Should we implant ICDs in more patients after myocardial infarction? Can we define the patient groups that benefit most?

The Wedensky test predicts malignant ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

Better tools are needed for detection of future malignant ventricular arrhythmias post myocardial infarct (MI). Wedensky Modulation (WM) is a new semi-invasive method: A short low-amplitude electrical impulse is applied synchronized to the QRS between a precordial and dorsal thoracic patch, and changes in the following QRS-T are registered.

DESIGN

A total of 357 (MI) ICD patients underwent WM testing. QRS-T wavelet analysis provided WM Indexes for the QRS complex (WMI-R) and T wave (WMI-T). Outcome was the time to first occurrence of appropriate device therapy for ventricular arrhythmia. Patients were followed at 6-month intervals for 2 years.

RESULTS

No arrhythmia was induced by the testing. Two-year appropriate arrhythmia treatment occurred in 35% (WMI-R positive) versus 25% (WMI-R negative, p = 0.014), and. 45% versus 26% (p = 0.001) for WMI-T positive versus negative. Two-year event rates of WMI-R or WMI-T positive versus WMI-R and WMI-T negative were 36% versus 22% (p = 0.004). In Cox proportional hazard model, the combination of WMI-R and WMI-T was the only statistically significant event predictor (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmic events could be predicted by the WM test. In combination with other risk factors WMI may be useful in these patients.