1
|
Simes D, Shochet I, Murray K, Gill DJ. Practice-based insights from specialized clinicians into youth suicide risk assessment and psychotherapy: A qualitative study. Psychother Res 2024; 34:972-990. [PMID: 37748115 DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2023.2253360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The experience of frontline clinicians is an underutilized source of knowledge about improving youth suicide intervention. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of highly experienced, specialized mental health clinicians on the practical application of risk assessment, stabilization, and treatment and their experience of working in this practice area.Method: Data were collected from seven focus groups with 28 clinicians and analyzed using consensual qualitative research methods.Results: Four domains emerged, describing 1) youth suicide intervention as relationally focused and attachment-informed, 2) the need for flexible and tailored care balancing individual and family intervention in the context of family complexity and fractured relationships, 3) a nuanced, therapeutic approach to managing the complexity and uncertainty of adolescent suicide risk, and 4) working in youth suicide intervention as emotionally demanding and facilitated or hampered by the organizational and systems context.Conclusion: The importance of harnessing family systems and attachment-informed approaches to alliance, risk assessment, and treatment was emphasized, along with the parallel need for systemic clinician support and consideration of the potential negative consequences of administrative and risk management protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Simes
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- New South Wales Health, Australia
| | - Ian Shochet
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kate Murray
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arakelian M, Barnett B, Weleff J. The Zero Suicide Model in Addiction Treatment Settings: Recognizing the Need for Feasibility and Implementation Data. Psychiatr Serv 2024; 75:378-380. [PMID: 37933133 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
The Zero Suicide (ZS) model is a promising approach for preventing all suicides across health care settings. ZS provides guidelines for health care systems to implement best practices in suicide prevention. Patients with substance use disorders are at increased risk for suicide, but no known research has investigated how to integrate the ZS model into addiction treatment settings. This Open Forum encourages clinicians and researchers to integrate ZS into such settings and to study its feasibility and effectiveness. ZS integration into addiction treatment may improve both suicide and addiction outcomes, but additional research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda Arakelian
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (Arakelian, Barnett); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (Barnett); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven (Weleff)
| | - Brian Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (Arakelian, Barnett); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (Barnett); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven (Weleff)
| | - Jeremy Weleff
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (Arakelian, Barnett); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (Barnett); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven (Weleff)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gonda X, Dome P, Serafini G, Pompili M. How to save a life: From neurobiological underpinnings to psychopharmacotherapies in the prevention of suicide. Pharmacol Ther 2023; 244:108390. [PMID: 36940791 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
The impact of suicide on our societies, mental healthcare, and public health is beyond questionable. Every year approximately 700 000 lives are lost due to suicide around the world (WHO, 2021); more people die by suicide than by homicide and war. Although suicide is a key issue and reducing suicide mortality is a global imperative, suicide is a highly complex biopsychosocial phenomenon, and in spite of several suicidal models developed in recent years and a high number of suicide risk factors identified, we still have neither a sufficient understanding of underpinnings of suicide nor adequate management strategies to reduce its prevalence. The present paper first overviews the background of suicidal behavior including its epidemiology, prevalence, age and gender correlations and its association with neuropsychiatric disorders as well as its clinical assessment. Then we give an overview of the etiological background, including its biopsychosocial contexts, genetics and neurobiology. Based on the above, we then provide a critical overview of the currently available intervention options to manage and reduce risk of suicide, including psychotherapeutic modalities, traditional medication classes also providing an up-to-date overview on the antisuicidal effects of lithium, as well as novel molecules such as esketamine and emerging medications and further molecules in development. Finally we give a critical overview on our current knowledge on using neuromodulatory and biological therapies, such as ECT, rTMS, tDCS and other options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xenia Gonda
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0-SE Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Peter Dome
