Reduced penetrance in a large Caucasian pedigree with Stickler syndrome

Pregnancy management in a patient with stickler syndrome

BACKGROUND

Stickler syndrome is a collagen disorder that can affect multiple organ systems. It is characterized by ocular abnormalities, hearing loss, midfacial hypoplasia, hypermobility, and joint abnormalities. The phenotypic expression of Stickler syndrome can vary among those affected. Since Stickler syndrome is a collagen disorder, it is possible to expect pregnancy complications similar to those reported in other collagen disorders. To our knowledge, there is only one case report in the literature on the management of pregnancy and delivery of a patient with Stickler syndrome.

METHODS/CASE REPORT

A 37-year-old primigravid woman with a diagnosis of Stickler syndrome presented at 9 weeks gestation for prenatal genetic consultation. At 26, the patient had prophylactic laser therapy for lattice degeneration of the retina. At 32, she was found to be heterozygous for the c.1527 G>T variant in the COL2A1 gene, which is associated with ocular abnormalities and autosomal dominant form of Stickler syndrome. Subsequently, she desired to pursue prenatal diagnostic testing for the familial variant. The patient voiced that the results would impact pregnancy management. Amniocentesis was performed at 16 weeks gestation. Results were negative for the maternal COL2A1 variant. Karyotype was normal (46, XX).

RESULTS

A multidisciplinary team using a patient-centered approach including obstetrics, ophthalmology, maternal-fetal medicine, and genetics determined that there were no contraindications for vaginal delivery. At 39 weeks, the patient underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery with no complications.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of data available regarding the maternal outcomes of women affected with collagen disorders, especially Stickler Syndrome. This case highlights the importance of accurate genetic diagnosis in the prenatal period and provides information to physicians caring for patients with Stickler syndrome.

A novel deep intronic COL2A1 mutation in a family with early-onset high myopia/ocular-only Stickler syndrome

PURPOSE

To identify the genetic defect causing early-onset high myopia (eoHM)/ocular-only Stickler syndrome (ocular-STL) in a large Chinese family.

METHODS

Genomic DNA and clinical data from a four-generation family with eoHM/ocular-STL were collected. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on one affected member in initial screening. Linkage scan based on microsatellite markers was carried out initially from candidate loci associated with autosomal dominant eoHM and Stickler syndrome. Sanger sequencing was used to detect potential variants. The pathogenicity of candidate variants was evaluated using mini genes ex vivo.

RESULTS

Eight patients and five unaffected members in the family participated in the study, in which the patients had high myopia with other variable ocular phenotypes but without extraocular abnormalities. Whole exome sequencing did not detect any potential pathogenic variant in all genes known to associate with the disease. The eoHM/ocular-STL in the family was mapped to markers around COL2A1 by candidate loci linkage scan, with a maximum lod score of 3.31 for D12S1590 at θ = 0. A novel deep intronic variant, c.86-50C > G in intron 1 of COL2A1, was detected by Sanger sequencing and co-segregated with eoHM/ocular-STL in the family. Ex vivo splicing test using mini genes confirmed that the variant created a new splicing acceptor 49 bp before the canonical splicing site of exon 2, resulted in addition of 49 bp fragment in the transcript (from c.86-49 to c.86-1) and premature termination.

CONCLUSIONS

Linkage study, bioinformatics prediction, and ex vivo transcript analysis suggest a novel deep intronic variant adjacent to 5-prime of exon 2 of COL2A1, affecting exon 2 splicing, as a potential cause of ocular-STL in a large family. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an intronic variant around exon 2 as a cause of ocular-STL while a series of variants in the coding region of exon 2, a dispensable alternative-splicing exon for extraocular tissues, in COL2A1 have been reported to cause Stickler syndrome-related ocular phenotype alone.

