Motor imagery in chronic neglect: An fMRI pilot study

Recent advances in treatment of spatial neglect: networks and neuropsychology

INTRODUCTION

Spatial neglect remains an underdiagnosed and undertreated consequence of stroke that imposes significant disability. A growing appreciation of brain networks involved in spatial cognition is helping us to develop a mechanistic understanding of different therapies under development.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on neuromodulation of brain networks for the treatment of spatial neglect after stroke, using evidence-based approaches including 1) Cognitive strategies that are more likely to impact frontal lobe executive function networks; 2) Visuomotor adaptation, which may depend on the integrity of parietal and parieto- and subcortical-frontal connections and the presence of a particular subtype of neglect labeled Aiming neglect; 3) Non-invasive brain stimulation that may modulate relative levels of activity of the two hemispheres and depend on corpus callosum connectivity; and 4) Pharmacological modulation that may exert its effect primarily via right-lateralized networks more closely involved in arousal.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite promising results from individual studies, significant methodological heterogeneity between trials weakened conclusions drawn from meta-analyses. Improved classification of spatial neglect subtypes will benefit research and clinical care. Understanding the brain network mechanisms of different treatments and different types of spatial neglect will make possible a precision medicine treatment approach.

Applications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Determining the Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Rehabilitation of Spatial Neglect

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a neuroimaging tool which has been applied extensively to explore the pathophysiological mechanisms of neurological disorders. Spatial neglect is considered to be the failure to attend or respond to stimuli on the side of the space or body opposite a cerebral lesion. In this review, we summarize and analyze fMRI studies focused specifically on spatial neglect. Evidence from fMRI studies have highlighted the role of dorsal and ventral attention networks in the pathophysiological mechanisms of spatial neglect, and also support the concept of interhemispheric rivalry as an explanatory model. fMRI studies have shown that several rehabilitation methods can induce activity changes in brain regions implicated in the control of spatial attention. Future investigations with large study cohorts and appropriate subgroup analyses should be conducted to confirm the possibility that fMRI might offer an objective standard for predicting spatial neglect and tracking the response of brain activity to clinical treatment, as well as provide biomarkers to guide rehabilitation for patients with SN.

Brain Activations During Optokinetic Stimulation in Acute Right-Hemisphere Stroke Patients and Hemispatial Neglect: An fMRI Study

Objective. Leftward optokinetic stimulation (OKS) is a promising therapeutic approach for right-hemisphere stroke patients with left hemispatial neglect. We questioned whether the putative neural basis is an activation of frontoparietal brain regions involved in the control of eye movements and spatial attention. Methods. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate brain activations during OKS in acute right-hemisphere stroke patients (RHS, n = 19) compared with healthy control subjects (HC, n = 9). Based on neuropsychological testing we determined the ipsilesional attention bias in all RHS patients, 11 showed manifest hemispatial neglect. Results. In HC subjects, OKS in either direction led to bilateral activation of the visual cortex (V1-V4), frontal (FEF) and supplementary (SEF) eye fields, intraparietal sulcus (IPS), basal ganglia, and thalamus. RHS patients' activations were generally reduced compared with HC. Nevertheless, leftward OKS bilaterally activated the visual cortex (V1-V4), FEF, SEF, IPS, and thalamus. The neural response to OKS was negatively correlated with patients' behavioral impairment: The greater the individual attention bias/neglect the weaker the brain activations. Conclusion. In RHS patients, leftward OKS activates frontoparietal regions (FEF, IPS) that are spared from structural brain damage and functionally involved in both oculomotor control and spatial attention. This may provide a neural basis for the known therapeutic effects of OKS on hemispatial neglect. In acute stroke stages, reduced activation levels correlating with neglect severity indicate functional downregulation of the underlying dorsal attention network. Therefore, chronic RHS patients with less severe neglect after recovery of network disturbances may be more suitable candidates for OKS rehabilitation.