Postmarketing surveillance evaluating the safety and effectiveness of golimumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Six-month safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: Interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the real-world safety/effectiveness of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in patients with RA in Japan registered in a post-marketing surveillance study.

METHODS

This interim analysis included data from July 2013 to December 2018. Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)/Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)/Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-4(ESR)] scores, and rates of SDAI/CDAI/DAS28-4(ESR)-defined remission and low disease activity were analysed using 6 months of data. Risk factors for serious infections were assessed by multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Safety and disease activity were evaluated in 6866 and 6649 patients, respectively. Overall, 32.73%/7.37% of patients reported AEs/SAEs. Clinically important AEs with tofacitinib included serious infections/infestations [3.13% of patients; incidence rate (IR; patients with events) 6.91/100 patient-years (PY)], herpes zoster (3.63%; IR 8.02/100 PY), and malignancies (0.68%; IR 1.45/100 PY). SDAI/CDAI/DAS28-4(ESR) scores and remission/low disease activity rates improved over 6 months. Male sex, older age, Steinbrocker's stage IV, history of infection, and diabetes mellitus at baseline were independent risk factors for serious infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with RA receiving tofacitinib in Japan, safety was consistent with the reported profile, and disease activity improved over 6 months.

STUDY IDENTIFIER

NCT01932372.

Computed tomography for malignancy screening in patients with rheumatoid arthritis before initiation of disease modifying antirheumatic drug

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of screening for malignancies using CT before the initiation of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients with active RA.

METHODS

We examined 2192 patients with RA who underwent plain CT scans prior to the initiation of b/tsDMARDs. The sensitivity for detecting malignancy was measured and compared with that of regular screening (physical examination and X-ray). We then evaluated the clinical characteristics, prognosis and treatment of patients with RA with concomitant malignancies. Additionally, we determined the incidence rate of malignancy in patients with RA who were initiated on b/tsDMARDs after CT screening.

RESULTS

Of the 2192 patients, 33 (1.5%) were diagnosed with malignancy after CT screening. Whereas regular screening detected only seven malignancies, CT screening further detected 26 (including 19 at the early stage). On the other hand, 86% of the malignancies detectable by regular screening were at an advanced stage. Patients diagnosed with early-stage malignancies received RA treatments that included b/tsDMARDs after curative resection; 80% of these patients achieved low disease activity after 1 year. This rate was comparable to the patients without malignancy detection after screening (70%). The 5 year incidence of malignancy after the initiation of b/tsDMARDs after CT screening was lower than that of the RA cohort without CT screening (standardized incidence ratio: 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Screening in patients with RA using CT before the initiation of b/tsDMARDs allows for the early detection and treatment of malignancy, resulting in safer and more stable b/tsDMARD treatments.

Post-Marketing Safety Surveillance of Tofacitinib over 9 Years in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

The safety of tofacitinib in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been demonstrated in clinical studies of ≤ 4 and 9.5 years, respectively. Post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for tofacitinib from spontaneous and voluntary adverse event (AE) reports have been published for RA, but not PsA. To inform the real-world safety profile of tofacitinib in PsA, we evaluated AE reports submitted to the Pfizer safety database (including RA data for context).

METHODS

Endpoints included AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), AEs of special interest (AESIs; serious infections, herpes zoster, cardiovascular events, malignancies, venous thromboembolism), and fatal cases. Exposure was estimated using IQVIA global commercial sales data. Number, frequency, and reporting rates (RRs; number of events/100 patient-years' [PY] exposure) were summarized by indication and formulation (immediate release [IR] 5 or 10 mg twice daily], modified release [MR] 11 mg once daily, or all tofacitinib). The data-collection period differed by indication (PsA: 14 December 2017 [US approval, IR/MR] to 6 November 2021; RA: 6 November 2012 [US approval, IR] to 6 November 2021; MR approval, 24 February 2016).

