding perceptions of health, which have important implications for the provision of genetic counseling support within Asian communities, especially in facilitating family communication such that at-risk relatives are informed about their ICC risks and available management options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Kam
- POLARIS @ SingHealth, Singapore Health Services, 20 College Road, The Academia, Discovery Tower, Level 10, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Reception Level 2, West Building, Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| | - Yasmin Bylstra
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Level 9, National Heart Centre, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore
- Inherited Cardiac Conditions Clinic, National University Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
| | - Laura Forrest
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Ivan Macciocca
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, 4th Floor, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Roger Foo
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 9, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 8, MD6, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117599, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coates N, Gregory M, Skirton H, Gaff C, Patch C, Clarke A, Parsons E. Family communication about cystic fibrosis from the mother's perspective: an exploratory study. J Res Nurs 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/1744987107083594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
With the advent of national newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in the UK, the communication of information within families after a diagnosis is made is important. As cystic fibrosis is a recessive genetic condition, even distant relatives may be carriers and therefore potentially at risk of having an affected child. Eight semi-structured interviews were carried out with mothers of children who were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis at around the time of birth. Thematic analysis was undertaken on interview transcripts. The interview data suggest open communication in these families with respect to first-degree relatives. Although disclosure was more selective with distant relatives, there was evidence that information was filtered to them through other family members. The main reasons for disclosure by mothers appeared to be the need for support and to allow relatives the option of carrier testing. Barriers to disclosure included lack of emotional and geographical closeness to relatives and the desire to protect relatives from unwelcome information. Health professionals may be able to assist the disclosure process by actively discussing disclosure with parents. It may also be helpful to revisit the issue of disclosure with parents after they have had some time to adjust to the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in their child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Coates
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Guy's Hospital, London, UK,
| | - Maggie Gregory
- CESAGen - ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, Wales, UK
| | - Heather Skirton
- Enterprise) of the School of Nursing and Community Studies Faculty of Health and Social Work, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Clara Gaff
- Genetic Health Service Victoria, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville Victoria, Australia
| | - Christine Patch
- Clinical Genetics Department, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Angus Clarke
- Institute of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Wales Cardiff University Wales, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patients’ Attitudes Towards Disclosure of Genetic Test Results to Family Members: The Impact of Patients’ Sociodemographic Background and Counseling Experience. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:314-24. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9873-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
9
|
Wiens ME, Wilson BJ, Honeywell C, Etchegary H. A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services. J Community Genet 2013; 4:233-42. [PMID: 23319393 PMCID: PMC3666832 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-012-0134-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2012] [Accepted: 12/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Family communication of genetic risk information is a complex process. Currently, there are no evidence-based interventions to help genetics professionals facilitate the process of disclosure within families. This study was designed to create a framework to assist in the development of tools to support patients in communicating genetic risk information to family members. A systematic review identified the factors relevant in communicating genetic risk information in families. A guiding theory for the proposed framework was selected and populated with the factors identified from the review. The review identified 112 factors of relevance. The theory of planned behaviour was selected to guide framework development, organising the framework in terms of the patient's attitudes about disclosure, perceived pressure to disclose and perceived control over disclosure. Attitudes about disclosure are influenced by a desire to protect oneself or family members, and the patient's perceptions of relevance of the information for family members, responsibility to disclose, family members' rights to information and the usefulness of communicating. Perceived pressure to disclose information is shaped by genetic professionals, family members and society. Perceived control over disclosure is affected by family relationships/dynamics, personal communication skills, the ability of the patient and family to understand the information and coping skills of the patient and family member. The family genetic risk communication framework presents a concise synthesis of the evidence on family communication of genetic information; it may be useful in creating and evaluating tools to help genetic counsellors and patients with communication issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam E Wiens
- CF Health Services Group Headquarters, Department of National Defence, 1745 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0K6,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Exploring resources for intrafamilial communication of cancer genetic risk: we still need to talk. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21:903-10. [PMID: 23340514 PMCID: PMC3746262 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2012] [Revised: 11/17/2012] [Accepted: 11/23/2012] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
While the importance of intrafamilial communication of hereditary cancer risk has been acknowledged, the factors that promote and act as barriers to patients disclosing their information to their families are complex and emerging. This raises the question: How are patients guided in practice to contemplate intrafamilial communication? Focusing on breast cancer, we conducted an exploratory study examining current resources supporting patients and health-care professionals, and isolated the messages surrounding intrafamilial communication of cancer risk. We find the duty for health-care professionals to counsel patients regarding intrafamilial communication is acknowledged to varying degrees by multiple actors in the cancer care delivery landscape, including health-care professional associations, health service organizations, and patient groups. A range of medical, psychosocial, and other factors underlying intrafamilial communication are acknowledged in messages to patients. Patients, however, are often referred to a single group of health-care professionals to discuss their diverse and complex needs. At the same time, messages aimed at patients appear to place the emphasis on barriers that could exist for patients contemplating intrafamilial communication, while highlighting the benefits families derive from such communication. Taken together, this points to a lack of coherence within materials directed to patients and suggests the need to do coordinated research among stakeholders to address two related issues: (1) determining who are the actors best positioned to send messages surrounding intrafamilial communication to patients and (2) addressing the content of messages conveyed in patient materials.
