Self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngectomy (SECEL): translation and psychometric properties in European Portuguese

Validation of the "obturator functioning scale" for Chinese-speaking patients with obturator prostheses after cancer-related maxillectomy

Objective

The Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS) is a scale without formal measures of validity in any language. This study aimed to translate and adapt the OFS from English to Chinese and check its reliability and validity in Chinese-speaking patients with obturator prostheses after cancer-related maxillectomy.

Methods

The 15-item Chinese preversion of the OFS was completed by 133 patients in three tertiary stomatological hospitals. Of these, 41 completed it again one week after the first measurement. The patients also completed the Chinese version of the University of Washington quality of life scale (UW-QOL, Version 4).

Results

Item 12 ("upper lip feels numb") was deleted to achieve a better statistical fit. The 14-item Chinese version of the OFS (OFS-Ch) demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.908). The test-retest reliability coefficients for most items exceeded 0.90, indicating substantial reproducibility. Confirmatory factor analysis found that the scale consisted of three correlated factors: 1) eating (four items), 2) speech (five items), and 3) other problems (five items). This explained 70.2 % of the total variance using exploratory factor analysis. The scale was significantly convergent and discriminant and could validly discriminate between patients with Brown I and IId maxillary defects.

Conclusions

Our results showed that the OFS-Ch scale is a valid tool for evaluating oral dysfunction and satisfaction with appearance for patients with the obturator prosthesis and identifying those at risk of poor obturator function in clinical settings.

Adaptation and Validation of the Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngectomy (SECEL) Questionnaire into Bahasa Malaysia

BACKGROUND

Communication adjustment from patients' perspective is paramount to ensure optimization of voice rehabilitation post laryngectomy. Very few specific self-rating tools exist with the Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngectomy (SECEL) having the most evidence regarding validity, reliability and clinical utility.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to translate and validate a Bahasa Malaysia version of SECEL (mSECEL) using a validated framework of transcultural adaptation.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre from February 2019 to May 2020. The mSECEL was produced following a rigorous forward and backward translation. Eighty-three laryngectomees (78 male, five female) using various methods of alaryngeal communication (47 voice prosthesis, 29 electrolarynx, three esophageal speech and four pen and paper), completed the mSECEL and mVHI-10 before head and neck and flexible laryngoscopic examinations. The mSECEL was repeated in 2 weeks via telephone interview or clinic visit. Its reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation. The Pearson product-moment correlation test was used to analyze correlation between the mSECEL and mVHI-10.

RESULTS

The mSECEL questionnaire showed strong internal consistency with the Cronbach alpha of >0.90 for total score, Environmental and Attitude subscale. The test-retest reliability for total mSECEL score was high with the intraclass correlation of 0.97. There was a highly significant positive correlation between the mSECEL total score and mVHI-10 (P < 0.001). Items in the General subscale showed poorer internal consistency with Cronbach alpha ranging 0.55-0.46 and poor correlation with mVHI-10.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bahasa Malaysia version of the SECEL measure is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate communication perception after laryngectomy. Future studies should consider subscale validation and further abbreviation of its items to make this measure clinically relevant.

Validation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Croatian Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngectomy Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION

The Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngectomy (SECEL) is a 35-item patient-reported questionnaire developed to address the communication needs of patients with laryngectomies. The aim was to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Croatian version.

METHODS

The SECEL was translated from English by two independent translators and back-translated by a native speaker, after which it was approved by an expert committee. The Croatian version of the Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngectomy questionnaire (SECEL:HR) was filled in by 50 laryngectomised patients who had completed their oncological treatment a year prior to inclusion in the study. Patients also filled in the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) on the same day. All patients completed the SECEL:HR twice, the second time being 2 weeks after the initial test. Maximum phonation time and diadochokinesis of articulation organs were used for objective assessment.

RESULTS

Among the Croatian patients, the questionnaire was well-accepted and demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency for two out of three subscales. The correlations between VHI, SF-36, and SECEL:HR were moderate to strong. There were no significant differences between patients who are using oesophageal speech, tracheoesophageal speech, or the electrolarynx based on the SECEL:HR.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary findings of the research indicate that the Croatian version of the SECEL has sufficient psychometric qualities, high reliability, and good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89 for the total score. The Croatian version of SECEL can be recommended as a reliable and clinically valid measure for the assessment of substitution voices in Croatian-speaking patients.

Validation of "Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngectomy" (SECEL) Questionnaire for Spanish-Speaking Laryngectomized Patients

Simple Summary

There is no tool in Spanish that assesses communication-related quality of life in laryngectomized patients. Therefore, we have translated and adapted the SECEL scale from English to Spanish and applied it to a group of patients to test its reliability and validity. As a result, we have observed that the Spanish version of the SECEL questionnaire has the same conceptual, semantic and idiomatic meaning as the original. The resulting model is composed of 21 items that can be used in clinical practice in a reliable way. The test can be considered a suitable tool to assess the communication skills of Spanish-speaking laryngectomees.

Abstract

Background: Laryngectomized patients have communicative limitations when they lose their phonatory function after surgery. The scale “Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngectomy” (SECEL) assesses the impact of total laryngectomy on quality of life related to communication. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the SECEL from English to Spanish and to apply this first version to a group of patients to check its reliability and validity. Materials and Methods: One-hundred-and-one laryngectomized patients completed the SECEL scale adjusted to Spanish, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire. Results: The Spanish version of the SECEL questionnaire has the same format and conceptual, semantic and idiomatic meaning as the original. The resulting model is composed of 21 items dimensioned in two highly correlated factors that are clear, meaningful, and replicable leading to measures that are reliable enough to be used in clinical evaluation. Conclusion: The Spanish translation and validation of the SECEL questionnaire were performed. It can be considered an appropriate tool to assess communication skills from laryngectomized people.