RESULTS

A total of 73,525 case reports were reviewed (PsA = 5394/RA = 68,131), with 20,706/439,370 PY (PsA/RA) of exposure. More AEs were reported for IR versus MR (IR/MR: PsA = 8349/7602; RA = 137,476/82,153). RRs for AEs (IR/MR: PsA = 59.6/113.4; RA = 44.0/64.8) and SAEs (PsA = 8.1/13.6; RA = 8.0/9.5) were higher with MR versus IR. AE RRs (RA) in the first 4 years after IR approval were 95.9 (IR; 49,439 PY) and 147.0 (MR; 2000 PY). Frequency of SAEs, AESIs, and fatal cases was mostly similar across formulations and indications. The most frequently-reported AE Preferred Terms (PsA/RA) included drug ineffective (20.0%/17.8%), pain (9.7%/10.6%), condition aggravated (9.9%/10.5%), headache (8.8%/7.9%) and, for PsA, off-label use (10.5%/3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib PMS safety data from submitted AE reports were consistent between PsA and RA, and aligned with its known safety profile. Exposure data (lower MR versus IR; estimation from commercial sales data), reporting bias, reporter identity, and regional differences in formulation use limit interpretation.

Efficacy and safety of the anti-TNF multivalent NANOBODY® compound ozoralizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: A 52-week result of a Phase II/III study (OHZORA trial)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety through a 52-week treatment with subcutaneous ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group confirmatory trial included a 24-week double-blind treatment period followed by a 28-week open-label treatment period. The double-blind treatment period randomized 381 (2:2:1) patients to placebo and ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg, and patients receiving placebo were re-randomized (1:1) to ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg in the open-label period.

RESULTS

The ozoralizumab groups showed good clinical improvement, with high American College of Rheumatology response rates at 52 weeks, as well as good improvements in other endpoints, which were observed from Day 3 and maintained through Week 52. Furthermore, the ozoralizumab groups showed a high remission rate in clinical and functional remission at Week 52. Serious adverse events occurred in a total of 23 patients in the ozoralizumab groups, without differences in incidence between doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Ozoralizumab demonstrated significant therapeutic effects and efficacy, which was maintained for 52 weeks. The safety profile was consistent with the evaluated results in interim analysis at Week 24, and ozoralizumab was well-tolerated up to Week 52.

Risk factors associated with relapse after methotrexate dose reduction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving golimumab and methotrexate combination therapy

AIM

To identify risk factors for relapse after methotrexate (MTX) dose reduction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving golimumab (GLM)/MTX combination therapy.

METHOD

Data on RA patients ≥20 years old receiving GLM (50 mg) + MTX for ≥6 months were retrospectively collected. MTX dose reduction was defined as a reduction of ≥12 mg from the total dose within 12 weeks of the maximum dose (≥1 mg/wk average). Relapse was defined as Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) score ≥3.2 or sustained (≥ twice) increase of ≥0.6 from baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 304 eligible patients were included. Among the MTX-reduction group (n = 125), 16.8% of patients relapsed. Age, duration from diagnosis to the initiation of GLM, baseline MTX dose, and DAS28-CRP were comparable between relapse and no-relapse groups. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of relapse after MTX reduction was 4.37 (95% CI 1.16-16.38, P = 0.03) for prior use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the aORs for cardiovascular disease (CVD), gastrointestinal disease and liver disease were 2.36, 2.28, and 3.03, respectively. Compared to the non-reduction group, the MTX-reduction group had a higher proportion of patients with CVD (17.6% vs 7.3%, P = 0.02) and a lower proportion of prior use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (11.2% vs. 24.0%, P = 0.0076).

CONCLUSION

Attention should be given to RA patients with history of CVD, gastrointestinal disease, liver disease, or prior NSAIDs-use when considering MTX dose reduction to ensure benefits outweigh the risks of relapse.

