Efficacy and safety of apremilast for 3 months in Behçet’s disease: A prospective observational study

[An update on Behçet's syndrome]

Behçet's syndrome (BS, synonym: Behçet's disease, or Adamantiades-Behçet's disease, ABD) is classified as a vasculitis of variable vessel size and can manifest itself in both arterial and venous vessels. Its extensive and at the same time interindividually very different clinical picture is not uncommon a challenge, both with regard to the diagnosis of this rheumatic systemic disease, which is rather rare in our latitudes, and its therapeutic options. In addition to the four cardinal symptoms of recurrent oral aphthae, genital aphthae, skin and eye lesions, the clinical picture offers numerous other manifestations which often require interdisciplinary cooperation. In addition to the above mentioned ocular involvement, which can still lead to blindness if inadequately treated, this is especially true for intestinal and cerebral manifestations as well as for large vessel vasculitis.A final revision of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of Behcet's syndrome (EULAR) was made in 2018, and the recommendations are now established internationally as an important treatment guide. Therapy is based on the leading organ involvement. After adalimumab received approval for the treatment of posterior ocular involvement in 2016, another agent, apremilast, became available in 2020. The drug is recommended for the treatment of recurrent oral aphthae in adult Behçet's patients requiring systemic therapy. Nevertheless, there is a further need for new drugs.This article aims to highlight recent findings in the areas of epidemiology, immunopathogenesis & genetics, clinical findings, and therapy, with an emphasis on clinical relevance.

SER recommendations on treatment of refractory Behçet's syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To develop multidisciplinary recommendations based on available evidence and expert consensus for the therapeutic management of patients with refractory Behçet's syndrome (BS) (difficult to treat, severe resistant, severe relapse) to conventional treatment.

METHODS

A group of experts identified clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document. These questions were reformulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison and outcome). Systematic reviews of the evidence were conducted, the quality of the evidence was evaluated following the methodology of the international working group Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). After that, the multidisciplinary panel formulated the specific recommendations.

RESULTS

4 PICO questions were selected regarding the efficacy and safety of systemic pharmacological treatments in patients with BS with clinical manifestations refractory to conventional therapy related to mucocutaneous and/or articular, vascular, neurological parenchymal and gastrointestinal phenotypes. A total of 7 recommendations were made, structured by question, based on the identified evidence and expert consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of most severe clinical manifestations of BS lacks solid scientific evidence and, besides, there are no specific recommendation documents for patients with refractory disease. With the aim of providing a response to this need, here we present the first official Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology for the management of these patients. They are devised as a tool for assistance in clinical decision making, therapeutic homogenisation and to reduce variability in the care of these patients.

[An update on Behçet's syndrome]

Behçet's syndrome (BS, synonym: Behçet's disease, or Adamantiades-Behçet's disease, ABD) is classified as a vasculitis of variable vessel size and can manifest itself in both arterial and venous vessels. Its extensive and at the same time interindividually very different clinical picture is not uncommon a challenge, both with regard to the diagnosis of this rheumatic systemic disease, which is rather rare in our latitudes, and its therapeutic options. In addition to the four cardinal symptoms of recurrent oral aphthae, genital aphthae, skin and eye lesions, the clinical picture offers numerous other manifestations which often require interdisciplinary cooperation. In addition to the above mentioned ocular involvement, which can still lead to blindness if inadequately treated, this is especially true for intestinal and cerebral manifestations as well as for large vessel vasculitis.A final revision of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of Behcet's syndrome (EULAR) was made in 2018, and the recommendations are now established internationally as an important treatment guide. Therapy is based on the leading organ involvement. After adalimumab received approval for the treatment of posterior ocular involvement in 2016, another agent, apremilast, became available in 2020. The drug is recommended for the treatment of recurrent oral aphthae in adult Behçet's patients requiring systemic therapy. Nevertheless, there is a further need for new drugs.This article aims to highlight recent findings in the areas of epidemiology, immunopathogenesis & genetics, clinical findings, and therapy, with an emphasis on clinical relevance.

Current pharmacological solutions for Behçet's syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Behçet's syndrome (BS) has a heterogeneous clinical phenotype, and its clinical manifestations may respond differently to drugs commonly used to treat BS. The type, dose, and duration of immunomodulatory, immunosuppressive, and biologic agents should be tailored individually.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the literature for articles on BS management that were published until June 2022 and summarized the management options in BS for each type of organ involvement. We aimed to cover all currently available pharmacological agents used in BS, as well as surgical and interventional options, focusing on recent evidence.

EXPERT OPINION

The management aims in BS are to preserve function and quality of life and to avoid damage. The choice of treatment modalities depends on the organs that are actively involved, the severity of that involvement, and prognostic factors. A treat-to-attack strategy would help improve long-term outcomes in BS.