Collapse
|
11
|
Forrest Keenan K, Simpson SA, Miedzybrodzka Z, Alexander DA, Semper J. How do partners find out about the risk of Huntington's disease in couple relationships? J Genet Couns 2013; 22:336-44. [PMID: 23297124 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9562-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2012] [Accepted: 12/06/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Whilst a growing body of work has explored family communication about Huntington's disease and how at-risk individuals learn about their risk, the experience of telling a partner and partners' experiences of finding out about this potentially devastating hereditary illness have received little attention. This study describes the experiences of partners in finding out about Huntington's disease and any impact on couple's relationships/marriages. We undertook a thematic analysis of qualitative interviews which explored the dynamics of partners' marriages after predictive testing and partners' views of genetic counseling. A main theme from partners' accounts was how they found out about their spouse's risk of Huntington's disease and the impact this had on marital relations. The analysis revealed four types of disclosure experiences: (1) marital secrets; (2) alerting, but not telling; (3) knowing and seeing; (4) marital ignorance. Our findings demonstrate that partners' experiences of (non)disclosure about the risk of HD within marriages is an important factor which contributes to couples' coping or marital problems. Exploring how spouses found out about their partner's risk of HD will illuminate issues about a couple's past and future patterns of communication and their coping strategies. A practical and ethical implication is the extent to which genetic counselors should inform partners about the course and nature of Huntington's disease when a partner is the support person for the individual being tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Forrest Keenan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mendes Á, Sousa L. Families' experience of oncogenetic counselling: accounts from a heterogeneous hereditary cancer risk population. Fam Cancer 2012; 11:291-306. [PMID: 22367452 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9514-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
This paper reports the results of semi-structured family interviews conducted with a purposive sample of nine families (comprising 50 individuals) involved in cancer genetic counselling at a Portuguese public hospital. Qualitative analysis resulted in thematic categories illustrating: (1) how families go through cancer genetic counselling (eliciting risk awareness, the motivators, risk management, the psychosocial context of familial engagement in genetic counselling, and the familial pathways of cancer risk tracking); and (2) how families incorporate genetic risk into family life (strategies for family resilience, and the meanings and values that permeate the experience). Families have recognised the value of genetic counselling in enabling participants to take measures to confront disease risk; however, the experience was dominated by distressing feelings. A set of ethical-relational principles guided the experience. Familial experiences on genetic counselling and tracking of cancer susceptibility encompass a sense of trajectory that takes the form of an historical and intergenerational narrative process, linking past, present and possible futures. Such process implies an ongoing set of individual and interactional experiences taking place over time. Specific changes associated with the illness timeline and with individual and family developmental lifespan transitions are thus acknowledged. These results may help genetics healthcare practitioners understand how families perceive, respond to and accommodate cancer risk counselling, and thus illuminate family-oriented tenets for planning and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Mendes
- Health, Family and Community Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, University Campus of Santiago, 3810-093, Aveiro, Portugal.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Incidence and predictors of positive and negative effects of BRCA1/2 genetic testing on familial relationships: a 3-year follow-up study. Genet Med 2011; 14:60-8. [PMID: 22237432 DOI: 10.1038/gim.0b013e3182310a7f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about the long-term impact of BRCA1/2 testing on the relationships between family members. We assessed the incidence of positive and negative family relationship effects of BRCA1/2 testing in the 3 years after result disclosure and identified predictors of these effects. METHODS A total of 485 women and 67 men who had undergone BRCA1/2 testing were asked 3 years later whether having been tested had improved and/or disrupted relationships with their relatives. The associations with sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial characteristics were assessed. RESULTS Globally, 85.1% did not report any positive or negative effects of genetic testing on family relationships. Positive and negative effects were reported by 13.2% and 3.7% of participants, respectively. Reporting positive relationship effects was associated with older age, intolerance for uncertainty, cancer-specific distress, and more social support. Low education, positive attitude toward prophylactic mastectomy, and low social support increased the likelihood of negative effects. CONCLUSION Our findings do not support the belief that family relationships are frequently disrupted by BRCA1/2 testing. Understanding that most family relationships are unchanged long term by genetic testing may help genetic service providers encourage those considering testing to overcome hesitancy related to potential difficulties of communicating results to relatives.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