Research on Liver Damage Caused by the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Novel Biological Agents or Targeted Agents

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by polyarticular, symmetric, and aggressive inflammation of the small joints in the hands and feet, resulting in dysfunction. With progress and development in medicine, treatment of RA is constantly evolving, making several drugs available for the treatment of RA. From the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at the start of illness to glucocorticoids and then to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), therapeutic-use drugs for RA have been keeping pace with scientific research. However, various types of drugs have additional side effects when used over the long-term. New and emerging biological and targeted agents have been widely applied in recent years; however, the side effects have not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we review the research progress on liver damage caused by novel biological and targeted agents available for RA treatment. The aim is to provide a reference for rational clinical administration of such drugs.

Persistence and Safety of Golimumab in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Renal Dysfunction in a Real-World Setting

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of golimumab in elderly patients with renal dysfunction are not well evaluated due to the exclusion criteria of clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the persistence and safety of golimumab in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients with renal dysfunction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we used Japan's nationwide electronic medical records and claims database to identify patients aged 65 years and older who were newly prescribed golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis between July 2011 and June 2018. Patients were divided into three groups according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; high, ≥ 90; moderate, ≥ 60, < 90; low, ≥ 30, < 60), and the persistence of golimumab and adverse events were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 423 patients met the eligibility criteria. At 6 months, the persistence rates of golimumab were 62.4%, 63.7% and 67.0% in the high, moderate and low eGFR groups, respectively. In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, baseline eGFR was not associated with golimumab persistence or adverse events, but concomitant methotrexate and low baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) were associated with longer golimumab persistence.

CONCLUSION

Reduced renal function was not associated with continuation of golimumab or incidence of adverse events, suggesting that the persistence of golimumab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is independent of the baseline level of renal function. On the other hand, concomitant use of methotrexate and low baseline CRP levels were suggested as factors that may affect the persistence of golimumab treatment.

Phase II/III Results of a Trial of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Multivalent NANOBODY Compound Ozoralizumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous administration of 30 mg or 80 mg of ozoralizumab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose disease remained active despite MTX therapy.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase II/III trial, 381 patients were randomized to receive placebo, ozoralizumab 30 mg, or ozoralizumab 80 mg, plus MTX subcutaneously injected every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. The primary end points were the response rates based on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 16 and change in the Sharp/van der Heijde score (ΔSHS) from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with an ACR20 response at week 16 was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in both ozoralizumab groups (79.6% for 30 mg, 75.3% for 80 mg), compared with placebo (37.3%); these improvements were observed from the first week of treatment. The proportion of the patients with structural nonprogression (ΔSHS ≤0) was significantly higher in both ozoralizumab groups than in the placebo group. For some secondary end points, significantly greater improvements were observed starting from as early as day 3. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients in the ozoralizumab 30-mg group and 5 patients in the ozoralizumab 80-mg group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with active RA who received ozoralizumab in combination with MTX, the signs and symptoms of RA were significantly reduced as compared with the outcomes in those receiving placebo. Ozoralizumab demonstrated acceptable tolerability with no new safety signals when compared with other antibodies against tumor necrosis factor.

Safety and Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japanese Clinical Practice: 24-Week Results of All-Case Post-Marketing Surveillance

OBJECTIVES

To assess safety and effectiveness of baricitinib treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This ongoing all-case post-marketing surveillance study (starting September 2017) includes all patients with RA treated with baricitinib in Japan. Safety and effectiveness (disease activity) were assessed for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Safety analyses to February 2021 included 4731 patients (initial baricitinib dose: 4 mg/day, n=3058; 2 mg/day, n=1661; other, n=12); 1059 (22.38%) were ≥75 years, and 3362 (71.06%) previously received biologic therapy. Overall observational period was 1863.14 patient-years; 1174 (24.82%) patients discontinued baricitinib before Week 24, mostly for lack of effectiveness (n=478; 10.10%). Adverse events occurred in 1271 (26.87%) patients (serious: 203 [4.29%]; death: 18 [0.38%]). The incidence of herpes zoster, hepatic function disorder, and serious infection was 3.09%, 2.77%, and 1.90%, respectively. Malignancy occurred in 17 patients (0.36%) and major adverse cardiovascular events in seven patients (0.15%). Among patients with effectiveness data, at least 26.57% (Boolean) achieved remission at Week 24.

