Why do Danish junior doctors choose general practice as their future specialty? Results of a mixed-methods survey

Would you like to be a general practitioner? Baseline findings of a longitudinal survey among Danish medical trainees

BACKGROUND

Recruiting and securing primary care physician workforce has been the center of international attention for decades. In Denmark, the number of general practitioners has decreased by 8.5% since 2013. However, a rising population age and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity place an even greater future need for general practitioners in Denmark. The choice of general practice as specialty has been associated with a range of both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, however, few studies have examined the recruitment potential that lies within medical trainees' who are undecided about general practice specialization. The aim of this study was, therefore, to explore how medical trainees who are undecided about general practice specialization (GP-positive/undecided) differ from medical trainees who are either committed (GP-committed) or not committed to a general practice career (GP-non-committed) regarding factors related to future work life.

METHODS

The present study concerns baseline findings from a longitudinal survey study. An online questionnaire was e-mailed to a national cohort of medical trainees during their transition from under- to postgraduate education. The associations between orientations towards general practice specialization and work-related factors and potential influencing factors, respectively, were analyzed using uni- and multivariable modified Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

Of 1,188 invited participants, 461 filled out key study variables concerning specialty preferences and rejections, corresponding to a response rate of 38.8%. We found significant positive associations between GP-positive/undecided orientation and valuing a good work/life balance and the opportunity to organize own working hours when compared to GP-non-committed respondents. Compared to the GP-committed orientations, the GP-positive/undecided orientation was associated with a positive attitude towards technology, working shift hours, and an openness towards several career paths. Across all orientations, undergraduate exposure to the specialties was found to be highly influential on the specialty preferences.

CONCLUSION

GP-positive/undecided medical trainees value autonomy over their working hours more than the GP-non-committed, but less than the GP-committed. However, the GP-positive/undecided respondents present more openness to different career opportunities and the use of technology in daily work. We suggest using this knowledge in the planning of recruitment strategies aiming to increase interest in general practice specialization.

Attitudes of medical students and junior physicians towards working self-employed in private practice in Northern and Western Europe: a systematic review

Aim

A shortage in primary care physicians has been a well-known challenge in many Western countries for several years. In addition, we currently see a trend in primary care, where an increasing number of physicians work as employees instead of being self-employed, even among general practitioners. To address this shortage, knowledge of the future specialists’ attitudes toward working self-employed is needed. This qualitative systematic review aims to explore the attitudes of future specialists towards self-employment in private practice, and what factors influence these attitudes.

Subject and methods

We conducted a systematic search using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. We developed a search strategy that collected terms for future specialists, career choices, and self-employment and linked these with the Boolean operator “AND”. We analysed the results using a qualitative content analysis, as both qualitative and quantitative studies were included in the research.

Results

Self-employment is less attractive to future specialists. In particular, women prefer to be employed and receive a fixed salary. The main factors that influence the decision as to whether to become self-employed or not are financial conditions, bureaucracy and non-medical tasks, organisation, job satisfaction during residency, personal responsibility, career opportunities, specialty-dependent factors, personal environment, and education.

Conclusion

Among future specialists, being self-employed is less attractive than being an employee. Students should be better informed about future career opportunities to make an informed decision. However, it should be examined whether other forms of organisation are more in line with the wishes of future specialists.

Perspectives of GPs working in or alongside emergency departments in England: qualitative findings from the GPs and Emergency Departments Study

BACKGROUND

Around 43% of emergency department (ED) attendances can be managed in general practice. Strategies to address this include directing appropriate patients to GPs working in or alongside EDs (GPED). Views of GPs choosing to work in GPED roles may inform planning and implementation of GPED services as well as wider general practice provision.

AIM

To explore the experiences and motivations of GPs choosing to work in GPED services in England, and to identify factors that may support or hinder GPs working in GPED roles.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Thematic analysis of 42 semi-structured interviews of GPs working in 10 GPED case sites across England.

METHOD

Qualitative GP interviews from a mixed-methods study of GPs in GPED roles were thematically analysed in relation to research aims.