Beneficial Effects of Apremilast on Genital Ulcers, Skin Lesions, and Arthritis in Patients With Behçet's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the clinical efficacy of apremilast for oral ulcers, extra-oral manifestations, and overall disease activity in patients with Behçet's disease (BD).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies assessing the treatment effects of apremilast in BD were included. The odds ratios (ORs) of being symptom free for individual manifestations and mean difference (MD) of Behçet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) scores were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) at 12 and 24 weeks using a random-model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 259 screened articles, eight were included. After 12 weeks of apremilast treatment the OR of symptom-free was as followings: oral ulcers, 45.76 (95% CI, 13.23-158.31); genital ulcers, 4.56 (95% CI, 2.47-8.44); erythema nodosum, 3.59 (95% CI, 1.11-11.61); pseudofolliculitis, 2.81 (95% CI, 1.29-6.15); and arthritis, 3.55 (95% CI, 1.71-7.40). Furthermore, BDCAF scores at 12 weeks were significantly reduced (MD=-1.38; -1.78 to -0.99). However, the proportion of oral-ulcer free patients increased at 24 weeks (OR=14.88; 4.81 to 46.07).

CONCLUSION

The currently accumulated data indicates an improvement in mucocutaneous and articular symptoms by short-term apremilast treatment in patients with BD.

An evaluation of apremilast for the treatment of adult patients with oral ulcers associated with Behçet's syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Behçet's syndrome is a chronic, multi-system, variable vasculitis of unknown etiology that can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Mucocutaneous lesions such as oral ulcers and genital ulcers are common manifestations that can affect the quality of life of patients significantly. Treatment for mucocutaneous lesions in Behçet's syndrome continues to be critical, and an unmet need remains a significant issue.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the mechanism of action of apremilast, its effect on the number and pain of oral ulcers, other manifestations, such as genital ulcers, disease activity, quality of life and safety profile in Behçet's syndrome patients. Data from clinical trials as well as observational studies were included.

EXPERT OPINION

Two randomized placebo-controlled trials and real-world observational data suggest that apremilast is an effective and well-tolerated treatment modality for oral and genital ulcers in Behçet's syndrome. Observational studies additionally showed beneficial results for skin lesions, arthritis, and intestinal involvement.

Advances in the Treatment of Behcet's Disease

Purpose of Review

To assess current management of Behcet’s disease (BD). Controversies on therapeutic approaches to different manifestations, whether conventional immunosuppressives (IS) or biologic agents, should be chosen, and options for refractory disease are discussed.

Recent Findings

Glucocorticoids are still the main agents for remission-induction and azathioprine the first-line conventional IS in maintenance phase to prevent relapses of major organ involvement. Apremilast is shown to be a safe and effective option approved by the FDA for oral ulcers. Large case series confirmed the efficacy and safety of TNFα inhibitors and Interferon-α. Promising results are observed with IL-1 inhibitors, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and tocilizumab for refractory BD.

Summary

Although both conventional IS and biologic agents are effectively used to suppress inflammation in BD, there is still an unmet need for clear therapeutic strategies in the management for different manifestations. Further controlled studies with new biologic agents, anticoagulants and the benefit of concomitant IS usage with biologics are needed to optimize the management of BD.

Apremilast in Refractory Behçet's Syndrome: A Multicenter Observational Study

Objective

Mucocutaneous and joint disorders are the most common manifestations in Behçet's syndrome (BS) and are frequently clustered in the so-called minor forms of BS. There remains a need for safe and effective treatment for joint lesions in BS. We report the long-term safety and effectiveness of apremilast in refractory joint and mucocutaneous manifestations of BS.

Methods

French nationwide multicenter study including 50 BS patients with either active joint and/or mucocutaneous manifestations resistant to colchicine and/or DMARDs. Patients received apremilast 30 mg twice a day. Primary effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete response (CR) of articular symptoms at month 6 (M6), defined as resolution of inflammatory arthralgia and arthritis, with joint count equal to zero.

Results

At inclusion, the median tender and swollen joint count was of 4 [2-6] and 2 [1-2], respectively. The proportion of CR in joint disease at M6 was 65% (n = 15/23), and 17% (n = 4/23) were partial responders. CR of oral and genital ulcers, and pseudofolliculitis at M6 was 73% (n = 24/33), 94% (n = 16/17) and 71% (n = 10/14), respectively. The overall response at M6 was 74% for the entire cohort and 70% for the mucocutaneous-articular cluster (n = 27). The median Behçet's syndrome activity score significantly decreased during study period [50 (40-60) vs. 20 (0-40); p <0.0001]. After a median follow-up of 11 [6-13] months, 27 (54%) patients were still on apremilast. Reasons for apremilast withdrawal included adverse events (n = 15, 30%) and treatment failure (n = 8, 16%). Thirty-three (66%) patients experienced adverse events, mostly diarrhea (n = 19, 38%), nausea (n = 17, 34%) and headache (n = 16, 32%).

Conclusion

Apremilast seems effective in BS-related articular disease refractory to colchicine and DMARDs. Discontinuation rates were significantly higher than that reported in clinical trials.