CONCLUSIONS

This large nationwide surveillance study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of 24 weeks of baricitinib for RA in real-world clinical practice. Continued surveillance of long-term safety is ongoing.

Predictive factors for retention of golimumab over a median 4-year duration in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-world setting: A retrospective study and literature review

OBJECTIVES

To investigate 6-year drug survival (median: 48.5 months) of golimumab and predictors for lack of efficacy leading to golimumab discontinuation in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in routine practice.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 60 patients with RA treated with golimumab from November 2011 to August 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups (retention, n = 28; withdrawal due to lack of efficacy, n = 24). The retention rate was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and variables associated with golimumab discontinuation were identified using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

The prevalence of concomitant methotrexate and no biologics use was significantly higher in the retention than in the withdrawal group. Overall drug survival of golimumab was 66.3%, 48.3%, and 24.5% at 12, 36, and 72 months, respectively. There were statistical differences in retention rates among groups stratified by initiation dose, methotrexate, and biologics use. Multivariate analysis revealed the factor associated with golimumab discontinuation as history of 1 (hazards ratio: 4.42, 95% CI: 1.35-19.93, P = .012) and ≥2 biologics use (7.49, 1.97-36.27, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior exposure of increasing number of biologics was identified as the most important factor negatively affecting long-term golimumab retention in Japanese patients with RA.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis by background methotrexate dose: post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 4 study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by background methotrexate (MTX) dose.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 4 study (NCT01758198), patients received intravenous abatacept (∼10 mg/kg) or placebo both with MTX (≥6 mg/week). Efficacy (Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein [DAS28 (CRP)] and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) was assessed by baseline MTX dosage (≤8 and >8 mg/week) to week 16; safety was assessed by MTX dosage ≤8 and >8 mg/week. Change from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and HAQ-DI was assessed using longitudinal repeated measures analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 101 and 102 patients received abatacept + MTX ≤8 and >8 mg/week, while 96 and 106 patients received placebo + MTX ≤8 and >8 mg/week, respectively. Regardless of baseline MTX dose received, mean changes from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and HAQ-DI in abatacept groups were similar; repeated measures analysis showed similar trends in changes from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and HAQ-DI. Abatacept safety profile was consistent with previous observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Post hoc analysis demonstrated similar efficacy and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve ACPA-positive Japanese patients with RA regardless of baseline MTX dose.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Golimumab in Rheumatic Diseases: Post-Marketing Surveillance in Korea

Introduction

Golimumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Inhibition of TNF-α by golimumab inhibits the inflammatory response, thereby modulating the immune response in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Although the efficacy of golimumab has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), various patient populations, such as those at high risk of infection, including those with latent tuberculosis and various comorbidities, or on co-administered medications, were excluded from the RCTs. Therefore, safety cannot be sufficiently evaluated by RCTs in the patient group with heterogenous characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondyloarthritis (AS) in a real-world setting in Korea.

Methods

We conducted an open-label, prospective, non-interventional study as post-marketing surveillance. Safety was evaluated by collecting and recording adverse events, and effectiveness was evaluated by assessing disease activity using DAS28-CRP, DAS28-ESR, ACR20, and ASAS20 outcome measures. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of adverse events, and changes in disease activity scores from baseline were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

A total 673 patients were enrolled, of whom 621 were included in the safety analysis. During the study, 97 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 62 patients (10.0%). The most frequently reported ADRs were related to infection, including nasopharyngitis (0.8%), upper respiratory tract infection (0.6%), and herpes zoster (0.5%). The mean (± standard deviation) changes from baseline in global disease activity at weeks 12 and 24 were − 3.37 ± 2.529 and − 3.68 ± 2.404, respectively, with statistical significance. In those patients with RA, 72.5 and 47.0% of individuals had a good response based on DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR outcomes at week 24. At week 24, 71.4% of patients with PsA had an ACR20 response and 72.9% of patients with AS had an ASAS20 response.

