Troubling the non-specialist prescription of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): the views of Australian HIV experts

Ending HIV Transmission in Australia: Expanding PrEP to Cisgender Women: A Scoping Review

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) availability through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme provides real potential for the elimination of HIV transmission in Australia, as evidenced by a rapid decline in HIV incidence among gay and bisexual men (GBM). However, HIV elimination will not be possible without also extending PrEP to other populations, including cisgender women. We conducted a scoping review to examine the extent to which PrEP access for cisgender women has been considered in Australia. A comprehensive search across five databases, grey literature, and hand search of references was conducted. A single reviewer conducted title and abstract screening and two reviewers completed full-text screening and data extraction. Nineteen documents were included in the final review and included both peer-reviewed journal articles and guidelines and strategies. Focused discussion of cisgender women's use of PrEP was largely missing from the literature and, although their use of PrEP is supported in some relevant guidelines, little has been done to actively develop strategies to inform cisgender women about PrEP as a precursor to prescribing for HIV prevention. Healthcare providers' narrow view of PrEP as being the domain of GBM further limits cisgender women's potential access. If HIV elimination in Australia is to be a reality, we need to develop mechanisms to specifically engage with cisgender women about PrEP.

Provider views of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for cisgender women - where do women fit in HIV elimination in Australia?

BACKGROUND

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Australia has largely been targeted at gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men. In the context of HIV elimination, the aim of this qualitative study was to explore PrEP prescribing for Australian cisgender women from the provider's perspective.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were held with Australian prescribers in 2022. Participants were recruited through relevant clinical services, newsletter distribution and snowball sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Seventeen prescribers participated, of whom 9 were sexual health physicians and 10 worked in New South Wales. All reported limited clinical experience prescribing PrEP for women. Potential enablers to PrEP prescribing to women included education for women and clinicians, easily identifiable risk factors, individualised risk assessment and expansion of existing services. Barriers were limited PrEP awareness among women and prescribers, difficulties with risk assessment and consult and service limitations. The type of service recommended for PrEP provision varied among participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinician experience of PrEP prescribing to Australian cisgender women is limited, with substantial barriers to access perceived by prescribers. Targeted education to PrEP prescribers, updated national PrEP guidelines to include women as a distinct group and further research regarding women's preferred model of PrEP access are required. Clarity of clinical ownership over PrEP implementation for women and, more broadly, women's sexual health, is essential in order to achieve HIV elimination in Australia.

Clinician imaginaries of HIV PrEP users in and beyond the gay community in Australia

Through the development and implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), the characteristics of PrEP users have been configured in a range of ways. Drawing on the concept of 'imaginaries', we consider how clinicians imagine PrEP users and related communities. We conducted 28 semi-structured interviews in 2019-2020 with PrEP-providing clinicians based in New South Wales and Western Australia. Participants included general practitioners, sexual health nurses and sexual health doctors. We inductively developed three themes through a reflexive thematic analysis: 'PrEP users as 99% gay men/MSM', 'The informed and connected PrEP user', and 'Condom users in the PrEP era'. Participants imagined PrEP users primarily as gay men, and so we focused on how gay community was imagined in relation to PrEP users. Users were imagined as supporting one another to use PrEP effectively, but some were imagined as threatening norms of condom use amongst gay community. Analysing clinician imaginaries of PrEP users reveals insight into how clinicians speculate about and engage with changing community norms related to condom use and accessing PrEP. These imaginaries reveal ongoing tensions about who is believed to be best suited to PrEP, and PrEP's impact on norms of conduct in imagined biosocial communities like gay men.

LGBTPQ Youth Negotiating Access to Sexual Health Education and Resources in a Rural South African University

This article draws on sexual citizenship theory to analyze how some lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, pansexual and queer (LGBTPQ) youth in a low socio-economic rural South African context negotiate access to inclusive sexual health education programmes and resources. Participants are students aged 19 to 32 years old at a South African university. Using in-depth individual interviews, participants reflected on their experiences of sexual health education when they were still at school. The findings show the continuing silencing of sexual health issues concerning LGBTPQ youth in South African schools. Disadvantaged by the lack of sexual health education programmes in schools, findings show how the students sought LGBTPQ centered knowledge through self-study and other ways to empower themselves with information on sexual health matters. Participants also reflected on accessing the student health clinic at the university where they are students. Accessing condoms, lubricants, dental dams and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains a challenge. Implications suggest ways of improving the provision of LGBTPQ inclusive sexual health education programmes and resources in poor rural contexts in South Africa.