This review of family communication of genetic risk information addresses questions of what the functions and influences on communication are; what, who and how family members are told about genetic risk information; what the impact for counsellee, relative and relationships are; whether there are differences by gender and condition; and what theories and methodologies are used. A systematic search strategy identified peer-reviewed journal articles published 1985-2009 using a mixture of methodologies. A Narrative Synthesis was used to extract and summarise data relevant to the research questions. This review identified 33 articles which found a consistent pattern of findings that communication about genetic risk within families is influenced by individual beliefs about the desirability of communicating genetic risk and by closeness of relationships within the family. None of the studies directly investigated the impact of communication on counsellees or their families, differences according to gender of counsellee or by condition nor alternative methods of communication with relatives. The findings mainly apply to late onset conditions such as Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. The most frequently used theory was Family Systems Theory and methods were generally qualitative. This review points to multifactorial influences on who is communicated with in families and what they are told about genetic risk information. Further research is required to investigate the impact of genetic risk information on family systems and differences between genders and conditions.
Collapse
|
15
|
KHAIR K, GIBSON F, MEERABEAU L. ‘Just an unfortunate coincidence’: children’s understanding of haemophilia genetics and inheritance. Haemophilia 2011; 17:470-5. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02448.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
16
|
Impediments to DNA Testing and Cascade Screening for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Long QT syndrome: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences. J Genet Couns 2010; 19:630-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9314-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2010] [Accepted: 07/07/2010] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
17
|
|
18
|
Forrest Keenan K, van Teijlingen E, McKee L, Miedzybrodzka Z, Simpson SA. How young people find out about their family history of Huntington's disease. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68:1892-900. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
19
|
Nycum G, Avard D, Knoppers BM. Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information. Eur J Hum Genet 2009; 17:872-80. [PMID: 19319160 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
What factors influence intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) genetic risk information? Such information can have health implications for individuals who undergo genetic testing, but it can also have implications for their blood relatives. This literature review adopts an ecological model to summarize factors at the individual, familial, and community levels, as well as cross cutting factors relating to the complexity of HBOC genetic information and responsibilities that this information can give rise to. These factors are complex and may result in conflicting senses of responsibility. Faced with the task of communicating HBOC genetic information, the response may be to attempt to balance the potential negative impact of the information on the well-being of the informee (eg, can s/he handle this information?) against the potential health benefit that the knowledge could result in. This balancing represents an effort to reconcile conflicting approaches to protecting family members, and is a moral dilemma. This review sheds light on the factors that contribute to resolve this dilemma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Nycum
- Centre de recherche en droit public, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Strømsvik N, Råheim M, Oyen N, Gjengedal E. Men in the women's world of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer--a systematic review. Fam Cancer 2009; 8:221-9. [PMID: 19165626 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9232-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2008] [Accepted: 01/02/2009] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about men seeking genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). We review the sparse literature on men attending such genetic consultations. Two main themes are identified: the women's influence on the genetic counseling process, and the psychological impact on men. The women in the HBOC families have an influence on the men's decision to request genetic testing, and they take the leading role in communicating genetic information. With respect to psychological impact, the men suffer from grief and fear of developing cancer, and they seem to use avoidance as a coping strategy. Carrier males experience feelings of guilt because they might have passed on a mutation to their children. Non-carriers experience test-related stress if their siblings tested positive. Mutation status may have an impact on reproductive issues. These findings are discussed in light of gender issues and literature concerning men's health behavior. Further studies are needed to provide optimal care for men seeking genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Strømsvik