Conclusion

In the real-world setting, golimumab was safe and effective in Korean patients with RA, PsA, and AS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00352-6.

Updates on management strategies of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with resolved hepatitis virus B infection undergoing immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatology and the current situation in Niigata Rheumatic Center

With the introduction of methotrexate, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), the disease activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been dramatically ameliorated. However, these drugs have strong immunosuppressive effects and can cause reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with resolved HBV infection. Corticosteroids or immunosuppressants used for other connective tissue diseases or vasculitis also carry a risk of inducing reactivation of HBV. Therefore, every rheumatologist should know how to detect the resolved infection of HBV in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving immunosuppressive therapy and how to monitor it when resolved infection is revealed. Of note, the cut-off index was changed from 2.1 log copies/ml to 20 IU/ml (1.3 Log IU/ml) in 2017. Rheumatologists should start nucleic acid analog administration at reactivation of HBV while performing ongoing immunosuppressive therapy in order to prevent severe or fulminant hepatitis. A low titer of HBs antibody (Ab) or lack of HBs Ab is a risk factor of reactivation of HBV. However, the reactivation of HBV cannot be prevented by HBs Ab titers at baseline or changes overtime. Rheumatologists should recognize that every immunosuppressive therapy, regardless of the mode of action, has a potential risk of reactivation. To facilitate proper management of patients with HBV infection, collaboration between rheumatologists and hepatologists is strongly encouraged. Patients' education, systems for checking electronic medical charts, and multidisciplinary efforts are considered important for detecting HBV reactivation.

Dose Adjustment of Methotrexate Administered Concomitantly with Golimumab for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japanese Real-World Clinical Settings

Introduction

The combination of methotrexate (MTX) with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) is a recommended treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients showing an inadequate response to MTX monotherapy. However, the adequate dose of MTX, especially in long-term treatment with bDMARDs/MTX combination therapy, remains under-addressed. Since RA patients require long-term treatment, we examined the effects of using golimumab (GLM) in the long run as well as its persistency and associated factors.

Methods

We used the Japan Medical Data Center Inc. (JMDC) administrative claims data of 489 patients receiving GLM therapy for calculating the persistency in patients with constant, reduced, or escalated MTX dosing. The factors associated with GLM persistency were assessed using Cox proportional hazard modeling, controlling for the dose adjustment of concomitant MTX, age, sex, RA disease period, and the initial dose of GLM or concomitant MTX during GLM/MTX combination therapy.

Results

During GLM/MTX combination therapy, up to 52% of patients were reported to experience dose adjustments of concomitant MTX treatment (i.e., dose reduction and escalation in 34% and 18% of patients, respectively). Persistency was similar in the MTX dose-reduction patients and the MTX dose-constant patients. In the Cox proportional hazard model, no significant differences were observed in association with GLM persistency, including with respect to MTX dose adjustment.

Conclusions

GLM prescription was continued in 80% or more (1 year) and 50% or more (3 years) of RA patients receiving reduced concomitant MTX dosing, suggesting that MTX dose adjustment (including MTX reduction) could be considered in GLM/MTX combination therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00228-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pharmacovigilance of Biopharmaceuticals in Rheumatic Diseases, Adverse Events, Evolution, and Perspective: An Overview

Since we have gained an understanding of the immunological pathophysiology of rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, treatment based on biological drugs has become a fundamental axis. These therapies are oriented towards the regulation of cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, and the modulation of cell-mediated immunity (B cells and T cells) by anti CD20 or anti CTAL-4 agents, and can increase the risk of associated infections or adverse events (AE). In this context, the entry of biotherapeutics represented a challenge for pharmacovigilance, risk management and approval by the main global regulatory agencies regarding biosimilars, where efficacy and safety are based on comparability exercises without being an exact copy in terms of molecular structure. The objective of this review is divided into three fundamental aspects: (i) to illustrate the evolution and focus of pharmacovigilance at the biopharmaceutical level, (ii) to describe the different approved recommendations of biopharmaceuticals (biological and biosimilars) and their use in rheumatic diseases (RDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other less frequent RD like cryopyrin-associated autoinflammatory syndromes (CAPS), and (iii) to identify the main AE reported in the post-marketing phase of RD biopharmaceuticals.