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gianluca Serafini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hawgood J, Spafford SG, Evans A, Webster A, Koo YW. Suicide risk assessment fears, attitudes and behaviours of lifeline crisis supporters. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e5083-e5094. [PMID: 35915919 PMCID: PMC10087418 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Lifeline Australia operates crisis support services through Lifeline Crisis Supporters. An integral part of their role is to conduct online suicide risk assessments with help-seekers. However, there is limited literature regarding suicide risk assessment practices for this population. This study aimed to examine how suicide prevention training, vicarious trauma and fears impacted suicide risk assessment behaviours of Lifeline Crisis Supporters. A cross-sectional survey design was used to recruit a volunteer convenience sample of 125 Lifeline Australia Crisis Supporters (75.2% females; Mage = 54.9) in 2018 to participate in an online survey. Findings revealed that those with more suicide-specific training had less risk assessment-related fears, and that fears were not related to attitudes towards suicide prevention. There was no significant relationship between vicarious trauma and amount of training or years of experience in the role. Further, participants with higher levels of vicarious trauma demonstrated significantly more negative attitudes towards suicide prevention. Overall, training appears to be a significant factor in suicide risk assessment practice behaviours of Lifeline Crisis Supporters, highlighting a need for ongoing training and support for them. This research also suggests that whilst fears exist, they do not significantly impair Lifeline Crisis Supporters' ability to undertake suicide risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacinta Hawgood
- Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention; School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Sarah G. Spafford
- Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention; School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- Department of Counseling Psychology and Human ServicesUniversity of OregonEugeneOregonUSA
| | - Ann Evans
- Lifeline AustraliaSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Amy Webster
- Lifeline AustraliaSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Yu Wen Koo
- Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention; School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schmied EA, Glassman LH, Carinio SR, Dell'Acqua RG, Bryan CJ, Thomsen CJ. Suicide-Specific Training Experiences and Needs Among Military Mental Health Providers. Arch Suicide Res 2022:1-15. [PMID: 35510759 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2022.2067510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Military suicide rates have risen over the past two decades, with a notable spike in recent years. To address this issue, military mental health providers must be equipped with the skills required to provide timely and effective care; yet little is known about the suicide-specific training experiences or needs of these professionals. METHODS Thirty-five mental health care providers who treat active duty personnel at military treatment facilities participated in this mixed-methods study. All participants completed a survey assessing training and clinical experiences, comfort and proficiency in working with patients at risk for suicide, and perceived barriers to obtaining suicide-specific training. A sub-set of participants (n = 8) completed a telephone interview to further describe previous experiences and perceived challenges to obtaining training. RESULTS The majority of participants (79.4%) had 6+ years of clinical experience, had a patient who had attempted suicide (85.3%), and completed at least one suicide-related training since finishing their education (82.4%). Survey results showed the leading barrier to enrolling in suicide-specific trainings was perceived lack of training opportunities (40.7% reported it was a barrier "quite often" or more), followed by lack of time (25%). Interview results revealed lack of time, location and logistical issues, and low perceived need for additional training among providers could impede enrollment. CONCLUSIONS Study results identified several modifiable barriers to receiving suicide-specific continuing education among military mental health providers. Future efforts should develop accessible training programs that can be easily integrated into routine clinical operations to mount the best defense against suicide. HIGHLIGHTSMilitary mental health providers report significant experience and relatively high degrees of comfort and proficiency working with patients at high risk for suicide.Most providers reported receiving training in suicide assessment and screening; few reported prior training in management of suicidality.Study results identified several modifiable barriers to receiving suicide-prevention continuing education among military mental health care providers; future efforts should seek to develop accessible training programs that can be easily integrated into routine clinical operations to mount the best defense against suicide.
Collapse
|
6
|
Finlayson BT, Jones E, Pickens JC. Solution Focused Brief Therapy Telemental Health Suicide Intervention. CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY 2021; 45:49-60. [PMID: 34393359 PMCID: PMC8353437 DOI: 10.1007/s10591-021-09599-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
One of the innumerable impacts of the coronavirus has been the change in how individuals provide services. For mental health providers, the pandemic required a sudden shift from in person to online service delivery. As therapists learn and embrace a new modality for providing therapy, crisis situations may present with some anxiety. With the pandemic increasing crisis situations for so many individuals, and teletherapy as a mode of service delivery being unlikely to go away after the pandemic, therapists require support in navigating crises situations online, in a medium that feels like the therapist has less control with their clients due to being in different physical locations. The authors believe that regardless of the primary model(s) therapists utilize in session, solution-focused brief therapy is an integrative model that uniquely captures client's resources and reasons for living and when clients are in crisis. The purpose of this paper is to present recommendations for applying solution-focused language in teletherapy practice, to provide ethical, evidenced based care for clients in crisis. A clinical vignette is used to illustrate the application of solution focused brief therapy for working with clients in crisis. Future directions and limitations are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin T. Finlayson
- Department of Community, Family, & Addiction Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX USA
| | - Ethan Jones
- Department of Community, Family, & Addiction Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX USA
| | - Jaclyn Cravens Pickens
