Subsidence of total ankle component associated with deterioration of an ankle scale in non-inflammatory arthritis but not in rheumatoid arthritis

Comparison of clinical and radiographic results of mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty between osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Clinical results of mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported, but no studies have compared osteoarthritis (OA) and RA. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after at least 3 years were compared between OA and RA.

METHODS

Eleven ankles with OA and 22 ankles with RA were followed after mobile-bearing TAA (FINE total ankle system). Clinical outcomes were assessed by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated by the angular position of the implant, radiolucent lines, migration, and subsidence. Operative and postoperative complications were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, or complications, except the final follow-up AOFAS total score (OA: 89.4 vs RA: 78.2; p = .044) and pain score (OA: 37.3 vs RA: 30.5; p = .041) at a mean follow-up of 83.4 months. Delayed wound healing occurred in 9.1% in RA and none in OA. Radiolucent lines were observed in 45% of both groups, and implant removal was performed in 9.1% and 18.2% of OA and RA, respectively; there were no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The final follow-up AOFAS total score and pain score were significantly higher in OA after the FINE total ankle system. There was a discrepancy between radiographic abnormalities and implant removal in both OA and RA.

Stress fractures in the forefoot after arthrodesis of the hindfoot in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: A case report

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease that attacks multiple joints throughout the body. Ankle arthrodesis (AA) has been the gold standard surgery for end-stage ankle arthritis in patients with RA. Here, we report the case of a 67-year-old woman with RA who had displacement and loosening of total ankle arthroplasty. The ankle was converted to AA using a metal spacer and an intramedullary nail. The patient had no complications in perioperative terms of arthrodesis. However, multiple fractures were found in the metatarsal bones at the routine 3-year follow-up. Although the patient did not remember any symptoms, the clinical outcome deteriorated compared to that a year before. The hindfoot in this case report was fixed completely by an intramedullary nail, while the midfoot had already involved ankylosis because of severe joint destruction present before the surgery. As a result, the range of motion in the joints of the midfoot and hindfoot was lost, and it is probable that an excessive load was applied to the forefoot during push-off by the toes, resulting in a stress fracture. Patients with RA remain at risk of future progressive joint destruction in every joint of their body. Therefore, surgeons should choose a surgery that preserves ankle motion to decrease the rate of adjacent joint degeneration for severe ankle arthropathy in patients with RA.

Total Ankle Replacement Outcome in Patients With Inflammatory Versus Noninflammatory Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The decision regarding total ankle replacement (TAR) is challenging in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) regarding more inferior bone quality, large bone cysts, and increased risk of infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the functional outcome, revision rate, complication rate, and survival rate of TAR between IA (including rheumatoid arthritis [RA]) and noninflammatory arthritis (NIA) (primary and posttraumatic).

METHODS

After reviewing the full texts, 30 articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria from 1985 until 2021, comparing TAR results. The eligible studies included 5508 patients, of whom 1565 patients had IA and 3943 patients had NIA. At the time of surgery, the average age was 58 years in the IA group and 63 in the NIA group. The average follow-up was 67.2 months in the IA group and 67 months in the NIA group. The outcome measures were the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the rate of complications, revisions, and survival.

RESULTS

The mean final AOFAS score was 82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78-86) in the IA group and 83 (95% CI: 78-88) in the NIA group, with no significant difference. There was no significant difference in the mean preoperative to postoperative AOFAS score change between the IA and the NIA. The complication rate was 16% (95% CI: 9%-27%) in the IA group and 15% (95% CI: 8%-27%) in the NIA group with no significant difference. The revision rate was 12% (95% CI: 10%-15%) in the IA group and 13% (95% CI: 10%-18%) in the NIA group, which was significant (P = .04). There was no significant difference in the survival rate between IA and NIA.

CONCLUSION

Total ankle replacement is a safe procedure in inflammatory ankle arthritis, specifically in RA patients with relatively minor and major complications close to other reasons for ankle replacement.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: prognostic.

Outcome Reporting in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Total ankle arthroplasty is an increasingly utilized treatment for ankle arthritis due to decreasing failure rates and improved outcomes. However, the literature on this procedure remains heterogeneous with large variability in outcome reporting methods. PRISMA guidelines were used to systematically review outcome reporting measures used in prospective studies and randomized control trials on total ankle arthroplasty published in 15 high-impact journals between Jan 1, 2009-May 1, 2020. A total of 43 studies were included and outcome measures were grouped into seven categories: pain, subjective function, patient satisfaction, complications, objective function, implant survivorship, and imaging. The most common topic of study was implant design followed by differences in outcomes when comparing total ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis. The most commonly reported outcome measure was post-surgical complications. No study reported on all seven categories, while 22 (51.2%) studies reported on four or more. Subjective measures had significant variability with fifteen different Patient Reported Outcome Measures used across the studies. While the included studies were quite comprehensive, there was little consistency in reporting outcomes after total ankle arthroplasty. With improving outcomes and techniques in total ankle arthroplasty, and thus an expected increase in utilization and number of published studies, efforts should be made to use commonly employed outcome reporting methods to facilitate comparison of results across studies.