Clinical response among golimumab-treated Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis by number of previous biologic therapies: Real-world evidence from post-hoc analysis of post-marketing surveillance data

OBJECTIVES

To assess the real-world effectiveness of golimumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had previously received one or more biologic therapies.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of post-marketing surveillance was performed. The clinical response to golimumab was analyzed in 1216 patients who had previously received one or more biologic agents including non-TNF inhibitors with stratification by the number of previous biologic agents. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with DAS28-CRP response to golimumab.

RESULTS

While treatment persistence is comparable, the response to golimumab declined with an increasing number of previous biologic therapies. When stratified by golimumab dose, patients receiving golimumab at 100 mg had higher disease activity at baseline with an increasing number of previous bDMARDs, but they still achieved comparable disease activity at 24 weeks regardless of how many bDMARDs had been previously used. Univariate and multivariate analyses both identified concomitant oral corticosteroid therapy as a factor negatively associated with the likelihood of achieving a DAS28-CRP response.

CONCLUSION

Switching to golimumab was effective regardless of how many biologic agents had been previously used, but the response declined with an increasing number of prior biologic agents. A golimumab dose of 100 mg was also effective for those who previously received three or more bDMARDs.

Effectiveness of golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to first-line biologic therapy: Results from a Japanese post-marketing surveillance study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the real-world effectiveness of golimumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had previously received first-line biologic therapy.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of post-marketing surveillance was performed. The effectiveness of golimumab was assessed in 731 patients with an inadequate response to first-line biologic therapy stratified by their prior biologic agents. Outcome variables included DAS28-CRP, DAS28-ESR, SDAI and CDAI, and medication persistence. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with the likelihood of achieving a DAS28-CRP response (good/moderate) after 24 weeks of golimumab treatment.

RESULTS

Patients demonstrated significant improvement in the clinical signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis at 24 weeks, as indicated by the reduction of DAS28-CRP (Δ0.87), DAS28-ESR (Δ0.85), SDAI (Δ7.32), and CDAI (Δ6.98) scores. This result was consistent across the subgroups stratified by previous biologic therapy. Multivariate analysis failed to identify any factors associated with response to golimumab.

CONCLUSION

In the real-world clinical setting, switching to golimumab was effective for Japanese patients with an inadequate response to first-line biologic therapy regardless of the biologic agent, including both TNF and non-TNF inhibitors.

Effect of Golimumab Dose Escalation in Japanese Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post-Hoc Analysis of Post-Marketing Surveillance Data

Introduction

While dose escalation of golimumab has been used for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who demonstrate an inadequate response to the standard dose, its effectiveness has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome observed by dose escalation of golimumab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the daily clinical setting.

Methods

A post hoc analysis was performed of data from the 24-week post-marketing surveillance conducted in Japan (n = 5154). A total of 301 patients with moderate or high disease activity at baseline who underwent dose escalation of golimumab were assessed for effectiveness at 24 weeks based on several variables, such as DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI, as well as for medication persistence through 24 weeks. In addition, the study population was stratified by the time to dose escalation, and effectiveness was likewise evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with a moderate/good EULAR response to golimumab at 24 weeks.

Results

Patients with golimumab dose escalation showed significant improvement of the clinical signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis at 24 weeks, as indicated by reduction of the DAS28-CRP (∆0.89), SDAI (∆8.64), and CDAI (∆8.28) scores. This result was relatively consistent across the subgroups stratified by the timing of dose escalation. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, 78.1% of the patients continued to receive golimumab at 24 weeks, and this was also similar among the subgroups stratified by the time to dose escalation. Multivariate analysis identified male sex and previous biologic therapy as factors that were significantly associated with the clinical response at 24 weeks.