- Center of Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Adolescent carrier testing in practice: the impact of legal rulings and problems with "gillick competence". J Genet Couns 2008; 17:509-21. [PMID: 18758928 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-008-9168-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2008] [Accepted: 05/28/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Testing for carrier status for various genetic conditions often takes place during adolescence or young adulthood. This paper aims to add to the discussion of when is the best time to test through an examination of how the law on medical treatment of children appears to be used in practice and how a careful examination of legal rulings might shed light upon best practice in this area. Our focus is on the Gillick ruling (Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority 1986), which dealt with consent and confidentiality with respect to the provision of contraceptive advice to under 16-year-olds, but which has become a general benchmark for consent to medical treatment within UK law. In addition, we draw upon data from a qualitative research study which indicates potential problems with certain practices in respect of the influence of the Gillick ruling on carrier testing procedures. We present evidence that in at least some instances, adolescents have reduced capacity to grasp fully the implications of carrier test results. In the light of our findings we make recommendations for practice concerning the testing of children and young persons.
Collapse
|
22
|
Forrest LE, Burke J, Bacic S, Amor DJ. Increased genetic counseling support improves communication of genetic information in families. Genet Med 2008; 10:167-72. [PMID: 18344705 DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e318164540b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether the provision of additional genetic counseling support could improve the uptake of genetic services by "at-risk" relatives of probands. METHODS The Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service implemented a specific counseling intervention to a cohort of patients who were diagnosed with a genetic condition with familial implications and compared this with a control cohort who had not experienced the specific counseling intervention. The study involved 150 family members in 19 different kindreds across the two cohorts. The principal outcome measure was the proportion of at-risk relatives who had made contact with the clinical genetics service within 2 years of the diagnosis in the index patient. RESULTS The proportion of at-risk relatives who made contact with the genetics service was 61% in the intervention cohort compared with 36% in the control cohort (P = 0.01). After controlling for the gender of the at-risk relatives, relatives in the intervention cohort were 2.6 times more likely to make contact with the genetics service (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The provision of increased genetic counseling support significantly increased the proportion of at-risk relatives who made contact with the genetic service. This suggests that the communication of genetic information within families can be enhanced by the provision of increased genetic counseling support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Forrest
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Forrest LE, Curnow L, Delatycki MB, Skene L, Aitken M. Health first, genetics second: exploring families' experiences of communicating genetic information. Eur J Hum Genet 2008; 16:1329-35. [PMID: 18493266 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic information may have health and reproductive implications for the proband and their family members. The responsibility for communicating this information within families generally lies with the proband or consultand. Previous research has explored the barriers and facilitators to communication, particularly in families affected with familial cancer syndromes. This study is an exploration of families' experiences, which aims to elucidate the process of communicating genetic information in families affected with non-cancer genetic conditions. The methodology involved 12 semi-structured interviews with probands, consultands and their family members. There were six different genetic conditions present in the families: adrenoleukodystrophy (n=3), cystic fibrosis (n=3), fragile X syndrome (n=1), haemochromatosis (n=1), balanced reciprocal chromosomal translocation (n=3) and Robertsonian chromosomal translocation (n=1). The results presented arise from two key themes, (1) the diagnosis and (2) post diagnosis. The interview data illustrate that the time of the diagnosis is a traumatic experience for families and that communication stimulated by this event revolves around informing family members about the diagnosis, but not warning them of their genetic risk. Post diagnosis, the collection of information about the genetic condition and continued communication to more distant family members, often using pre-existing family communication patterns, enables the continuation of communication about the genetic condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Forrest
- Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kristman VL, Kreiger N. Information disclosure in population-based research involving genetics: a framework for the practice of ethics in epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol 2008; 18:335-41. [PMID: 18083547 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2007] [Revised: 09/18/2007] [Accepted: 10/01/2007] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The completion of the Human Genome Project has resulted in increased epidemiological research to identify genes and their products as risk factors for adverse health events. A parallel increase in ethical issues associated with genetic research is noted. One such issue is whether or not epidemiologists should disclose individual genetic results to research participants. Existing ethical guidelines and frameworks are not helpful for determining whether disclosure is the moral choice. The purpose of this paper was to develop a framework for use by epidemiologists, research ethics boards, and institutional review boards during the protocol development stage to ethically address the dilemma regarding disclosure of individual genetic information. METHODS The core principles of research ethics were introduced and applied to the issues surrounding disclosure of genetic information. A principle-based framework was developed through analysis of the current ethical arguments for and against disclosure. Finally, examples demonstrating the use of the framework were provided. CONCLUSION The proposed framework will not solve all ethical dilemmas related to individual disclosure of genetic information. It is, however, a useful starting point to facilitate the consideration process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki L Kristman
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Klitzman R, Thorne D, Williamson J, Chung W, Marder K. Disclosures of Huntington disease risk within families: patterns of decision-making and implications. Am J Med Genet A 2007; 143A:1835-49. [PMID: 17632780 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Patterns of disclosure of Huntington disease risk and genetic test results among family members are important, but have been underexplored. We interviewed 21 individuals in-depth - eight mutation-positive for HD, four mutation-negative, and nine not tested - for 2 hr each. Within families, critical questions arose of what, when, and to whom to disclose, and what to do post-disclosure. Interviewees wrestled with dilemmas of what to tell (e.g., suspicions vs. confirmed symptoms; initiation vs. completion of testing; partial vs. indirect information), how to disclose (e.g., planning in advance vs. "blurting out" information in arguments), and whether and how to tell extended family members. Questions arose of when to tell (i.e., to avoid disclosing "too early" or "too late"). Similarities and differences emerged related to types of relationships (e.g., parents telling offspring vs. offspring telling parents vs. siblings telling each other). Individuals often disclosed because of perceived duty to foster the health of their family members, enabling these others to pursue appropriate medical evaluation, if desired. Yet tensions arose because the information could burden these members, who also have rights to remain "in denial" if they wish and not discuss the topic or pursue testing. Post-disclosure, dilemmas emerged of whether and how much to encourage family members to pursue testing. These data shed important light on critical issues that have received little, if any, attention concerning what, how, and when disclosure occurs, and have key implications for at-risk individuals, genetic counselors, and other health care workers (HCWs), and for future research. At-risk individuals would benefit from considering these issues in advance. HCWs need to realize that these decisions are multi-faceted. Future research can explore whether, when, how, and how often HCWs raise these issues with individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Klitzman
- Associate Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sivell S, Elwyn G, Gaff CL, Clarke AJ, Iredale R, Shaw C, Dundon J, Thornton H, Edwards A. How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review. J Genet Couns 2007; 17:30-63. [PMID: 17968638 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9132-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2007] [Accepted: 09/28/2007] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
As an individual's understanding of their genetic risk may influence risk management decisions, it is important to understand the ways in which risk is constructed and interpreted. We systematically reviewed the literature, undertaking a narrative synthesis of 59 studies presenting data on the ways in which individuals perceive, construct and interpret their risk, and the subsequent effects. While most studies assessed perceived risk quantitatively, the combined evidence suggests individuals find risk difficult to accurately quantify, with a tendency to overestimate. Rather than being a stand-alone concept, risk is something lived and experienced and the process of constructing risk is complex and influenced by many factors. While evidence of the effects of perceived risk is limited and inconsistent, there is some evidence to suggest high risk estimations may adversely affect health and lead to inappropriate uptake of medical surveillance and preventative measures by some individuals. A more focused approach to research is needed with greater exploration of the ways in which risk is constructed, along with the development of stronger theoretical models, to facilitate effective and patient-centered counseling strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Sivell