Clinical diagnosis of Larsen syndrome, Stickler syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome in a 19-year old male: a case report

Background

Larsen syndrome is a hereditary disorder characterized by osteochondrodysplasia, congenital large-joint dislocations, and craniofacial abnormalities. The autosomal dominant type is caused by mutations in the gene that encodes the connective tissue protein, filamin B (FLNB). Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder characterized by arterial aneurysms, dissections and tortuosity, and skeletal, including craniofacial, manifestations. Mutations in five genes involved in the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling pathway cause five types of LDS. Stickler syndrome is a genetically heterogeneous arthro-ophthalmopathy caused by defects in collagen, exhibiting a wide specter of manifestations in connective tissue. A rare case is reported that was diagnosed with all these three hereditary connective tissue disorders.

Case presentation

A 19 year-old, Norwegian male with a clinical diagnosis of Larsen syndrome and with healthy, non-consanguineous parents attended a reference center for rare connective tissue disorders. Findings at birth were hypotonia, joint hypermobility, hyperextended knees, adductovarus of the feet, cervical kyphosis, craniofacial abnormalities, and an umbilical hernia. From toddlerhood, he required a hearing aid due to combined conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. Eye examination revealed hyperopia, astigmatism, and exotropia. At 10 years of age, he underwent emergency surgery for rupture of an ascending aortic aneurysm. At 19 years of age, a diagnostic re-evaluation was prompted by the findings of more distal aortic dilation, tortuosity of precerebral arteries, and skeletal findings. High throughput sequencing of 34 genes for hereditary connective tissue disorders did not identify any mutation in FLNB, but did identify a de novo missense mutation in TGFBR2 and a nonsense mutation in COL2A1 that was also present in his unaffected father. The diagnosis was revised to LDS Type 2. The patient also fulfills the proposed criteria for Stickler syndrome with bifid uvula, hearing loss, and a known mutation in COL2A1.

Conclusion

LDS should be considered in patients with a clinical diagnosis of Larsen syndrome, in particular in the presence of arterial aneurysms or tortuosity. Due to genetic heterogeneity and extensive overlap of clinical manifestations, genetic high throughput sequencing analysis is particularly useful for the differential diagnosis of hereditary connective tissue disorders.

Phenotypic characterization of patients with early-onset high myopia due to mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1: Why not Stickler syndrome?

PURPOSE

Our previous study reported that 5.5% of probands with early-onset high myopia (eoHM) had mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1. Why were the probands initially considered to have eoHM but not Stickler syndrome (STL)?

METHODS

Probands and family members with eoHM and mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1 were followed up and reexamined based on the criteria for STL. Further comprehensive examinations were conducted for patients with eoHM and mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1 and controls with eoHM without mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1. We performed comparisons between probands, affected family members with mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1, and controls with eoHM without mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1.

RESULTS

Twelve probands (8.91±4.03 years) and 14 affected family members (37.00±11.18 years) with eoHM and mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1, as well as 30 controls with eoHM but without mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1, were recruited. Among them, 25.0% of probands and 50.0% of affected family members met the diagnostic criteria for STL after reexamination. Posterior vitreous detachment/foveal hypoplasia (PVD/FH), hypermobility of the elbow joint (HJ), and vitreous opacity were more frequent in patients with eoHM with mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1 than in the controls (p = 1.40 × 10^-5, 3.72 × 10^-4, 2.30× 10^-3, respectively). HJ was more common in the probands than in the affected family members (11/12 versus 3/14; p = 3.42 × 10^-4), suggesting age-dependent manifestation. EoHM presented in all the probands and in 11/14 affected family members, suggesting that it is a more common indicator of STL than the previously described vitreoretinal abnormalities, especially in children. The rate of STL diagnosis could increase from 25.0% to 66.7% for probands and from 50.0% to 92.9% for affected family members if eoHM, PVD/FH, and HJ are added to the diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, it is not easy to differentiate STL from eoHM with routine ocular examination in outpatient clinics. Awareness of atypical phenotypes and newly recognized signs may be of help in identifying atypical STL, especially in children at eye clinics.