Conclusion

In real-world clinical practice, improvement of disease activity was observed after uptitration of golimumab from 50 to 100 mg regardless of the timing. Male patients and biologic-naive patients were more likely to respond to dose escalation of golimumab.

Trial Registration

UMIN-CTR, Identifier: UMIN000015895.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00198-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Assessments of the unmet need in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: analyses from the NOR-DMARD registry

Objective

To describe the outcomes of MTX and biologic DMARD (bDMARD) treatment in patients with RA and assess unmet needs in patients who fail treatment, using real-world data from the Norwegian DMARD (NOR-DMARD) registry.

Methods

Data included RA treatment courses from January 2007 until July 2016. Patients received MTX monotherapy (in MTX-naïve patients), bDMARD monotherapy, bDMARDs + MTX, or bDMARDs + other conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). DAS28-4(ESR) was used to measure remission (<2.6) and inadequate response (>3.2) across all groups at Months 6 and 12. Estimated ACR20/50/70 and EULAR good and good/moderate response rates (based on DAS28-4[ESR] score) for bDMARDs were modelled at Months 6 and 12 using logistic mixed regression. DAS28-4(ESR) scores and changes from baseline, and rates and reasons for discontinuation, were evaluated for all groups over 24 months.

Results

The 2778 treatment courses in this analysis included 714 MTX monotherapy, 396 bDMARD monotherapy, 1460 bDMARDs + MTX and 208 bDMARDs + other csDMARDs. Of patients with DAS28-4(ESR) data at Months 6 and 12 (25.0–34.1%), 33.9–47.2% did not switch treatment and were inadequate-responders at Month 12. There were no significant differences in efficacy between bDMARD groups (bDMARD monotherapy, or bDMARDs + MTX or other csDMARDs). Lack of efficacy was the most common reason for stopping treatment across all groups (13.7–22.1% over 24 months).

Conclusion

An unmet treatment need exists for patients still experiencing inadequate response to MTX monotherapy and bDMARDs as monotherapy or in combination with MTX/other csDMARDs after 12 months.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01581294.

Abatacept in combination with methotrexate in Japanese biologic-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised placebo-controlled phase IV study

Objectives

To evaluate efficacy and safety of abatacept+methotrexate (MTX) in biologic-naive, anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and early erosion versus placebo+MTX.

Methods

In this phase IV, multicentre, double-blind study (NCT01758198), patients were randomised (1:1) to receive intravenous abatacept (~10 mg/kg) or placebo, plus MTX (≥6 mg/week). Primary efficacy objectives were to compare American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response rates at week 16 and mean change from baseline in van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (vdH-mTSS) at week 24 between abatacept+MTX and placebo+MTX groups.

Results

Overall, 203 and 202 patients received abatacept+MTX and placebo+MTX, respectively. At week 16, ACR20 response rates were higher in the abatacept (75.4%) versus placebo group (27.7%; p<0.001). Mean change from baseline in vdH-mTSS at week 24 was 0.84 in the abatacept and 1.26 in the placebo group (p=0.017). Radiographic non-progression rates (change in vdH-mTSS≤smallest detectable change (1.9)) were 88.1% and 75.4% in abatacept and placebo groups, respectively. Adjusted mean change from baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (C-reactive protein) (DAS28 (CRP)) at week 16 demonstrated a numerically greater reduction in the abatacept versus placebo group. Proportions of patients with DAS28 (CRP), Simplified Disease Activity Index and Clinical Disease Activity Index remission up to week 52 were higher in the abatacept versus placebo group. The abatacept safety profile was consistent with previous observations.

Conclusions

Compared with MTX alone, abatacept+MTX improved clinical symptoms and inhibited structural damage progression in ACPA-positive, Japanese patients with RA, early erosion and inadequate response to MTX.

Comparing the effectiveness of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs using real-world data

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) by analyzing claims data of 13 Japanese national university hospitals.