Prescribing as affective clinical practice: Transformations in sexual health consultations through HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis

New medicines can transform routines and priorities in clinical practice, but how do clinicians think and feel about these changes, and how does it affect their work? In Australia, the HIV prevention regimen pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been rapidly rolled out, transforming the sexual cultures and practices of users, but less attention has been given to the ways PrEP has reconfigured clinical practice. This paper draws on 28 qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted between 2019 and 2020 with PrEP-providing doctors and nurses in Australia to consider how they have affectively engaged with PrEP and put it into practice. Through a reflexive thematic analysis, we explore how clinicians adapted to PrEP, how the field of HIV prevention has been transformed, and how these developments have changed how clinicians approach patients. While the introduction of PrEP was initially received with uncertainty and shock, clinicians described PrEP as enjoyable to prescribe, and better aligned with the moral duties of sexual health consultations than existing HIV prevention strategies like condoms. Through approaching clinical work as an 'affective practice', we argue for attending not only to how new interventions change expectations and practices, but also how these changes are felt and valued by clinicians.

How Do Family Physicians Perceive Their Role in Providing Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention?-An Online Qualitative Study in Flanders, Belgium

Introduction:

In Belgium, the provision of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention is centralized in specialized HIV clinics. Engaging family physicians in PrEP care could help scale-up its delivery and reach underserved populations. The objective of this study was to gain insight into family physicians' self-perceived roles in providing PrEP.

Methods

We conducted 16 online group discussions with a total of 105 Flemish family physicians, between November 2020 and February 2021. A brief online questionnaire assessed their socio-demographics and experience with sexual health. We analyzed verbatim transcribed data using a grounded theory approach.

Results

Despite limited awareness and experience, participants reported a high willingness to be more actively involved in PrEP care. Four potential roles for the family physician in PrEP care were identified: acting as low-threshold entry point for advice; opportunistic case finding of PrEP candidates; initiating appropriate care for PrEP-eligible clients; and ensuring high-quality follow-up care for PrEP users. Participants framed each of these roles within their current activities and responsibilities as primary care providers. Yet, participants differed in their views on the concrete operationalization of these roles, and in the extent of their involvement in PrEP. Particular challenges were a lack of experience with antiretrovirals, perceived limited exposure to clients at high HIV risk, and a lack of expertise and resources to conduct time-intensive risk assessments and counseling related to PrEP.

Conclusion

Belgian family physicians demonstrated a keen willingness to be involved in PrEP care, but had differing views on the practical implementation into their practices. Providing tailored training on sexual health and PrEP, and investing in collaboration between primary and secondary care, could optimize the integration of PrEP in the primary care practice.

Issues Associated With Prescribing HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Anxiety: A Qualitative Analysis of Australian Providers' Views

ABSTRACT

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can alleviate anxiety about acquiring HIV, particularly for gay men and other men who have sex with men. However, research with PrEP providers has rarely examined HIV anxiety. We conducted 25 semistructured interviews in 2019-2020 with PrEP providers in New South Wales and Western Australia, and analyzed data thematically. Participants included general practitioners and sexual health nurses and doctors. Our analysis explores providers' views on providing PrEP to reduce HIV anxiety for gay men, serodiscordant couples where the partner with HIV has an undetectable viral load, and for "worried well" individuals who the providers speculated might have undisclosed risk. Although providers viewed PrEP as beneficial for many people's personal lives and relationships, they felt cautious about prescribing PrEP solely for HIV anxiety, while at the same time reporting that they prescribed PrEP if individuals insisted on it and had no medical contraindications.

Australian interdisciplinary healthcare providers' perspectives on the effects of broader pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) access on uptake and service delivery: a qualitative study

Background The addition of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention to the Australian Government-subsidised Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) enables any doctor or nurse practitioner to prescribe it and has increased accessibility options. However, understanding of Australian healthcare providers' (HCP) knowledge and preparedness to prescribe PrEP remains limited.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews, conducted before PBS listing (October 2016-April 2017), explored PrEP knowledge and prescription experiences of 51 multidisciplinary HCPs involved with the Queensland Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Demonstration study.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis revealed that participants viewed PrEP as a necessary HIV prevention option, but there was concern about confusing prevention messages and potential risk compensation. Clinical capacity, stigma, cultural norms, rural access and PrEP-associated costs were identified as barriers to access and uptake. Some of these barriers may be addressed by the PBS listing; nonetheless, there was strong specialist concern about the preparedness of general practitioners without sexual health experience to prescribe PrEP. Participants identified a need to educate all HCPs, implement multidisciplinary supply models and provide timely access to PrEP for vulnerable populations and those ineligible for Medicare (Australia's universal healthcare insurance system).

CONCLUSIONS

Although PrEP listing on the PBS addressed structural barriers to access, this study highlights the role of nurses and other interdisciplinary healthcare workers in the provision of PrEP in addressing the sociocultural barriers that still affect the access of certain populations to HIV prevention measures. These findings will inform further professional training as PrEP is more widely accessed and requested outside specialist sexual health services. Future work is needed to ensure that the primary healthcare workforce is prepared to provide competent and safe access to PrEP across diverse locations and population groups.