Effects of initial planning on task execution performance of older adults: A naturalistic assessment paradigm

Real-world compensatory strategy use in community-dwelling mid-life and older adults: An evaluation of quality

Objective: Older adults often spontaneously engage in compensatory strategies (CS) to support everyday task completion, but factors that influence success of chosen CS remain unclear. This study examines whether real-world prospective memory (PM) task completion is better predicted by CS count or a CS quality rating. Method: Seventy mid-life and older adult participants were presented four novel, real-world PM tasks via remote assessment and encouraged to use their typical CS. The examiner captured detailed information about planned CS at task presentation (T1) and utilized CS at follow-up testing (T2). From this information, count (CS Count; quantity of CS) and quality (CS Quality; rating of CS thoroughness and utility) scores were coded separately for the planned and utilized CS. PM task performance accuracy was also coded (PM Accuracy). Results: Hierarchical regressions revealed planned CS Count and Quality did not predict PM Accuracy. In contrast, the utilized CS Quality predicted a significant amount of PM Accuracy variance over and above CS Count, global cognition, and age (R2 = .47, ΔR2 = .24, ΔF = 29.36, p < .001, f2 = .45). Furthermore, utilized CS Quality accounted for a similar amount of variance in PM Accuracy when utilized CS Count was removed from the model. Conclusions: This study's CS coding system can capture and quantify the quality of strategies, which uniquely predicts real-world PM performance. This coding system may provide researchers with a nuanced CS measure and lead to improved CS interventions designed to support everyday PM performance, such as targeted CS trainings.

A Process Analysis of Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test Performance Using the Boston Qualitative Scoring System in HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders

Deficits in episodic verbal memory are commonly observed in persons with HIV (PWH) disease, in whom they are characterized by dysregulation of the executive aspects of encoding and retrieval and adversely impact everyday functioning. Deficits in episodic visual memory are also apparent in PWH, but we know less about their cognitive architecture. This study used the Boston Qualitative Scoring System (BQSS) for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) to examine visual learning and recall in 43 individuals without HIV and 141 PWH who completed a full research neuropsychological, psychiatric, and medical assessment. A mixed model covarying for education and estimated verbal IQ showed that participants with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) performed worse than PWH without neurocognitive disorders and HIV- participants at comparable medium-to-large effect sizes across the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed trials of the BQSS-ROCF, suggesting a primary encoding deficit. A component process analysis of the BQSS-ROCF Copy Trial revealed that participants with HAND had specific difficulties with configural accuracy, cluster accuracy, and cluster placement. Within the PWH sample, measures of motor coordination and executive functions emerged as independent predictors of BQSS-ROCF Copy Trial performance. Findings extend prior research by showing that HAND may be associated with a primary encoding deficit for complex visuomotor learning and memory tasks that is driven by a combination of visuospatial, motor, and executive difficulties.

Assessing functional ability of healthy adults with the Night Out Task

Objective: Given the negative health outcomes associated with functional loss, there is need to better understand the trajectory of functional change and compensation use with age. Many older adults successfully age in place, and there is not a one-to-one relationship between cognitive changes and ability to live independently. This study compared healthy age cohorts' performance and approach on a functional measure, particularly examining compensatory strategy use to support task performance. Methods: 57 young adults (YAs; ages 18-39), 42 young-old adults (YOAs; ages 60-69) and 47 old-old (OOAs; ages 70+) completed the Night Out Task (NOT); an open-ended functional assessment in which participants complete eight subtasks in preparation for a night out with a friend (e.g. prepare tea and gather items for a recipe). The NOT measures both primary outcome variables (e.g. time and accuracy), error types and 'compensation variables', which are process-approach variables intended to map on to the types of compensatory strategies individuals use in their everyday lives (e.g. planning and checking). Results: Results revealed that YAs performed better than the oldest group on the NOT in accuracy, execution time and number of both inefficient and inaccurate/incomplete errors. YAs additionally used fewer compensatory strategies than both older groups. Only one compensation variable had a positive relationship to outcome; double-checking was related to improved accuracy and fewer inaccurate/incomplete errors within the oldest cohort. Conclusion: Together these findings support a spectrum of functional change with age. While compensation use increased with age, the relationship between compensation use and outcome was unclear. Future work is needed to understand under what conditions older adults' self-initiate compensation use and to understand the relationship between compensation use and outcome.

Applying linguistic demand analysis to functional multitasking assessments

PURPOSE

The linguistic demand of task instructions in cognitive assessments may mask or even invalidate cognitive testing results for individuals with language differences or impairments. The purpose of this study was to apply an analysis of linguistic demand to a sample of functional multitasking assessments.

METHOD

We sampled the task instructions and materials from seven functional multitasking assessments that are based on everyday activities. We calculated indices of linguistic demand.

RESULTS

The Density Index is based on total number of words, total number of sentences, total number of different words, total number of syllables, and complex (not-simple) sentences. The Breakfast Task and the Frisch Cooking Task consistently ranked lowest in linguistic demand for both instructions and materials based on the indices reviewed. These tasks are most likely to be appropriate for individuals with language impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians have a responsibility to fairly evaluate cognitive functions of individuals with impaired language functioning. The analysis of linguistic demand provides a useful way to evaluate task instructions and materials in a systematic way, so that individuals with language impairments or language differences might be more appropriately evaluated.