- Department of Community, Family, & Addiction Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hawgood J, Ownsworth T, Kõlves K, Spence SH, Arensman E, De Leo D. Impact of Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality (STARS) Protocol Training on Mental Health Professionals' Attitudes, Perceived Capabilities, Knowledge, and Reluctance to Intervene. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:827060. [PMID: 35211039 PMCID: PMC8861433 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.827060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality (STARS) protocol and associated training were developed with the key objectives of supporting clinicians to conduct a suicide enquiry, obtaining a comprehensive account of psycho-social factors contributing to suicidality, and collaboratively developing a safety plan with clients. STARS training aims to address knowledge, attitudes and capabilities that influence intervention behavior/skills. This study aimed to examine associations between clinician characteristics and pre-training competencies in suicide risk assessment (SRA), as well as the impact of STARS training workshop on clinician competencies; and to determine the predictors of SRA training outcomes. METHOD Australian mental health professionals working with suicidal persons who undertook the STARS 2-day face-to-face workshop between 2018 and 2020 completed an online survey at pre- and post-training. Of the 222 participants who completed the pre-training questionnaire, 144 (64.9%) also completed the post-training questionnaire. Participants were mostly female (75.7%), had completed a university degree (86.4%), had <10 years of experience in suicide prevention (71.7%), and were allied and mental health professionals (78.1%). We used linear mixed-effects regression for statistical analyses. RESULTS STARS participants who reported higher perceived capability at baseline had significantly greater formal and informal training, more years of experience in suicide prevention, and were more likely to have experienced client suicide and/or suicide attempt and to report fewer SRA related fears. We found overall significant positive impacts of STARS training on clinician competencies (attitudes, perceived capability, declarative knowledge) from pre- to post-training. The most distinct changes following STARS training were for perceived capability and declarative knowledge. Participants who had more positive attitudes after training were significantly more likely to have had less prior supervision/mentoring. Reluctance to intervene was not found to significantly change after training. CONCLUSIONS We found evidence that attitudes, perceived capability and declarative knowledge changed positively from pre- to post-STARS training among mental health professionals. Underpinned by the minimum standardized SRA competencies, STARS training may be critical for informing evidence-based knowledge and skills in SRA and safety planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacinta Hawgood
- Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD, Australia
| | - Tamara Ownsworth
- School of Applied Psychology, Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, The Hopkins Centre, Griffith University, Queensland, QLD, Australia
| | - Kairi Kõlves
- Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD, Australia
| | - Susan H Spence
- Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD, Australia
| | - Ella Arensman
- School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,National Suicide Research Foundation, Cork, Ireland.,Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD, Australia
| | - Diego De Leo
- Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brown S, Iqbal Z, Burbidge F, Sajjad A, Reeve M, Ayres V, Melling R, Jobes D. Embedding an Evidence-Based Model for Suicide Prevention in the National Health Service: A Service Improvement Initiative. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17144920. [PMID: 32650466 PMCID: PMC7399800 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17144920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Despite the improved understanding of the determinants of suicide over recent decades, the mean suicide rate within the United Kingdom (UK) has remained at 10 per 100,000 per annum, with about 28% accessing mental health services in the 12 months prior to death. In this paper, we outlined a novel systems-level approach to tackling this problem through objectively differentiating the level of severity for each suicide risk presentation and providing fast-track pathways to care for all, including life-threatening cases. An additional operational challenge addressed within the proposed model was the saturation of local crisis mental health services with approximately 150 suicidality referrals per month, including non-mental health cases. This paper discussed a service improvement initiative undertaken within a National Health Service (NHS) secondary care mental health provider's open-access 24/7 crisis and home treatment service. An organisation-wide bespoke "suicide risk triage" system utilising the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) was implemented across all services. The preliminary impacts on suicidality, suicide rates and service user outcomes were described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Brown
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK; (S.B.); (F.B.)
- NAViGO Health and Social Care Community Interest Company, Grimsby DN32 0QE, UK; (A.S.); (M.R.); (V.A.); (R.M.)
| | - Zaffer Iqbal
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK; (S.B.); (F.B.)
- NAViGO Health and Social Care Community Interest Company, Grimsby DN32 0QE, UK; (A.S.); (M.R.); (V.A.); (R.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-1472-806800
| | - Frances Burbidge
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK; (S.B.); (F.B.)
- NAViGO Health and Social Care Community Interest Company, Grimsby DN32 0QE, UK; (A.S.); (M.R.); (V.A.); (R.M.)
| | - Aamer Sajjad
- NAViGO Health and Social Care Community Interest Company, Grimsby DN32 0QE, UK; (A.S.); (M.R.); (V.A.); (R.M.)
| | - Mike Reeve
- NAViGO Health and Social Care Community Interest Company, Grimsby DN32 0QE, UK; (A.S.); (M.R.); (V.A.); (R.M.)
| | - Victoria Ayres
- NAViGO Health and Social Care Community Interest Company, Grimsby DN32 0QE, UK; (A.S.); (M.R.); (V.A.); (R.M.)
| | - Richard Melling
- NAViGO Health and Social Care Community Interest Company, Grimsby DN32 0QE, UK; (A.S.); (M.R.); (V.A.); (R.M.)
| | - David Jobes
- Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, Clinical Psychology Faculty, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA;
| |
Collapse
|