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 2nd Floor, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gaff CL, Clarke AJ, Atkinson P, Sivell S, Elwyn G, Iredale R, Thornton H, Dundon J, Shaw C, Edwards A. Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet 2007; 15:999-1011. [PMID: 17609674 DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The communication of risk is a central activity in clinical genetics, with genetic health professionals encouraging the dissemination of relevant information by individuals to their at-risk family members. To understand the process by which communication occurs as well as its outcomes, a systematic review of actual communication in families about genetic risk was conducted. Findings from 29 papers meeting the inclusion criteria were summarised and are presented narratively. Family communication about genetic risk is described as a deliberative process, in which: sense is made of personal risk; the vulnerability and receptivity of the family member is assessed; decisions are made about what will be conveyed; and the right time to disclose is selected. The communication strategy adopted will depend on these factors and varies within families as well as between families. Inherent in these processes are conflicting senses of responsibility: to provide potentially valuable information and to prevent harm that may arise from this knowledge. However, the research 'outcomes' of communication have been professionally determined (number of relatives reported as informed, uptake of testing, knowledge of the recipient) and are typically unrelated to the concerns of the family member. The impact of communication on the individual, family members, and family relationships is of concern to the individual conveying the information, but this is largely self-reported. Currently, there is insufficient information to inform the development of theoretically and empirically based practice to foster 'good' communication. The implications for future research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara L Gaff
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Forrest LE, Delatycki MB, Skene L, Aitken M. Communicating genetic information in families--a review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet 2007; 15:612-8. [PMID: 17392704 DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
This article aims to review ethical and clinical guidelines and policies addressing the communication of genetic information in families. Websites of national and regional bioethics committees, national human genetics societies, international health organisations, genetic interest groups and legal recommendations committees were searched for guidelines and policies. The databases Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar were also utilised to search for additional guidelines relating to the communication of genetic information in families. The guidelines and policies included in this review are limited to those available in English. The search resulted in guidelines from 18 international, regional and national organisations from six countries pertaining to family communication of genetic information. The following ideals were common in their guidelines: (1) individuals have a moral obligation to communicate genetic information to their family members; (2) genetic health professionals should encourage individuals to communicate this information to their family members; and (3) genetic health professionals should support individuals throughout the communication process. The difference between the organisations' guidelines was the inclusion of information about the role of the health professional in supporting clients during the process of communicating genetic information to their family members. Only two recommendations suggested that the health professional should support their clients by identifying at-risk family members, but more guidelines recommended that directive counselling should be undertaken to encourage clients to communicate genetic information to their family members. In conclusion, the guidelines provide an overview of the role that genetic health professionals may undertake; however, there are gaps that need to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Forrest
- Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gregory M, Boddington P, Dimond R, Atkinson P, Clarke A, Collins P. Communicating about haemophilia within the family: the importance of context and of experience. Haemophilia 2007; 13:189-98. [PMID: 17286773 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01417.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
This study examines communication within families affected by haemophilia, focusing especially on communication about carrier status. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with family members in the UK revealed recurrent patterns in communication strategies and styles. Participants drew a marked contrast between the nature of communication within the clinic and within the home. In families, it is notable that communication usually occurs within the context of concrete experience of the condition. Noticeable differences existed in families with obligate carriers when compared with families with non-obligate carrier daughters. In families with affected sons, daughters may have more experience of haemophilia and consequently more understanding of their possible carrier status than in families with an affected father. Families also typically make value judgements and comments on coping strategies when they communicate about the condition. Readiness to receive information is very variable, and depends upon factors such as personality and life stage. Information may seem to be successfully communicated but the recipient may sometimes actually comprehend much less, only understanding more fully later or when the information becomes directly relevant to them. Periodic checking of understanding of different family members, and the provision of written information, may be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Gregory
- Institute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|