RESULTS

Four themes were generated: the 'pull' of a portfolio career; the 'push' of disillusionment with general practice; professional reciprocity; sustainability of GPED services and core general practice. Flexible, favourable working conditions, collaboration, and professional development made GPED an attractive workplace, often as part of a portfolio career or after retiring from core general practice. Working in GPED services was largely driven by disillusionment with core general practice. Both GPED and core general practice were thought to benefit from GPED GPs' skills. There were concerns about GPED sustainability and destabilisation of core general practice.

CONCLUSION

GPED may extend the clinical careers of experienced GPs and support recruitment and retention of more recently qualified GPs. Despite some benefits, GPED may destabilise core general practice and increase pressure on both environments.

Factors influencing specialty choice and the effect of recall bias on findings from Irish medical graduates: a cross-sectional, longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Despite being a vital part of medical workforce planning and development, how medical students and graduates choose their career specialty is still not well understood. This study aimed to identify the factors medical graduates consider important influences in their choice of specialty after their first year of practice, and to test the validity of relying on respondent recall to measure changes in specialty choice.

METHODS

The baseline survey was administered online to all final year students in Ireland's six medical schools. Those who consented to follow-up (n = 483) were surveyed 18 months later (June 2018), during the final month of first year of practice.

RESULTS

The baseline survey had a 67% (n = 483) response rate. At the follow-up survey, (n = 232, 48% response rate) the top specialty choices were: Medicine, n = 54 (26%); Surgery, n = 34 (16%); General Practice, n = 28 (13%); Anaesthesia, n = 16 (8%) and Paediatrics, n = 14 (7%). Of the 49 respondents (28%) reporting a change of specialty since baseline, 13 (27%) selected the same specialty in both surveys; of the 121 (69%) reporting no change, 22 (18%) selected a different specialty at follow-up. Over 90% of respondents rated as 'important or 'very important': 'Own aptitude', 'Work-life balance' and 'What I really want to do'. Over 75% rated as 'not at all', or 'not very important' 'Current financial debt' and 'Inclinations before medical school'. When adjusted for sex and age, compared with Medicine, General Practice rated as more important: continuity of patient care (RRR 3.20 CI(1.59-6.41), p = 0.001); working hours/conditions (RRR 4.61 CI(1.03-20.60), p = 0.045) and a career that fit their domestic circumstances (RRR 3.19 CI(1.27-8.02), p = 0.014). Those choosing Surgery rated as less important: patient contact (RRR 0.56 CI(0.33-0.95), p = 0.033) and working hours/conditions (RRR 0.55 CI(0.31-0.96), p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The different demographic and motivational profiles by specialty choice are consistent with other studies suggesting a distinct profile for doctors intending to enter General Practice. In addition, our results suggest longitudinal study designs guard against recall bias and so provide more robust medical workforce models to inform and direct recruitment drives and interventions in future medical workforce planning.

Factors associated with the entry to general practice training: A multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Despite recent studies regarding general practice (GP) career decision-making, the impact of primary care exposure during undergraduate study on career-decision-making remain unclear.

PURPOSE

To examine the association between primary care exposure with the entry to GP training.

METHODS

An unmatched case-control study design was employed. A total of 130 trainees in GP training and 260 trainees in other speciality training were randomly selected from speciality training registration. Questionnaires were used to identify primary care exposure and factors associated with career-decision making. Odds ratios (OR) and logistic regression were used to examine the association between the entry to GP training and those factors.

RESULTS

The response rate was 66.4%. Three variables were found associated with entering GP training, including timetabled primary care sessions in all three clinical years (adjusted OR = 2.91; 95% CI = 1.23 - 6.88), enrolling in rural medical student recruitment schemes (adjusted OR = 3.07; 95% CI = 1.05 - 8.99) and valuing core values of GP (adjusted OR = 8.46; 95% CI = 3.27 - 21.88).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that timetabled primary care sessions in all three clinical years has a positive influence on entering GP training. This research extends our knowledge of primary care exposure regarding continuity of the exposure.