METHODS

We evaluated 4970 cases of rheumatoid arthritis treated with bDMARDs from the Clinical Information Statistical Analysis database, which has collected and integrated 13 Japanese national university hospitals' claims data for 10 years. We surveyed the medications and calculated the retention rates of bDMARDs using the Kaplan-Meier method and differentiated the effectiveness between the two bDMARDs by comparing the retention rates after switching from one drug to another.

RESULTS

Of the 4970 cases, 1364 switched bDMARDs at least once. Tocilizumab (TCZ) reported the highest retention rate, whereas abatacept (ABT) revealed a similar rate compared with only naïve cases. The retention rate curves were higher in cases on TCZ that switched from the other bDMARDs than those in the reversed cases. Following TCZ, ABT and etanercept indicated better results than the other bDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

We could compare the effectiveness among bDMARDs by differentiating the retention rates from big claims data. TCZ reported higher retention rates in both naïve and switched cases than other bDMARDs.

Safety, Effectiveness, and Treatment Persistence of Golimumab in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Real-World Clinical Practice in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Golimumab has been proven as an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in clinical trials. However, there is a scarcity of data regarding its use in elderly patients in a real-world setting. This study aims to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and treatment persistence of golimumab in elderly Japanese patients (≥ 75 years) with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

This study was a post hoc analysis of post-marketing surveillance data on 5137 Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who received golimumab for 24 weeks. The study population was divided into two age groups (younger: < 75 years and elderly: ≥ 75 years), and the safety, effectiveness, and treatment persistence of golimumab were assessed. Also, the reasons for discontinuing golimumab treatment were analyzed by multi-logistic regression.

RESULTS

During golimumab treatment over 24 weeks, younger and elderly groups exhibited comparable improvement of disease activity as measured by EULAR response criteria with similar overall rates of adverse events. However, the survival curve of golimumab for elderly patients was significantly different from that for younger patients due largely to the discontinuation at 4 weeks. The most common reason for discontinuation in elderly patients was patient choice, while it was disease progression in younger patients. Analysis of elderly patients who discontinued treatment by their own decision identified EULAR good response as a factor associated with continuation of golimumab treatment whereas no predictive factor associated with discontinuation was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness of golimumab treatment in elderly Japanese patients aged 75 years or older were comparable to those in younger patients in real-world clinical practice. Analysis of the survival curves suggested that continuous use of golimumab might further improve clinical benefit of golimumab in elderly patients, underpinning the importance of effective communication between physicians and elderly patients based on the treat-to-target strategy.

FUNDING

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.

Real-World Treatment Patterns for Golimumab and Concomitant Medications in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate real-world treatment patterns for use of golimumab and concomitant medications in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

This study was a post hoc retrospective analysis from post-marketing surveillance data on 2350 Japanese patients with moderate/severe rheumatoid arthritis who received golimumab for 24 weeks. The study population was divided based on initiation treatment or dose adjustment patterns with golimumab, methotrexate, or oral glucocorticoids.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis revealed that the baseline factors associated with administration of golimumab (100 mg) were higher body weight, failure of prior biological therapy (bio-failure), no previous methotrexate use, and respiratory disease, while previous methotrexate use and absence of renal impairment or respiratory disease were associated with concomitant methotrexate therapy, and previous glucocorticoid use was associated with concomitant glucocorticoid therapy. The following associations were identified with regard to dose adjustment during treatment: bio-failure, no previous methotrexate use, previous csDMARDs use, presence of respiratory disease, allergy history, and higher CRP for golimumab dose escalation; shorter disease duration, previous GC, and no previous methotrexate use for methotrexate dose escalation; no prior biological therapy and renal impairment for methotrexate dose reduction; no previous GC use for glucocorticoid dose escalation; and absence of Steinbrocker's stage II/III/IV, absence of Steinbrocker's class II, no bio-failure, and no previous csDMARDs use for glucocorticoid dose reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that various baseline factors were associated with initiation of treatment and dose adjustment of golimumab, methotrexate, or oral glucocorticoids, reflecting both the treatment strategies of physicians for improving RA symptoms and/or reducing adverse events.

FUNDING

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.